Assignment MCED 2024 3
Assignment MCED 2024 3
By submitting this assignment, you acknowledge that you have read and understood all the rules
as per the terms in the registration contract, in particular the assignment and assessment rules in
The IIE Assessment Strategy and Policy (IIE009), the intellectual integrity and plagiarism rules in
the Intellectual Integrity and Property Rights Policy (IIE023), as well as any rules and regulations
published in the student portal.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. No material may be copied from original sources, even if referenced correctly, unless it is a
direct quote indicated with quotation marks. No more than 10% of the assignment may
consist of direct quotes.
2. Your assignment must be submitted through SafeAssign.
3. Save a copy of your assignment before submitting it.
4. Assignments must be typed unless otherwise specified.
5. All work must be adequately and correctly referenced.
6. This is an individual assignment.
ACADEMIC HONESTY DECLARATION
Please complete the Academic Honesty Declara on below.
Please note that your assessment will not be marked, and you will receive 0% if you have not
completed ALL aspects of this declara on.
Declara on SIGN
I have read the assessment rules provided in this declara on.
This assessment is my own work.
I have not copied any other student’s work in this assessment.
I have not uploaded the assessment ques on to any website or App offering
assessment assistance.
I have not downloaded my assessment response from a website.
I have not used any AI tool without reviewing, re-wri ng, and re-working this
informa on, and referencing any AI tools in my work.
I have not shared this assessment with any other student.
I have not presented the work of published sources as my own work.
I have correctly cited all my sources of informa on.
My referencing is technically correct, consistent, and congruent.
I have acted in an academically honest way in this assessment.
Referencing Rubric
Providing evidence based on valid and referenced academic Markers are required to provide feedback to students by
sources is a fundamental educational principle and the indicating (circling/underlining) the information that best
cornerstone of high-quality academic work. Hence, The IIE describes the student’s work.
considers it essential to develop the referencing skills of our
students in our commitment to achieve high academic standards. Minor technical referencing errors: 5% deduction from the
Part of achieving these high standards is referencing in a way that overall percentage – the student’s work contains five or more
is consistent, technically correct and congruent. This is not errors listed in the minor errors column in the table below.
plagiarism, which is handled differently.
Major technical referencing errors: 10% deduction from the
Poor quality formatting in your referencing will result in a penalty overall percentage – the student’s work contains five or more
of a maximum of ten percent being deducted from the percentage errors listed in the major errors column in the table below.
awarded, according to the following guidelines. Please note,
however, that evidence of plagiarism in the form of copied or If both minor and major errors are indicated, then 10% only (and
uncited work (not referenced), absent reference lists, or not 5% or 15%) is deducted from the overall percentage. The
exceptionally poor referencing, may result in action being taken in examples provided below are not exhaustive but are provided to
accordance with The IIE’s Intellectual Integrity Policy (0023). illustrate the error
Required: Minor errors in technical correctness of Major errors in technical correctness of referencing
Technically correct referencing referencing style style
style Deduct 5% from percentage awarded Deduct 10% from percentage awarded
Consistency Minor inconsistencies. Major inconsistencies.
The referencing style is generally Poor and inconsistent referencing style used in-
The same referencing format consistent, but there are one or two text and/or in the bibliography/ reference list.
has been used for all in-text changes in the format of in-text Multiple formats for the same type of referencing
references and in the referencing and/or in the bibliography. have been used.
bibliography/reference list. For example, page numbers for direct For example, the format for direct quotes (in-text)
quotes (in-text) have been provided for and/or book chapters (bibliography/ reference
one source, but not in another instance. list) is different across multiple instances.
Two book chapters (bibliography) have
been referenced in the bibliography in
two different formats.
Technical correctness Generally, technically correct with some Technically incorrect.
minor errors. The referencing format is incorrect.
Referencing format is The correct referencing format has been Concepts and ideas are typically referenced, but a
technically correct throughout consistently used, but there are one or reference is missing from small sections of the
the submission. two errors. work.
Concepts and ideas are typically Position of the references: references are only
The correct referencing format referenced, but a reference is missing given at the beginning or end of large sections of
for the module’s discipline has from one small section of the work. work.
been used, i.e., either APA, OR Position of the references: references For example, incorrect author information is
Harvard OR Law are only given at the beginning or end of provided, no year of publication is provided,
every paragraph. quotation marks and/or page numbers for direct
Position of the reference: a For example, the student has incorrectly quotes missing, page numbers are provided for
reference is directly associated presented direct quotes (in-text) and/or paraphrased material, the incorrect punctuation is
with every concept or idea. book chapters (bibliography/reference used (in-text); the bibliography/reference list is
list). not in alphabetical order, the incorrect format for
For example, quotation marks, a book chapter/journal article is used, information
page numbers, years, etc. are is missing e.g. no place of publication had been
applied correctly, sources in provided (bibliography); repeated sources on the
the bibliography/reference list reference list.
are correctly presented.
Congruence between in-text Generally, congruence between the in- A lack of congruence between the in-text
referencing and bibliography/ text referencing and the bibliography/ referencing and the bibliography.
reference list reference list with one or two errors. No relationship/several incongruencies between
There is largely a match between the the in-text referencing and the
All sources are accurately sources presented in-text and the bibliography/reference list.
reflected and are all accurately bibliography. For example, sources are included in-text, but not
included in the bibliography/ For example, a source appears in the in the bibliography and vice versa, a link, rather
reference list. text, but not in the bibliography/ than the actual reference is provided in the
reference list or vice versa. bibliography.
