Cognitive Notes
Cognitive Notes
STATES OF CONSCIOUSNESS
I. Introduction
States of consciousness refer to the different levels or conditions of awareness a person experiences. These
states can vary from being fully awake and alert to being in altered states, such as sleeping, dreaming, or
under the influence of drugs.
Consciousness is not always a single, fixed state, and can fluctuate throughout the day based on mental,
emotional, and physiological factors.
II. Types of States of Consciousness
1. Waking Consciousness
Fully awake and alert.
In this state, we are aware of our thoughts, perceptions, and surroundings.
Key Features:
o Attention: Focused mental energy.
o Perception: The brain processes information from the environment.
o Cognitive Functions: Reasoning, decision-making, memory, etc.
2. Sleep
Unconscious or altered state of consciousness.
Essential for physical and mental restoration.
Sleep stages:
o Non-REM Sleep: Includes stages 1-3, which involve deep relaxation and physical restoration.
o REM Sleep: Dreaming occurs, and the brain is highly active, though the body is temporarily
paralyzed to prevent acting out dreams.
3. Dreaming
A subset of sleeping consciousness, especially during REM sleep.
Characterized by vivid images, emotions, and sensations, but with altered perception of reality.
Theories about dreaming:
o Freud's theory: Dreams as expressions of unconscious desires and repressed thoughts.
o Activation-Synthesis Hypothesis: Dreams are the brain's attempt to make sense of random
neural activity during sleep.
4. Altered States of Consciousness (ASC)
States in which awareness is different from normal waking consciousness.
Can be induced by:
o Drugs (e.g., hallucinogens, alcohol)
o Meditation and Hypnosis
o Stress or Trauma
o Deprivation of sensory input (e.g., sensory isolation tanks)
Examples:
o Hypnosis: Deep relaxation and focused concentration that heightens suggestibility.
o Meditation: Focused state of mindfulness that can lead to altered awareness of self and
surroundings.
o Drug-induced states: Hallucinations, altered sense of time, and perception.
5. Coma and Vegetative States
Coma: A deep state of unconsciousness where the person cannot be awakened, and does not
respond to external stimuli.
Vegetative State: A person may exhibit basic physical functions (like breathing and heart rate) but
has no conscious awareness.
6. Near-Death Experiences (NDEs)
These are profound psychological events reported by people who have been close to death but
survived.
Features may include feelings of peace, an out-of-body experience, or encounters with a “light” or
deceased relatives.
Scientific views: NDEs may be linked to brain activity during extreme stress or oxygen deprivation.
III. Psychological Theories of Consciousness States
1. Theories of Sleep and Dreaming
Freud's Psychoanalytic Theory: Dreams are the manifestation of unconscious desires and
unresolved conflicts.
Activation-Synthesis Theory: Dreams are the brain's attempt to organize and interpret random
neural activity.
Information Processing Theory: Dreams help us process and organize experiences and emotions.
2. Theories of Altered States of Consciousness
Ericksonian Hypnosis: Hypnosis alters perception, memory, and identity, and is used
therapeutically to treat conditions like pain or trauma.
Flow State (Csikszentmihalyi): A state of optimal engagement in an activity where one feels fully
immersed, focused, and energized.
IV. Conclusion
States of consciousness are diverse, ranging from fully alert states to deep unconscious states.
Understanding these different states is essential in cognitive psychology, as they provide insight into
mental processes, memory, and behavior. Each state reflects how awareness can shift and vary depending
on our mental and physical condition, influencing how we interact with the world around us.
UNIT - II
THEORIES OF LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT
1. Behaviourist Theory:
o Emphasizes language acquisition through conditioning and reinforcement.
o Associated with B.F. Skinner.
o Focuses on imitation and environmental stimuli.
2. Nativist Theory (Generative Paradigm):
o Proposed by Noam Chomsky.
o Introduces the concept of an innate Language Acquisition Device (LAD).
o Highlights the idea of Universal Grammar (UG) and the "poverty of the stimulus" argument.
