Teacher Education: Current Models
Author: Moinul Islam
Master of Arts in Applied Linguistic And ELT
Department of English
Jagannath University, Dhaka
I. Introduction
The landscape of teacher education is undergoing significant transformation, driven by evolving
societal demands, technological advancements, and persistent global challenges. As education
systems worldwide strive to equip learners for an uncertain future, the imperative to effectively
prepare and support teachers has become paramount. This report provides an expert-level
analysis of current teacher education models, examining their foundational structures,
pedagogical approaches, assessment methodologies, and the strengths, weaknesses, and
challenges inherent in each. By synthesizing academic literature and international case studies,
this analysis aims to offer a comprehensive understanding of the diverse pathways into the
teaching profession and the cross-cutting themes shaping their evolution.
The purpose of this report is to delineate the characteristics of contemporary teacher education
models, including traditional, concurrent, consecutive, alternative, and apprenticeship programs.
It seeks to identify the theoretical underpinnings, curriculum structures, and assessment
practices unique to each model, while also exploring their comparative effectiveness,
advantages, and limitations. Furthermore, the report will highlight emerging trends and
innovations that are collectively reshaping teacher preparation globally. The intended audience
includes policymakers, educational leaders, researchers, and practitioners seeking a robust,
non-specialist source of international comparative trends in education. The report maintains a
formal, academic, objective, analytical, and authoritative tone, consistent with a deep
engagement with educational policy and curriculum development.
II. Global Frameworks and Driving Forces in Teacher
Education
The preparation of teachers is increasingly influenced by international standards and global
trends, underscoring the interconnectedness of educational practices worldwide. Organizations
such as the OECD and UNESCO actively contribute to shaping the discourse around teacher
professionalism and development. The OECD's "Teaching Compass," for instance, provides a
visionary framework to reimagine teaching as a proactive, purpose-driven, and future-ready
force, built on pillars of teacher agency, competencies, and well-being. Similarly, the UNESCO
Global Teacher Campus (GTC) offers free online courses to enhance teachers' skills and
competencies, aiming to address the urgent global need for 44 million primary and secondary
teachers by 2030, particularly in regions like Sub-Saharan Africa.
International frameworks, such as the "Global Framework of Professional Teaching Standards"
outlined by the Teacher Task Force, emphasize that teacher professionalism is non-negotiable,
akin to the rigorous standards expected of other professions like surgery. These frameworks aim
to clarify and specify teaching standards to enhance equitable and quality education for all. The
Eaquals Framework for Language Teacher Training & Development further exemplifies this by
setting out key professional competencies in knowledge and skills across different development
phases, promoting self-assessment and continuous professional development.
Global challenges, including geopolitical tensions and crises, underscore the role of education in
fostering resilience among learners and providing a sense of security. This necessitates that
teacher education systems anticipate disruptions and think strategically about the future,
leveraging futures thinking to navigate complex global challenges. The interconnectedness of
educational practices highlights the importance of cross-cultural understanding in shaping
contemporary teacher education. Pooling scientific expertise and financial resources through
international cooperation can enable swifter and more effective responses to global crises, while
also consolidating social progress on human rights, equality, and non-discrimination by setting
global norms and standards. This global perspective on teacher education emphasizes the
diverse and multifaceted nature of educational systems worldwide, highlighting the need for
contextually relevant approaches to teacher preparation and professional development.
III. Traditional University-Based Teacher Preparation
Models
Definition and Historical Context
Traditional teacher preparation typically involves an aspiring educator enrolling in an
undergraduate program at a college or university, culminating in a bachelor's degree in
education. Many of these programs also offer the option to pursue a master's degree in
education. The curriculum in these programs generally includes liberal arts courses to build
broad content knowledge, specialized content knowledge for secondary candidates,
professional education courses, and a culminating student teaching experience. For graduate
teacher candidates, the path typically focuses on professional coursework and student teaching.
Historically, this model evolved from the "Normal School Model" of the mid-19th century, which
involved a two-year course of study. This progressed to the "Undergraduate Model" in the early
20th century, requiring four years of study for a bachelor's degree with a prescribed education
curriculum. A more recent modification is the "5-Year Credential Model" or "Postgraduate
Model," where candidates first obtain a bachelor's degree and then complete a fifth year of
instruction focused on teaching. This model is mandatory for all new teachers in California,
reflecting a belief that a post-bachelor's degree elevates the teaching profession.
Admission standards for these programs can vary significantly. While approximately a quarter of
elementary teacher-preparation programs may require a 3.0-grade point average, nearly
two-thirds have lower GPA requirements, and some do not consider applicants' academic
records at all. The historical trajectory of traditional teacher education models, from Normal
Schools to postgraduate degrees, reflects a continuous societal and academic endeavor to
professionalize teaching. This progression emphasizes a deeper integration of academic rigor
and specialized pedagogical knowledge, aiming to elevate teaching's status and effectiveness,
aligning it more closely with other esteemed professions.
Theoretical Foundations and Educational Philosophies
Traditional teacher education programs are grounded in theoretical foundations that integrate
scholarship into the practice of teaching, applying various conceptual frameworks, theories, and
models. Key terms in this context include "educate," derived from the Latin educere (to draw out
and develop), "pedagogy" (the art and science of education), and "andragogy" (the study of
adult learning).
Core pedagogical approaches that inform these programs include:
● Behaviorist Pedagogy: This approach forms the basis for traditional, teacher-centered,
lecture-style classroom learning, emphasizing memorization, repetition, and positive
reinforcement. It is often considered useful for subjects that rely on facts and formulas,
such as mathematics or grammar.
● Constructivist Pedagogy: In contrast, this approach is student-led, valuing learning
through firsthand experience and inquiry. It promotes group discussion and views the
teacher's role as creating a "hidden framework" that supports individualized, student-led
learning. This philosophy posits that knowledge is constructed by learners themselves,
building upon their existing understanding.
● Social Constructivist Pedagogy: A hybrid approach, social constructivism utilizes group
work with teacher guidance, emphasizing that learning develops through social interaction
and language use. Interactions with teachers and peers challenge students to reflect on
their current understanding and form new ideas, facilitating deeper learning.
Further theoretical underpinnings include instructional scaffolding, where temporary support is
gradually decreased as learners gain independence, and critical thinking and reflection,
promoted through activities like reflective journaling and case studies. William Purkey's
invitational theory, based on human value, responsibility, and capability, with pillars of respect,
trust, optimism, and intentionality, also informs educational relationships. Boyer's forms of
scholarship—discovery, integration, application, and teaching—underscore the intellectual rigor
expected of educators, elevating teaching beyond a mere function to a scholarly enterprise.
The integration of diverse educational philosophies, from behaviorist to constructivist and social
constructivist approaches, within traditional teacher education programs highlights an underlying
commitment to preparing adaptable educators capable of applying varied pedagogical
strategies. This multidisciplinary theoretical grounding aims to foster teachers who are not only
skilled practitioners but also reflective scholars, capable of contributing to the evolving
knowledge base of the profession. This broad theoretical base ensures that teachers are
equipped to navigate complex and varied learning environments, adapting their methods to suit
diverse student needs and subject matter.
Curriculum Structure and Pedagogical Approaches
The curriculum in traditional teacher preparation programs blends theory and practice, with
specific content varying based on program design and state requirements. For undergraduate
candidates, the pathway typically encompasses liberal arts courses to ensure broad content
knowledge, specialized content knowledge for those pursuing secondary education,
professional education courses, and a culminating student teaching experience. Graduate
candidates usually focus on professional coursework and the student teaching component.
Student teaching is a critical, full-time, and typically unpaid experience, often spanning a full
semester or even a year. During this period, candidates teach and manage a classroom under
the supervision of an experienced mentor or "cooperating" teacher. Some states, like Maryland,
have introduced stipends for student teachers to mitigate the financial burden and make the
profession more attractive.
The core curriculum of traditional teacher education models aims to bridge theoretical
knowledge with practical application, primarily through this extensive student teaching.
However, the often-unpaid nature of this critical practical component introduces significant
financial barriers, which can limit access to the profession for diverse candidates. This financial
constraint potentially impacts the diversity of the teaching workforce, creating a systemic
challenge in ensuring equitable access to high-quality preparation.
Assessment Methods and Practices
Upon program completion, candidates in traditional routes must pass licensure tests to obtain
certification and enter the classroom. Assessment practices within these programs are diverse,
encompassing written exams, projects, presentations, observations, and portfolios. Both
formative and summative assessments are extensively utilized. Formative assessments, such
as quizzes, classroom discussions, and ongoing feedback, are employed during instruction to
monitor student progress and allow for timely instructional adjustments, which is deemed critical
for promoting student success. Summative assessments, including tests, exams, and projects,
serve an evaluative function, typically at the end of a unit or term, to measure mastery of a
subject.
Teacher candidates are expected to develop assessment literacy, which includes the ability to
measure student performance, analyze assessment data, and make informed instructional
decisions. To ensure minimum standards for licensure, programs often require candidates to
pass standardized licensure exams (e.g., PRAXIS) or complete portfolio assessments (e.g.,
edTPA). While licensure exams are predictive of teacher effectiveness, portfolio assessments
are noted for providing formative feedback and a more realistic evaluation of teaching ability.
However, the edTPA, for instance, can be costly and has been identified as a potential barrier
for candidates of color.
Traditional teacher education programs employ a range of assessment methods, from traditional
tests to authentic performance-based tasks and high-stakes licensure exams. While these aim
to ensure teacher quality and accountability, the financial burden and potential demographic
biases associated with some standardized certification assessments (e.g., edTPA) present a
significant equity challenge. This can potentially limit the diversity of the teaching pipeline,
despite efforts to foster comprehensive teacher competence.
Strengths and Weaknesses
Traditional university-based teacher preparation models offer several notable strengths. They
provide a structured and disciplined learning environment, emphasizing foundational knowledge
in core subjects like mathematics, science, and languages, which builds a solid academic base.
The close interaction between students and teachers fosters strong mentorship and
personalized guidance. These programs have a proven track record of producing successful
individuals and often integrate extracurricular activities, contributing to overall development.
They offer ample opportunities for hands-on learning and guided supervision, particularly during
the culminating student teaching experience.
Despite these advantages, traditional models also face significant weaknesses. They often
exhibit limited adaptability to individual learning needs, frequently adopting a "one-size-fits-all"
approach that may not cater to diverse learning styles. There can be an overemphasis on
memorization, which may stifle creativity and critical thinking, and a slower adoption of
technological integration compared to modern demands. The pressure to perform well in exams
and adhere to rigid curricula can create a stressful learning environment, and the focus on
theoretical knowledge sometimes leads to a lack of real-world applications. Furthermore, these
programs are generally high in cost, including tuition, campus fees, commuting, and housing,
and their rigid class schedules may not be suitable for working professionals or those with family
responsibilities.
The analysis indicates that while traditional university-based teacher education models offer a
structured environment and strong foundational knowledge, their inherent rigidity, high costs,
and slower adaptation to technological advancements and diverse learning needs represent
significant weaknesses. This suggests a critical need for these programs to evolve by
integrating greater flexibility, leveraging technology more effectively, and exploring innovative
financial models to remain competitive and relevant in preparing teachers for contemporary
educational challenges. Finding a balance between maintaining their proven benefits and
addressing modern demands is crucial for their continued efficacy.
International Case Studies
Teacher education systems globally, including those following traditional models, are
experiencing a phenomenon referred to as "Europeanisation," where national and European
policies influence their development, albeit at varying speeds across countries. However,
despite this trend, there are no consistent, consolidated standards across European countries,
with national decisions continuing to govern legal frameworks for teacher education. Key trends
in European teacher education include the introduction of a three-cycle model—comprising a
degree, professional preparation, and a supported induction period—and a drive to recruit more
qualified teachers through diverse routes.
In France, initial teacher education is primarily provided by university-based "Instituts nationaux
supérieurs du professorat et de l’éducation" (INSPE), following a consecutive model.
Candidates typically complete a bachelor's degree in their chosen discipline, followed by a
Master's degree (MEEF) specialized in teaching, education, and training. This master's program
includes preparation for competitive entrance examinations, such as the CRPE for primary
education and CAPES for secondary education. Practical training is a significant component,
with placements starting from the first year of the Master's program and leading to work-linked
courses in the second year. The MEEF curriculum emphasizes learning through and with digital
technology, the use of innovative methods and tools, international exposure, and research.
