LAN6271 Assignment 2 Sample
LAN6271 Assignment 2 Sample
Contents
Rationale ……………………………………….……………………..………………….…………………….……………………..….. 3
Appendix 1 ………………………….…………………….………………………………………..…………...……..….……..…….. 15
Appendix 2 ………………………….…………………….………………………………………..…………...……..….……..……. 16
Reflection ………….………………………….…………….…………….………….………………………..…….……….…..…..… 17
References ………….………………………….…………….………………..….………………………..…….…..…………….….. 19
3
Rationale
This rationale justifies the development of two lesson plans tailored to a specific group of adult
learners. The learners, aged 18-20, are enrolled in an English course to prepare them for university
studies. They need to attain a level of B1 to enter their chosen courses. Their current level of written
and spoken English is at the pre-intermediate level (A2), and they all speak Vietnamese as their first
language. Although they are not English majors, many of the students want to study overseas in an
English-speaking country, such as Australia. They get along well with their classmates and are very
respectful towards their teachers. They are used to traditional teaching methods, but they are open
to different approaches. They have the typical second language learning capacities and cognitive
Although this group of learners are familiar with traditional teaching methods, I have chosen to use
the Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach, specifically Task-Based Language Teaching
effectively in real-life situations (Brown & Lee, 2015). It encourages students to use the target
language through meaningful and authentic activities, rather than focusing solely on grammar rules.
The teacher acts as a facilitator, and the students take on collaborative roles (Brown & Lee, 2015).
Within the CLT framework is TBLT, where learners complete purposeful, goal-oriented tasks that
reflect how the language is used in real life (Brown & Lee, 2015; Ellis, 2003). Although there are
various versions of TBLT, they all centre around the same premise: there is a communicative
problem that needs to be solved. Ellis (2006) proposes a TBLT framework using three phases: pre-
task, main task and post-task. I have chosen Ellis’ TBLT approach to plan two lessons for this group of
Vietnamese A2 learners, as it will be a motivating and engaging structure for them. The students are
open to approaches that differ from traditional teaching methods, and TBLT is suitable because it
focuses on real-world language use through authentic activities, supports learner engagement and
4
motivation, improves fluency and encourages learner autonomy and agency. These aspects are
Pre-Task Phase
This group of learners share a common goal of achieving a B1 proficiency level in English, and many
want to study in an English-speaking country. Lessons need to be motivating for adult learners
because motivation helps them stay engaged and continue learning (Dornyei & Ushioda, 2013).
Studies also show that students at lower proficiency levels, much like these A2 learners, are more
likely to succeed at greater levels when they are motivated to learn the language (Hasannejad et. al.,
2017). The three-part structure of the TBLT approach helps to improve motivation. Both lessons
follow the same lesson structure, with a pre-task, main-task and post-task phase. The pre-task phase
prepares learners for the task by providing them with the necessary knowledge of vocabulary and
language required to complete it (Motlagh et. al., 2014). In the pre-task for both lessons, learners
are presented with the necessary vocabulary and phrases needed to perform the task. They are
presented with planning materials that serve as guidelines for carrying out the task. Students are
also able to watch the teacher model the task. By providing students with a well-organised pre-task,
their motivation to engage in the main task is likely to be greatly increased (Motlagh et. al., 2014).
Adult learners need chances to collaborate because interaction helps them make meaning and
improve their language skills (Long, 1996; Mudinillah et. al., 2024). Group work also creates more
opportunities for meaningful communication than teacher-led activities (Ellis, 2003). Therefore, it is
imperative that these adult learners have opportunities to collaborate with their peers in pairs or
groups. During the main task of both lessons, students are encouraged to work in pairs or small
groups to achieve the main task. According to Long’s Interaction Hypothesis (1996), language
learning happens when learners engage in conversations that require them to negotiate meaning.
