INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCE 13(8) (2024) 157-165

Research in Business & Social Science

IJRBS VOL 13 NO 8 (2024) ISSN: 2147-4478
Available online at www.ssbfnet.com
Journal homepage: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs

The emergence of artificial intelligence in the higher education:

Prospects and challenges of AI
Oluwatoyin Ayodele Ajani (a)* Morakinyo Akintolu (b) Sunday Oluwafemi Afolabi (c)
(a)
Languages and Social Sciences Education, University of Zululand, South Africa.
(b)
UNESCO Chair on Open Distance Learning, University of South Africa, Pretoria.
(c)
Information Science, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa, South Africa.

ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT

Article history: This study presents a systematic literature review analysing the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on
higher education, focusing on its methods, results, and implications. By synthesising a diverse range
Received 19 June 2024 of academic papers, the review explores how AI technologies influence educational standards and
Received in rev. form 23 Sept 2024 practices in higher education institutions. Findings reveal that AI has the potential to enhance the
Accepted 15 November 2024 quality of higher education by diversifying teaching responsibilities, customising learning experiences,
and employing intelligent, adaptive teaching strategies. These capabilities position AI as a
transformative tool for improving educational delivery and outcomes. However, the study also
Keywords: highlights significant challenges associated with integrating AI into higher education. These
challenges include delineating the appropriate scope of AI use, addressing inequalities in access to
Higher Education, Artificial
digital resources, and ensuring adequate training and support for educators and students. The review
Intelligence, Constructivism, Quality, underscores the importance of understanding these complexities to guide the development of effective
Teaching and Learning Outcomes, strategies and policies that optimise AI's potential while mitigating its limitations. The review offers
Student Involvement critical insights into the dual role of AI in higher education, where it can either advance or hinder
educational standards depending on how it is implemented. By examining the advantages, limitations,
JEL Classification: and broader consequences of AI-powered instructional tools, this study provides a comprehensive
I23, O33, C88 perspective on the intricate relationship between AI and educational quality. The findings aim to inform
educators, policymakers, and stakeholders about the opportunities and challenges of adopting AI in
higher education, contributing to the development of inclusive, innovative, and sustainable educational
practices.
.

© 2024 by the authors. Licensee SSBFNET, Istanbul, Turkey. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Introduction
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into higher education has become a focal point of scholarly discussion, with researchers
emphasising its transformative potential and inherent challenges (Alghamdi, 2022). Deng et al. (2022) highlight AI's ability to
revolutionise higher education by facilitating customised learning experiences, automating administrative tasks, and enhancing
teaching delivery. However, concerns persist regarding whether these advancements in efficiency might compromise educational
quality (Ngema & Ajani, 2024). This review seeks to evaluate the dual impact of AI in higher education, examining its potential to
either bolster or undermine educational standards, while exploring the nuanced relationship between AI integration and the overall
quality of education.
Kharbat et al. (2020) and Zhang (2023) posit that AI heralds a diversification of academic roles, improved teaching methodologies,
and a more open and adaptive education ecosystem. These technological shifts demand a reassessment of traditional pedagogical
models to embrace automation, personalised learning, and innovative assessment techniques. Zhang (2023) further notes that higher
education stands at a historical crossroads, requiring significant reforms to align with the demands of emerging AI technologies. This

* Corresponding author. ORCID ID: 0000-0001-6545-0203

© 2024 by the authors. Hosting by SSBFNET. Peer review under responsibility of Center for Strategic Studies in Business and Finance.
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v13i8.3507
 Ajani et al., International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 13(8) (2024), 157-165

transformation extends beyond instructional methods to encompass the broader structural and operational frameworks of higher
education institutions (Khoalenyane & Ajani, 2024).
The application of AI in education has gained prominence in addressing crises and emergencies, ensuring uninterrupted access to
learning opportunities (Slimi, 2022). AI has enabled substantial improvements in the efficiency and effectiveness of education
systems, particularly in regions with resource constraints. Nevertheless, these advancements present both opportunities and
challenges, requiring institutions to adapt their management structures to accommodate AI-driven technologies (Lucena et al., 2019;
Singh & Hiran, 2022). Misconceptions surrounding AI’s capabilities and its potential risks necessitate a paradigm shift in how
teaching, learning, and expertise are defined (Singh & Hiran, 2022).

Bearman et al. (2022) describe AI as a rapidly developing field capable of simulating human-like intelligent behaviour, offering
substantial benefits for higher education. Studies such as Aldosari (2020) reveal a critical gap in awareness and preparedness for AI
adoption, particularly in the African context (Maphalala & Ajani, 2024). Faculty training, access to AI tools, and incentives to
integrate AI into teaching and research remain pivotal to maximising its potential. Alenezi (2023) emphasises the importance of
leadership support and technical infrastructure to ensure that AI technologies are effectively utilised in higher education.