In Germany, the traditional structure of teacher education involves two distinct phases. The first
phase is academically oriented, focusing on the acquisition of subject knowledge and
corresponding subject didactics. The second phase, which typically lasts between 1.5 and 2
years, is more practical and school-based, organized by specialized teacher training seminars
and training schools under the supervision of the Ministry of Education.
The observation of these diverse national implementations, even within a broader
"Europeanisation" trend, highlights that the effectiveness of teacher education models is deeply
rooted in national cultural, political, and historical contexts. While a trend towards
"Europeanisation" in teacher education suggests a move towards shared standards and
frameworks, the persistence of diverse national models (e.g., France's INSPE-based
consecutive model, Germany's two-phase system) indicates that national contexts continue to
shape implementation. This highlights a critical balance between global aspirations for quality
and the necessity of contextually relevant approaches, implying that international cooperation
primarily serves to inform and inspire rather than dictate uniform adoption.
Here is a comparative overview of the major teacher education models discussed in this report:
Model Name Primary Focus Typical Key Typical Entry Main Output
Duration Components Requirements
Traditional Comprehensive 4-5 years Liberal arts, High school Bachelor's/Mas
University-Bas academic and (B.Ed. or subject-specific diploma, ter's Degree in
ed pedagogical B.A./B.S. + content, varying GPA Education,
preparation. M.Ed.) professional requirements. State
education Licensure/Certif
courses, ication.
extensive
student
teaching.
Concurrent Integrated 3-5 years (dual Simultaneous High school Dual Bachelor's
subject degree) pursuit of B.Ed. diploma, Degrees (e.g.,
expertise and and another competitive B.A. + B.Ed.),
pedagogical undergraduate GPA. Certification.
skills. degree;
integrated
coursework
and practicum.
Consecutive Pedagogical 1-2 years Focused Bachelor's Bachelor of
training after (post-baccalaur professional degree in a Education
disciplinary eate) education subject area. (B.Ed.) or
studies. coursework, Post-Graduate
intensive Certificate in
practicum. Education
(PGCE),
Certification.
Alternative Expedited Weeks to 2 Condensed Bachelor's Provisional/Full
Certification entry, practical years coursework, degree in any Certification.
skills, often "teacher field.
addressing of record"
shortages. status,
mentorship,
field
experience.
Teacher Earn-and-learn, 1-4 years Paid Varies (e.g., Certification,
Apprenticeshi on-the-job (varies) employment, high school often a
p training, structured diploma, Bachelor's
mentorship. on-the-job paraprofession Degree.
learning with al experience,
mentor, formal bachelor's
academic degree).
instruction,
competency-ba
Model Name Primary Focus Typical Key Typical Entry Main Output
Duration Components Requirements
sed
progression.
Table 1: Comparative Overview of Major Teacher Education Models
This table provides a concise, high-level comparative summary of the pros and cons of each
model. It makes it easy for the reader to quickly grasp the core differences and similarities
across models at a glance, which is crucial for a comprehensive overview. This visual aid
immediately orients the reader to the landscape of teacher education, serving as a quick
reference point throughout the report and reinforcing the distinctions discussed in subsequent
detailed sections.
IV. Concurrent Teacher Education Models
Definition and Characteristics: Integrated Subject and Pedagogical
Studies
Concurrent education programs are distinctive in their approach, allowing students to pursue
both a Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) degree and another undergraduate degree simultaneously.
This integrated structure means that disciplinary studies (subject content) and pedagogical
studies (knowledge about teaching) are interwoven and taught concurrently throughout the
program. Students in these programs gain both specialized subject expertise, such as in
mathematics or English, and the necessary pedagogical skills to become effective teachers.
The duration of these programs typically ranges from 3 to 4 years, combining a subject-specific
focus with pedagogical training. Some programs, like Queen's Concurrent Education in Canada,
extend to 5 years plus an additional summer term, designed to prepare secondary school
graduates for certification. The defining characteristic of these programs is the integration of
content and pedagogy from day one, which aims to provide a more holistic understanding of
teaching. This integrated learning is seen as advantageous for directly linking theoretical
knowledge with practical classroom application. However, this early integration necessitates a
firm career decision from students, who often enter directly from high school. This can be a
drawback if their career interests evolve, highlighting a trade-off between integrated learning
and career flexibility.
Theoretical Underpinnings and Program Design
The concurrent model allows for the practicum, or practical teaching experience, to be
distributed over a more extended period. This extended engagement is believed to enhance the
integration among disciplinary content, educational theory, research, and classroom practice.
This approach fosters a more cohesive learning experience and a prolonged period of
socialization into the teaching profession. A significant advantage of concurrent study programs
is the integrity achieved between discipline-specific studies and educology (the study of
education), promoting a predominantly interdisciplinary and cooperative view of teaching and
learning.
The extended and integrated design of the concurrent model, particularly its prolonged
practicum, facilitates a deeper and more gradual socialization into the teaching profession. This
fosters a holistic development of the teacher's personality, encompassing cognitive, social, and
moral domains , and a more robust integration of theory and practice. This comprehensive
approach, in contrast to accelerated pathways, potentially leads to more resilient and adaptable
educators, as they develop a deeper understanding of the profession's complexities over time
within a supportive, integrated learning environment.
Curriculum and Pedagogical Approaches
The curriculum in concurrent education models includes a balanced mix of education courses
and subject-specific classes. Students typically select their teaching divisions (e.g.,
Primary-Junior for early grades or Intermediate-Senior for middle and high school) early in the
program. A key feature is the inclusion of experiential placements in non-classroom settings,
such as early learning centers or museums, during the initial years, alongside traditional
in-school practicum. The final year often involves extensive practicum, ranging from 15 to 18
weeks, and may include a 3-week alternative practicum that can even be completed
internationally.
Pedagogical approaches within concurrent instruction are designed to be flexible and adaptive,
often including strategies for teaching virtual and in-person learners simultaneously or in
different class periods. This involves collectively establishing classroom norms, developing
differentiated group plans, and effectively utilizing online platforms for student engagement.
Broader pedagogical methods emphasized include inquiry-based learning, project-based
learning, problem-based learning, experiential learning, and entrepreneurial learning. These
approaches focus on developing critical thinking, fostering collaboration, and applying
knowledge to real-world situations.
The curriculum in concurrent teacher education models extends beyond traditional coursework
to embrace diverse experiential learning opportunities and modern pedagogical approaches like
inquiry-based and collaborative learning. This forward-looking design, including the integration
of strategies for concurrent virtual and in-person instruction, indicates a proactive effort to
prepare educators who are adaptable, innovative, and capable of navigating the complexities of
contemporary, technologically-enhanced classrooms. This multi-faceted curriculum aims to
produce teachers who are not only theoretically grounded and subject-matter experts but also
practically adept and innovative in their teaching methods.
Assessment Methods, including Practicum Evaluation
Assessment within concurrent teacher education programs, particularly for practicum
experiences, is structured around three interconnected aspects: ongoing feedback, formative
assessment, and summative evaluation. The overarching goal of this assessment framework is
to enhance student learning and development. Various tools are employed to provide feedback,
including informal debriefings, structured lesson feedback forms, reflective journals or
notebooks, rubrics, and written comments on lesson plans.
Formative assessments, often administered as checklists at the midpoint of a practicum block,
play a crucial role in identifying teacher candidates who may be "at-risk" of not meeting
expectations, allowing for timely support interventions. Summative evaluations, typically
conducted at the end of the practicum, provide a final appraisal (e.g., Pass or Fail) and detailed
descriptive evidence of the candidate's practice teaching performance, which is valuable for
future employment applications. A key concept underpinning these assessments is "assessment
literacy," which encompasses a teacher's ability to plan and implement appropriate assessment
tasks, and to effectively use assessment results for communication and instructional
improvement.
The assessment methodologies within concurrent teacher education, particularly for practicum,
are characterized by a continuous, feedback-driven approach encompassing ongoing feedback,
formative assessment, and summative evaluation. This emphasis on iterative development and
early identification of "at-risk" candidates underscores a pedagogical philosophy centered on
continuous improvement and the cultivation of reflective practitioners, thereby enhancing the
overall quality and adaptability of aspiring teachers. This feedback-rich environment is crucial for
models where candidates are learning both content and pedagogy simultaneously over an
extended period, allowing for continuous refinement of teaching skills.
Strengths and Weaknesses
Concurrent teacher education programs offer several distinct strengths. They enable
specialization in a specific subject area alongside teaching qualifications, which can enhance a
graduate's competitiveness in the job market. Students gain valuable hands-on teaching
experience through integrated practicum placements and may become eligible for additional
certifications. These programs are lauded for fostering a better integration of academic and
professional studies, allowing for the refinement of professional interests and early exposure to
the practical problems of teaching, thereby effectively linking theory and practice. Furthermore,
for students who are certain about a teaching career, the concurrent route can alleviate the
stress associated with applying for a B.Ed. later in their academic journey.
However, the model also presents weaknesses. It necessitates an early career decision from
students, which may not be ideal for less mature individuals or those who are unsure about
pursuing teaching as a long-term profession. Some critics suggest that these programs might
include "unnecessary undergraduate courses" that could be perceived as a "money grab,"
potentially diverting students from a deeper focus on their primary academic discipline.
Balancing multiple areas of study simultaneously can also be academically challenging for
students.
A central tension in concurrent teacher education lies between its strength in fostering early
subject specialization and integrated practical experience, and the inherent weakness of
demanding a significant career commitment from students at a relatively young age. While this
model enhances market competitiveness, it risks deterring or misplacing individuals who may
discover their passion for teaching later or prefer broader academic exploration, thereby
highlighting a need for greater career guidance and flexible entry/exit points.
Challenges: Faculty Expertise, Funding, Curriculum Coherence
Concurrent teacher education models face several challenges, particularly concerning faculty
expertise, funding, and curriculum coherence.
● Faculty Expertise: A critical challenge lies in ensuring the quality of courses, especially
when high school instructors are involved in dual enrollment programs that feed into
concurrent pathways. This concern often revolves around instructor qualifications, such
as possessing a master's degree in the content area. The concept of dual certification
itself can raise questions about the nature of teacher expertise. Furthermore, faculty
members may face barriers to pedagogical change, including a lack of training, insufficient
time, and inadequate incentives.
● Funding: Financial constraints are a pervasive challenge. Student-borne costs can be
substantial, and there are broader issues of insufficient funding for professional
development. Teachers sometimes resort to paying for their own classroom materials,
creating a financial divide that impacts students from less affluent backgrounds.
● Curriculum Coherence: Concerns exist regarding the overall quality of coursework and
the transferability of credits. There is a recognized lack of comprehensive information on
what constitutes a truly successful curriculum for initial teacher education. Programs also
grapple with effectively balancing "learn that" statements (informed by research) with
"learn how to" statements (practice-based skills), ensuring a coherent and integrated
learning experience.
Despite their integrated design, concurrent teacher education models face significant challenges
in ensuring consistent quality and curriculum coherence, particularly concerning faculty
expertise and adequate funding. The need for highly qualified instructors across both academic
and practical domains, coupled with financial constraints impacting professional development
and resources, can undermine the intended benefits of integrated learning. This emphasizes the
necessity of robust quality assurance and sustained investment to realize the model's full
potential and prevent resource limitations or inconsistent quality from compromising its promise.
Case Studies (e.g., Canada)
Canadian concurrent education programs offer compelling case studies of this model's
implementation. Queen's University provides a 5-year plus one summer term program that
leads to both an honours undergraduate degree and a Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.). Students
choose between Primary-Junior (Kindergarten to Grade 6) or Intermediate-Senior (Grades 7-12)
teaching divisions. The program integrates education courses from the early years, alongside
experiential placements in non-classroom settings. The final year includes an extensive
18-week practicum, notably featuring a 3-week alternative practicum that can be completed
anywhere in the world. Queen's also offers specialized concentrations and program tracks, such
as Indigenous Teacher Education, International Education, STEM, and Social Justice, allowing
for tailored professional development.
Lakehead University in Canada also offers a Concurrent Education program designed to
accelerate entry into the teaching profession by enabling students to earn two degrees
simultaneously. This program emphasizes practical learning through various placements,
practicums, community engagement, and international opportunities, aiming to fully prepare
graduates for the workforce. Lakehead further provides accelerated program options, allowing
students to complete a 4-year undergraduate degree and a 2-year B.Ed. in just 5 years.
