See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/377188435

Artificial Intelligence in Personalized Learning: A

Bibliometric Analysis

Chapter · December 2023

CITATION READS

1 819

2 authors:

Anshul Saluja Nitish Kumar Minz

K.R. MANGALAM UNIVERSITY K.R. MANGALAM UNIVERSITY
15 PUBLICATIONS 12 CITATIONS 36 PUBLICATIONS 47 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Nitish Kumar Minz on 06 January 2024.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Chapter - 1
Artificial Intelligence in Personalized Learning: A
Bibliometric Analysis

Dr. Anshul Saluja*

Nitish Kumar Minz**

Abstract
This bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overview of
research within the intersection of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and
Personalized Learning in the realm of education. The central theme
revolves around the utilization of AI-driven techniques to tailor and
enhance the learning experience for individual students. This
emerging field seeks to revolutionize education by adapting content,
pace, and pedagogy to match the unique needs and preferences of
each learner. The study involved a meticulous search across various
Scopus databases, yielding a substantial corpus of 187 documents.
The search strings were meticulously crafted to capture the essence
of AI's role in personalized education, encompassing terms like
"AI," "Personalized Learning," and related educational technology
concepts. Through rigorous bibliometric analysis, we unravel
publication trends, highlight influential journals, identify prolific
authors, and reveal recurring keyword associations present in this
body of research. These insights provide a compass for researchers,
educators, and policymakers keen on understanding and
contributing to the ever-evolving landscape of AI in education,
where the central theme revolves around harnessing the power of AI
to tailor educational experiences and optimize learning outcomes for
every student.
_________________________
* Assistant Professor, School of Education, K.R. Mangalam University
** Student, School of Management & Commerce, K.R. Mangalam University

1
Keywords: Bibliometric Analysis, Artificial Intelligence,
Personalized Learning, Education, Research, Scopus, Bibliometric,
Biblioshiny, And VOS Viewer
1. Introduction
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has orchestrated a profound
transformation in the realm of education, ushering in an era of
personalized learning experiences. This bibliometric analysis
embarks on a journey through the expansive landscape of research
where AI and Personalized Learning converge, illuminating trends,
eminent authors, and emerging themes. As Ni et al. (2023) delve into
the intricacies of a heterogeneous graph neural network model for
knowledge tracing, Lampropoulos (2023) envisions immersive
intelligent tutoring systems, combining Augmented Reality and AI.
In parallel, Singh et al. (2022) craft SeisTutor, a custom-tailored
intelligent tutoring system fostering sustainable education, while
Pishtari et al. (2023) meticulously review model-based learning
analytics to strengthen the partnership between teachers and
intelligent systems.
Education's metamorphosis is further exemplified by Machado et al.
(2021), who exploredd metaheuristic-based adaptive curriculum
sequencing approaches, echoing the transformative potential of AI
in tailoring learning journeys. Delving into two decades of AI in
education, Chen et al. (2022) uncover contributors, collaborations,
research topics, challenges, and future directions, providing a
roadmap for this dynamic field. The fusion of hybrid attentive
networks with self-supervised dual-channel heterogeneous graphs
for knowledge tracing, as illustrated by Wu and Ling (2023),
showcases the cutting-edge techniques revolutionizing personalized
learning.
Furthermore, Katsarou et al. (2023) open a new dimension by
systematically reviewing voice-based intelligent virtual agents in
2
English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education. Meanwhile, Tato
and Nkambou (2022) infused expert knowledge into deep neural
networks through attention mechanisms, shaping personalized
learning environments. Shin (2022) explored the integration of
intelligent tutoring systems into mathematics education, shedding
light on prospective teachers' concerns and Technological
Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). These works exemplify
the multifaceted facets of AI-driven personalized learning, where
technology and pedagogy intertwine (Crompton & Burke, 2023).
In this bibliometric analysis, the authors embark on a quest to
understand the evolving landscape of AI in personalized learning,
where educational paradigms are reshaped to cater to individual
learners. Drawing insights from these pioneering works and a corpus
of 2,182 documents, we navigate the intricate web of publication
trends, influential journals, prolific authors, and recurring keyword
associations. The path we traverse serves as a guiding light for
researchers, educators, and policymakers, inviting them to join this
transformative journey, where AI orchestrates the symphony of
tailored educational experiences.
2. Research Methodology
This bibliometric analysis follows a systematic research
methodology to investigate the intersection of Artificial Intelligence
(AI) and Personalized Learning in education. The research process
encompasses the following key steps:
2.1 Search Strings: Five distinct search strings are formulated,
incorporating relevant keywords such as "AI," "Personalized
Learning," "Education," and related terms. These search strings are
designed to comprehensively retrieve relevant research documents.