Kshirsagar et al. (2022) suggest that AI's integration has reached a point where it could significantly reshape the foundational design
of higher education institutions. AI-driven tools such as deep learning, big data analytics, and facial recognition offer promising
applications in education management and teaching delivery (Yu, 2021). These technologies promote transparency, rational decision-
making, and forward-looking education management. However, Zhao and Fu (2022) highlight the operational challenges AI faces,
particularly in adapting to diverse educational contexts, which underscores the importance of robust policy frameworks and
implementation strategies.

Despite its potential, AI presents notable hurdles, including disparities in digital access, ethical concerns, and resistance to
technological change. Zhang and Fu (2022) illustrate how AI has disrupted traditional education models, particularly in physical
education, necessitating a re-evaluation of content, style, and delivery methods. Institutions must address these barriers to ensure that
the benefits of AI are equitably distributed and aligned with pedagogical goals (Ajani, 2024a; Ajani, 2024b).
This review identifies critical areas where AI enhances educational quality, including personalised learning, automation, and
improved resource management. However, it also highlights potential risks such as over-reliance on technology, erosion of traditional
teaching methods, and the risk of marginalising students without access to advanced digital resources. The balance between
leveraging AI's advantages and mitigating its risks will determine its success in improving higher education quality (Ajani, Gamede
& Matiyenga, 2024).
To guide this evaluation, the study addresses three key research questions: the hurdles associated with AI integration, the ways AI
enhances educational quality, and the potential risks to maintaining high standards in education. By answering these questions, this
review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of AI's role in transforming higher education, offering insights into its
effective and equitable implementation.

Literature Review
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into higher education (HE) has seen a significant rise in scholarly interest, particularly
between 2016 and 2022. This systematic review, adhering to PRISMA principles, analyses 138 articles to explore the influence of
AI on HE (Lucena et al., 2019). Using a combination of a priori and grounded coding methodologies, the review highlights a marked
increase in AI-related publications in 2021 and 2022, reflecting emerging trends in the field (Zhang, 2023). These trends include the
diversification of academic responsibilities, intelligent instructional methods, and the development of adaptive learning technologies,
all contributing to a more open and personalised educational ecosystem (Bozkurt et al., 2021; Zhang & Xu, 2022). AI-driven
advancements, such as tailored learning experiences and automated assessment methods, promise significant pedagogical benefits
while reshaping the operational dynamics of HE institutions.

A prominent application of AI in HE is the automation of administrative tasks, enabling educators to focus on meaningful interactions
with students (Khoalenyane & Ajani, 2024). Intelligent tutoring systems further enhance the learning experience by providing
personalised feedback and targeted assistance (Bearman et al., 2022; Zhang, 2023). These systems exemplify how AI can streamline
instructional delivery and improve learning outcomes. AI technologies also offer scalability and affordability, giving students greater
flexibility and access to customised resources (Singh & Hiran, 2022). However, the successful integration of AI demands that
academics develop the skills necessary to utilise these technologies effectively (Chaka, 2022). Without proper training, the potential
benefits of AI risk being underutilised, underscoring the need for professional development initiatives (Deng et al., 2022).
The ethical implications of AI in HE are a recurrent concern in the literature, particularly regarding data privacy and algorithmic bias
(Alghamdi, 2022). Ensuring that AI tools are implemented ethically and transparently is essential to avoid unintended harm. Equally
pressing are the disparities in access to AI-enabled education, as not all institutions are equally equipped to adopt these technologies
(Zawacki-Richter et al., 2019; Chaka, 2022). These inequities highlight the need for a more inclusive approach to deploying AI,
ensuring that its benefits extend across diverse educational contexts. Ethical considerations must remain central to discussions about
AI in HE to maintain trust and uphold educational integrity (Yu, 2021).

158
 Ajani et al., International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 13(8) (2024), 157-165

The potential of AI to enhance the quality of education is well-documented, yet its impact is contingent on how it is implemented
and perceived by stakeholders (Ajani, 2024c). When AI tools are embraced by academics, students, and administrators as user-
friendly and beneficial, they can improve various aspects of education, such as personalised learning, timely interventions, and data-
driven insights into student performance (Hannan & Liu, 2021). However, when AI is seen as overly complex or misaligned with
existing pedagogical practices, it can lead to resistance and frustration, thereby undermining its effectiveness (Lucena et al., 2019).
Addressing these challenges is critical to realising AI’s transformative potential (Ajani, 2023).