3. Cognitive Theory:
o Developed by Jean Piaget.
o Suggests that language development is linked to cognitive development stages.
o Emphasizes the role of mental processes in language acquisition.
4. Social Interactionist Theory:
o Associated with Lev Vygotsky.
o Highlights the importance of social interaction and cultural context.
o Introduces the concept of the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD).
Cognitive Theory – Jean Piaget
Piaget’s cognitive theory suggests that language is not innate, nor is it acquired purely through interaction
or reinforcement. Instead, language emerges as a part of broader cognitive development. Children must
first develop certain mental structures and concepts before they can use language meaningfully.
1. Language Follows Thought:
o Piaget believed that cognitive development precedes language development.
o A child must first understand a concept (like object permanence or time) before being able
to use words related to it meaningfully.
2. Language Reflects Cognitive Readiness:
o Language is a representation of existing knowledge.
o Children talk about things they already understand cognitively. For example, they use spatial
terms like “in” or “under” only after they grasp spatial relationships.
3. Egocentric Speech (now referred to as private speech):
o In early childhood (preoperational stage), children often engage in egocentric speech—
talking aloud to themselves not intended for communication, but rather for self-guidance
and cognitive organization.
o This eventually transforms into internal thought.
Stages of Cognitive Development & Language:
1. Sensorimotor Stage (0–2 years):
o No true language initially.
o Development of object permanence.
o Beginning of symbolic thought → leads to first words.
2. Preoperational Stage (2–7 years):
o Rapid language growth.
o Use of symbols in language.
o Egocentric speech common.
3. Concrete Operational Stage (7–11 years):
o Improved logical thinking.
o Better understanding of grammar and sentence structure.
4. Formal Operational Stage (12+ years):
o Abstract reasoning appears.
o Language becomes more sophisticated and abstract.
Criticism of Piaget’s Theory:
Underestimated children's linguistic ability: Research shows children can use certain words even
without fully understanding the concept.
Lacks emphasis on social factors: Piaget focused more on individual mental development, unlike
Vygotsky, who emphasized the role of social interaction.
Social Interactionist Theory – Lev Vygotsky
Vygotsky believed that language develops primarily from social interaction. According to him,
communication with more knowledgeable others—parents, teachers, peers—drives language acquisition.
Unlike Piaget, who emphasized individual cognitive development first, Vygotsky argued that social
interaction is fundamental to both cognitive and language development.
🌍 Core Assumptions:
1. Language is Social in Origin:
o Children learn language through conversations, guidance, and imitation.
o It is not learned in isolation, but shaped by cultural and social contexts.
2. Language and Thought Are Initially Separate:
o In early infancy, thought and language develop on parallel tracks.
o Around age 2, these merges, and language becomes a tool for thought (inner speech).
3. Private Speech (Self-Talk):
o Children often talk to themselves when solving problems or playing.
o This "private speech" is a form of self-guidance and reflects internalized social dialogue.
o Over time, this becomes inner speech (thinking in words).
🔄 Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD):
The ZPD is the gap between what a child can do independently and what they can do with help.
Language learning occurs most effectively within this zone.
With support from adults or peers (scaffolding), the child gradually becomes capable of performing
the task alone.
Role of Caregivers and Culture:
Caregivers and teachers play a critical role by:
o Adjusting their speech to the child’s level (e.g., child-directed speech).
o Encouraging turn-taking, naming, questioning.
o Offering models for imitation and feedback.
Culture provides the context and structure of the language a child learns (vocabulary, syntax, rules
of communication).
📝 Key Contributions:
Emphasizes the collaborative nature of language learning.
Views language as both a social tool and a cognitive tool.
Recognizes cultural variation in how children acquire language.
Behaviorist Theory – B.F. Skinner
Skinner proposed that language is a learned behavior, just like any other behavior, and is acquired through
operant conditioning—a process of learning through rewards (reinforcement) and punishments. This
theory is rooted in behaviorism, which emphasizes observable behaviors over internal mental processes.