3
Box 1: Boolean String for Search

(“Artificial Intelligence" OR "AI" OR "Machine Learning" OR

"Deep Learning" OR "Neural Networks”) AND (“Personalized
Learning" OR "Individualized Learning" OR "Adaptive Learning"
OR "Customized Learning”) AND (“Educational Technology" OR
"Intelligent Tutoring Systems" OR "Educational Data Mining" OR
"Student-Centered Learning" OR "Personalized Instruction" OR
"Educational AI”)
2.2 Document Retrieval: An exhaustive search is conducted across
Scopus databases to gather research documents that align with the
specified search strings. This phase yields a substantial corpus of
documents for analysis.
2.3 Filtering and Manual Screening: A meticulous filtering
process is applied to enhance document quality and relevance. For
documents retrieved in the 2017-2023 period, manual screening is
performed to ensure alignment with specified criteria.
2.4 Data Collection: Detailed metadata, including publication year,
authorship, source title, and abstract, is systematically collected for
each document. This data collection step is essential for subsequent
analysis.
2.5 Bibliometric Analysis: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis
is conducted, revealing publication trends, prominent journals,
influential authors, and keyword co-occurrences within the dataset.
Advanced bibliometric tools and techniques are employed for this
analysis.
2.6 Insight Generation: The insights generated through this
analysis provide valuable guidance for researchers, educators, and
policymakers interested in the evolving field of AI in education.
These findings underscore the central theme of AI's role in
customizing educational experiences to optimize learning outcomes
for individual students.

4
This research methodology follows a structured approach
encompassing systematic search string development, rigorous
document retrieval, meticulous filtering, manual screening, and in-
depth bibliometric analysis to explore the dynamic landscape of AI
in Personalized Learning within the educational context. Through
this methodical process, the study contributes valuable insights into
the evolving field of AI in education.
3. Literature Review
Ni et al. (2023) introduced HHSKT, a pioneering model for
knowledge tracing in online education. They addressed challenges
in heterogeneous knowledge structures and sparse interaction
records by leveraging a heterogeneous graph-based approach and
enhancing short-term memory. Their emphasis on interpretable
feedback to learners distinguished it from prior models.
Experimental results demonstrated HHSKT's superiority, with an
average AUC improvement of up to 3% over existing models. This
research enhanced Intelligent Tutoring Systems' effectiveness and
contributed to educational data mining (Ni et al., 2023).
Lampropoulos (2023) discussed the integration of Artificial
Intelligence (AI) and Augmented Reality (AR) in education, which
was poised to revolutionize learning. This convergence led to the
development of immersive Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS),
offering personalized and engaging educational experiences. These
technologies considered learners' psychological, cognitive, and
motivational states, enhancing teaching and learning activities
across educational levels. The implications encompass improved
learning outcomes and increased motivation, addressing evolving
educational needs (Lampropoulos, 2023).
Singh et al. (2022) explored the integration of cognitive intelligence
into an Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) to enhance sustainable
education. The primary objective was to mimic human tutor
cognitive intelligence, offering a personalized curriculum to
5
learners. The research employed the Kirkpatrick four-phase
evaluation model to assess the effectiveness of the SeisTutor. The
implications of this work lay in the potential to improve learning
outcomes and adaptivity in educational settings through AI-driven
ITS (Lin et al., 2023; Chrysafiadi et al., 2023).
The Proceedings of RTA-CSIT 2021 offered a comprehensive
insight into recent trends in computer science and information
technology (Xhina & Hoxha, 2021). The document comprised 29
papers covering diverse topics, including machine learning
optimization methods, intelligent tutoring systems in reinforcement
learning, e-learning experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic,
and performance measurements in Azure databases. This collection
provided valuable implications for researchers interested in the
evolving landscape of technology and education (Xhina & Hoxha,
2021).
Model-Based Learning Analytics (MbLA) fostered collaboration
between teachers and intelligent systems, enhancing the learning
process through transparent student learning and instruction models.
Research revealed an early-stage community comprising diverse
research groups primarily from learning analytics and intelligent
tutoring systems fields. These groups shared a common core
literature but had limited collaboration. Topics explored included
teacher practices (e.g., awareness, reflection, learning orchestration)
and technology (e.g., dashboards, adaptive learning architectures).
However, social and collaborative learning aspects remained
understudied. Future research should focus on interdisciplinary
hybrid teacher-AI approaches, involving teachers early in
development (Pishtari et al., 2023).
A systematic review of the literature on metaheuristic-based
adaptive curriculum sequencing (ACS) approaches was conducted
to identify key implications, objectives, and methodologies. The
study analyzed 61 papers from 2005 to 2018, emphasizing the use