5
This negotiation means asking questions or clarifying ideas. These moments help draw attention to
gaps in their language and push them to try out new forms (Ellis, 2003; Long, 1996). Swain (2005)
adds that producing language in response to others also supports learning, as it encourages learners
to reflect on how they express their ideas. Collaborative tasks also provide greater opportunities to
speak, which is crucial for adult learners who need more time and confidence to use English (Ellis,
2003). The pair and group work used in both lessons give the learners real reasons to use English
TBLT engages adult learners with meaningful tasks that reflect authentic language use needed in
academic, professional, or everyday settings (Ellis, 2003; Van den Branden, 2006). When learners are
engaged in tasks that are relevant to their real-world experiences, they are likely to be motivated to
participate and interact (Mudinillah et. al., 2024). Both lessons are centred on real-world scenarios.
In Lesson One, students are tasked with creating a university club and persuading their peers to join.
This is both authentic and relevant, as these learners all share a common goal of attending
university, where they will likely need to meet new people and make new friends. As young adults,
learners will also likely need to plan upcoming holidays, study trips, or work trips. The practical and
useful nature of Lesson Two's Airbnb task allows learners to feel confident in taking learning risks
without concern for making mistakes, which helps to improve language learning (Ismail et al., 2023).
Nunan (2004) points out that tasks should be carefully designed to be both meaningful and
achievable, allowing learners to be challenged without feeling overwhelmed. Research also shows
that when learners take part in tasks based on real-life communication, they are more engaged and
better able to retain and apply the language they have learned (Mudinillah et al., 2024; Oura, 2001).
By using real-world scenarios, both lessons help learners see the tasks as achievable, which can
TBLT supports the development of fluency and communicative competence by encouraging learners
to use English in natural, meaningful ways. Ellis (2003) explains that language instruction should
reflect the communicative demands learners will face outside the classroom, and that task-based
learning helps achieve this by focusing on real-world, purposeful communication. In both lessons,
students use language to solve problems and complete authentic tasks, whether that’s designing a
university club during Lesson One or choosing an Airbnb stay during Lesson Two. These activities
give learners real reasons to speak, listen, and respond, which builds their confidence and fluency
over time. Long (2015) found that learners in TBLT programs outperformed those in traditional
classrooms when it came to communicative competence, mainly because tasks simulate the kinds of
interactions that happen in daily life. In addition, engaging in collaborative tasks gives students
frequent opportunities to negotiate meaning, which supports both fluency and accuracy (Long,
1996; Long, 2015; Swain, 2005). By using English to express personal opinions, ask questions, and
make decisions, learners develop their ability to use language flexibly and effectively in real-life
situations.
TBLT creates a learner-centred environment in which students are encouraged to take ownership of
their learning (Nunan, 2004; Willis & Willis, 2007). Teachers need to give learners control over their
learning by allowing them to choose content, make decisions and express personal opinions. When
they do, learners can enact agency, which aligns with an adult’s need for independence (Leaver &
Willis, 2004). The main tasks in both lessons allow students to make their own choices based on
personal opinions. During Lesson One, students design a university club based on their personal
interests. During Lesson Two, students choose their favourite Airbnb stay based on their personal
preferences. During the post-task in both lessons, students reflect on their learning through class
discussions. At the end of Lesson One, students vote on their favourite club. Both lessons are
7
learner-centred, where learners are actively involved in their planning, decision-making, and
reflection. Because students can see how their ideas are directly used in the task, this sense of
autonomy also increases motivation (Nunan, 2004). By taking responsibility for their choices and
reflecting on their learning, students are more engaged and active in the process (Mudinillah et. al.,
2024). This autonomy supports deeper learning and helps students develop their language skills,
along with their confidence, critical thinking, and teamwork abilities (Willis & Willis, 2007).
Conclusion
Overall, TBLT offers a clear and purposeful approach to help A2-level adult learners develop their
English communication skills. It supports fluency, motivation, and learner agency through
meaningful, real-world tasks that are relevant to their lives and future goals. The pre-task, task and
post-task structure allows for opportunities for choice and collaboration, which helps these learners
feel more confident using English in practical ways. The two lessons I’ve designed aim to help these
A2 adult learners practise language in meaningful contexts while building their confidence and
independence.