In summary: the recording of In summary, at least 80% of the sources In summary, at least 60% of the sources are
references is accurate and are correctly reflected and included in a incorrectly reflected and/or not included in
complete. reference list. reference list.
Overall Feedback about the consistency, technical correctness and congruence between in-text referencing and bibliography:
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Instructions
Analyse critique and apply your understanding in a 1000 - 1500 words essay, about the LGBTQ
community. Focus your discussion on the following areas:
Describe using literature, how would you explain the concept of LGBTQ and identities to
students in a way that promotes understanding and inclusivity?
Discuss the stereotypes, biases, and misconceptions related to LGBTQ and identities in
your classroom? Provide examples of specific activities or discussions you would
facilitate.
How would you address potential challenges or resistance from parents, colleagues, or
community members when discussing LGBTQ+ topics with students?
Support your discussion with at least four credible sources.
Note: Be objective, you do not have to give your opinion only you’re understanding and
professionalism.
*Refer to content covered within the module, to support your discussion.
Please consult the rubric for guidance.
Identified potential The response shows a The response demonstrates a The student offers insightful The response demonstrates an
challenges from lack of awareness or basic understanding of explanations, demonstrating a exceptional understanding of
parents, colleagues and understanding of potential obstacles or good understanding of why potential obstacles or resistance,
community members potential obstacles or resistance but may overlook these challenges may arise including nuanced and complex
when discussing LGBTQ resistance. The significant challenges. Limited and the impact they can have challenges that arise when
with students. student fails to insight into why these on discussing LGBTQ. discussing LGBTQ.
provide any challenges may arise, offering
meaningful insight only surface-level
into why these explanations.
challenges may arise.
Language structure 0-1 2-3 4-5
Writing The academic style, tone and The academic style, tone and Used a formal academic style,
Essay is well structured, format is unacceptable. There format has been reviewed. tone, and format. Work shows
with a logical, coherent is a lack of proofreading and Proof reading and revision is evidence of proofreading and
flow. Academic tone and revision. evident. revision.
clear writing are used.
Synthesis of ideas is The essay fails to integrate The essay offers limited critical The essay demonstrates a clear
evident from a well-built information or viewpoints analysis but may rely more on understanding of the sources and
essay based on multiple from the sources effectively. summarising or restating effectively connects them to the
sources. information from the sources. overall argument or claim.
Instructions:
Conduct an interview with a student from a different cultural group within South Africa that is not
one you belong to. Analyse and compare the culture with your own.
Write a reflective essay of 1000 words explaining the following key pointers:
Compare and contrast their cultural practices, traditions, and values. How do these cultural
aspects shape their identities and perspectives?
Explore their experiences of assimilation and maintaining their cultural identity and
compare their journey with your own. What insights did you gain about the complexities of
cultural adaptation?
Reflect on the personal growth and learning you experienced through this process of
interviewing a student from a diverse culture.
o How did this interview challenge your assumptions and broaden your understanding
of cultural diversity?
o Discuss the implications for your future role as an inclusive educator.
Note: Your essay should include credible sources that justify your understanding of the chosen
culture.
0-2 3 4-5
Personal growth and Offers minimal or incorrect Presents a basic reflection on Reflects on personal growth and
learning reflection on personal growth personal growth and learning, learning through the interview
and learning, lacking mentioning some general process, demonstrating deep
meaningful insights into the takeaways from the interview insight into the impact of the
interview experience's impact. experience. experience on the pre-service
teacher’s perspective. Discusses a
range of specific lessons learned.
Challenging Offers minimal or incorrect Presents a basic explanation Provides a thorough and insightful
Assumptions and future discussion of assumptions of how the interview discussion of how the interview
role challenged and implications challenged assumptions, challenged the pre-service teacher
for the future role. however, lacks depth in assumptions about cultural
understanding the broader diversity. Demonstrates a clear
impact. Discusses some understanding of how the
implications for the pre- experience broadened their
service teacher’s future role. understanding. Discusses the
implications for their future role
as an inclusive educator with
depth.
Instructions:
Provide clear and easy verbal instructions for learners. Please outline the key steps you will include
in your video, ensuring they are precise and easy to understand. You may use any verbal language
appropriate for learners, but please include English subtitles to ensure accessibility (If your video is
presented in English, subtitles are not required).
Additionally, briefly describe any visual aids, or demonstrations you plan to use to enhance clarity
in your video. Your video should be suitable for all age groups at Primary school.
Please submit your video outline along with a brief explanation of your instructional approach.
You may use any video creator software you are familiar with. The following Apps are
recommended:
• Microsoft PowerPoint
• Canva: https://www.canva.com/templates/
• Vimeo.com: https://vimeo.com/
• VideoWiki: https://video.wiki/
*Note:
a) Do not exceed 3 minutes.
b) When submitting your video, it would be best to download and embed this in the
assignment template.
c. If you intend on inserting the URL link, and this is inactive during the marking process you
will receive zero!
Overall quality and The video lacks creativity The video is somewhat The video is exceptionally
creativity. and is of poor quality, creative but could benefit creative, with outstanding
hindering engagement and from improvements in production quality,
interest. quality and engagement. captivating and fully
engaging viewers.