6
of Swarm Intelligence and Genetic Algorithms in addressing the
NP-Hard ACS problem. While various parameters for student and
knowledge domain modeling were considered, intrinsic student
parameters received limited attention. The review was sponsored by
CAPES, CNPq, FAPEMIG, and UFJF. The objective was to classify
and analyze solutions for ACS in online learning systems (Machado
et al., 2021; Normann et al., 2023; Rahayu et al., 2023; Li et al.,
2023).
The literature review on Two Decades of Artificial Intelligence in
Education (AIEd) spanned from 2000 to 2019 and identified key
research topics like intelligent tutoring systems, natural language
processing, and educational robots (Chen et al., 2022). Challenges,
including learner emotion detection, were highlighted. The review
emphasized the significance of addressing these challenges for the
future of AIEd research (Chen et al., 2022). This comprehensive
analysis of 4,519 publications provided valuable insights for
researchers and educators interested in integrating AI technologies
into education settings (Chen et al., 2022).
Wu and Ling (2023) addressed the data sparsity challenge in
Knowledge Tracing (KT) within Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS).
They introduced the Dual-channel Heterogeneous Graph Network
(DHGN), utilizing self-supervised and contrastive learning, and the
Hybrid Attentive Network (HAN) to model long-term and short-
term student intents. Experimental results on real-world datasets
demonstrated significant performance improvements over existing
methods, highlighting the potential to enhance ITS and online
learning platforms (Wu & Ling, 2023).
This literature review explored the role of Voice-based Intelligent
Virtual Agents (IVAs) in English as a Foreign Language (EFL)
education. The study, conducted by Katsarou et al. (2023), assessed
IVAs' impact on academic achievement, their affordances, and
adoption barriers. It emphasized the potential of IVAs for

7
personalized learning but noted the scarcity of empirical studies.
Educators should consider pedagogical implications and future
research directions for effective IVAs implementation in EFL
education. This research underscored the need for further empirical
validation of IVAs in language learning (Katsarou et al., 2023).
In the study by Tato and Nkambou (2022), the authors tackled bias
in machine learning models arising from imbalanced datasets,
especially in education. They proposed a hybrid neural network,
combining LSTM and CNN, enriched with expert knowledge
through attention mechanisms. Testing in Logic-Muse (an
intelligent tutoring system) and MorALERT (a serious game)
demonstrated improved knowledge tracing and socio-moral
reasoning prediction. The research underscored the importance of
integrating expert knowledge to enhance model generalization,
particularly when data was limited. Funding support was
acknowledged, and a relevant conference presentation was noted
(Tato et al., 2020).
In the study by Shin (2022), prospective mathematics teachers'
integration of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) was examined.
Findings revealed that prospective teachers primarily expressed
concerns about ITSs' informational and personal aspects, often
positioning them as servants rather than partners. Interestingly, those
who considered ITSs as partners demonstrated greater interest in
modifying ITS-integrated teaching practices and exhibited higher
levels of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge
(TPACK). This underscored the importance of enhancing teacher
training programs to foster a collaborative mindset in ITS
integration (Shin, 2022).
The field of Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED) merged AI
and learning sciences, focusing on creating adaptive learning
environments and personalized educational tools (Hamal et al.,
2022). AIED addressed modern educational challenges like