AI's contribution to educational quality is influenced by a range of factors beyond user acceptance, including the sophistication of
algorithms, alignment with educational principles, and ethical safeguards (Kim et al., 2022). For instance, the Technology Acceptance
Model (TAM) provides a framework for understanding how perceptions of usefulness and ease of use shape the adoption of AI in
HE (Go et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2021). When these variables are favourable, AI can improve educational outcomes through
personalised experiences, efficient administration, and enhanced engagement (Slimi, 2022). Conversely, ethical dilemmas, technical
complexities, and resistance to change can diminish its impact (Mospan et al., 2022).
The review also emphasises the importance of aligning AI applications with broader educational objectives. Effective implementation
requires not only technological readiness but also a commitment to maintaining pedagogical integrity. Issues such as algorithmic
accuracy, ethical compliance, and compatibility with established teaching methods play crucial roles in determining AI’s overall
impact (Winkler-Schwartz et al., 2019). These considerations highlight the need for strategic planning and policy support to maximise
AI's benefits while mitigating its risks.
In conclusion, AI has the potential to revolutionise higher education by fostering innovation, enhancing instructional quality, and
streamlining operations. However, its integration presents significant challenges, including the need for ethical oversight, equitable
access, and academic preparedness. Addressing these challenges requires a holistic approach that considers technical, ethical, and
pedagogical dimensions. As the literature reveals, the successful adoption of AI in HE depends on balancing its transformative
potential with the need to uphold educational equity and quality.

The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) serves as a robust theoretical framework for analysing the adoption and acceptance of
technology, particularly in higher education. Rooted in the principles of perceived usefulness and ease of use, TAM provides insights
into how individuals assess and integrate new technologies into their practices (Go et al., 2020). In the context of artificial intelligence
(AI) in higher education, TAM proves instrumental in exploring whether the adoption of AI enhances or undermines educational
quality. As academics grapple with understanding the pedagogical advantages of AI technologies, TAM helps evaluate their
perceptions and their subsequent willingness to embrace these tools for teaching and learning enhancement (Zawacki-Richter et al.,
2019).

A significant aspect of TAM is its emphasis on the perceived usefulness of technology. If educators view AI technologies as valuable
tools that can personalise learning, streamline assessments, and optimise educational outcomes, they are more likely to adopt and
integrate them into their teaching practices (Go et al., 2020). This adoption, as Zawacki-Richter et al. (2019) argue, can lead to
improved higher education quality. However, existing gaps in research, such as the prevalence of descriptive studies and the scarcity
of longitudinal research, highlight the need for deeper exploration to maximise AI's utility in academic settings.

Equally critical is TAM's focus on ease of use, which influences the extent to which educators are willing to integrate AI technologies
into their pedagogical workflows. For AI to be effective, educators must find it intuitive and seamless to use (Chaka, 2022). If AI
systems are cumbersome or misaligned with existing teaching methods, resistance may arise, hindering their potential benefits.
Conversely, accessible and user-friendly AI tools can enhance teaching efficiency, enabling educators to focus more on fostering
meaningful student engagement (Deng et al., 2022).

Ethical considerations are integral to TAM when applied to AI in education. Concerns surrounding data privacy, algorithmic bias,
and the ethical implications of automated decision-making can influence academics’ perceptions of AI technologies (Alghamdi,
2022). If educators deem AI systems ethically sound and aligned with pedagogical principles, they are more likely to incorporate
them into their practice. However, unresolved ethical issues may deter adoption and compromise the potential educational benefits
(Zawacki-Richter et al., 2019).

The integration of AI technologies with learning analytics represents a promising avenue for enhancing educational quality. By
merging predictive models with real-time feedback, AI can provide actionable insights to improve student learning outcomes
(Ouyang et al., 2023). TAM suggests that if educators perceive these analytics as effective tools for timely feedback and adaptive
learning, they are more likely to adopt AI technologies. This integration can reshape instructional practices, enabling data-driven
approaches to teaching and learning (Go et al., 2020).

Moreover, TAM highlights the importance of aligning AI technologies with the broader goals of higher education. Technologies that
support adaptive learning, customised education pathways, and innovative assessment practices resonate strongly with the model’s
focus on perceived usefulness (Bozkurt et al., 2021). However, for these benefits to be realised, institutions must invest in capacity-
building initiatives to equip educators with the skills needed to navigate and utilise AI effectively (Zawacki-Richter et al., 2019).

159
 Ajani et al., International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 13(8) (2024), 157-165

TAM's applicability extends beyond educational contexts, as evidenced by its successful deployment in fields such as hospitality,
tourism, and intelligent education technology (Cai et al., 2022; Siripipatthanakul et al., 2022). These studies demonstrate TAM’s
relevance in examining users’ acceptance of modern technologies, affirming its utility in analysing AI adoption in higher education.
By focusing on factors like perceived interactivity and satisfaction, TAM provides a comprehensive lens to evaluate technology
acceptance across diverse domains (Go et al., 2020).
In conclusion, TAM offers a valuable framework for understanding the factors that influence the acceptance and adoption of AI
technologies in higher education. By considering perceived usefulness, ease of use, and ethical alignment, TAM underscores the
conditions necessary for successful AI integration. However, the current paucity of longitudinal studies and limited exploration of
ethical and educational dimensions signal opportunities for further research. By addressing these gaps, TAM can guide efforts to
harness AI’s transformative potential in enhancing educational quality and innovation in higher education (Popenici & Kerr, 2017;
Rutner & Scott, 2022).