🔁 Core Assumptions:
1. Language Is Learned, Not Innate:
o Children are blank slates (tabula rasa) at birth.
o Language develops through experience with the environment, not through innate
mechanisms.
2. Imitation:
o Children learn to speak by imitating the speech of adults and caregivers.
o They copy words, sounds, and sentence structures they hear around them.
3. Reinforcement and Conditioning:
o When a child says something correctly (like “milk”), caregivers may reward them with praise,
a smile, or by giving them milk.
o This positive reinforcement increases the likelihood of the behavior (saying "milk")
happening again.
4. Shaping:
o Parents and caregivers use successive approximation to shape language.
o For example, a baby’s babble (“ma-ma”) is encouraged, and over time it evolves into the full
word “mama”.
📉 Criticisms of Behaviorist Theory:
1. Doesn’t Explain Novel Sentences:
o Children often create sentences they’ve never heard before, like “I goed to the park,” which
imitation alone cannot explain.
2. Lack of Focus on Mental Processes:
o Ignores cognitive and biological factors involved in language acquisition.
3. Poverty of the Stimulus (Chomsky’s critique):
o The linguistic input children receive is often incomplete or incorrect, yet they still learn
complex grammar—suggesting innate mechanisms may be involved.
🧠 Comparison to Other Theories:
Unlike Chomsky’s Nativist Theory, Skinner’s view does not involve any inborn language structures.
Vygotsky’s and Piaget’s theories consider internal mental or social processes, while Skinner focused
solely on external behavior and environmental influence.
Nativist Theory – Noam Chomsky
Chomsky’s theory revolutionized linguistics by asserting that language is an innate biological ability.
According to him, children are born with a built-in capacity to acquire language, and exposure to language
in the environment merely triggers this inborn faculty.
🧠 Core Concepts:
1. Language Acquisition Device (LAD):
o An innate mental mechanism present in every human.
o Enables children to decode and produce language once they are exposed to it.
o It explains how children quickly and accurately learn complex grammar without formal
teaching.
2. Universal Grammar (UG):
o Refers to the common grammatical structure underlying all human languages.
o All languages share a set of universal principles (e.g., subject–verb–object structure,
recursion).
o The LAD uses UG to help children figure out the specific rules of their native language.
3. Poverty of the Stimulus Argument:
o The linguistic input (stimulus) children receive is limited, fragmented, and often incorrect.
o Yet, they are able to learn the grammar of their language perfectly.
o Therefore, Chomsky argued that something more than the environment must be at work—
namely, an innate system.
📋 Evidence Supporting the Nativist Theory:
Critical Period Hypothesis: Children must be exposed to language during a specific window
(typically before puberty) to acquire it fully. After this period, language learning becomes much
harder.
Overregularization: Children say things like “goed” or “foots,” showing they are applying grammar
rules they have never been explicitly taught.
Cross-linguistic similarities: Many unrelated languages share similar deep structures, suggesting an
underlying universal system.
❗ Criticisms of Chomsky’s Theory:
Vague concept of LAD: Critics argue the LAD is not well-defined or empirically proven.
Underestimates social interaction: Chomsky focuses on biology but ignores the role of
communication and cultural context, which Vygotsky emphasized.
Doesn’t explain language differences or dialects: While UG suggests similarities, the theory doesn’t
fully account for linguistic diversity and pragmatic use.
UNIT – III
BASIC ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT: CONCEPT FORMATION
Thought is a complex mental process involving the manipulation of information, symbols, and
representations. One of the fundamental elements of thought is the concept, which plays a central role in
reasoning, categorization, and problem-solving.
🧠 1. What is a Concept?
A concept is a mental representation or category used to group objects, events, or ideas based on
shared features or common properties.
It allows efficient processing, storage, and communication of information.
📘 2. Types of Concepts
Concrete Concepts: Tangible, observable objects (e.g., "chair", "dog").