8
personalized learning, mobile learning, educational games,
MOOCs, and augmented reality (Hamal et al., 2022). Researchers
employed methodologies like data mining and learning analytics to
optimize learning experiences and offered a glimpse into a future of
accessible, tailored, and effective education.
4. Bibliometric Analysis
4.1 Document analysis
Table 1 presents a comprehensive document analysis highlighting
key characteristics of the dataset under scrutiny in this study.
Spanning the time frame from 2017 to 2023, the dataset comprises
187 research documents drawn from a diverse array of 113 distinct
sources, encompassing journals, books, and various scholarly
publications. These findings underscore the dataset's substantial
annual growth rate of 21.03%, indicative of the burgeoning interest
in the fusion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Personalized
Learning. The dataset boasts a relatively recent average document
age of 2.41 years, attesting to the timeliness and currency of the
research it encapsulates. Furthermore, each document within the
dataset garners an average of 8.171 citations, reflecting its resonance
and significance within the academic discourse. The dataset is also
notably rich in references, totaling 7,384 citations, establishing its
interconnectedness with a broader body of related literature.
Comprising a diverse array of document types, including 66 articles,
1 book, 6 book chapters, 89 conference papers, 11 conference
reviews, 1 editorial, and 13 reviews, it offers a multifaceted
exploration of the multifarious facets of AI in Personalized
Learning. Collaborative authorship is a prominent feature, with an
average of 3.43 co-authors per document, along with a notable
21.39% international co-authorship rate. These insights collectively
provide a comprehensive overview of the dataset's composition,
growth dynamics, and its pivotal role in advancing research at the

9
intersection of AI and Personalized Learning within the educational
domain.
Table 1: Document analysis
Description Results
Main information about the data
Timespan 2017:2023
Sources (Journals, Books, etc.) 113
Documents 187
Annual growth rate % 21.03
Document average age 2.41
Average citations per doc 8.171
References 7384
Document contents
Keywords plus (id) 866
Author's keywords (de) 518
Authors
Authors 554
Authors of single-authored docs 20
Authors collaboration
Single-authored docs 23
Co-Authors per Doc 3.43
International co-authorships % 21.39
Document types
Article 66

10
 Book 1
Book chapter 6
Conference paper 89
Conference review 11
Editorial 1
Review 13
Source: Author’s Compilation
4.2 Performance Analysis
4.2.1 Annual Scientific Production. Figure 1 shows the annual
scientific production in AI and personalized learning from 2017 to
2023. The figure shows a steady increase in the number of
publications in this area, with the number of publications increasing
from 21 in 2017 to 44 in 2023. This suggests that the field of AI in
personalized learning is growing rapidly and that there is a growing
body of research being published. The figure also shows that the
field is becoming increasingly diverse, with publications published
in a variety of journals from different countries. This suggests that
researchers from all over the world are interested in this field and
that there is a global interest in developing and implementing AI-
powered personalized learning solutions. Overall, the performance
analysis of annual scientific production in AI and personalized
learning is positive. The steady increase in the number of
publications in this area suggests that the field is growing rapidly
and that there is a growing body of research being published. The
increasing diversity of the field also suggests that AI in personalized
learning is a global priority. It is important to note that the data in
Figure 1 is based on a single database, Scopus. It is possible that
there are additional publications in this area that are not indexed in
Scopus. However, the overall trend of increasing scientific
production is likely to be similar across other databases.