Research and Methodology

This study employs a systematic review methodology to explore the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education,
specifically its impact on educational quality. The review adheres to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews
and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, ensuring a rigorous and transparent approach to literature synthesis (Moher et al., 2015). A
comprehensive search strategy was implemented to identify relevant studies across various academic databases, such as Google
Scholar and Scopus. Keywords such as "artificial intelligence," "higher education," and "education quality" were used to capture a
wide spectrum of literature pertinent to the study's aims.

The inclusion criteria were carefully defined to ensure the relevance and quality of the selected literature. Peer-reviewed publications,
reports, and studies addressing the influence of AI on higher education quality were considered. The timeframe extended from the
inception of AI's application in education to the present, providing a longitudinal perspective on the evolution of AI in this domain
(Belur et al., 2018). Initial screening involved a review of titles and abstracts to eliminate irrelevant studies, followed by a thorough
full-text evaluation to confirm their alignment with the research objectives (Moher et al., 2015).

The data extraction process employed a systematic approach, utilising a structured data extraction form to capture key details from
each selected study. This included information on methodologies, findings, and implications relevant to the impact of AI on higher
education. This process ensured consistency and allowed for the efficient organisation of critical insights across diverse studies (Page
et al., 2021). Thematic analysis was conducted to identify recurring themes and patterns within the literature. This qualitative
approach allowed for the categorisation of findings into coherent themes that reflect the multifaceted impact of AI in higher education.
Themes were iteratively refined to capture the complexity of AI's influence on teaching, learning, and institutional practices (Saldana,
2015). The PRISMA framework facilitated a systematic synthesis of the findings, ensuring that the review not only captured the
breadth of existing literature but also provided a focused and critical analysis of the themes emerging from the studies. This structured
approach enhances the validity and reliability of the review, contributing to a nuanced understanding of AI's potential and challenges
in higher education (PRISMA, 2021).

Overall, the methodological approach ensures a comprehensive and rigorous review, providing valuable insights into the current state
of research on AI in higher education. By synthesising findings from diverse studies, the review contributes to the growing body of
knowledge on how AI can transform educational quality and practices in higher education institutions.

Results
The results of this study provide a comprehensive analysis of the challenges, benefits, risks, and strategies associated with integrating
artificial intelligence (AI) into higher education, highlighting its multifaceted impact on educational quality. Hence, Table 1 below
presents the summary of the systematic literature review:
Table 1: Summary of the systematic literature review

Theme Author (Year) Key Findings

Challenges in Alasadi (2023); Cheng et Ethical concerns (data privacy, algorithmic bias) and technological
Integrating AI al. (2020) barriers (infrastructure gaps) hinder effective AI adoption.
Contributions to Bozkurt et al. (2021); AI enhances education through personalised learning, adaptive systems,
Education Quality Slimi (2022) and automated administrative tasks.
Potential Hazards of AI Akgun & Greenhow Overreliance on AI risks diminishing human interaction, and biases in
(2021); Schiff (2020) algorithms may perpetuate inequalities.
Strategies for Lu et al. (2021); Li & Su Adaptive learning systems, inclusive measures, and robust
Implementing AI (2020) cybersecurity are essential for effective AI integration.
Future Opportunities Corsello & Santangelo AI presents opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration and
(2023); Yu (2021) advancements in medical education and research.

160
 Ajani et al., International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 13(8) (2024), 157-165

Integrating AI into higher education is fraught with challenges, ranging from ethical dilemmas to infrastructure demands. Ethical
considerations include issues of data privacy and algorithmic bias, where sensitive student data could be mishandled or misused,
raising concerns over accountability and transparency in AI-driven decisions (Alasadi, 2023). Academic staff often require substantial
training and development to effectively employ AI tools in their teaching, highlighting a gap in preparedness (Maphalala & Ajani,
2023; Shirin, 2022). Without sufficient expertise, the potential benefits of AI integration may remain underutilised, potentially
widening the digital divide.

Technological barriers also pose significant obstacles. High-speed internet, advanced computational resources, and equitable access
to AI technologies are often lacking in many institutions, especially in underserved regions (Cheng et al., 2020; Xu & Ouyang, 2022).
Addressing disparities in technology infrastructure is crucial to ensure that AI-driven education is inclusive and widely accessible.
Furthermore, aligning AI adoption with educational goals and pedagogical principles presents another challenge, as effective
assessment methodologies for AI-enhanced learning outcomes remain underdeveloped (Rios-Campos et al., 2023).

AI offers transformative potential to enhance the quality of education by personalising learning experiences and streamlining
administrative functions. AI-driven adaptive learning systems use machine learning algorithms to customise instructional content,
pacing, and feedback, boosting student engagement and outcomes (Bozkurt et al., 2021). Intelligent tutoring systems deliver tailored
feedback and guidance, addressing individual student needs and improving knowledge retention (Asatryan & Matevosyan, 2023).
AI also supports educators in their roles, enabling data-driven insights for optimising instructional methods and resource allocation.
Automated grading and administrative tasks allow academics to focus on teaching and mentoring (Slimi, 2022). Learning analytics
derived from AI systems provide actionable data to refine curriculum design and foster evidence-based educational practices (Li &
Su, 2020).