Canadian concurrent education programs exemplify an adaptation to globalized and diverse
educational needs through features like international practicum opportunities and specialized
program tracks (e.g., Indigenous Teacher Education, STEM). This indicates a strategic effort to
cultivate culturally competent and specialized educators, enhancing their global marketability
and responsiveness to varied societal demands, thereby reflecting a broader trend towards
more nuanced teacher preparation. These examples demonstrate the model's capacity to
produce well-rounded educators who are not only academically strong but also globally aware
and equipped for diverse teaching contexts.
V. Consecutive Teacher Education Models
Definition and Characteristics: Sequential Disciplinary and
Pedagogical Studies
The consecutive model of teacher education is characterized by its sequential structure, where
pedagogical studies are undertaken after the completion of disciplinary academic studies. In this
approach, learners are exposed to particular content about teaching in a distinct phase,
following their prior university education. Candidates typically enter these programs already
holding a university degree in relevant arts, science, or social science disciplines. This structure
often attracts graduates who possess more prior experience and expertise in their subject
areas.
The training period for teaching in the consecutive track is generally shorter compared to
concurrent models. For instance, Queen's Consecutive Education program is completed in four
successive terms, typically from May to August of the following year, which allows graduates to
enter the job market earlier than many other programs. This model is a strategic response to the
need for teachers with strong content knowledge, particularly in areas facing shortages. Its
accelerated nature helps to bring qualified individuals into the workforce more quickly. However,
the condensed pedagogical training period may raise questions about the depth of practical
preparation compared to models with more extended practicum experiences, suggesting a
trade-off between speed-to-market and comprehensive professional socialization.
Theoretical Underpinnings and Program Rationale
Both concurrent and consecutive models share the fundamental aim of equipping pre-service
teachers with both specific disciplinary content and the pedagogical knowledge and skills
required to teach that content effectively. A central debate in teacher education revolves around
how to attract new candidates into the profession while ensuring that their preparation is not
inadequate due to insufficient integration of academic and professional studies. The consecutive
approach is rooted in the philosophy that a strong foundation in high-end academic disciplinary
knowledge is paramount.
The theoretical underpinning of consecutive teacher education models prioritizes the acquisition
of high-end academic disciplinary knowledge before pedagogical training, aiming to produce
content-rich educators. However, this sequential structure inherently poses a challenge in
effectively integrating theoretical pedagogy with practical classroom application, leading to
ongoing debates about the "theory-practice gap" and the potential for insufficient professional
socialization within a condensed timeframe. This model implicitly prioritizes content mastery,
potentially assuming that strong subject knowledge can compensate for a more condensed
pedagogical training. However, the persistent "theory-practice gap" means that even highly
knowledgeable graduates may struggle without sufficient practical application and reflection
opportunities, necessitating intensive, high-quality clinical experiences within these shorter
programs to ensure pedagogical competence.
Curriculum and Pedagogical Approaches
The curriculum for consecutive teacher education programs typically includes focused
professional coursework complemented by a significant student teaching experience. Students
in these programs often have the opportunity to specialize their degree by choosing
concentrations (e.g., Arts and Learning, Educational Technology, Exceptional Learners, Social
Justice) or specific program tracks (e.g., Indigenous Teacher Education Program, Outdoor &
Experiential Education, Technological Education).
Practicum placements are a substantial component, with programs like Queen's requiring 21
weeks of placements, including both regular in-school experiences and an alternative practicum
that can be completed outside a traditional school setting, even internationally. Pedagogical
approaches integrated into these curricula may include place-based education, which advocates
for using local cultural, economic, and ecological phenomena as meaningful contexts for
interdisciplinary learning. Experiential learning is also emphasized, encouraging hands-on
activities and reflection to foster a deeper connection between theory and practice.
Consecutive teacher education models, despite their condensed pedagogical phase, are
increasingly incorporating specialized concentrations and contextually relevant pedagogical
approaches like place-based and experiential learning. This strategic curricular design aims to
equip content-expert teachers with the capacity to connect subject matter to students' diverse
realities and specific community needs, thereby enhancing their practical relevance and
adaptability in varied educational settings. This focus on specialization and contextual learning
indicates a recognition that effective teaching demands the ability to link content to students'
lived experiences and diverse needs.
Assessment Methods, including Practicum Evaluation
Assessment in consecutive teacher education models is designed to evaluate student learning,
inform educational policy, and ultimately improve student success. A variety of methods are
employed, including written exams, projects, presentations, observations, and portfolios. Both
formative and summative assessments are utilized, with formative assessments being
particularly crucial for providing ongoing feedback and enabling timely instructional adjustments
during a lesson or unit of study.
During practicum, assessments involve detailed observation, collaborative co-planning, and
co-teaching of lessons. Reflection is a key component, with students engaging in discussions
with "critical friends" and faculty conducting personal visits to schools to provide feedback and
support. This emphasis on reflective practice and direct application during practicum is vital for
consecutive models to compensate for their condensed pedagogical phase. It suggests that
while the initial academic foundation is strong, the programs rely heavily on intensive, guided
practical experiences and continuous feedback to ensure pedagogical competence. The quality
of mentorship and structured reflection becomes even more critical in this model, as it is
essential for bridging the theory-practice gap within a shorter training period.
Strengths and Weaknesses
The primary strengths of consecutive teacher education models lie in their ability to provide
stronger subject matter preparation, as candidates typically complete a full disciplinary degree
before specializing in pedagogy. This model offers flexible entry points into teacher education
and can readily accommodate changes in student interests and labor market conditions, making
it appealing for career changers. It also allows for the fast-tracking of undergraduate degrees,
potentially reducing the overall time to enter the profession. The opportunity to gain a solid
disciplinary background before committing to teaching provides individuals with more time to
decide if teaching is the right career path, and it often attracts graduates with more extensive
prior experience and expertise. Additionally, earning graduate hours through these programs
can lead to higher pay scales in many districts.
However, consecutive models also have notable weaknesses. They often result in a less
integrated learning experience between disciplinary studies and pedagogical studies, and a
shorter period of socialization into the teaching profession compared to concurrent models.
Debates surrounding proposed new patterns of teacher training frequently focus on
cost-effectiveness and speed of delivery, which can inadvertently marginalize the role of
professional educators in shaping program design. Furthermore, the financial burden of student
loans incurred to pursue higher education can deter some individuals from pursuing high-quality,
comprehensive pre-service preparation, as these programs may be perceived as more costly
than shorter, less rigorous alternatives.
The primary strength of consecutive teacher education models lies in their flexibility, ability to
attract experienced graduates, and expedited entry into the workforce, which effectively
addresses immediate teacher shortages. However, this efficiency often comes at the cost of a
less integrated learning experience between subject matter and pedagogy and a shorter period
of professional socialization, potentially impacting the depth of pedagogical skill development
and long-term teacher retention. The choice between concurrent and consecutive models often
involves a trade-off between the depth of pedagogical integration and the flexibility/speed of
entry.
Challenges: Funding, Faculty Expertise, Relevance to Evolving Needs
Consecutive teacher education models face significant challenges that impact their
effectiveness and sustainability.
● Funding: The high costs associated with credentialing and the burden of student loans
can disincentivize individuals from entering or remaining in the teaching profession.
Teachers' average salaries are often lower than those in comparable college-degree
careers, exacerbating the financial strain of loan repayments. While programs like TEACH
grants exist to recruit teachers into high-need fields, these grants may convert to loans if
service obligations are not met, adding further financial risk.
● Faculty Expertise: Research indicates a complex and often non-linear relationship
between a teacher's years of experience and their effectiveness, which challenges the
traditional reliance on observable characteristics like advanced degrees for salary levels.
Furthermore, faculty professional development in higher education institutions often
receives low priority, which can affect the quality of instruction within teacher preparation
programs.
● Relevance to Evolving Needs: The curriculum in teacher education often focuses more
on beliefs and theoretical knowledge than on the practical, day-to-day tasks of teaching.
There is a recognized need for fundamental renovations to curriculum to center it more
squarely on actual teaching practice. Challenges also include preparing teachers to
effectively manage classrooms, teach mandated curricula, and address the diverse needs
of students, including English learners, often with limited resources.
Consecutive teacher education models, while efficient for attracting subject-matter experts, are
significantly challenged by systemic issues including high student loan burdens and
comparatively low teacher compensation, which deter entry and retention. Furthermore, a
persistent gap in faculty expertise development and a curriculum that often prioritizes theoretical
knowledge over the practical "work of teaching" hinder the relevance and effectiveness of
preparation, collectively undermining the goal of cultivating a high-quality, adaptable teaching
workforce. These interconnected systemic barriers highlight that addressing teacher shortages
and improving quality requires comprehensive policy reforms that tackle compensation, invest in
continuous faculty professional development, and re-center curriculum on the practical demands
of teaching in complex, modern classrooms.
Case Studies (e.g., Israel, UK)
International case studies provide valuable insights into the implementation and effectiveness of
consecutive teacher education models. A study conducted in Israel comparing the effectiveness
of concurrent and consecutive initial teacher education programs found an advantage for the
consecutive model in most of the measures examined. This specific finding challenges
generalized assumptions about the universal superiority of any single model and underscores
the importance of contextual factors in determining program effectiveness.
In the United Kingdom, the Postgraduate Certificate in Education (PGCE) is a prominent
example of a consecutive teacher education program. Typically a one-year full-time or two-year
part-time program, the PGCE often leads to Qualified Teacher Status (QTS), which is essential
for teaching in the UK. The curriculum includes modules focused on developing teachers as
professionals, subject specialists, reflective practitioners, and research-informed educators. The
UK also features school-based teacher training models, where schools play a significant role in
partnership with higher education institutions in delivering initial teacher education.
Case studies, such as the Israeli finding of the consecutive model's advantage, highlight that the
effectiveness of teacher education models is highly context-dependent and not universally
generalizable. The UK's PGCE further demonstrates how a condensed consecutive program
can achieve comprehensive teacher development through focused modules and strong
school-based partnerships, underscoring that program design and contextual alignment are
more critical determinants of success than the mere structural classification of the model. These
examples illustrate that the success of a teacher education model is not solely determined by its
structural type but by the quality of its implementation, the specific design of its curriculum, and
its alignment with national and local educational contexts and needs.
VI. Alternative Teacher Certification Programs
Definition and Characteristics: Expedited and Flexible Pathways
Alternative teacher preparation programs offer pathways into the classroom that are typically
more affordable and faster than traditional university-based programs. A defining characteristic
of these programs is that candidates often serve as the "teacher of record"—meaning they are
responsible for their own classroom—while simultaneously completing their training and before
earning a full teaching license. These programs are not limited to a single type of provider; they
are operated by a diverse range of entities, including colleges and universities, nonprofit
organizations, school districts, and for-profit companies.
A significant demographic impact of alternative programs is their success in attracting a greater
proportion of teachers of color compared to traditional programs. However, the
comprehensiveness of training offered by these programs varies widely, ranging from those that
provide extensive training comparable to traditional programs to others with minimal standards
and requirements. The observation that alternative programs are "cheaper and faster" and
attract "significantly more teachers of color," yet vary "significantly" in training
comprehensiveness, reveals a critical tension. While effectively addressing teacher shortages
and enhancing diversity by offering expedited and more affordable pathways, this inherent
variability creates a challenge in ensuring consistent pedagogical excellence. This necessitates
robust quality assurance mechanisms to prevent negative impacts on student outcomes and
higher teacher attrition rates.
Theoretical Frameworks
Alternative teacher certification programs are designed with the explicit goal of transforming
individuals who possess strong content knowledge into effective classroom teachers. The
theoretical underpinnings guiding the design and evaluation of these programs often draw from
established models of teacher knowledge.
Shulman's Model of Teacher Knowledge Base (1987): This framework is foundational,
proposing seven categories of knowledge essential for teachers to promote student
comprehension. These include Content Knowledge (CK), Pedagogical Knowledge (PK),
Curricular Knowledge, and Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK). PCK is particularly
emphasized as the blending of content and pedagogy, representing how teachers transform
subject matter to make it comprehensible to diverse learners. It is considered a key differentiator
between a content specialist and a pedagogue. Shulman argued for the necessity of
sophisticated professional knowledge that extends beyond generic teaching behaviors.