11
 Figure 1:Annual Scientific Production

Articles
50

40

30

20

10

0
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Source: Author’s Compilation

4.2.2 Sources' Production over Time. Table 2 and Figure 2 show the
production of articles over time in the five sources that published the
most articles on AI and personalized learning from 2017 to 2023.
The data shows that all five sources have experienced an increase in
production over this period, with the largest increase seen in the
journal Sustainability (Switzerland). The Lecture notes in Computer
Science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence
and lecture notes in bioinformatics) series is the most productive
source, with 19 articles published in 2023. The ACM International
Conference proceeding series is the second most productive source,
with 10 articles published in 2023. The remaining three sources,
Sustainability (Switzerland), Communications in computer and
Information Science, and International Journal of artificial
intelligence in Education, all published 6 articles in 2023. The
analysis also shows that the sources are becoming more diverse over
time. In 2017, only two sources published articles on AI and
12
personalized learning. By 2023, five sources were publishing
articles on this topic. This suggests that the field is growing and
attracting attention from a wider range of researchers. The analysis
of sources' production over time in AI and personalized learning is
positive. The increase in production and the increasing diversity of
sources suggest that the field is growing and thriving.
Table 2: Sources' Production over Time
Lecture notes in
computer science
(including
subseries lecture Acm International
notes in artificial International Communications journal of
intelligence and Conference in computer and artificial
lecture notes in proceeding Sustainability information intelligence
Year bioinformatics) series (Switzerland) science in education

2017 0 4 1 0 0

2018 5 6 1 3 1
2019 9 6 1 3 2
2020 14 8 1 3 2
2021 16 9 1 5 4
2022 16 10 5 5 5

2023 19 10 9 6 6

Source: Author’s Compilation

13
 Figure 2: Sources' Production over Time

20

10

0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE (INCLUDING

SUBSERIES LECTURE NOTES IN ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE AND LECTURE NOTES IN
BIOINFORMATICS)
ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDING
SERIES

SUSTAINABILITY (SWITZERLAND)

Source: Author’s Compilation

4.3 Article citation and co-authorship analysis
4.3.1 Average Citations Per Year. Table 3 shows the average number
of citations per year for AI and personalized learning papers
published from 2017 to 2023. The average number of citations per
year has increased steadily over time, from 0.341429 in 2017 to
2.320000 in 2023. This suggests that the field of AI and personalized
learning is growing and attracting increasing attention from the
research community. The table also shows that the number of citable
years has decreased over time. This is because the data is only
current up to the year 2023. Papers published in 2023 have not had
as much time to be cited as papers published in previous years. The
increasing average number of citations per year for AI and
personalized learning papers suggests that the field is growing and
attracting increasing attention from the research community. This is
a positive development, as it suggests that there is a growing interest
in developing new AI-powered personalized learning solutions. The
14
decreasing number of citable years suggests that it is important to
interpret the average number of citations per year with caution.
Papers published in 2023 have not had as much time to be cited as
papers published in previous years. Therefore, it is likely that the
average number of citations per year for AI and personalized
learning papers will continue to increase in the future. Overall, the
analysis of average citations per year for AI and personalized
learning papers suggests that the field is growing and attracting
increasing attention from the research community. This is a positive
development, as it suggests that there is a growing interest in
developing new AI-powered personalized learning solutions.
Table 3: Average Citations Per Year
Year MeanTCperArt N MeanTCperYear Citable Years
2017 16.71 14.00 2.39 7
2018 12.33 21.00 2.06 6
2019 7.52 27.00 1.50 5
2020 11.52 23.00 2.88 4
2021 9.54 26.00 3.18 3
2022 6.78 32.00 3.39 2
2023 2.32 44.00 2.32 1

Source: Author’s Compilation

4.3.2 Co-authorship analysis. Figure 3 shows that the author has
collaborated with a variety of researchers from different institutions.
The author's most frequent collaborators are:
1. S. Kolosˇa (3 collaborations)
2. F. Flaška (3 collaborations)
3. P. Král (3 collaborations)
4. T. Arehun (2 collaborations)
5. J. Nedˇu (2 collaborations)
15
The author has also collaborated with researchers from institutions
in other countries, such as China, Brazil, and the United States. This
suggests that the author is engaged in international collaboration,
which is important for advancing research in the field. The author's
co-authorship network is also notable for its diversity. The author
has collaborated with researchers from different disciplines, such as
computer science, education, and business. This suggests that the
author is interested in interdisciplinary research, which is another
important trend in research.
The author has a strong collaborative relationship with S. Kolosˇa,
F. Flaška, and P. Král. These three researchers have collaborated
with the author on multiple projects, suggesting that they have a
close working relationship. The author has also collaborated with a
number of other researchers from different institutions and
disciplines. This suggests that the author is well-connected in the
research community and is interested in collaborating with a variety
of researchers. The author's co-authorship network is international,
with collaborators from China, Brazil, and the United States. This
suggests that the author is engaged in international collaboration and
is well-known in the international research community. The author's
co-authorship network suggests that the author is a well-connected
and interdisciplinary researcher who is engaged in international
collaboration. This is a positive sign, as it suggests that the author is
well-positioned to conduct high-quality research.