Despite its advantages, AI integration carries risks, particularly regarding ethical issues and the overreliance on technology. Data
privacy is a major concern, as AI systems handle sensitive student information that could be vulnerable to breaches or misuse (Akgun
& Greenhow, 2021). Additionally, biases embedded in AI algorithms may perpetuate inequalities in education, underscoring the need
for careful oversight and transparency (Schiff, 2020).
Overdependence on AI for teaching and learning may erode the human aspect of education. The reduction in face-to-face interactions
could affect students' emotional and social development, which are critical components of holistic education (Nguyen et al., 2022).
These concerns necessitate balancing AI implementation with human-led educational strategies to preserve quality and inclusivity.

Effective AI strategies in higher education include adaptive learning systems, quality assessments, and improved inclusivity
measures. Adaptive learning employs algorithms to customise education based on students' unique needs, enhancing learning
outcomes (Bozkurt et al., 2021). Similarly, AI-based quality assessment tools evaluate online instruction and provide personalised
tutoring support, ensuring academic success (Li & Su, 2020).
Inclusion and equity are critical considerations. Institutions must ensure that AI technologies do not exacerbate existing disparities
but instead support underprivileged students through accessible and affordable AI tools (Lu et al., 2021). Furthermore, robust
cybersecurity protocols are essential to protect sensitive educational data and maintain compliance with privacy regulations (Lainjo
& Tsmouche, 2023).

The continued evolution of AI presents opportunities for innovative applications in education, including interdisciplinary research
and medical education advancements. AI-powered tools can facilitate collaboration among scholars, enhancing research outcomes
and fostering innovation across disciplines (Corsello & Santangelo, 2023). In medical education, AI supports clinical decision-
making and accelerates the development of healthcare solutions, demonstrating its versatility (Corsello & Santangelo, 2023).
To harness these opportunities, institutions must invest in ongoing academic training and professional development to equip educators
with the skills needed to integrate AI technologies effectively. This investment will ensure that AI serves as a complementary tool to
human expertise, advancing the goals of higher education.

Discussion
AI integration into higher education has the potential to reshape teaching, learning, and administration, but its implementation comes
with a mix of opportunities and challenges. The findings reveal that AI technologies can enhance education quality through
personalisation, efficiency, and data-driven insights. However, the success of these implementations depends on addressing
infrastructure, ethical, and equity-related challenges (Bozkurt et al., 2021; Alasadi, 2023).

Personalised learning enabled by AI promotes student engagement and academic success. Adaptive learning systems and intelligent
tutoring platforms cater to individual student needs, providing timely feedback and targeted support. This tailored approach fosters
a deeper understanding of subject matter and bridges gaps in traditional teaching methods (Peng, 2023). However, educators must
remain central to this process to balance AI's capabilities with the essential human elements of empathy and mentorship.

161
 Ajani et al., International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 13(8) (2024), 157-165

The ethical dimensions of AI integration remain a critical concern. Issues such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, and accountability
must be prioritised to ensure responsible use (Akgun & Greenhow, 2021). Transparent AI practices and inclusive algorithms are
necessary to prevent reinforcing inequalities and to safeguard the trust of stakeholders in the education system.

Infrastructure limitations, especially in resource-constrained environments, pose significant barriers to equitable AI adoption.
Institutions must address these disparities by investing in technological resources and ensuring equal access to AI-enabled education
(Xu & Ouyang, 2022). Bridging the digital divide is essential to fully realise AI's potential for transforming higher education.

AI's potential to automate administrative functions and provide actionable learning analytics offers significant operational benefits.
However, overdependence on AI systems risks diminishing human judgment and creativity in education. A balanced approach that
combines the efficiency of AI with human oversight is crucial for maintaining education quality and integrity (Schiff, 2020).

Finally, the study underscores the importance of professional development for academic staff. Educators must be equipped with the
skills to effectively integrate AI technologies into their teaching practices. Comprehensive training programmes and interdisciplinary
collaboration can foster an environment where AI complements human expertise, enhancing educational outcomes (Lainjo &
Tsmouche, 2023).

In conclusion, AI has the potential to revolutionise higher education by enhancing learning experiences, streamlining operations, and
fostering innovation. However, addressing its associated challenges—ethical concerns, infrastructure gaps, and the need for
professional readiness—is crucial for achieving sustainable and inclusive AI integration.