Lesson Plan 1
Level: A2 Adult Learners Skills: All four modes. The main modes are Duration: 60 minutes Approach: Task-Based Language Teaching
Speaking and Writing.
Aim: Sub Aims:
By the end of the lesson, students will be able to: • Develop vocabulary related to university clubs
• Persuade others to join a new university club • Design a university club that includes a name, purpose, activities and rules
• Work collaboratively to plan and organise a persuasive speech
• Deliver a short persuasive speech to an audience
• Listen actively and respond to peers’ speeches
Resources: Assessment:
• Interactive whiteboard (IWB) • Assessment will be based on whether each group is able to persuade their
• Join our university club! handout – one for the teacher to display peers to join their club
and one for each student • Handouts will be collected at the end of the lesson
• Teacher will actively monitor groups during the main task phase and make
notes on students’ ability to communicate for the purpose of the task
• Teacher will also make notes on how proficient each group is in using
English to communicate
5 mins Introduce Task and Model Key Vocabulary Learners may not understand
• Explain the task: “You and your friends are new to university. You decide to create a club. Your the idea of a “club” at university
club is new, and you need to persuade others to join!” → Show the images on the
• Distribute the Join our University Club! Handout handout and explain further
• Teach key vocabulary: club, activity, meeting, join, new students, members, rules with examples. “A study club is
• Teach key persuasive phrases: Its fun! Everyone is welcome! It’s free! a group that meets to help each
other study”
5 mins Teacher Models Task
• Model how to fill in the club plan on the Join our university club! handout:
- Club Name: Movie Club
- Purpose: Watch movies and talk about them
- Activities: Movie nights, film quiz nights
- Meeting time: Every Friday at 4pm
- Rules: Be respectful, try to speak English
• Model how to present a persuasive speech to the class, persuading them to join the club:
“Our new movie clubs is fun and it’s free! You should join because you can watch new movies
and make new friends. You must come!”
Main 25 mins Main Task Students may feel hesitant to
Task • Students form small groups (3-4 per group) speak in their group, or there is
• Each group completes the club plan on the Join our university club! handout uneven group participation →
- Choose a club name, purpose, activities, day/time to meet and simple rules Assign rotating roles in each
• Students prepare a short persuasive pitch to present their club to the class group such as note taker,
• Walk around the room and monitor each group, making sure that they are on task speaker, idea giver and
• Ask prompting questions to elicit information from students: questioner. Encourage the
- “Why did you choose this name?” quieter students by directing
- “What activities will you do?” questions to them
- “Why should people join your club?”
• Support language using sentence stems: Students may struggle to
- “Join our club because ________.” generate their own ideas →
Encourage them to choose a
- “You will enjoy _____________.”
club based on one of the
- “It’s a great way to _____________.” pictures on the handout
10
Lesson Plan 2
Level: A2 Adult Learners Skills: All four modes. The main mode is Reading Duration: 60 minutes Approach: Task-Based Language Teaching
Aim: Sub Aims:
By the end of the lesson, students will be able to: • Develop vocabulary related to accommodation and amenities
• Explain and justify their favourite Airbnb stay in Perth • Select five AirBNB features based on personal preferences
• Use skimming and scanning digital texts for specific information
• Work collaboratively with a partner to choose a favourite
Airbnb stay based on shared preferences
• Present and justify the favourite Airbnb stay to peers
Resources: Assessment:
Teacher needs: • Assessment will be based on whether each pair is able to
• Interactive whiteboard with WIFI choose an AirBNB stay and describe it to their peers
Each student needs their own: • Handouts will be collected at the end of the lesson
• Electronic device • Teacher will actively monitor pairs during the main task phase
• Access to WIFI and make notes on students’ ability to communicate for the
• Where will I stay? handout purpose of the task
• Teacher will also make notes on how proficient each pair is in
using English to communicate
• Model to students how to how to use the website to find stays for Perth, on the given date,
for two adults for three nights.