Connelly and Clandinin's Theory of Personal Practical Knowledge (1988): This theory
posits that a teacher's personal experiences—rooted in their past, present practice, and future
intentions—contribute significantly to their teaching knowledge. This knowledge is constructed
through ongoing interactions with students, colleagues, and the broader school context, and is
best understood through narrative. A study exploring perceived teaching preparation in an
alternative certification program found that while alternatively certified teachers generally felt
prepared for the challenges of teaching, they reported being only marginally prepared for
specific areas like classroom management and building connections in urban school settings.
They demonstrated adequate PCK for fostering connections and CK for modeling lesson
content.
While alternative teacher certification programs are theoretically grounded in comprehensive
frameworks like Shulman’s knowledge bases and Connelly and Clandinin’s personal practical
knowledge, aiming to develop both content and experiential expertise, practical gaps persist.
Specifically, alternatively certified teachers often report feeling underprepared in critical areas
such as classroom management and instructional differentiation. This suggests that the
accelerated nature of these programs may not consistently translate theoretical knowledge into
robust practical competence across all essential domains, highlighting a challenge in fully
integrating all facets of teacher knowledge within a compressed timeframe.
Curriculum and Pedagogical Approaches
The curriculum in alternative teacher certification programs is designed to provide a holistic
understanding of teaching pedagogy, strategy, and practice, often with an accelerated pace. A
core characteristic is the emphasis on practical, in-classroom experience combined with
structured mentorship. Coursework typically covers professional education topics such as
assessment, teaching diverse learners, and the social and cultural contexts of education (e.g.,
race, class, gender in education), alongside curriculum development and instructional methods.
Field experiences and classroom observations are integral components, allowing candidates to
familiarize themselves with authentic learning environments.
Pedagogical approaches within these programs prioritize practical application and
responsiveness to diverse student needs. This includes developing culturally responsive lesson
activities, structuring lessons for varied student populations, and utilizing backward design for
lesson planning. Some programs offer highly specialized, job-specific instruction, such as for
aspiring math educators, combining virtual self-paced online classes with real-world practice.
The curriculum of alternative programs is explicitly designed to be practical and responsive to
immediate classroom needs, often emphasizing "real-world experience" and "tailored
instruction". The inclusion of courses on "Teaching Diverse Learners" and "Race, Class, Gender
in Education" reflects an awareness of the diverse student populations these teachers will
serve, aligning with the observation that these programs attract more teachers of color. This
practical and diversity-focused curriculum is a direct response to the urgent need for
classroom-ready teachers who can effectively serve varied student demographics.
Assessment Methods and Certification Processes
Assessment in alternative teacher certification programs is designed to evaluate a candidate's
readiness for the classroom and ensure they meet certification requirements. Programs typically
require candidates to pass state certification exams, such as TExES or edTPA. The overall
assessment aims to foster a holistic understanding of teaching pedagogy, strategy, and practice.
Assessment methods extend beyond traditional tests to include a range of alternative and
authentic approaches. These may involve professional presentations, demonstrations,
annotated bibliographies, peer- and self-review activities, e-portfolios, and group projects.
Authentic assessments, such as essays, exhibitions, experiments, interviews, journals, and
performance tasks, are widely used to allow students to demonstrate the meaningful application
of knowledge and skills in real-world scenarios. These methods are crucial for evaluating
practical readiness and the application of skills, rather than solely theoretical knowledge. The
emphasis on student reflection in these assessments further supports metacognitive
development.
Assessment methods in alternative teacher certification programs heavily emphasize authentic,
performance-based tasks and reflective practices, aiming to evaluate practical readiness and
the application of skills in real-world contexts. This approach is critical for validating the
competence of candidates entering the classroom rapidly, highlighting a strategic focus on
demonstrable teaching abilities over extensive theoretical preparation. However, its
effectiveness hinges on robust and consistent evaluation frameworks to ensure that these
varied assessments accurately reflect teaching effectiveness.
Strengths and Weaknesses
Alternative teacher certification programs offer significant strengths. They provide cheaper and
faster pathways into the classroom compared to traditional routes, making them accessible to a
broader range of individuals, including career changers. These programs have been particularly
successful in bringing in more teachers of color, contributing to a more diverse teaching
workforce. Many programs allow candidates to teach while completing their certification, often
through paid internships, which alleviates financial burdens. The prevalence of online options
provides flexible schedules and versatile learning environments, eliminating the need for
physical classrooms and reducing commuting costs. Their condensed courses contribute to a
quicker entry into the profession, directly addressing teacher shortages.
However, alternative programs also have notable weaknesses. Research indicates that
teachers who enter the profession through these routes tend to leave at higher rates than those
from traditional programs. Some studies suggest that teachers from online-only preparation
programs may negatively impact student achievement. There is a recognized lack of
consistency in the pathways offered and their influence on student outcomes. These programs
are sometimes perceived as academic and professional shortcuts, with varying amounts of
instructional hours (ranging from 75 to 795 hours). Additionally, alternatively certified teachers
may experience higher levels of stressors, such as violent incidents and classroom
management problems, and often report a lack of administrative support, excessive workload,
and insufficient opportunities for peer interaction, all of which contribute to attrition.
While alternative teacher certification programs excel in addressing immediate teacher
shortages and diversifying the workforce through efficient, cost-effective pathways, their
sustainability is undermined by higher teacher attrition rates. This is often linked to
inconsistencies in preparation (e.g., classroom management) and insufficient ongoing support,
highlighting a critical need for comprehensive induction programs and improved working
conditions to ensure these expedited routes lead to long-term, effective teaching careers. The
"earn and learn" model is appealing, but its long-term success requires robust support
structures.
Challenges: Quality Assurance, Funding, Teacher Retention
Alternative teacher certification programs face significant challenges that impact their overall
effectiveness and sustainability.
● Quality Assurance: A primary concern is the varying intensity and rigor of these
programs, with some having minimal requirements, which can lead to inconsistencies in
teacher preparation. Specifically, online-only programs have been linked to negative
impacts on student achievement. The lack of consistent pathways and their impact on
student outcomes remains a subject of ongoing debate and research.
● Funding: While alternative programs are often more affordable for individual candidates,
the broader funding landscape for teacher education remains a challenge, contributing to
overall teacher shortages.
● Teacher Retention: A critical challenge is the higher attrition rate among teachers who
enter through alternative routes. This can be attributed to various factors, including
exposure to violent incidents, difficulties with classroom management, a perceived lack of
administrative support, excessive workload, and insufficient opportunities for collegial
interaction, alongside issues like low salaries.
The efficacy and longevity of alternative teacher certification programs are significantly
hampered by persistent challenges in quality assurance and teacher retention. The rapid entry
often correlates with inadequate preparation in critical areas and insufficient ongoing support,
leading to higher attrition rates. This necessitates a systemic shift towards comprehensive
post-certification support, including targeted professional development and robust mentorship,
to ensure these teachers can thrive and remain in the profession long-term. Addressing these
challenges is crucial for the long-term viability and positive impact of alternative certification on
the teaching workforce.
Case Studies (e.g., USA, UK, Australia, Germany)
Alternative teacher certification programs are implemented in various forms across the globe,
reflecting diverse national and local needs.
In the USA, prominent examples include:
● Teach For America: This program recruits, trains, and places recent college graduates
and professionals, often in hard-to-staff urban and rural schools.
● Teachers of Tomorrow: A leading alternative certification program, it aims to streamline
the process of becoming a teacher, offering affordability, convenience, and engagement.
● Relay Graduate School of Education: This institution offers one-year alternative
certification programs designed to prepare novice teachers and career changers, often
with curriculum paralleling the first year of a Master of Arts in Teaching. Early pioneers in
the development of alternate route programs in the USA included California, New Jersey,
Texas, and Connecticut, often in response to calls for bringing subject matter experts into
teaching.
In the UK, alternative routes include:
● Postgraduate teaching apprenticeships: These programs offer a salary from the outset
and no tuition fees, providing a non-university route to Qualified Teacher Status (QTS).
● School-led training routes: These involve a mix of classroom teaching and practical
training, often supported by government bursaries.
● Teach First: This program recruits high-achieving graduates for an intensive five-week
summer course, followed by school placement with mentor and university tutor support.
In Australia, alternative pathways generally require a four-year undergraduate teaching degree
or a bachelor's degree combined with a one- or two-year postgraduate teaching qualification,
such as a Master of Teaching. Teach For Australia, for instance, partners with Australian
Catholic University (ACU) to deliver a Master of Teaching (Secondary), which includes intensive
training, school practicums, and mentor development for its "Associates".
Germany offers several alternative routes, including:
● "Lateral entry" (Quereinstieg): Specific regulations allow individuals to work as teachers
in "shortage subjects" even without a traditional teaching degree or full recognition of
foreign qualifications.
● "Bridge Programs": These programs are designed for foreign graduates to become
childhood educators, combining theoretical education at technical colleges with practical
work experience in early education or youth facilities. Other options include working at
private or international schools, or as supply teachers.
The global proliferation and diverse manifestations of alternative teacher certification programs
across countries like the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany underscore a widespread, adaptive
response to persistent teacher shortages. These varied models, from expedited certification to
postgraduate apprenticeships, demonstrate a shared imperative for flexible entry routes into the
profession, while simultaneously highlighting the necessity of contextualizing program design to
align with national regulatory frameworks and specific local workforce demands. The variations
highlight that while the core purpose (addressing shortages, increasing flexibility) is shared, the
implementation requires careful contextualization to align with national qualification frameworks
and address local needs.
VII. Teacher Apprenticeship Programs
Definition and Characteristics: Earn-and-Learn Models with
On-the-Job Training
Teacher apprenticeship programs represent a rapidly growing trend within alternative teacher
preparation pathways. These models are designed to allow individuals to train for a new career
in education with minimal to no personal cost, while simultaneously earning a paycheck. They
fundamentally combine structured on-the-job learning under the guidance of an experienced
mentor teacher with formal academic instruction.
A key feature of these programs is their ability to leverage federal funding streams. States can
register such programs with the U.S. Department of Labor, which opens up new avenues for
financial support to cover on-the-job training, wages, and other supportive services like
transportation, textbooks, or childcare. Many apprenticeship programs strategically target
specific populations, such as paraprofessionals who already possess years of education
experience but may lack a degree or teaching license, or even high school students interested
in a teaching career. Apprentices typically work alongside an experienced mentor teacher, who
serves as the teacher-of-record, for at least one full academic year.
Teacher apprenticeship programs represent a significant innovation in teacher preparation by
offering "earn-and-learn" pathways that directly address the financial barriers and opportunity
costs often associated with traditional routes. By providing paid, on-the-job training, these
models not only expand access to the profession, particularly for paraprofessionals and high
school students, but also strategically integrate new educators into school communities from the
outset, signaling a shift towards a more accessible and workforce-aligned approach to teacher
supply. This model effectively democratizes access to the profession and improves retention by
integrating new teachers into the school culture from day one.
Theoretical Basis: Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory
The design of teacher apprenticeship programs is often informed by Cognitive Apprenticeship
Theory. This educational theory emphasizes learning through guided experiences, focusing on
the development of both cognitive and metacognitive skills. The central aim of cognitive
apprenticeship is to make the expert's thinking processes visible to the learner, thereby enabling
them to observe, practice, and refine their skills in real-world contexts.
Key components of this theoretical framework, as applied in teacher education, include:
● Modeling: The expert teacher demonstrates a skill, often thinking aloud to reveal their
underlying thought processes, allowing apprentices to observe how an expert approaches
a task.
● Coaching: As apprentices begin to practice the skill, the mentor provides ongoing
monitoring and targeted feedback to guide their development.
● Scaffolding: Mentors provide temporary support that is gradually withdrawn as the
apprentice gains competence and independence.
● Articulation: Apprentices are encouraged to verbalize and reflect on their
problem-solving strategies, making their own cognitive processes explicit.
● Reflection: The program fosters a culture of self-assessment and critical thinking to
promote continuous growth.
● Exploration: Apprentices are encouraged to develop autonomy in problem-solving and
problem formulation, applying learned skills to novel situations.
The theoretical foundation of teacher apprenticeship programs in cognitive apprenticeship
theory signifies a sophisticated approach to practical learning, aiming to make the complex,
often "invisible" cognitive processes of expert teaching explicit through modeling, coaching, and
scaffolding. This deepens practical training beyond mere imitation, fostering reflective
practitioners capable of adaptable problem-solving and a profound understanding of
pedagogical decisions, thereby potentially leading to greater long-term effectiveness and
resilience in the profession. This approach directly addresses the "unnatural" and "invisible"
nature of teaching skills, aiming to cultivate highly adaptable problem-solvers rather than mere
technicians.