Abstract Concepts: Intangible ideas (e.g., "justice", "freedom").
Natural Concepts: Based on real-world experience; often have fuzzy boundaries (e.g., "bird").
Artificial Concepts: Defined by rules or logic (e.g., "triangle", "prime number").
🔍 3. Process of Concept Formation
Concept formation involves:
A. Perception & Categorization
Organizing sensory input into meaningful categories.
Based on similarities and differences.
B. Prototypes (Eleanor Rosch)
Prototype: The best or most typical example of a concept.
E.g., A robin is a better prototype of “bird” than a penguin.
C. Exemplars
Instead of one prototype, we store multiple examples of a concept and compare new items with
them.
D. Rule-Based Formation
Concepts are formed by applying logical rules (e.g., "All squares have four equal sides").
E. Hypothesis Testing (Bruner, Goodnow & Austin)
Learners form hypotheses about category membership and test them through feedback.
Involves selective attention, testing attributes, and confirmation/disconfirmation.
⚙️4. Cognitive Models of Concept Formation
Classical View: Concepts have defining features (e.g., "bachelor" = adult + male + unmarried).
Prototype Model: Concepts organized around an ideal or average member.
Exemplar Model: Concepts are collections of specific instances stored in memory.
Schema Theory: Concepts are part of larger cognitive structures that include typical patterns.
✅ Conclusion
Concept formation is a key cognitive function that supports thinking, communication, and learning. By
forming mental categories based on shared properties, the human mind efficiently organizes experience
and enables flexible adaptation to new situations.
ASSOCIATION
In cognitive psychology, association refers to the linking or connection between mental representations,
such as ideas, sensations, or concepts. It is one of the foundational principles of learning and memory,
originally rooted in classical philosophical and psychological traditions.
🧠 1. Historical Background
Originates from Associationism, an early psychological theory influenced by philosophers like
Aristotle, Locke, and Hume.
Developed scientifically by Ebbinghaus, who studied associations in verbal memory using nonsense
syllables.
Core idea: “Ideas that occur together tend to be recalled together.”
🔗 2. Types of Association
A. Contiguity
When two events or stimuli occur together in time or space.
E.g., Lightning → Thunder → We associate the two.
B. Similarity
Items that are alike are associated together.
E.g., Apple and Orange → both are fruits.
C. Contrast
Sometimes opposites form associations.
E.g., Hot and Cold.
🧠 3. Role in Learning and Memory
Paired-associate learning: Learning involves forming connections between paired items (e.g.,
learning a foreign word and its meaning).
Associations are the basis for semantic networks, where concepts are nodes connected by
associative links.
Helps explain recall, recognition, priming, and spreading activation in memory.
🧪 4. Experimental Findings
Free association tasks: Participants respond with the first word that comes to mind when given a
stimulus word → shows strength of associations.
Priming studies: Exposure to one stimulus (e.g., “doctor”) speeds up response to a related word
(e.g., “nurse”).
🧠 5. Neural Basis
Associations are believed to be represented in the brain through neural connections.
Hebbian learning: “Neurons that fire together wire together” — frequent co-activation strengthens
connections.
✅ Conclusion
Association is a central concept in cognitive psychology, underpinning how we learn, remember, and think.
It explains how experiences and knowledge are interconnected in the mind, influencing behavior, memory
recall, and understanding.
HYPOTHESIS TESTING
Hypothesis testing is a cognitive process through which individuals form and test assumptions or ideas to
understand and categorize the world. It plays a crucial role in concept formation, problem-solving, and
learning.
🧠 1. Definition
In cognitive psychology, hypothesis testing refers to the active process of generating, evaluating,
and modifying mental hypotheses about categories, rules, or patterns based on feedback or
observation.
It is not statistical hypothesis testing, but a psychological process studied especially in concept
learning and categorization tasks.