Conclusion
Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into higher education presents both opportunities and challenges, necessitating a nuanced
understanding of its impact on educational quality. This review highlights that AI's influence is not inherently positive or negative;
rather, its effects depend on contextual factors such as implementation strategies, system design, and institutional readiness to
embrace these technologies. AI has demonstrated its potential to enhance student engagement, personalise learning experiences, and
optimise administrative efficiency, thereby enabling educators to focus on tailored teaching and meaningful interactions. However,
concerns remain regarding the potential for AI to perpetuate bias, reduce human interaction, and foster overreliance on technology.
Issues such as the opaque "black-box" nature of algorithms and the need for robust data protection mechanisms underscore the
complexities of AI adoption.
Achieving a balanced integration of AI in higher education requires a collaborative effort from educators, policymakers, and
institutions to maximise its advantages while addressing its risks. Ethical considerations, data security, and the broader development
of critical thinking, creativity, and social skills must remain central to this discourse. As higher education evolves, it is crucial to
apply AI technologies thoughtfully, valuing the irreplaceable role of human expertise and interaction. A measured, strategic approach
that blends technological innovation with educational integrity can help navigate the dual promise and peril of AI, ultimately
contributing to a more enriched and equitable higher education landscape.

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education carries significant implications for policymakers, educators, and
institutions. Policymakers must prioritise creating a comprehensive framework that addresses both the opportunities and challenges
of AI in education. This includes establishing ethical guidelines to ensure data privacy and prevent algorithmic bias. Transparent
regulations are necessary to mitigate inequalities in access and foster an inclusive environment where AI technologies are equitably
available to all students, regardless of socioeconomic backgrounds.

For institutions, a significant implication is the need to invest in infrastructure that supports AI adoption. This includes providing
high-speed internet, adequate computational resources, and AI platforms that can be seamlessly integrated into teaching and learning
practices. Institutions should also address the digital divide by implementing strategies to make AI technologies accessible to
underserved regions. Equitable resource distribution ensures that all students and educators can benefit from AI-driven solutions,
promoting inclusivity and reducing disparities in educational quality.

Educators play a central role in the successful implementation of AI. Professional development programs should be prioritised to
equip academic staff with the skills and knowledge necessary to integrate AI into their teaching practices effectively. Tailored training
sessions can help educators understand the potential of AI in personalising learning, automating routine tasks, and analysing data to
improve student outcomes. By fostering digital literacy, educators can maximise AI’s benefits while maintaining the critical human
element in education.

Students also stand to gain significantly from AI integration, but their engagement requires thoughtful implementation. AI-powered
adaptive learning systems must be designed to enhance personalised education without replacing the interpersonal relationships
crucial for holistic development. Educational institutions should involve students in discussions about AI’s role, ensuring that their
needs and concerns are central to the design and deployment of these technologies.
A critical recommendation for all stakeholders is fostering interdisciplinary collaboration. Universities can create partnerships with
AI developers, policymakers, and educational researchers to co-develop innovative solutions. These collaborations can ensure that

162
 Ajani et al., International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 13(8) (2024), 157-165

AI tools align with pedagogical goals and ethical standards, providing an avenue for continuous improvement and innovation in AI
applications in higher education.
Lastly, this study emphasises the importance of ongoing research to evaluate the impact of AI in higher education. Stakeholders must
support longitudinal studies that assess the long-term implications of AI on educational quality, student engagement, and equity. By
leveraging evidence-based insights, stakeholders can refine AI strategies to optimise their potential and address emerging challenges.
A collaborative, well-informed approach will ensure that AI contributes positively to the transformation of higher education.

This study is limited by its reliance on a systematic review methodology, which, while comprehensive, is inherently constrained by
the quality and scope of existing literature. The reviewed studies predominantly focus on descriptive or pilot research, leaving gaps
in longitudinal data that could provide deeper insights into the long-term impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on higher education.
Furthermore, much of the existing literature originates from developed regions, which may not fully represent the diverse educational
contexts of developing nations where access to AI technologies and infrastructure is limited. Ethical concerns, such as algorithmic
bias and data privacy, are often highlighted in the literature but lack detailed exploration of practical mitigation strategies.
Additionally, the study does not account for rapidly evolving AI technologies, which could render some findings outdated as newer
advancements emerge. These limitations suggest the need for future research that incorporates empirical, longitudinal, and globally
diverse perspectives to better understand the dynamic relationship between AI and higher education quality.
Acknowledgement
All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, OAA., MA. and SOA; methodology, OAA., MA.validation, OAA.; formal analysis, OAA., MA. and
SOA.; investigation, OAA.; resources, OAA.; writing—original draft preparation, OAA..; writing—OAA. review and editing, OAA, MA., and SOA.
Funding: Not Applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, due to that the research does not deal with
vulnerable groups or sensitive issues.
Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly
available due to privacy.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
Ajani, O. A. (2023a). Exploring strategies for effective self-regulated learning in students’ use of online learning for quality learning.
Webology, 20(3).
Ajani, O. A. (2024b). Sustainable transformation in South African rural universities: A digital perspective. International Journal of
Management, Knowledge and Learning, 13(1), 113–127.
Ajani, O. A. (2024c). Technological pedagogical content knowledge for twenty-first century learning skills: Empowering African
teachers for Industry 5.0. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 13(4), 468–476.
Ajani, O. A., Gamede, B., & Matiyenga, T. C. (2024). Leveraging artificial intelligence to enhance teaching and learning in higher
education: Promoting quality education and critical engagement. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 7(1),
54–69.
Ajani, O. A. (2024). A systematic review of the post COVID-19 pandemic transformation on design and delivery of curriculum.
Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 7(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.53449/ije.v7i1.328
Alghamdi, A. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education as a means to achieve sustainable development in accordance with the pillars
of the kingdom's Vision 2030—a systematic review. International Journal of Higher Education, 11(4), 80.
https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v11n4p80
Bearman, M., Ryan, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2022). Discourses of artificial intelligence in higher education: A critical literature review.
Higher Education, 86(2), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2
Belur, J., Tompson, L., Thornton, A., & Simon, M. (2018). Interrater reliability in systematic review methodology: Exploring
variation in coder decision-making. Sociological Methods & Research, 13(3), 004912411887999.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799372
Bozkurt, A., Karadeniz, A., Baneres, D., Guerrero-Roldán, A., & Rodríguez, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence and reflections from
the educational landscape: A review of AI studies in half a century. Sustainability, 13(2), 800.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020800
Cai, R., Cain, L., & Jeon, H. (2022). Customers' perceptions of hotel AI-enabled voice assistants: Does brand matter? International
Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(8), 2807–2831. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-10-2021-1313
Chaka, C. (2022). Fourth industrial revolution—A review of applications, prospects, and challenges for artificial intelligence,
robotics, and blockchain in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 18, 002.
https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18002