Curriculum and Practical Training Components
The curriculum of teacher apprenticeship programs is meticulously designed to integrate
extensive on-the-job learning with rigorous academic instruction. On-the-job learning constitutes
supervised clinical experience, encompassing various aspects of a teacher's role, such as
instructional planning, delivering lessons, working with students, communicating with parents,
and participating in professional development activities. Many programs require apprentices to
engage in at least one full academic year of side-by-side co-teaching and coaching under the
direct supervision of an experienced mentor teacher.
The formal academic instruction, or job-related technical instruction, provides the theoretical
foundation necessary for classroom practice. This coursework typically covers essential areas
such as educational psychology, curriculum development, instructional strategies, assessment
methods, and educational technology. The overall curriculum focuses on developing both
professional and pedagogical skills, ensuring a comprehensive preparation for the complexities
of the teaching profession.
The curriculum of teacher apprenticeship programs is characterized by a deep integration of
extensive on-the-job learning with formal academic instruction, heavily relying on sustained
mentorship and co-teaching. The efficacy of this immersive, practice-centered approach is
critically dependent on the quality and training of mentor teachers, suggesting that significant
investment in mentor development is paramount to fully realize the model's potential for
cultivating highly skilled and classroom-ready educators. This direct, immersive approach is a
key differentiator from traditional student teaching models, but its success hinges on the quality
of the mentor relationship.
Assessment Methods and Competency Benchmarks
Teacher apprenticeship programs typically adopt a four-year competency-based approach to
assessment, which measures a candidate's progress and readiness based on their
demonstrated mastery of specific skills, knowledge, and dispositions. These competencies span
various critical aspects of effective teaching, including subject matter expertise, instructional
strategies, classroom management, assessment methods, and professional dispositions.
Assessment methods within these programs are comprehensive and often performance-based.
They include clinical observation evaluations, where apprentices' teaching practices are directly
observed and assessed, as well as performance assessments that require candidates to
demonstrate their abilities in authentic teaching scenarios. Content knowledge assessments are
also integral. A notable feature is that most competencies are measured multiple times
throughout the program, ensuring thorough and consistent evaluation. Rubrics are widely used
to provide clear criteria for evaluation and feedback, ensuring transparency and consistency in
assessing apprentice performance.
Teacher apprenticeship programs employ a competency-based assessment framework that
prioritizes the demonstration of practical skills and professional dispositions through clinical
observations, performance assessments, and rubrics. This mastery-oriented approach, where
competencies are measured multiple times, directly aligns with the "learn-by-doing" philosophy,
ensuring that apprentices achieve demonstrable readiness for the classroom and shifting the
focus from mere credentialing to verified professional capability. This performance-based
system is well-suited for apprenticeship models as it validates the practical readiness of
teachers entering the classroom, providing clear benchmarks for development and
accountability for skill acquisition.
Strengths and Weaknesses
Teacher apprenticeship programs offer compelling strengths, particularly in addressing
persistent educator shortages, especially in high-need areas such as special education, STEM,
and bilingual instruction. These programs are highly effective at tapping into a pipeline of
nontraditional candidates, including paraprofessionals and other school-based staff, who often
already possess an understanding of school culture and student needs. By providing paid,
debt-free pathways to licensure and degrees, apprenticeships significantly promote equity in
access to the teaching profession, making it a more financially viable career option. Employers
also benefit from a high return on investment , and these models have demonstrated higher
retention rates among teaching apprentices compared to other alternative routes.
However, teacher apprenticeship programs also face weaknesses and limitations. A significant
concern arises when some states design their registered apprenticeship programs to allow
apprentices to serve as the "teacher of record" before fully completing their training and
certification requirements. Critics argue that this practice may risk poor student outcomes and
hinder the apprentices' long-term success. Furthermore, the sustainability and scalability of
these programs can be impacted by funding uncertainties. A notable example is the recent
termination of the Educator Registered Apprenticeship (ERA) Intermediary contract by the U.S.
Department of Labor, which was intended to provide centralized support and technical
assistance. This decision, while not halting the movement entirely, may slow centralized support
and highlights the vulnerability to changes in funding policies.
While teacher apprenticeship programs offer compelling strengths in addressing teacher
shortages, promoting equity, and improving retention through paid, on-the-job training, their
long-term viability and quality are vulnerable to policy debates (e.g., "teacher of record" status
before full licensure) and funding uncertainties. The recent termination of federal support,
despite strong state-level momentum, underscores the critical need for sustained, coherent
policy and financial commitment to prevent quality compromises and ensure the model's full
potential is realized.
Limitations and Relevance in Addressing Teacher Shortages
The primary limitations of teacher apprenticeship programs revolve around funding
uncertainties. The recent termination of significant federal contracts, such as the Educator
Registered Apprenticeship (ERA) Intermediary contract, highlights a vulnerability to changes in
funding streams, which can impact the centralized support and technical assistance available
for these programs. Despite this, the movement for teacher apprenticeship programs is
considered "far from halted," with strong momentum at state and local levels.
The relevance of these programs in addressing persistent educator shortages is exceptionally
high. They offer an innovative and effective on-the-job training model that allows school districts
to access a pipeline of nontraditional candidates, particularly paraprofessionals and other
school-based staff, who already possess an understanding of the school culture and student
needs. By providing paid, debt-free pathways to licensure and degrees, apprenticeships
simultaneously address critical workforce development needs and promote equity in access to
the teaching profession.
Despite their undeniable relevance in addressing critical teacher shortages, particularly in
high-need areas, the scalability and long-term sustainability of teacher apprenticeship programs
are significantly constrained by funding uncertainties and inconsistent policy support. The
termination of key federal contracts, even amidst strong local momentum, highlights that
systemic financial backing and coherent policy alignment are paramount for these innovative
models to achieve their full potential and avoid fragmentation. This implies that for teacher
apprenticeship programs to be a truly sustainable solution, they require long-term, stable
financial backing and clear policy alignment at all governmental levels.
Case Studies (e.g., USA, UK, Australia, Germany, Canada)
Teacher apprenticeship programs are being implemented and adapted across various countries,
showcasing a global commitment to addressing teacher shortages through innovative models.
In the USA, key examples include:
● Tennessee's Registered Apprenticeship program: This was the first state-approved
program by the Department of Labor in January 2022, pioneering the "grow-your-own"
pathway.
● Deer Park Independent School District (ISD): This district developed its own teacher
apprenticeship pipeline, pairing applicants with experienced mentors for hands-on
experience while completing degrees and certification.
● MathTrack Institute: Offers a specialized Transition to Teaching Program for aspiring
math educators, combining online classes with real-world practice.
● Berwick Academy's Teaching Apprentice Program: This M.Ed. program emphasizes
full-time teaching immersion alongside seasoned mentors, providing individualized
guidance and feedback.
● Broward College: Offers Bachelor of Science degrees in education fields (e.g., Middle
Grades Mathematics, Exceptional Student Education) with a required two-year
co-teaching residency alongside a mentor teacher.
In the UK, the Liverpool Hope University offers a BA (Hons) Primary 3-11 with Qualified
Teacher Status Degree Apprenticeship, integrating academic excellence with practical training.
The country also features a broader postgraduate teaching apprenticeship route, which is
tuition-free and provides a salary from the outset.
Australia has programs like the Head Start initiative, which supports students in years 10-12 to
participate in school-based apprenticeships and traineeships, combining senior secondary
education with paid part-time employment and off-the-job training. Teach For Australia also
includes mentor development and a Master of Teaching program for its participants.
Germany utilizes a "dual apprenticeship system" that combines work and school, a model with
deep historical roots in craft traditions. "Bridge Programs" are available for foreign graduates,
combining theoretical education at technical colleges with practical work experience in early
education or youth facilities. The country also offers "lateral entry" (Quereinstieg) options for
individuals to work as teachers in shortage subjects without a traditional teaching degree.
In Canada, while traditional apprenticeships typically focus on trades , some university
programs, like Queen's University's Technological Education program, offer a Bachelor of
Education (B.Ed.) option for individuals with relevant apprenticeship experience.
The global landscape of teacher apprenticeship programs showcases a remarkable diversity in
implementation, with each country adapting the core "earn-and-learn" model to its unique
educational, regulatory, and workforce contexts. This rich array of international case studies
provides invaluable opportunities for cross-cultural learning and the identification of best
practices, suggesting that the future evolution of these models will involve continued adaptation
and refinement based on shared global experiences. These diverse adaptations highlight
attempts to tailor the model to specific national/local educational structures, workforce needs,
and regulatory environments.
VIII. Cross-Cutting Themes and Emerging Innovations
Beyond the distinct models of teacher preparation, several cross-cutting themes and emerging
innovations are fundamentally reshaping the landscape of teacher education globally. These
trends influence curriculum design, pedagogical approaches, and the overall professional
development continuum for educators.
Technology Integration
Technology is increasingly integral to modern education, transforming how teachers are
prepared and how they, in turn, teach.
● Online and Blended Learning: These modalities offer significant benefits, including
increased access to education for students in remote or underserved areas, greater
flexibility and autonomy for learners, and personalized learning experiences facilitated by
data and analytics. However, challenges persist, such as ensuring equitable access to
technology for all students, maintaining the quality and rigor of online programs, and
providing adequate support for students who may struggle in these environments.
Blended learning, which combines in-person instruction with web-enhanced learning,
encompasses various models like station rotation, lab rotation, individual rotation, flipped
classroom, and flex models, each integrating technology directly into the teaching method
and curriculum.
● Digital Pedagogy: The integration of technology in classrooms has led to the widespread
use of educational software, interactive presentations, and multimedia resources,
improving student engagement and achievement. Technology enables teachers to
personalize learning, facilitate collaboration, and provide instant feedback, allowing
students to learn at their own pace and in flexible environments.
● AI/VR in Teacher Education: There is an anticipated expanding role for artificial
intelligence (AI) and virtual reality (VR) in education. AI tutors, for example, can create
personalized learning experiences for students, thereby freeing up class time for more
collaborative and active learning activities.
Technology integration, encompassing online, blended learning, and emerging AI/VR
applications, is profoundly transforming teacher education by enhancing accessibility, flexibility,
and personalized learning experiences. However, this transformative potential is critically
contingent on addressing inherent challenges related to digital equity, ensuring consistent
quality and rigor in online programs, and providing adequate support for both teacher
candidates and faculty in digital pedagogy. Without deliberate strategies to mitigate these
issues, technology risks exacerbating existing educational disparities rather than bridging them,
emphasizing the need for robust infrastructure, teacher training in digital pedagogy, and policies
to ensure equitable access and high-quality online learning experiences.
Competency-Based Progression
Competency-based progression represents a significant shift in educational philosophy, moving
beyond traditional time-based metrics to focus on students' demonstration of specific skills,
knowledge, and attitudes. This approach allows for more personalized and flexible learning
pathways, recognizing that students progress at different rates. The number of
competency-based education programs in the United States has seen substantial growth,
indicating a broader adoption of this model.
A key aspect of this trend is the redesign of assessment and accountability systems to prioritize
the demonstration of competencies over traditional metrics like standardized test scores. In
competency-based models, students are measured on their mastery of explicit
expectations—knowledge, skills, and dispositions—rather than simply completing a predefined
set of courses or receiving letter grades. This emphasis leads to a focus on real-world
readiness, flexible learning, and practical, hands-on application of skills.
Competency-based progression signifies a fundamental paradigm shift in teacher education,
moving from time-based credentialing to demonstrated mastery of explicit skills, knowledge, and
dispositions. This outcome-driven approach promises enhanced accountability for teacher
quality and personalized learning pathways, particularly aligning with the practical focus of
alternative and apprenticeship models. However, its effective implementation necessitates a
comprehensive redesign of curriculum and assessment frameworks to ensure equitable and
robust evaluation of genuine teaching effectiveness, requiring clear, measurable competencies
and fair assessment practices.
Social-Emotional Learning (SEL)
Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) has emerged as a growing priority in education policy due to
its documented positive impact on student outcomes, including academic achievement, social
skills, and emotional well-being. SEL refers to the process of developing the skills, knowledge,
and attitudes necessary for students to succeed in school and beyond. Frameworks like the
CASEL SEL Framework identify five key competencies: self-awareness, self-management,
social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making.