📘 2. Origin: Bruner’s Theory of Concept Formation (1956)
Jerome Bruner, Goodnow, and Austin proposed that humans learn concepts by:
o Formulating hypotheses about defining features.
o Testing them through selective observation and feedback.
o Accepting or rejecting them based on outcomes.
🔁 3. Steps in Cognitive Hypothesis Testing
1. Generate Hypothesis
o Based on limited cues or examples.
2. Test Hypothesis
o Compare new stimuli with expected patterns.
3. Evaluate Outcome
o Was the hypothesis confirmed or disconfirmed?
4. Revise if Necessary
o Modify or abandon the hypothesis for a better fit.
🧩 4. Strategies in Hypothesis Testing
Conservative Focusing: Varying one attribute at a time to test what’s essential.
Focus Gambling: Testing multiple attributes at once.
Successive Scanning: Generating and testing one hypothesis at a time.
Simultaneous Scanning: Considering all possible hypotheses and ruling them out progressively.
🔬 5. Experimental Example
In a concept identification task, subjects are given a set of cards with various features (e.g., shape,
color, number).
They must figure out the underlying rule by testing guesses and receiving feedback.
This simulates real-life cognitive tasks like diagnosis, classification, or decision-making.
✅ Conclusion
Hypothesis testing in cognitive psychology demonstrates how people learn by actively forming and
refining ideas. It reflects a scientific approach to thinking, supporting effective problem-solving, decision-
making, and concept formation.
REASONING
Reasoning is a core cognitive process that involves drawing conclusions, making decisions, and solving
problems based on available information. It is essential for higher-order thinking and reflects how
individuals use logic and knowledge to arrive at new information.
🧠 1. Definition
Reasoning is the mental process of deriving logical conclusions from given premises or facts.
It allows individuals to go beyond the information given to infer relationships, solve problems, or
make predictions.
🔍 2. Types of Reasoning
A. Deductive Reasoning
Draws specific conclusions from general rules or premises.
If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.
Example:
o All humans are mortal.
o Socrates is a human.
o → Socrates is mortal.
B. Inductive Reasoning
Draws generalizations from specific instances or observations.
Probabilistic in nature (conclusions are likely but not certain).
Example:
o The sun has risen every day in my life.
o → The sun will rise tomorrow.
C. Abductive Reasoning
Begins with an incomplete set of observations and tries to find the best possible explanation.
Common in diagnostic or inferential thinking (e.g., in medicine or psychology).
🧩 3. Theories and Models of Reasoning
Mental Model Theory (Johnson-Laird)
o People build mental models of situations to reason through possibilities.
Dual-Process Theories
o System 1: Fast, intuitive, automatic.
o System 2: Slow, deliberate, logical.
Rule-Based Theories
o Emphasize formal logic (e.g., syllogisms, conditional reasoning).
🔬 4. Experimental Tasks in Reasoning
Syllogistic reasoning tasks
Wason Selection Task (tests conditional reasoning)
Analogical reasoning problems
⚖️5. Errors in Reasoning
Belief bias: Accepting conclusions that align with prior beliefs, even if logically invalid.
Confirmation bias: Seeking evidence that confirms one’s hypothesis while ignoring contradictory
evidence.
Heuristics: Mental shortcuts (e.g., representativeness, availability) that can lead to biased reasoning.
✅ Conclusion
Reasoning is a fundamental aspect of cognition that enables individuals to make sense of the world, draw
inferences, and solve problems. It reflects both logical processes and heuristic shortcuts, integrating
knowledge, experience, and context in decision-making.
UNIT – IV
INTELLIGENCE: BASIC CONCEPTS & DEFINITIONS
Intelligence has been defined in multiple ways by different psychologists:
Binet & Simon (1905): "The ability to judge well, understand well, and reason well."
Wechsler (1944): "The global capacity of an individual to act purposefully, think rationally, and deal
effectively with the environment."
Sternberg (1985): "Mental activity directed toward purposive adaptation to, selection, and shaping
of real-world environments relevant to one's life."
Solso (2001): "A general ability of individuals to understand complex ideas, learn from experience,
and adapt to changes in the environment."