163
 Ajani et al., International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 13(8) (2024), 157-165

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Chu, H., Tu, Y., & Yang, K. (2022). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review of
the top 50 most-cited articles. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 54–69.
https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7889
Deng, H., Jia, W., & Chai, D. (2022). Discussion on innovative methods of higher teacher education and training based on new
artificial intelligence. Security and Communication Networks, 2022, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3899413
Garidzirai, R., & Garidzirai, R. (2021). Together but not together: Challenges of remote learning for students amid the COVID-19
pandemic in rural South African universities. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 6(3), 213–226.
https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2021.39
Go, H., Kang, M., & Suh, S. (2020). Machine learning of robots in tourism and hospitality: Interactive technology acceptance model
(ITAM) – cutting edge. Tourism Review, 75(4), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-02-2019-0062
Górriz, J. M., Ramírez, J., Ortíz, A., Martínez-Murcia, F. J., Segovia, F., Suckling, J., Leming, M., Zhang, Y. D., Álvarez-Sánchez,
J. R., Bologna, G., Bonomini, P., Casado, F. E., Charte, D., Charte, F., Contreras, R., Cuesta-Infante, A., Duro, R. J.,
Fernández-Caballero, A., Fernández-Jover, E., … Ferrández, J. M. (2020). Artificial intelligence within the interplay
between natural and artificial computation: Advances in data science, trends and applications. Neurocomputing, 410, 237–
270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.05.078
Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.). Sage.
Gupta, S., & Chen, Y. (2022). Supporting inclusive learning using chatbots? A chatbot-led interview study. Journal of Information
Systems Education, 33(1), 98–108.
Hannan, E., & Liu, S. (2021). AI: A new source of competitiveness in higher education. Competitiveness Review: An International
Business Journal Incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness, 33(2), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1108/cr-03-2021-
0045
Jaguga, F., & Kwobah, E. (2020). Mental health response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Kenya: A review. International Journal of
Mental Health Systems, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13033-020-00400-8
Kharbat, F., AlShawabkeh, A., & Woolsey, M. (2020). Identifying gaps in using artificial intelligence to support students with
intellectual disabilities from education and health perspectives. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 73(1), 101–128.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-02-2020-0054
Khoalenyane, N. B., & Ajani, O. A. (2024). Life after COVID-19: Artificial intelligence in hotels; In-depth literature review.
International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 13. https://doi.org/10.53615/2232-5697.13.93-104
Kim, C., & Bennekin, K. N. (2016). The effectiveness of volition support (VoS) in promoting students’ effort regulation and
performance in an online mathematics course. Instructional Science, 44, 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-
9375-x
Koć-Januchta, M. M., Schönborn, K. J., Roehrig, C., Chaudhri, V. K., Tibell, L. A. E., & Heller, C. (2022). “Connecting concepts
helps put main ideas together”: Cognitive load and usability in learning biology with an AI-enriched textbook. International
Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(11), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00317-3
Li, D., Tong, T. W., & Xiao, Y. (2021). Is China emerging as the global leader in AI? Harvard Business Review.
https://hbr.org/2021/02/is-china-emerging-as-the-global-leader-in-ai
Liang, J. C., Hwang, G. J., Chen, M. R. A., & Darmawansah, D. (2021). Roles and research foci of artificial intelligence in language
education: An integrated bibliographic analysis and systematic review approach. Interactive Learning Environments.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1958348
Lucena, F., Díaz, I., Reche, M., & Rodríguez, J. (2019). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A bibliometric study on its impact
in the scientific literature. Education Sciences, 9(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010051
Maphalala, M. C., & Ajani, O. A. (2023). The COVID-19 pandemic: Shifting from conventional classroom learning to online learning
in South Africa’s higher education. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, (2(38)).
Maphalala, M. C., & Ajani, O. A. (2024). Teaching and learning of computer science in higher education: A self-directed learning
perspective. In Navigating Computer Science Education in the 21st Century (pp. 89–111). IGI Global.
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. (2015). Preferred reporting
items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
Mospan, N., Melnychenko, O., & Сисоєва, С. (2022). Emergency higher education digital transformation: Ukraine's response to the
COVID-19 pandemic. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 89(3), 90–104.
https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v89i3.4827
Ngema, T., & Ajani, O. A. (2024). Exploring digital transformation in preservice teacher education in Africa: Prospects, challenges,
and implications for sustainable lifelong learning. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Economy, 3(47).
https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijite/30092024/8236a

