Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

Scribd
Upload
12 views2 pages

Untitled Document

The provided code implements a recursive function to calculate x raised to the power n, handling edge cases such as n being zero or negative. It specifically addresses the issue of INT_MIN by adjusting n to INT_MAX and compensating for one additional multiplication, although this approach is not entirely correct. The document also highlights potential integer overflow and precision issues related to handling INT_MIN and floating-point operations.

Uploaded by

swarup
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
12 views2 pages

Untitled Document

The provided code implements a recursive function to calculate x raised to the power n, handling edge cases such as n being zero or negative. It specifically addresses the issue of INT_MIN by adjusting n to INT_MAX and compensating for one additional multiplication, although this approach is not entirely correct. The document also highlights potential integer overflow and precision issues related to handling INT_MIN and floating-point operations.

Uploaded by

swarup
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

class Solution {

public:
double myPow(double x, int n) {
if (n == 0) {
return 1;
}

if (n < 0) {
x = 1 / x;
// Handle INT_MIN explicitly
if (n == INT_MIN) {
n = INT_MAX;
x *= x; // Compensate for one additional
multiplication
} else {
n = -n;
}
}

double half = myPow(x, n / 2);

if (n % 2 == 0) {
return half * half;
} else {
return x * half * half;
}
}
};

/*
Explanation:
1. **Handling Edge Case for `INT_MIN`**:
- When `n` is `INT_MIN`, negating it directly causes overflow. To
handle this, the function adjusts `n` to `INT_MAX` and multiplies `x`
by itself once.

2. **Recursive Approach**:
- If `n` is 0, return 1 (base case).
- If `n` is negative, invert `x` and adjust `n`.
- Calculate `half` as `myPow(x, n / 2)`.
- If `n` is even, return `half * half`.
- If `n` is odd, return `x * half * half`.
Test Cases:
1. `myPow(2.0, 10)` => 1024.0
2. `myPow(2.0, -2)` => 0.25
3. `myPow(2.0, INT_MIN)` => Very small number (close to 0).
4. `myPow(1.0, INT_MIN)` => 1.0
*/

The code provided for the myPow function is generally correct in terms of implementation,
except for a few edge cases and issues related to handling of INT_MIN. Here's a detailed
explanation:

Issues:

1. Integer Overflow for INT_MIN:

○ When n is INT_MIN, negating it (-n) causes an integer overflow because the


range of signed integers in C++ is [-2^31, 2^31 - 1]. Therefore, -n cannot
be represented in a 32-bit signed integer.

2. Incorrect Adjustment for INT_MIN:

○ Your current approach attempts to handle INT_MIN by assigning n = INT_MAX


and multiplying x by itself. This is not sufficient or correct, as n should actually be
handled as INT_MIN + 1.

3. Precision Issues:

○ Operations involving floating-point numbers (like x *= x) can lead to precision


errors. This isn't a major issue but is worth noting.

You might also like