16
 Figure 3: Co-authorship network

Source: Author’s Compilation

5. Science mapping
5.1 Co-occurrence of keywords. The science mapping image of the
co-occurrence of keywords in the field of AI in education shows that
the field is highly interdisciplinary, with keywords from a variety of
disciplines, such as computer science, education, and psychology,
being frequently co-occurred. The following are some of the key
findings from the image: The most frequently co-occurring
keywords are "machine learning" and "artificial intelligence,"
suggesting that machine learning is one of the core technologies of
AI in education. Other frequently co-occurring keywords include
"educational technology," "learning analytics," "adaptive learning,"
and "personalized learning." This suggests that AI is being used to
develop a variety of new educational technologies and approaches
to teaching and learning. Figure 4 also shows that AI is being used
to address a variety of educational challenges, such as "student
engagement," "dropout prevention," and "assessment." Overall, the
image suggests that AI is a rapidly developing field with the
17
potential to revolutionize education. The image shows a number of
emerging trends in the field of AI in education, such as the use of AI
to develop personalized learning systems, to improve student
engagement, and to prevent dropout. The image also shows that AI
is being used to address a variety of educational challenges, such as
the need to improve assessment methods and to make education
more accessible to students with disabilities. The figure highlights
the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration in the field of AI in
education. Researchers from a variety of disciplines, including
computer science, education, and psychology, are working together
to develop new AI-powered educational technologies and
approaches to teaching and learning. Overall, the science mapping
image of the co-occurrence of keywords in the field of AI in
education provides a valuable overview of this rapidly developing
field. Figure 4 shows that AI is being used to develop a wide range
of new educational technologies and approaches to teaching and
learning and that it has the potential to address a variety of
educational challenges.
Figure 4: Co-occurrence of keywords

Source: Author’s Compilation

18
6. Conclusion Remarks and Future Directions
The bibliometric analysis conducted in this study provides a
comprehensive glimpse into the burgeoning field at the confluence
of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Personalized Learning in
education. The overarching theme of leveraging AI-driven
techniques to tailor and enrich the learning experience for each
student has emerged as a transformative force in the educational
landscape. Several key insights gleaned from this analysis
underscore the significance and dynamism of this field.
The research in AI-powered personalized learning has experienced
remarkable growth over recent years. The consistent annual increase
in the number of publications highlights the escalating interest and
investment in harnessing AI's capabilities to individualize
educational journeys. Moreover, the diverse sources from which
these research contributions originate signify the global and
multidisciplinary nature of AI in education. It is evident that scholars
and practitioners worldwide are actively engaged in collaborative
endeavours that transcend geographical boundaries and disciplinary
boundaries, reflecting a concerted effort to drive innovation in
personalized learning. Collaborative authorship and international
co-authorship rates are notable features of this field. These statistics
reveal that researchers are not only working together across
institutions but are also bridging international divides to collectively
advance knowledge and expertise in AI-powered personalized
learning. Furthermore, the increasing average citations per year for
papers in this domain are indicative of the growing recognition and
influence of this research within the academic community. This
suggests that the findings and innovations emerging from this field
are not only contributing to theoretical knowledge but also
influencing practical applications and pedagogical approaches.
Looking ahead, the field of AI in personalized learning is poised for
further development and refinement. To ensure that the promises of