164
 Ajani et al., International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science 13(8) (2024), 157-165

Ouatik, F., Ouatik, F., Fadli, H., Elgorari, A., Mohadabb, M. E. L., Raoufia, M., et al. (2021). E-learning and decision-making system
for automating students' assessment using remote laboratory and machine learning. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge
Society, 17(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135285
Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research
from 2011–2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 7893–7925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10925-9
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T., Mulrow, C., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A.,
Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson,
E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic
reviews. British Medical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education.
Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(22), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8
PRISMA Statement. (2021). PRISMA endorsers. PRISMA statement website. http://www.prisma-
statement.org/Endorsement/PRISMAEndorsers
Rutner, S. M., & Scott, R. A. (2022). Use of artificial intelligence to grade student discussion boards: An exploratory study.
Information Systems Education Journal, 20(4), 4–18.
Salas-Pilco, S., & Yang, Y. (2022). Artificial Intelligence application in Latin America higher education: A systematic review.
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(21), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-022-
00326-w
Saldana, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
Shukla, A. K., Janmaijaya, M., Abraham, A., & Muhuri, P. K. (2019). Engineering applications of artificial intelligence: A
bibliometric analysis of 30 years (1988–2018). Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 85, 517–532.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2019.06.010
Singh, S. V., & Hiran, K. K. (2022). The impact of AI on teaching and learning in higher education technology. Journal of Higher
Education Theory and Practice, 22(13). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i13.5514
Siripipatthanakul, S., Limna, P., Kraiwanit, T., & Siripipattanakul, S. (2022). Predicting intention to use smart education technology
during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of higher education students in Thailand. International Conference on Research
and Development (Icorad), 1(2), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.47841/icorad.v1i2.46
Slimi, Z. (2022). Artificial intelligence implementation in Omani higher education; logistics studies, income as a case study. Journal
of the University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 24(02), 116–146. https://doi.org/10.51201/jusst/22/0154
Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Wang, D., Tong, X., Liu, T., Zhang, S., … & Clarke, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence for COVID-19: a
systematic review. Frontiers in Medicine, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.704256
Winkler-Schwartz, A., Bissonnette, V., Mirchi, N., Ponnudurai, N., Yilmaz, R., Ledwos, N., Siyar, S., Azarnoush, H., Karlik, B., &
Del Maestro, R. F. (2019). Artificial intelligence in medical education: Best practices using machine learning to assess
surgical expertise in virtual reality simulation. Journal of Surgical Education, 76(6), 1681–1690.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.05.015
Yang, A. C. M., Chen, I. Y. L., Flanagan, B., & Ogata, H. (2021). Automatic generation of cloze items for repeated testing to improve
reading comprehension. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 147–158.
Yao, X. (2022). Design and research of artificial intelligence in multimedia intelligent question-answering systems and self-test
systems. Advances in Multimedia. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2156111
Yu, W. (2021). Artificial intelligence for the development of university education management. Frontiers in Educational Research,
4(1). https://doi.org/10.25236/fer.2021.040120
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence
applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher
Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhang, B., Jin, H., & Duan, X. (2022). Physical education movement and comprehensive health quality intervention under the
background of artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.947731
Zhang, F. (2022). Design and application of artificial intelligence technology-driven education and teaching systems in universities.
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8503239
Zhang, J. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence on higher education in the perspective of its transformation application. Lecture
Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 2(1), 822–830. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2/2022483
Zhang, Z., & Xu, L. (2022). Student engagement with automated feedback on academic writing: A study on Uyghur ethnic minority
students in China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2102175

Publisher’s Note: SSBFNET stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

© 2024 by the authors. Licensee SSBFNET, Istanbul, Turkey. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). International Journal
of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478) by SSBFNET is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

165
Copyright of International Journal of Research in Business & Social Science is the property of
Center for Strategic Studies in Business & Finance and its content may not be copied or
emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written
permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.