2. Types of Intelligence
Over time, psychologists have categorized intelligence into different types:
2.1 Spearman’s Two-Factor Theory (1904)
General Intelligence (g): A core intelligence that affects all cognitive tasks.
Specific Intelligence (s): Abilities specific to particular tasks.
Critiques of General Intelligence (Spearman, 1904)
Strengths
Provides a unifying concept of intelligence.
Supported by factor analysis studies.
Criticisms
Oversimplification: Critics argue that a single “g” factor cannot explain the complexity of human
intelligence (Gardner, 1983).
Neglects Special Talents: Some individuals excel in specific areas but may have average overall
intelligence.
Example: A musician may struggle with math but be a genius in composition.
2.2 Thurstone’s Primary Mental Abilities (1938)
Thurstone proposed seven independent factors:
1. Verbal Comprehension
2. Word Fluency
3. Numerical Ability
4. Spatial Visualization
5. Associative Memory
6. Perceptual Speed
7. Reasoning
Critiques of Primary Mental Abilities (Thurstone, 1938)
Strengths
Highlights multiple independent abilities.
More comprehensive than Spearman’s single-factor model.
Criticisms
Contradicts the “g” Factor: Later research (Carroll, 1993) showed that Thurstone’s factors still
correlate, suggesting an underlying general intelligence.
Complex Measurement: Difficult to assess all seven abilities in a standardized test.
2.3 Cattell’s Theory: Fluid & Crystallized Intelligence (1963)
Fluid Intelligence (Gf): The ability to solve new problems without prior knowledge (abstract
reasoning).
Crystallized Intelligence (Gc): Knowledge gained through learning and experience.
Critiques of Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence (Cattell, 1963)
Strengths
Explains how intelligence changes with age.
Fluid intelligence aligns with neurological studies of problem-solving skills.
Criticisms
Difficult to Separate: Some argue that fluid and crystallized intelligence are interdependent rather
than distinct.
Limited Cultural Perspective: Emphasizes Western-style problem-solving over other forms of
intelligence.
2.4 Howard Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences (1983)
Gardner challenged the traditional IQ concept and introduced eight intelligences:
1. Linguistic
2. Logical-Mathematical
3. Spatial
4. Musical
5. Bodily-Kinesthetic
6. Interpersonal
7. Intrapersonal
8. Naturalistic
Critiques of Multiple Intelligences (Gardner, 1983)
Strengths
Recognizes diverse intellectual abilities beyond traditional IQ.
Applied widely in education.
Criticisms
Lack of Empirical Evidence: There is no strong neuroscientific basis proving that each intelligence
operates independently (Waterhouse, 2006).
Overly Broad Definition: Critics argue that talents like musical ability or bodily-kinesthetic skills are
not "intelligence" but rather skills or aptitudes.
2.5 Sternberg’s Triarchic Theory (1985)
Intelligence is composed of three types:
Analytical Intelligence: Problem-solving abilities.
Creative Intelligence: Ability to deal with new situations.
Practical Intelligence: Adaptation to real-life situations.
Critiques of the Triarchic Theory (Sternberg, 1985)
Strengths
Incorporates real-world problem-solving.
Emphasizes creativity and practical intelligence.
Criticisms
Difficult to Measure: Unlike traditional IQ tests, assessing practical and creative intelligence is
subjective.
Limited Empirical Support: Sternberg’s theory lacks large-scale experimental validation.
2.6 Emotional Intelligence (Daniel Goleman, 1995)
Goleman introduced Emotional Intelligence (EI), which includes self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation,
empathy, and social skills.
Critiques of Emotional Intelligence (Goleman, 1995)
Strengths
Highlights the role of emotions in decision-making and success.
Useful in workplace and leadership studies.
Criticisms
Not a Form of Intelligence: Some researchers (Locke, 2005) argue that emotional intelligence is
more of a personality trait than an actual intelligence.
