Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
114 views3 pages

r2001 HW2 Solution

The document presents solutions to various problems related to risk management and utility functions for risk-averse investors. It includes evaluations of utility functions, expected utilities of different investment choices, and calculations of certainty equivalents and risk premiums for gambles. The document also discusses the decision-making process for investments and insurance based on expected utility theory.

Uploaded by

ke ke
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
114 views3 pages

r2001 HW2 Solution

The document presents solutions to various problems related to risk management and utility functions for risk-averse investors. It includes evaluations of utility functions, expected utilities of different investment choices, and calculations of certainty equivalents and risk premiums for gambles. The document also discusses the decision-making process for investments and insurance based on expected utility theory.

Uploaded by

ke ke
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Department of Statistics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong

RMSC 2001 Introduction to Risk Management (Term 2, 2023-24)

Solution to Assignment 2

1. Which of the following utility functions are valid for modelling the preference of a risk-averse investor for

w ≥ 0? (a) U (w) = w2 ; (b) U (w) = w−2 and (c) U (w) = w.

Solution:
We check their derivatives:

(a) As U ′ (w) = 2w and U ′′ (w) = 2 > 0, we know that the investor is risk seeking.
(b) As U ′ (w) = −2w−3 < 0, it is not a valid utility function.
(c) As U ′ (w) = 12 w−1/2 and U ′′ (w) = − 14 w−3/2 < 0, we know that the investor is risk averse.

2. A person with utility function U (w) = 1 − e−0.05w , where w ≥ 0 is offered $20 against the gamble $30
with the probability (0.5 + p), $15 with the probability (0.5 − p). Find the smallest value of p at or above
which the game is an attractive one.

Solution:
To make the game an attractive one, we need a larger expected utility for the gamble, which gives us

(0.5 + p)(1 − e−0.05×30 ) + (0.5 − p)(1 − e−0.05×15 ) ≥ 1 − e−0.05×20 .

We get p ≥ −0.08.

3. Suppose that you are a ventured capitalist and you are considering two possible investment alternatives for
the coming year. The first alternative is to buy Treasury bills, which will give you a wealth of $ M for sure.
The second alternative has three possible outcomes. They will produce wealth levels $10, $5, and $1 with

corresponding probabilities 0.2, 0.4, and 0.4 respectively. Your utility function for money is U (x) = 2 x.

a. Evaluate the expected utility for these two choices.


b. Which choice would you prefer if M = 6?
c. Find the value of M so that the expected utility of these two choices are the same. How do you interpret
this result?
d. Find the second derivative of U . Is U concave or convex?
e. What can you say about your attitude toward risk for this U ?

Solution:


(a) The expected utility of the first choice is E(U (W )) = 2 M , and of the second is
√ √ √
E(U (W )) = 2 10 × 0.2 + 2 5 × 0.4 + 2 1 × 0.4 ≈ 3.8538.

(b) If M = 6, then 2 M = 4.8990 > 3.8538, so the first choice is more preferrable.

1

(c) Let 2 M = 3.8538, we get M = 3.71. So one will be indifferent to the two choices if M = 3.71.
Notice that M is the certainty of equivalence.
(d) U ′ (x) = x−1/2 and U ′′ (x) = − 12 x−3/2 < 0 for x > 0. Hence U (x) is concave.
(e) I am a risk-adverse person.

4. Assume an initial wealth of $100, 000 and a 5% probability of incurring a $10, 000 loss. Given a natural
logarithm utility function and the fact that the insurance company charges at 5.1% of the insured amount.
How much insurance will the individual buys so that he can maximize his expected utility?

Solution:
Suppose the individual buys an insurance of amount x, then the expected utilitywill be

E {U (W (x))} = 0.05 × log(100, 000 − 10, 000 + x − 0.051x) + 0.95 × log(100, 000 − 0.051x).

To find the maximum of {U (W (x))} as a function of x, we take the derivative with respect to it and set to
0, we get
0.05 × (1 − 0.051) 0.95 × (−0.051)
= .
90, 000 + (1 − 0.051)x 100, 000 + (−0.051)x
Hence, x = 7944.38.

5. Suppose you have to pay $2 to play a gamble. You earn $19 with probability 1/3 and nothing with probability
2/3. Your current wealth is $10 and your utility function is U (x) = log(x), x > 0. What is the certainty
equivalence of this gamble? What is risk premium? Should you play the gamble or not?
Solution:
By the definition of certainty equivalence, we can compute the expected utility of this gamble as

1 2
E[u(G)] = × log 27 + × log 8 = log 12
3 3
To find find the certainty equivalence C by solving the equality

u(C) = log C = E[u(G)] = log 12 =⇒ C = 12

Moreover the expected value of the gamble can be easily computed 31 × 27 + 23 × 8 = 3 ,


43
and the risk
premium is given by E(G) − C = 43 3 − 12 = 3 . Therefore, we should play the gamble.
7

6. Suppose that Misato’s is an expected utility maximiser, with the utility function U (w) = log(w), for w > 0
(use natural log).

i. What is Misato’s certainty equivalent of the following lottery:

Probability Money
0.4 30
0.5 100
0.1 500

ii. What is the risk premium Misato is willing to pay to insure against this uncertain prospect?

2
iii. Suppose that Misato has $1,200,000 in wealth, and decides to open a stationery shop called Penpen.
She finds a tract of land for sale for $1,000,000, which will produce no return at all if she cannot get
the business licence from the Toyko-3 council, or will yield $10,000,000 of income (net of operating
expenses but not of the cost of the land) if the stationer can be successfully opened. Let p ∈ [0, 1] be the
probability that she can get the business licence. Specify the two lotteries that result from the actions,
“open the stationer” and “not open the stationer”. What probability p of getting the approval would
make Misato exactly indifferent between opening the shop and not opening it?

Solution:

(a) The expected utility is

E(W ) = log(30) × 0.4 + log(100) × 0.5 + log(500) × 0.1 = 4.2845.

Hence, Misato’s CE can be found from log(CE) = 4.2845, so CE = 72.57.


(b) The expected return is E(W ) = 30 × 0.4 + 100 × 0.5 + 500 × 0.1 = 112. So the risk premiuum
is 112 − 72.57 = 39.43.
(c) Lottery 1 - Open the stationer: G1 := G1 (10200000, 200000 : p).
Lottery 2 - Not open the stationer: G2 := G2 (1200000 : 1).
The expected utilities are:

E(U (G1 )) = log(10, 200, 000) × p + log(200, 000) × (1 − p) = log(200, 000) + p log(51),

and
E(U (G2 )) = log(1, 200, 000).
If Misato is indifferent to the two options, then

log(200, 000) + p log(51) = log(1, 200, 000).

Solve for p = log(6)/ log(51) = 0.4557.

You might also like