Integrating SEL into teacher education requires supportive policies that facilitate its inclusion in
curriculum and school culture, adequate funding, and professional development opportunities
for teachers to effectively implement SEL strategies. The increasing emphasis on SEL in
teacher education reflects a critical recognition that effective teaching extends beyond academic
content delivery to encompass the holistic development and well-being of students. This also
implicitly acknowledges the emotional demands on teachers themselves, requiring them to
possess strong SEL competencies to manage classrooms and support student needs.
The growing integration of Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) into teacher education curricula
signifies a critical recognition that effective teaching extends beyond academic instruction to
encompass the holistic development and well-being of students. This emphasis prepares future
educators to cultivate supportive learning environments and address complex student needs,
while also implicitly acknowledging the necessity for teachers themselves to possess robust
SEL competencies for their own resilience and effective classroom management in an
increasingly challenging global context. Integrating SEL into teacher preparation is crucial for
preparing educators who can foster supportive learning environments and address the complex
social and emotional needs of their students, especially in an increasingly conflict-ridden and
unstable world.
Lifelong Learning and Continuous Professional Development
The concept of lifelong learning is a fundamental aim for 21st-century teachers, recognizing that
the demands of the profession are constantly evolving. Teachers must continually learn and
relearn their craft to remain effective in a dynamic educational landscape. This continuous
education can take formal forms, such as pursuing advanced degrees or credits required for
certification maintenance, or informal avenues, including professional development activities
and individual research.
International organizations play a significant role in supporting this continuum of professional
growth. UNESCO's Global Teacher Campus, for instance, provides free online courses
designed to help teachers and educators improve their skills and competencies for diverse
learning environments. Its mission aims to help one million teachers gain digital skills and
access professional development opportunities by 2025. Similarly, the OECD's "Teaching
Compass" offers a visionary framework to reimagine teaching as a "future-ready force,"
emphasizing teacher agency, competencies, and well-being as core pillars for supporting
teachers to thrive.
The pervasive emphasis on lifelong learning and continuous professional development,
supported by global initiatives like UNESCO's Global Teacher Campus and OECD's Teaching
Compass, underscores that initial teacher education is merely the foundational phase of a
teacher's career. This highlights the critical need for a comprehensive, accessible ecosystem of
post-certification support, ensuring educators can continuously adapt to evolving demands,
integrate new pedagogies, and maintain their effectiveness and well-being throughout their
professional journey. This suggests that the long-term effectiveness of any teacher education
model is also dependent on the availability and accessibility of high-quality, ongoing professional
development opportunities that help teachers adapt to new challenges and continuously refine
their skills.
Here is a table summarizing key assessment methods commonly employed across various
teacher education programs:
Assessment Type Purpose Examples Key Characteristics
Diagnostic Identify students' prior Pre-tests, surveys, Establishes baseline,
Assessments knowledge, strengths, informal discussions. informs lesson
and weaknesses before planning.
instruction.
Formative Monitor student Quizzes, classroom Ongoing, low-stakes,
Assessments learning during discussions, exit informs immediate
instruction to provide tickets, peer instructional decisions,
ongoing feedback and evaluations, journal promotes student
adjust teaching. reflections. self-assessment.
Summative Evaluate learning Tests, exams, essays, High-stakes, measures
Assessments mastery at the end of a projects, presentations. cumulative learning,
unit, course, or often used for grading.
program.
Authentic Require students to Essays, exhibitions, Real-life scenarios,
Assessments demonstrate experiments, focuses on higher-order
meaningful application interviews, thinking, direct
of knowledge and skills performance tasks, evidence of learning.
in real-world tasks. portfolios.
Performance-Based Evaluate skills through Clinical observations, Directly assesses
Assessments practical teaching videos with teaching competence,
Assessment Type Purpose Examples Key Characteristics
demonstrations of reflections, lesson plan often uses rubrics,
teaching abilities. artifacts. provides formative
feedback.
Licensure Exams Standardized tests to Multiple-choice tests, Uniform, reliable, often
(e.g., PRAXIS, TExES) ensure candidates constructed response a prerequisite for
meet minimum questions. certification, predictive
state/national teaching of effectiveness.
standards.
Portfolio Collection of teaching Teaching videos, Comprehensive,
Assessments (e.g., artifacts (e.g., lesson lesson plans, student provides realistic
edTPA) plans, student work, work samples, written assessment of teaching
videos) with reflections, commentaries. ability, costly, can be a
scored against rubrics. barrier for some
candidates.
Practicum Ongoing feedback and Mentor observations, Integrates theory and
Evaluations formal assessment of co-planning/co-teachin practice, developmental
teaching performance g feedback, reflective focus, identifies
during supervised field journals, summative "at-risk" candidates.
experience. reports.
Table 4: Key Assessment Methods in Teacher Education
This table provides a clear categorization and description of assessment methods, highlighting
their purpose and application across different teacher education models. It helps the reader
understand the "how" of evaluating teacher candidates, showing the diversity of tools used to
measure knowledge, skills, and dispositions, and reinforcing that assessment is not just about
grading but also about providing feedback for development.
IX. Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations
Synthesis of Key Observations on the Diversity and Evolution of
Teacher Education Models
The current landscape of teacher education is characterized by a rich diversity of models, each
with distinct structures, theoretical underpinnings, and pedagogical approaches. Traditional
university-based programs offer comprehensive academic and pedagogical preparation,
emphasizing foundational knowledge and structured practicum experiences. Concurrent models
integrate disciplinary and pedagogical studies from the outset, fostering a holistic and extended
socialization into the profession. Consecutive models prioritize deep subject matter expertise
before a condensed pedagogical training, appealing to career changers and addressing
immediate workforce needs. Alternative certification programs provide expedited and often more
affordable pathways, significantly increasing access to the profession and diversifying the
teacher workforce. Finally, teacher apprenticeship programs represent an innovative
"earn-and-learn" model, combining paid on-the-job training with formal instruction, directly
addressing financial barriers and leveraging cognitive apprenticeship theory for deep practical
learning.
Across these models, a global imperative to address persistent teacher shortages and enhance
educational quality is evident, driving innovations that prioritize accessibility, flexibility, and
practical readiness. A recurring tension exists between the depth of theoretical preparation and
the speed and practicality of entry into the classroom. Similarly, balancing the imperative to
ensure consistent quality and accountability with the goal of promoting equity in access to the
profession remains a critical challenge. Furthermore, cross-cutting themes such as technology
integration, the shift towards competency-based progression, the growing emphasis on
social-emotional learning, and the necessity of lifelong learning are fundamentally reshaping
how teachers are prepared and supported throughout their careers.
The analysis reveals that no single teacher education model offers a panacea; rather, effective
teacher preparation necessitates a holistic, integrated ecosystem approach. This implies that
strategic policy and practice must move beyond advocating for a singular "best" model, instead
focusing on leveraging the complementary strengths of diverse pathways, mitigating their
inherent weaknesses through targeted support (e.g., funding, mentorship), and ensuring
continuous professional development aligned with evolving educational demands and global
trends. The most effective approach is not about choosing one model over another, but rather
about developing a comprehensive, integrated ecosystem that leverages the strengths of
diverse models, addresses their weaknesses through targeted interventions, and supports
teachers throughout their entire career continuum.
Implications for Policy, Practice, and Future Research
The multifaceted nature of current teacher education models carries significant implications for
policy, practice, and future research:
● Policy: Policymakers must strive for coherent national and international frameworks that
effectively balance rigorous quality assurance with the flexibility and accessibility needed
to attract a diverse and sufficient teaching workforce. This includes addressing critical
financial barriers, such as the high cost of student loans and the often-unpaid nature of
extensive practicum experiences, and incentivizing entry into high-need subject areas and
geographic regions. Crucially, policies must support robust mentor development and
compensation across all preparation models, recognizing the pivotal role of experienced
educators in shaping new teachers.
● Practice: Teacher education programs, regardless of their structural model, must
continuously adapt their curricula to integrate cutting-edge pedagogical research,
leverage emerging technologies, embed social-emotional learning, and promote culturally
responsive teaching. The emphasis should be on fostering reflective practice and
ensuring real-world application of theoretical knowledge. This necessitates a dynamic
approach to curriculum design and delivery that prepares teachers for the complex,
diverse, and technologically-rich classrooms of the 21st century. Ongoing professional
development should be viewed as an integral part of a teacher's career, not an optional
add-on.
● Future Research: There is a pressing need for more rigorous, long-term comparative
studies on the effectiveness and retention rates across diverse teacher education models
and varied educational contexts. Research should delve deeper into the specific impacts
of different pedagogical approaches within each model and rigorously evaluate the
efficacy of technology integration and social-emotional learning interventions across
diverse student populations. Such research is vital for generating evidence-based insights
that can inform and refine policy and practice, ensuring that teacher education systems
are continuously improving and responsive to evolving needs.
Recommendations for Fostering High-Quality, Adaptable, and
Sustainable Teacher Education Systems Globally
Based on the comprehensive analysis of current teacher education models, the following
strategic recommendations are put forth to foster high-quality, adaptable, and sustainable
teacher education systems globally:
1. Invest in a Multi-Pathway System: Support and strengthen a diverse range of teacher
preparation models—traditional, concurrent, consecutive, alternative, and
apprenticeship—to cater to varied candidate profiles, leverage different strengths, and
effectively address diverse workforce needs and teacher shortages.
2. Prioritize Clinical Practice and Mentorship: Ensure that all teacher preparation models
include extensive, high-quality, and well-supervised clinical experiences. This requires
significant investment in recruiting, training, and compensating experienced mentor
teachers, recognizing their critical role in bridging theory and practice. Consider
implementing stipends or paid apprenticeships to alleviate financial burdens for aspiring
teachers during their practical training.
3. Enhance Curriculum Relevance and Adaptability: Continuously update teacher
education curricula to integrate the latest pedagogical research, digital literacies,
social-emotional learning competencies, and culturally responsive teaching strategies.
This prepares educators for the complexities of modern classrooms, including diverse
student populations and evolving learning environments.
4. Strengthen Quality Assurance and Accountability: Implement robust accreditation
standards and performance-based assessments that ensure consistent quality and rigor
across all teacher preparation pathways. These mechanisms should focus on
demonstrated teaching competence while actively working to mitigate financial barriers
and promote equity in access for all aspiring educators.
5. Foster Lifelong Professional Development: Establish comprehensive, accessible, and
adequately funded systems for ongoing professional learning, induction, and continuous
support for teachers throughout their entire careers. Recognizing that initial preparation is
merely the beginning, this continuum of support is essential for teachers to adapt to new
challenges, refine their skills, and sustain their effectiveness and well-being.
6. Address Systemic Financial Barriers: Advocate for policy reforms that address the
financial challenges associated with entering and remaining in the teaching profession,
including increasing teacher salaries to be competitive with other professions, expanding
student loan forgiveness programs, and ensuring sustainable funding for high-quality
teacher education programs.
7. Promote Research and Evidence-Based Practice: Encourage ongoing, rigorous
research into the long-term effectiveness of different teacher education models and
pedagogical approaches in diverse contexts. Foster a culture of inquiry and reflective
practice among educators, ensuring that policy and practice are continually informed by
empirical evidence and professional wisdom.
Here is a summary table of the strengths and weaknesses of each teacher education model:
Model Name Key Strengths Key Weaknesses Primary Challenges
Traditional Structured learning, Rigid, less adaptable to Adapting to modern
University-Based foundational individual needs, demands, cost, tech
knowledge, strong overemphasis on integration, ensuring
Model Name Key Strengths Key Weaknesses Primary Challenges
mentorship, proven memorization, slow relevance.
success, tech integration, high
comprehensive cost, rigid schedules.
preparation.
Concurrent Integrated subject & Requires early career Faculty expertise (dual
pedagogy, decision, potential for roles), funding,
specialization, "unnecessary" courses, curriculum coherence,
enhanced market balancing multiple quality across
competitiveness, areas of study is integrated components.
hands-on experience, challenging.
early exposure to
teaching.
Consecutive Strong subject matter Less integrated Funding (student debt,
preparation, flexible learning, shorter low pay), faculty
entry, attracts professional expertise
experienced graduates, socialization, potential (development,
faster entry to job theory-practice gap. relevance), curriculum
market. relevance (focus on
practice).