Measurement Issues: Emotional intelligence tests are inconsistent and prone to self-report biases.
3. Nature of Intelligence
There has been a long debate on whether intelligence is influenced more by genetics (nature) or
environment (nurture).
3.1 Nature (Genetic Influence)
Studies on twins (Bouchard & McGue, 1981) show that identical twins have higher IQ correlations
than fraternal twins.
Intelligence is moderately heritable (50-80%), as shown by Plomin & Deary (2015).
3.2 Nurture (Environmental Influence)
Education, culture, nutrition, and socioeconomic status play a significant role in shaping intelligence.
Studies by Flynn (1987) found that IQ scores have been increasing over generations due to better
environmental conditions.
3.3 Interaction of Nature and Nurture
Intelligence is a product of both genetic predisposition and environmental experiences.
The Reaction Range Theory (Gottesman, 1963) suggests that genetics set a potential range for
intelligence, but environment determines where an individual falls within this range.
Nature vs. Nurture Debate on Intelligence
Genetic Argument: Twin studies show intelligence has a heritable component (~50-80%).
Environmental Argument: The Flynn Effect (Flynn, 1987) shows that IQ scores have increased over
generations due to better education and living conditions.
Interactionist Perspective: Intelligence is influenced by both genes and environment, making it
difficult to separate their effects.
4. History of Intelligence: How It Emerged
4.1 Early Theories of Intelligence
Plato (400 BCE): Believed intelligence is innate and linked to reasoning abilities.
Aristotle (350 BCE): Proposed that intelligence comes from experience and learning.
4.2 First Scientific Studies
Sir Francis Galton (1884): First to measure intelligence through reaction times and sensory
perception.
Alfred Binet & Théodore Simon (1905): Developed the first intelligence test to identify children
needing special education in France.
Lewis Terman (1916): Adapted Binet’s test into the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, introducing the
IQ (Intelligence Quotient).
David Wechsler (1944): Created the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS), focusing on verbal
and performance IQ.
4.3 Modern Approaches
Cognitive Approaches (Neisser, 1967; Solso, 2001): Focus on how mental processes influence
intelligence.
Neuroscientific Research: Studies using fMRI and EEG have linked intelligence to brain regions such
as the prefrontal cortex (Jung & Haier, 2007).
5. First Concept of Intelligence in Psychology
The first psychologist to introduce the concept of intelligence scientifically was Sir Francis Galton (1883) in
his book Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development. He argued that intelligence is hereditary and
proposed measuring it through sensory acuity.
Alfred Binet and Théodore Simon (1905) were the first to develop an intelligence test to measure cognitive
abilities in children.
Critiques of Intelligence Testing (IQ Tests)
Strengths
Useful for educational and clinical assessment.
Predicts academic and job performance to some extent.
Criticisms
Cultural Bias: IQ tests often favor individuals from Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and
democratic (WEIRD) societies (Nisbett, 2009).
Narrow Scope: IQ tests do not measure creativity, emotional intelligence, or social skills.
Overemphasis on Standardized Testing: Critics argue that intelligence should be assessed through
broader methods rather than a single test score.
THEORIES OF INTELLIGENCE
Intelligence is defined as the capacity to learn from experience, adapt to the environment, and solve
problems. Over the years, psychologists have proposed various theories to explain the nature, structure,
and components of intelligence.
🧠 1. Spearman’s Two-Factor Theory (1904)
Proposed by Charles Spearman.
Intelligence consists of:
o General intelligence (g): A core factor that influences overall cognitive ability.
o Specific abilities (s): Skills specific to particular tasks.
Based on factor analysis.
Supported by consistent performance across different types of intellectual tasks.
🧠 2. Thurstone’s Primary Mental Abilities (1938)
Proposed by L.L. Thurstone, who opposed the idea of a single “g” factor.
Identified seven primary mental abilities:
1. Verbal comprehension
2. Word fluency
3. Number ability
4. Spatial relations
5. Memory
6. Reasoning
7. Perceptual speed
Emphasized multidimensional nature of intelligence.