19
personalized education are fully realized, several avenues for future
research and development are worth exploring. Ethical
considerations should take center stage, with research focusing on
the implications of AI-driven personalized learning systems in terms
of fairness, equity, and privacy. Striking a balance between
customization and ethical standards is paramount. User-centric
design principles must guide the creation of AI-powered tools and
platforms. Understanding and addressing the unique needs and
preferences of individual learners should remain a priority.
Assessment and evaluation frameworks require ongoing refinement
to accurately measure the impact of AI-driven personalized learning
on student outcomes and pedagogical effectiveness. Inclusive
education should be a central objective, with AI being harnessed to
ensure accessibility and tailored support for students with diverse
abilities and learning styles. Collaboration between educators and
students through AI tools should be explored further to create a
synergistic learning environment that maximizes the benefits of
personalized education. Longitudinal studies are essential to assess
the long-term effects of AI-driven personalized learning on student
academic performance and holistic development. The development
of policies and regulations in collaboration with educational
institutions is critical to ensure responsible and ethical AI
implementation in education. The fusion of AI and Personalized
Learning holds immense promise for reshaping education. Future
research and development efforts should continue to propel this field
forward, addressing emerging challenges and ensuring equitable
access to the benefits of AI-driven personalized education for all
learners.
References
Chen, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., & Xie, H. (2021). Artificial
intelligence-assisted personalized language learning: Systematic
review and co-citation analysis. Proceedings - IEEE 21st

20
International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies,
ICALT 2021. DOI: 10.1109/IEEEICALT53675.2021.9573460
Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2022). Two
Decades of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Contributors,
Collaborations, Research Topics, Challenges, and Future Directions.
Educational Technology and Society. DOI:
10.2307/jeductechsoci.25.3.138
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher
education: The state of the field. International Journal of
Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 22.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Dai, K., Qiu, Y., & Zhang, R. (2021). The Construction of Learning
Diagnosis and Resources Recommendation System Based on
Knowledge Graph. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International
Conference on Progress in Informatics and Computing, PIC 2021.
DOI: 10.1109/PIC49888.2021.9596471
Deininger, H., Lavelle-Hill, R., Parrisius, C., Pieronczyk, I., Colling,
L., Meurers, D., Trautwein, U., Nagengast, B., & Kasneci, G.
(2023). Can You Solve This on the First Try? – Understanding
Exercise Field Performance in an Intelligent Tutoring System.
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture
Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in
Bioinformatics). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-82405-1_15
Ghnemat, R., Shaout, A., & Al-Sowi, A. M. (2022). Higher
Education Transformation for Artificial Intelligence Revolution:
Transformation Framework. International Journal of Emerging
Technologies in Learning. DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v17i21.23579
Glaser, N. (2023). Exploring the Potential of ChatGPT as an
Educational Technology: An Emerging Technology Report.
Technology, Knowledge and Learning. DOI: 10.1007/s10758-023-
09530-2