Alternative Cheaper & faster Higher attrition rates, Quality assurance,
Certification pathways, increases inconsistent funding stability,
diversity (teachers of quality/rigor, online-only teacher retention
color), allows teaching can negatively impact (post-certification
while training, flexible students, perceived as support, working
online options, "shortcuts," insufficient conditions).
addresses shortages. support.
Teacher Paid & debt-free "Teacher of record" Policy alignment
Apprenticeship pathways, addresses debate (student (teacher of record
shortages (high-need outcomes), vulnerable status), sustained
areas), taps to funding uncertainties funding, scalability,
non-traditional (e.g., federal contract ensuring quality in rapid
candidates, promotes termination). expansion.
equity, high retention.
Table 3: Strengths and Weaknesses of Teacher Education Models
This table provides a concise, high-level comparative summary of the pros and cons of each
model, making it easy for the reader to quickly grasp the trade-offs involved in each approach. It
serves as a powerful synthesis of the detailed discussions, reinforcing the nuanced
understanding that no single model is perfect and that choices involve balancing various factors.
It supports the overall conclusion about the need for a multi-faceted approach.
Here is a table outlining various pedagogical approaches and their application within teacher
education programs:
Pedagogical Approach Core Principles Typical Application in Relevant Models
Teacher Education Where Applied
Behaviorist Pedagogy Teacher-centered, Direct instruction, drills, Traditional, some
stimulus-response, rote learning of facts Alternative (for
memorization, (e.g., grammar rules, foundational skills).
Pedagogical Approach Core Principles Typical Application in Relevant Models
Teacher Education Where Applied
repetition, positive multiplication tables).
reinforcement.
Constructivist Student-centered, Project-based learning, Traditional, Concurrent,
Pedagogy knowledge is inquiry-based learning, Alternative,
constructed by problem-solving tasks, Apprenticeship.
learners, active group discussions,
learning, inquiry, reflective journaling.
reflection.
Social Constructivist Learning through social Group work, peer Traditional, Concurrent,
Pedagogy interaction, teaching, collaborative Alternative,
collaboration, language problem-solving, Apprenticeship.
use, teacher as guide. debates, discussions,
culturally responsive
teaching.
Inquiry-Based Students ask Designing experiments, Concurrent,
Learning questions, investigate, research projects, Consecutive,
explore, discover open-ended Alternative.
answers; fosters critical problem-solving,
thinking. Socratic method.
Experiential Learning Hands-on activities, Field placements Concurrent,
direct experience, (non-classroom Consecutive,
reflection on tasks, settings), community Alternative,
real-world application. engagement, Apprenticeship.
practicum, case
studies, simulations.
Cognitive Making expert thinking Mentor-apprentice Teacher
Apprenticeship visible (modeling, relationships, Apprenticeship, some
coaching, scaffolding, co-teaching, structured Alternative (mentorship
articulation, reflection, observation, explicit components).
exploration). demonstration of
cognitive processes.
Blended Learning Combines in-person Flipped classrooms, All models
instruction with online station rotation, online (increasingly),
learning, technology modules, virtual particularly
integration. discussions, digital Online-focused
tools for personalized Alternative.
learning.
Competency-Based Focus on demonstrated Performance Teacher
Learning mastery of skills, assessments, Apprenticeship, some
knowledge, and portfolios, rubrics, Alternative (growing
dispositions, rather individualized learning trend).
than time. pathways,
mastery-based
progression.
Social-Emotional Developing SEL curriculum All models (growing
Pedagogical Approach Core Principles Typical Application in Relevant Models
Teacher Education Where Applied
Learning (SEL) self-awareness, integration, classroom priority).
self-management, management
social awareness, strategies, fostering
relationship skills, positive classroom
responsible culture, teacher
decision-making. well-being.
Table 2: Pedagogical Approaches and Their Application Across Models
This table provides a consolidated view of how different teaching philosophies manifest in
teacher education. It allows for a clear mapping of pedagogical theories to their practical
application within different teacher education models, highlighting the diversity of instructional
strategies employed. This table helps the reader understand the "how" of teacher education,
showing that programs are not just about content but also about the methods used to cultivate
teaching skills. It reinforces the idea that different models may emphasize different pedagogical
approaches based on their design and goals.
Works cited
1. Trends Shaping Education 2025 - OECD,
https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/trends-shaping-education-2025_ee6587fd-en.html 2.
Webinar: The OECD Teaching Compass: Aligning teaching with the future of learning,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DoKcHE-AivU 3. Contemporary Teacher Education: A
Global Perspective-Introduction to a Special Collection of Research - ResearchGate,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353139015_Contemporary_Teacher_Education_A_Gl
obal_Perspective-Introduction_to_a_Special_Collection_of_Research 4. Global Teacher
Campus - UNESCO, https://www.unesco.org/en/global-education-coalition/teacher-campus 5.
Global framework of professional teaching standards | Teacher Task Force,
https://teachertaskforce.org/knowledge-hub/global-framework-professional-teaching-standards
6. The Eaquals Framework for Language Teacher Training & Development,
https://www.eaquals.org/our-expertise/teacher-development/the-eaquals-framework-for-teacher-
training-and-development/ 7. Teacher Preparation, Explained: Alternative Routes, Enrollment ...,
https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/teacher-preparation-explained-alternative-routes-enro
llment-trends-and-more/2024/01 8. What makes teacher prep “traditional” or “non-traditional”?,
https://teacherquality.nctq.org/dmsView/NCTQ_-_What_Makes_Teacher_Prep_Traditional_or_N
on_Traditional 9. Teacher Program Models - The Wing Institute,
https://www.winginstitute.org/pre-service-teacher-program-models 10. CHAPTER ONE –
THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF TEACHING AND LEARNING - eCampusOntario
Pressbooks,
https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/remediateclinicalteaching/chapter/chapter-one-theoretic
al-foundations-of-teaching-and-learning/ 11. “Chapter 1. Theoretical Foundations of Teaching
and Learning” in “Creative Clinical Teaching in the Health Professions” | AU Press—Digital
Publications,
https://read.aupress.ca/read/creative-clinical-teaching-in-the-health-professions/section/17105b
19-3943-45ff-b2fa-8bee37bcff80 12. What Is Pedagogy in Education? - Augusta University,
https://www.augusta.edu/online/blog/what-is-pedagogy-in-education 13. College of Education &
Human Sciences - Assessment Methods - Tennessee Tech University,
https://ouweb.tntech.edu/education/assessment-methods.php 14. ASSESSMENT FOR
LEARNING IN TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS: NAVIGATING THE JUXTAPOSITION OF
THEORY AND PRAXIS Christopher DeLuca Quee - ERIC,
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1177153.pdf 15. A Teacher's Guide for the Types of
Assessments in Education, https://texestest.org/teacher-guide-types-assessments-education/
16. What Is a Comprehensive Assessment in Education? | HMH,
https://www.hmhco.com/blog/what-is-a-comprehensive-assessment-in-education 17. Center for
Research, Evaluation, and Assessment - CREA - University of Nevada, Las Vegas,
https://crea.unlv.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/PINE-Effective-Teacher-Pathways-Full-Paper-
Final.pdf 18. Advantages and Disadvantages of Traditional Educational Systems - boarding
school, https://blog.srcsdoon.com/pros-and-cons-of-traditional-educational-systems/ 19.
Traditional Education vs Online Learning: Which One Suits You Best?,
https://online.edgewood.edu/blog/online-vs-traditional-teacher-education/ 20. Europeanisation in
Teacher Education: A Comparative Case Study of Teac - Routledge,
https://www.routledge.com/Europeanisation-in-Teacher-Education-A-Comparative-Case-Study-o
f-Teacher-Education-Policies-and-Practices/Symeonidis/p/book/9780367638375 21. The
Education of History Teachers in Europe—A Comparative Study. First Results of the “Civic and
History Education Study” - Scientific Research Publishing,
https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=87005 22. The role of schools within
initial teacher education in England: an ...,
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02607476.2024.2413167 23. Initial education for
teachers working in early childhood and school ...,
https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/eurypedia/france/initial-education-teachers-working-early-c
hildhood-and-school-education 24. Teacher Education in Germany: Traditional Structure,
Strengths and Weaknesses, Current Reforms - SciSpace,
https://scispace.com/pdf/teacher-education-in-germany-traditional-structure-strengths-394o07jrx
q.pdf 25. Understanding Concurrent Education: What Is It Anyway? - Exquisitive Education,
https://exquisitiveeducation.com/what-is-concurrent-education/ 26. Comparing the effectiveness
of two models of initial teacher ...,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316266421_Comparing_the_effectiveness_of_two_mo
dels_of_initial_teacher_education_programmes_in_Israel_concurrent_vs_consecutive 27.
Concurrent Education - Faculty of Education | Queen's University,
https://educ.queensu.ca/teacher-education/concurrent 28. The Concurrent and Consecutive
Models of Initial Teacher Training: Problematics and Tendencies,
https://llufb.llu.lv/conference/REEP/2015/Latvia-Univ-Agricult-REEP-2015proceedings-347-354.
pdf 29. Concurrent vs Consecutive BEd : r/OntarioTeachers - Reddit,
https://www.reddit.com/r/OntarioTeachers/comments/1hgrn6c/concurrent_vs_consecutive_bed/
30. Concurrent Teaching Considerations,
https://www.niet.org/assets/Resources/5733ad7a75/concurrent-teaching-considerations.pdf 31.
Guide For Schools: Pedagogical Approaches, Education Boards & More | Kidspreneurship,
https://www.kidspreneurship.com/pedagogical-approaches/ 32. 9 Pedagogical Approaches for
Higher Ed Explained [Plus: 40+ Free Strategies to Implement in Your Classroom] | Top Hat,
https://tophat.com/blog/pedagogy/ 33. Pedagogical approaches to teaching in higher education,
https://www.cipcourses.com/blog/pedagogical-approaches-to-teaching-in-higher-education/ 34.
Practicum Assessment & Evaluation | Ontario Institute for Studies in Education,
https://www.oise.utoronto.ca/ctl/practicum-assessment-evaluation 35. Developing Pre-service
Teachers' Assessment Literacy in the Practicum: An Action Research Study - ERIC,
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1434290.pdf 36. Consecutive or Concurrent Education: Pros &
Cons : r/yorku - Reddit,
https://www.reddit.com/r/yorku/comments/1goived/consecutive_or_concurrent_education_pros_
cons/ 37. Transition into Teaching – Comparing Graduates of Concurrent vs. Consecutive
Teacher Education Programs | EERA,
https://eera-ecer.de/ecer-programmes/conference/20/contribution/34123 38. Increasing the
Supply of Qualified High School Teachers for Dual Enrollment Programs: - Education
Commission of the States,
https://www.ecs.org/wp-content/uploads/Increasing-the-Supply-of-Qualified-High-School-Teache
rs-for-Dual-Enrollment-Programs.pdf 39. Dual Certification Programs | Oxford Research
Encyclopedia of,
https://oxfordre.com/education/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-97
80190264093-e-1183?d=%2F10.1093%2Facrefore%2F9780190264093.001.0001%2Facrefore-
9780190264093-e-1183&p=emailAiGxLUNTUtJDg 40. Barriers to Faculty Pedagogical Change:
Lack of Training, Time, Incentives, and…Tensions with Professional Identity? | CBE—Life
Sciences Education, https://www.lifescied.org/doi/10.1187/cbe.12-09-0163 41. Effective Teacher
Professional Development - Learning Policy Institute,
https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Effective_Teacher_Professional_
Development_REPORT.pdf 42. The Curriculum for Initial Teacher Education: Literature Review -
GOV.UK,
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5da5fd0ce5274a3928cebafe/Literature_Review_
of_Initial_Teacher_Education_Curriculum_-_final.pdf 43. North West - The Training Model -
Kingsbridge Teacher Training,
https://www.kingsbridgeteachertraining.co.uk/about-us/the-training-model 44. Education -
Concurrent - Lakehead University,
https://www.lakeheadu.ca/programs/undergraduate-programs/education-concurrent/node/3437
45. Teacher Education: Consecutive - Faculty of Education | Queen's University,
https://educ.queensu.ca/teacher-education/consecutive 46. Place-related Approaches in
Teacher Education - WyoScholar,
https://wyoscholar.uwyo.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/b6e38981-4cc3-4810-b3ac-22bde85915
56/content 47. (PDF) Pedagogical Strategies for 21st-Century Classrooms - ResearchGate,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387469261_Pedagogical_Strategies_for_21st-Century
_Classrooms 48. Practicum Information - Faculty of Education | Queen's University,
https://educ.queensu.ca/for-teachers/practicum 49. Encouraging reflective practice in the
teacher education practicum: A dean's early efforts,
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1040104/full 50.