🧠 3. Cattell’s Theory: Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence (1963)
Proposed by Raymond Cattell.
Fluid intelligence (Gf):
o Ability to solve novel problems, use logic, and identify patterns.
o Independent of education and culture.
Crystallized intelligence (Gc):
o Accumulated knowledge from past experiences and education (e.g., vocabulary, general
knowledge).
These two types interact but develop differently with age.
🧠 4. Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences (1983)
Proposed by Howard Gardner.
Criticized traditional IQ tests for being too narrow.
Suggested eight independent intelligences:
1. Linguistic
2. Logical–mathematical
3. Spatial
4. Musical
5. Bodily–kinesthetic
6. Interpersonal
7. Intrapersonal
8. Naturalistic
Emphasizes cultural and contextual relevance of intelligence.
🧠 5. Sternberg’s Triarchic Theory (1985)
Proposed by Robert J. Sternberg.
Intelligence consists of three interrelated components:
1. Analytical intelligence (problem-solving and logical reasoning)
2. Creative intelligence (novelty and adaptability)
3. Practical intelligence (“street smarts” or everyday problem-solving)
Focuses on how intelligence is used rather than only what it is.
🧠 6. Information Processing Theories (Cognitive Approach)
Emphasize mental processes involved in problem-solving, such as:
o Encoding
o Storage
o Retrieval
o Speed of processing
Influenced by cognitive psychology and models like Atkinson-Shiffrin memory model.
Intelligence is seen as the efficiency of cognitive operations.
✅ Conclusion
There is no single definition or model of intelligence; it is a multifaceted construct. From Spearman’s “g”
factor to Gardner’s multiple intelligences, each theory contributes to a broader understanding of human
intellectual potential. In applied psychology, these theories aid in assessment, education, and intervention
planning.
MEASUREMENT OF INTELLIGENCE
The measurement of intelligence involves quantifying cognitive abilities using standardized psychological
tests. These tests assess skills such as reasoning, problem-solving, memory, verbal ability, and processing
speed. The goal is to derive an Intelligence Quotient (IQ) or a profile of intellectual strengths and
weaknesses.
🧠 1. Intelligence Quotient (IQ)
Introduced by Alfred Binet and later revised by Lewis Terman.
Formula:
IQ=Mental Age (MA)Chronological Age (CA)×100\text{IQ} = \frac{\text{Mental Age (MA)}}{\
text{Chronological Age (CA)}} \times 100IQ=Chronological Age (CA)Mental Age (MA)×100
Modern IQ tests use a deviation IQ (mean = 100, SD = 15).
🧪 2. Major Intelligence Tests
A. Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale
Measures fluid reasoning, knowledge, quantitative reasoning, visual-spatial processing, and
working memory.
For ages 2 to adult.
Provides a Full-Scale IQ.
B. Wechsler Scales
Developed by David Wechsler:
WAIS (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale) – for adults.
WISC (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children) – for children.
Subtests: Verbal Comprehension, Perceptual Reasoning, Working Memory, Processing Speed.
Gives Full Scale IQ and index scores.
📊 3. Group Intelligence Tests
Administered to multiple individuals at once.
Examples:
o Army Alpha and Beta Tests
o Raven’s Progressive Matrices (non-verbal, culture-fair)
Used in educational, military, and employment settings.
🌍 4. Culture-Fair Tests
Aim to reduce cultural and language bias.
Example: Cattell’s Culture Fair Intelligence Test.
Focuses on abstract reasoning and pattern recognition.
🧬 5. Psychometric Properties
To be effective, intelligence tests must have:
Reliability: Consistency of results.
Validity: Accuracy in measuring intelligence.
Standardization: Norms based on a representative sample.
✅ Conclusion
Measuring intelligence involves a variety of standardized tools tailored for different populations and
purposes. A proper assessment includes considering test reliability, cultural fairness, and the
multidimensional nature of intelligence.