21
Hamal, O., El Faddouli, N.-E., Alaoui Harouni, M. H., & Lu, J.
(2022). Artificial Intelligent in Education. Sustainability
(Switzerland). DOI: 10.3390/su14249361
Huang, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., Chen, X., & Xie, H. (2023). Trends,
Research Issues and Applications of Artificial Intelligence in
Language Education. Educational Technology and Society. DOI:
10.2307/jeductechsoci.26.1.8
iting Time in Adaptive Learning from Educational Data.
Communications in Computer and Information Science. DOI:
10.1007/978-3-030-77620-1_9
Jing, Y., Zhao, L., Zhu, K., Wang, H., Wang, C., & Xia, Q. (2023).
Research Landscape of Adaptive Learning in Education: A
Bibliometric Study on Research Publications from 2000 to 2022.
Sustainability (Switzerland). DOI: 10.3390/su14042039
Katsarou, E., Wild, F., Sougari, A.-M., & Chatzipanagiotou, P.
(2023). A Systematic Review of Voice-based Intelligent Virtual
Agents in EFL Education. International Journal of Emerging
Technologies in Learning. DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v18i06.24497
Kim, S., Kim, J., Hyung, W., Shin, S., Choi, M. J., Kim, D. H., &
Im, C. (2023). Characteristic Behaviors of Elementary Students in a
Low Attention State During Online Learning Identified Using
Electroencephalography. IEEE Transactions on Learning
Technologies. DOI: 10.1109/TLT.2023.3078380
Kulshreshtha, D., Shayan, M., Belfer, R., Reddy, S., Serban, I. V., &
Kochmar, E. (2022). Few-Shot Question Generation for
Personalized Feedback in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Frontiers in
Artificial Intelligence and Applications. DOI: 10.3233/FAIA220114
Lampropoulos, G. (2023). Augmented Reality and Artificial
Intelligence in Education: Toward Immersive Intelligent Tutoring
Systems. Springer Series on Cultural Computing. DOI:
10.1007/978-3-030-27166-3_8
22
Lei, G. (2023). Influence of ASSURE model in enhancing
educational technology. Interactive Learning Environments. DOI:
10.1080/10494820.2023.2186542
Li, Z., Shi, L., Zhou, Y., & Wang, J. (2023). Towards Student
Behaviour Simulation: A Decision Transformer Based Approach.
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture
Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in
Bioinformatics).
Machado, M. O. C., Bravo, N. F. S., Martins, A. F., Bernardino, H.
S., Barrere, E., & Souza, J. F. (2021). Metaheuristic-based adaptive
curriculum sequencing approaches: a systematic review and
mapping of the literature. Artificial Intelligence Review. DOI:
10.1007/s10462-021-09840-9
Morel, G. M., & Spector, J. M. (2022). Foundations of educational
technology: Integrative approaches and interdisciplinary
perspectives. Foundations of Educational Technology: Integrative
Approaches and Interdisciplinary Perspectives.
Ni, Q., Wei, T., Zhao, J., He, L., & Zheng, C. (2023). HHSKT: A
learner–question interactions based heterogeneous graph neural
network model for knowledge tracing. Expert Systems with
Applications. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.118820
Pishtari, G., Ley, T., Khalil, M., Kasepalu, R., & Tuvi, I. (2023).
Model-Based Learning Analytics for a Partnership of Teachers and
Intelligent Systems: A Bibliometric Systematic Review. Education
Sciences. DOI: 10.3390/educsci11020058
RTA-CSIT 2021 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference
on Recent Trends and Applications in Computer Science and
Information Technology (2021). CEUR Workshop Proceedings.
DOI: 10.51640/rta-csit-2021
Shin, D. (2022). Teaching Mathematics Integrating Intelligent
Tutoring Systems: Investigating Prospective Teachers’ Concerns
23
 and TPACK. International Journal of Science and Mathematics
Education. DOI: 10.1007/s10763-022-10283-x
Singh, N., Gunjan, V. K., Mishra, A. K., Mishra, R. K., & Nawaz,
N. (2022). SeisTutor: A Custom-Tailored Intelligent Tutoring
System and Sustainable Education. Sustainability (Switzerland).
DOI: 10.3390/su14041994
Tato, A., & Nkambou, R. (2022). Infusing Expert Knowledge Into a
Deep Neural Network Using Attention Mechanism for Personalized
Learning Environments. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. DOI:
10.3389/frai.2022.650547
Wu, T., & Ling, Q. (2023). Fusing hybrid attentive network with
self-supervised dual-channel heterogeneous graph for knowledge
tracing. Expert Systems with Applications. DOI:
10.1016/j.eswa.2023.118801
Xu, S. (2022). Effective Graph Mining for Educational Data Mining
and Interest Recommendation. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics.
DOI: 10.1155/2022/8644291
Yan, Q., Shuang, Q., & Zhenyuan, C. (2021). Application and
Analysis of Computer Data Mining Technology in Intelligent
Teaching System for Urban Residents. Proceedings - 2021
International Symposium on Advances in Informatics, Electronics
and Education, ISAIEE 2021. DOI:
10.1109/ISAIEE53606.2021.9676665
Zeng, F., Xu, L., Zhou, Y., Zhou, Y., & Liao, J. (2022). Review of
knowledge tracing model for intelligent education. Journal of
Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology. DOI:
10.3389/fict.2022.800225
***

24

View publication stats