Importance of Continuing Education for Teachers - Graduate Programs for Educators,
https://www.graduateprogram.org/blog/importance-of-teachers-continuing-their-education/ 51.
TEACHER EDUCATION: BACK TO THE FUTURE, https://www.erc.ie/documents/vol25chp2.pdf
52. In Debt: Student Loan Burdens Among Teachers - Learning Policy Institute,
https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/student-loans-among-teachers-brief 53. Federal -
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, https://aacte.org/advocacy/federal/ 54.
Relationship between teaching experience and teacher effectiveness: implications for policy
decisions - ERIC, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1216895.pdf 55. Why Colleges and
Universities Need to Invest in Quality Teaching More Than Ever - ACUE,
https://acue.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/ACUE-White-Paper1.pdf 56. INSTITUTIONAL
COMMITMENT TO TEACHING EXCELLENCE: - American Council on Education,
https://www.acenet.edu/documents/institutional-commitment-to-teaching-excellence.pdf 57. The
Work of Teaching and the Challenge for Teacher Education - University of Rochester,
https://www.rochester.edu/warner/lida/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/BallForzani_2009_Teaching-
and-Teacher-Ed_HLTP.pdf 58. Routes into teaching | Prospects.ac.uk,
https://www.prospects.ac.uk/jobs-and-work-experience/job-sectors/teacher-training-and-educati
on/routes-into-teaching 59. Teach in the UK, https://www.teachaway.com/teach-uk 60.
Alternative Teacher Certification: The Politics, the Preparation, and ...,
https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2791&context=gradschool_dissertations
61. Content Knowledge for Teaching - Achievethecore.org, https://achievethecore.org/file/5252
62. Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) - ERIC,
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1085915.pdf 63. PedagogicalContentKnowledgeI,
https://mierjs.in/index.php/mjestp/article/download/1841/1386 64. Personal Practical Knowledge
of Teacher Educators | Request PDF - ResearchGate,
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340949409_Personal_Practical_Knowledge_of_Teach
er_Educators 65. Pergamon - Benjamin Bolden,
https://benjaminbolden.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/1997-Connely-et-al-teachers-personal-p
ractical-knowledge.pdf 66. Extracts from pages 1-5 of 'Shaping a Professional Identity: Stories
of educational practice' F. Michael Connelly and D. Jean Cl - ActionResearch.net,
https://www.actionresearch.net/writings/clandinin/clandinin1996to07.pdf 67. Personal Practical
Knowledge of Teacher Educators - UNL Digital Commons,
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1404&context=teachlearnfacpub 68.
Curriculum | Alternative Teacher Certification - Glasscock School of Continuing Studies,
https://glasscock.rice.edu/alternative-teacher-certification/curriculum 69. Alternative Teacher
Certification Program - MathTrack Institute,
https://mathtrack.co/alternative-teacher-certification-program 70. Alternative Assessment - The
Center for Teaching and Learning - UNC Charlotte,
https://teaching.charlotte.edu/teaching-guides/online-academic-integrity/alternative-assessment/
71. Alternative Authentic Assessment Methods | Center for Excellence in Teaching and
Learning,
https://cetl.uconn.edu/resources/teaching-and-learning-assessment/teaching-and-learning-asse
ssment-overview/assessment-design/alternative-authentic-assessment-methods/ 72. 12
Alternative Types of Assessments in Education - University of San Diego Online Degrees,
https://onlinedegrees.sandiego.edu/rethinking-education-assessment-types/ 73. Examples of
Alternative Assessments | UWI Teaching & Learning Remotely,
https://uwi.edu/remote/teaching/authentic-assessments 74. Alternative Teacher Program Guide
in 2025 | Teachers of Tomorrow,
https://www.teachersoftomorrow.org/blog/insights/alternative-teacher-program-guide/ 75. Top 5
Benefits Of Alternative Certification For Teachers - Cascade Business News,
https://cascadebusnews.com/top-5-benefits-of-alternative-certification-for-teachers/ 76.
Traditional or Alternative Teacher Licensure: Which is Right for Me? - Saint Xavier University,
https://www.sxu.edu/academics/programs/grad-education-programs/traditional-vs-alternative-lic
ensure.html 77. TXST ACE - College of Education : Texas State University,
https://www.education.txst.edu/ci/programs/alt-teacher-cert.html 78. Alternative Certification: A
Solution or an Alternative Problem? - ERIC, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1185689.pdf 79.
Difficulties of alternatively certified teachers - CUNY Academic Works,
https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1314&context=cc_pubs 80.
Alternative Teacher Certification Programs From Teachers Of Tomorrow,
https://www.teachersoftomorrow.org/alternate-teacher-certification/ 81. Alternative Certification |
Relay / GSE, https://www.relay.edu/programs/certification-only-programs 82. The Evolution of
Alternative Teacher Certification - HTH Unboxed, https://hthunboxed.org/alternative-certification/
83. Teaching in Australia from Texas : r/AustralianTeachers - Reddit,
https://www.reddit.com/r/AustralianTeachers/comments/1hz15yg/teaching_in_australia_from_te
xas/ 84. Become a partner school | Teach For Australia,
https://teachforaustralia.org/for-schools/become-a-partner-school/ 85. Your recognition
procedure as Teacher (m/f) in Frankfurt am Main ...,
https://www.anerkennung-in-deutschland.de/en/interest/finder/result?arrangement=Nein&locatio
n=8976&nationality=Drittstaat&profession=575&success=Ja&whereabouts=Ausland&zipSearch
=0&qualification=Drittstaaten&pdf=1 86. For Teachers & Educators – adlerschule,
https://www.adlerschule.de/teach-in-germany/ 87. Your recognition procedure as Teacher (m/f)
in Berlin, Berlin - Anerkennung in Deutschland,
https://www.anerkennung-in-deutschland.de/en/interest/finder/result?location=47619&profession
=575&zipSearch=0&nationality=Drittstaat&qualification=&arrangement=Ja&nationalityDrittstaat=
&whereabouts=null&pdf=1 88. How States Can Support Teacher Apprenticeship: The Case of
Tennessee,
https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/tennessees-teacher-apprenticeship-program-brief 89.
Characteristics of Teacher Apprenticeship Programs and Outcomes of Teacher Residency
Programs - Institute of Education Sciences,
https://ies.ed.gov/rel-northwest/2025/01/characteristics-teacher-apprenticeship-programs-and-o
utcomes-teacher-residency-programs 90. Cognitive Apprenticeship Theory,
https://www.mcw.edu/-/media/MCW/Education/Academic-Affairs/OEI/Faculty-Quick-Guides/Cog
nitive-Apprenticeship-Theory.pdf 91. Educational theory of apprenticeship - Wikipedia,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Educational_theory_of_apprenticeship 92. What Is the Cognitive
Apprenticeship Model of Teaching and Its Use in eLearning,
https://www.coursebox.ai/blog/cognitive-apprenticeship-model-of-teaching-and-its-use-in-elearni
ng 93. Cognitive Apprenticeship - American Federation of Teachers,
https://www.aft.org/ae/winter1991/collins_brown_holum 94. Teaching as a Profession (TAP) -
The University of Tennessee System,
https://tennessee.edu/state-impact/grow-your-own-center/school-districts/teaching-as-a-professi
on/ 95. Registered Teacher Apprentice Manual - KSDE,
https://www.ksde.gov/Portals/0/TLA/RTA/RTA%20Manual%201-22-24.pdf?ver=2024-01-22-143
117-743 96. building effective teaching apprenticeship models - National Education Association,
https://www.nea.org/sites/default/files/2025-06/apprenticeship-models-compendium.pdf 97.
Registered Teaching Apprenticeship Holistic Assessment & Evaluation Handbook | Oregon.gov,
https://www.oregon.gov/tspc/EPP/Documents/Apprenticeship/Registered%20Apprenticeship%2
0in%20Teaching%20Assessment%20%26%20Evaluation%20Handbook.pdf 98. Sample
evaluation/observation tool and guide - KSDE,
https://www.ksde.gov/Portals/0/TLA/RTA/RTAP_Sample_evaluation_observation_tool__guide.d
ocx?ver=2024-07-24-120345-210 99. Teacher Apprenticeship Programs, Recently Defunded,
Remain a ...,
https://www.f3law.com/insights/teacher-apprenticeship-programs-recently-defunded-remain-a-vi
able-option-for-fi-102kbdw/ 100. Apprenticeship Programs in Teaching and Education - SUNY
System Administration,
https://system.suny.edu/media/suny/content-assets/documents/apprenticeship/flyers/Teaching_
web.pdf 101. Registered Apprenticeship Program (EnrichED Pathways) - Deer Park ISD,
https://www.dpisd.org/apps/pages/index.jsp?uREC_ID=1567862&type=d&pREC_ID=2558884
102. Teaching Apprentice Programs - Berwick Academy - Lesley University,
https://www.berwickacademy.org/teaching-apprentice-program 103. Teacher Apprenticeship
Program (TAP) - Education - Broward College,
https://www.broward.edu/academics/education/teacher-apprenticeship-program.html 104.
Teacher Apprenticeship - Liverpool Hope University,
https://www.hope.ac.uk/apprenticeships/apprenticeshipcoursea-z/teacherapprenticeship/ 105.
Head Start apprenticeships and traineeships | vic.gov.au - Victorian Government,
https://www.vic.gov.au/head-start-apprenticeships-and-traineeships 106. Apprenticeships and
traineeships - Department of Education,
https://www.education.wa.edu.au/career-development/apprenticeships-and-traineeships 107.
Germany's apprenticeship system: a model for Education ? | Université Grenoble Alpes,
https://en.sciencespo-grenoble.fr/blogs/le-systeme-dapprentissage-en-allemagne-un-modele-de
-formation 108. About Apprenticeship - WorkBC,
https://www.workbc.ca/explore-training-and-education/trades-training/about-apprenticeship 109.
Technological Education - Faculty of Education | Queen's University,
https://educ.queensu.ca/teacher-education/consecutive/tech 110. The Future of Learning:
Emerging Trends in Education Policy - Number Analytics,
https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/future-of-learning-emerging-trends-in-education-policy
111. What Is Blended Learning? Definition, Models and Benefits | GCU Blog,
https://www.gcu.edu/blog/teaching-school-administration/what-blended-learning-definition-model
s-and-benefits 112. Using Blended Learning to Explore Multifaceted Topics in Grades 3 to 5 |
Edutopia, https://www.edutopia.org/article/using-blended-learning-explore-multifaceted-topics
113. What Is Blended Learning? Definition, Examples, and Models - iSpring,
https://www.ispringsolutions.com/blog/blended-learning-a-primer 114. Blended Learning Models,
https://www.blendedlearning.org/models/ 115. History of Innovation in Education – How to Adapt
for Today's Gen Z Students,
https://www.umassglobal.edu/blog-news/history-of-innovation-in-education-how-to-adapt-for-tod
ays-gen-z-students 116. The Role of Teachers in Technology Integration - Brittany Washburn,
https://brittanywashburn.com/2023/11/the-role-of-teachers-in-technology-integration/ 117. How
to Integrate Technology in the Classroom - School of Education - Drexel University,
https://drexel.edu/soe/resources/student-teaching/advice/how-to-use-technology-in-the-classroo
m/ 118. Digital learning in the 21st century: trends, challenges, and innovations in technology
integration - Frontiers,
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2025.1562391/full 119. A
Close Look at Competency-Based Learning | Cult of Pedagogy,
https://www.cultofpedagogy.com/competency-based-learning/ 120. Five Models of Curriculum
Design: Choosing the Right Approach - Teachers Institute,
https://teachers.institute/planning-and-management-of-higher-education/five-models-of-curriculu
m-design/ 121. 5 Examples of Competency Based Training from Real Training Providers,
https://www.arlo.co/blog/examples-of-competency-based-training 122. Continued Learning,
Teacher Quality: A Report on The Preparation and Qualifications of Public School Teachers -
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES),
https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/frss/publications/1999080/index.asp?sectionid=4