• Model how to set the filters so that you only see stays based on price and chosen features
• Model how to open a listing, and skim and scan the listing to see if it checks off all your
chosen features. Model again with a different listing.
• Model how to write down your favourite stay and explain your choice on the Where will I
stay handout
• Model how to present your favourite Airbnb stay and explain why you chose it
• Model to students how you might explain your favourite stay. Example – “We like this place
the best because it has ______________. This is important to us because ____________.”
Main 25 mins Main Task Students may feel hesitant to
Task • Students write down their preferred features on to the Where will I stay Handout. Explain to speak in pairs → Offer
students that features means any amenities that are important for their stay. sentence stems and write
• Place students with a partner these on the board. For
• Have students collaboratively decide on their five most important features and write them example: “I think it is
into their table important that an AirBNB has
• Allow students this time to work with their partner to search for Airbnb stays that suit their _______. Do you agree?”
chosen features Teacher can also assign
• Walk around the room and monitor each partner, making sure that they are on task rotating roles so that one
• Ask questions to elicit information from students: person is the speaker, and the
• Why did you choose this AirBNB stay? other is the note-taker
• What do you like about this AirBNB stay?
• Is this one better than the other stay? Learners may struggle to use
effective scanning and reading
• What is important to you when you stay in an AirBNB?
strategies → Pair stronger
readers with lower-level
learners. Encourage students
to choose and compare the
first three listings, rather than
scrolling through many. If
most students are struggling,
encourage students to only
14
Appendix 1
rules It’s fun! It’s free! Everyone is welcome! You must join because
__________.
Appendix 2
Your Task: You and a university friend are planning a three-night holiday in Perth for the following
dates: December 12, 2025, to December 15, 2025. The main purpose of your trip is to visit Edith
Cowan University and explore the city, as you want to study there in the future. You have a budget of
$750 to spend on an Airbnb stay. You need to decide which features and amenities are most
important to you. You and your partner need to choose your favourite stay and explain your choice to
the class.
It is close to ____. It has ________. There is/There The price is ____ per
are_____. night.
References
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language
pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2013). Teaching and researching motivation (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2006). The methodology of task-based teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 19–45.
https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/main-editions-new/the-methodology-of-task-based-
teaching/
Freepik. (n.d.). Images used under license from Freepik [Illustrations]. Retrieved May 11, 2025, from
https://www.freepik.com
Hasannejad, M. R., Zoghi, M., & Asl, H. D. (2017). Motivation, tasks, attitudes: The influence of
motivational pre-task strategies on task performance and task engagement. The Journal of
Language Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 113–128.
https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/619281
Ismail, S. M., Wang, C., & Jamalyar, R. (2023). The impact of task-based instruction on learners’
reading comprehension, L2 grit, anxiety, and motivation for L2 reading. Asian-Pacific Journal
of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8(1), 42.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00216-2
Leaver, B. L., & Willis, J. R. (Eds.). (2004). Task-based instruction in foreign language education:
Practices and programs. Georgetown University Press.
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W.
Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic
Press.
Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley Blackwell.
Motlagh, F. A., Jafari, A. S., & Yazdani, Z. (2014). A general overview of task-based language
teaching (TBLT), from theory to practice. International Journal of Language and
Linguistics, 2(5-1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.s.2014020501.11
Mudinillah, A., Rahmi, S. N., & Taro, N. (2024). Task-based language teaching: A systematic review of
research and applications. Lingeduca: Journal of Language and Education Studies, 3(2), 102
115. https://doi.org/10.70177/lingeduca.v3i2.1352
Oura, G. K. (2001). Authentic task-based materials: Bringing the real world into the classroom.
Sophia Junior College Faculty Bulletin, 21, 65–84.
https://www.jrc.sophia.ac.jp/pdf/research/bulletin/ki21/gaio.pdf
18
Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of
research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483). Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates. https://doi-org.ezproxy.ecu.edu.au/10.4324/9781410612700
Van den Branden, K. (Ed.). (2006). Task-based language education: From theory to practice.
Cambridge University Press.
Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford University Press.