Module 2 Micros
Module 2 Micros
Microscopy
(General Microbiology and GEBT202)
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Table of Contents
2.8 References 21
Department of Biotechnology
Brainware University, Kolkata 1
BSCMRIT and 2nd Semester
General Microbiology (GEBT202)
2024-25
History of Microscopes
In the late 17th century, Antoine van Leeuwenhoek of Holland created a simple single-lens microscope.
Similar to a modern magnifier in structure, this novel invention differed in that its magnification reached
more than 200 times. This new microscope allowed Leeuwenhoek to discover microorganisms and
spermatozoa.
Around the same time, Robert Hooke of England created a compound microscope that had two lenses,
objective and ocular lenses. Hooke observed cork tissue and called it cells because it looked like the small
cells of honeycomb. Thus he coined the biological term cell.
At that time, combining two lenses adversely affected the accuracy, partly due to the aberration of the
lenses, resulting in a lower resolution than a simple microscope.
In the 19th century, microscope resolution was improved dramatically through various measures.
Aberration correction was implemented by using better lenses or combination of lenses and was
supported by German companies such as Zeiss and Leitz who were the main contributors. Ernst Abbe of
Germany made theoretical and technical microscope innovations, and it can be said he established the
prototype of the modern optical microscope.
Various observation methods were invented in the 20th century. Both the phase contrast microscope
introduced in the 1930s and the differential interference contrast microscope invented in the 1950s,
contributed to high magnification of transparent samples such as cells. The confocal laser microscope, also
invented in the 1950s, marked the beginning of observation with clearer images. Fluorescence
microscopes have evolved together with the development of fluorescent dyes around the early 20th
century. Despite these significant improvements in microscopy, 19th century researcher George Airy
discovered a limit to resolution based on the nature of light. Soon after, Ernst Abbe introduced the concept
of numerical aperture and proved microscopic samples can be resolved only up to 200 nm under visible
light, regardless of the performance of the lens, which created a new challenge for magnified observation.
Principles of microscope
Department of Biotechnology
Brainware University, Kolkata 2
BSCMRIT and 2nd Semester
General Microbiology (GEBT202)
2024-25
A general biological microscope mainly consists of an objective lens, ocular lens, lens tube, stage, and
reflector. An object placed on the stage is magnified through the objective lens. When the target is
focused, a magnified image can be observed through the ocular lens.
Telescopes also have a similar structure; however, they are used for observing distant objects. A telescope
receives light from a star or other distant object with the objective lens and adjusts the refracted light to
the focal point through the ocular lens. On the other hand, a microscope is designed to emit light onto or
through objects and magnify the transmitted or reflected light with the objective and ocular lenses.
Department of Biotechnology
Brainware University, Kolkata 3
BSCMRIT and 2nd Semester
General Microbiology (GEBT202)
2024-25
1. Base or Metal Stand: The whole microscope rests on this base. Mirror, if present, is fitted to it.
2. Pillars: It is a pair of elevations on the base, by which the body of the microscope is held to the
base
3. Inclination joint: It is a movable joint, through which the body of the microscope is held to the
base by the pillars. The body can be bent at this joint into any inclined position, as desired by the
observer, for easier observation. In new models, the body is permanently fixed to the base in an
inclined position, thus needing no pillar or joint.
4. Curved Arm: It is a curved structure held by the pillars. It holds the stage, body tube, fine
adjustment and coarse adjustment.
5. Body Tube: It is usually a vertical tube holding the eyepiece at the top and the revolving nosepiece
with the objectives at the bottom. The length of the draw tube is called ‘mechanical tube length’
and is usually 140-180 mm (mostly 160 mm).
6. Draw Tube: It is the upper part of the body tube, slightly narrower, into which the eyepiece is
slipped during observation.
7. Coarse Adjustment: It is a knob with rack and pinion mechanism to move the body tube up and
down for focusing the object in the visible field. As rotation of the knob through a small angle
moves the body tube through a long distance relative to the object, it can perform coarse
adjustment. In modern microscopes, it moves the stage up and down and the body tube is fixed to
the arm.
8. Fine Adjustment: It is a relatively smaller knob. Its rotation through a large angle can move the
body tube only through a small vertical distance. It is used for fine adjustment to get the final clear
image. In modern microscopes, fine adjustment is done by moving the stage up and down by the
fine adjustment.
9. Stage: It is a horizontal platform projecting from the curved arm. It has a hole at the center, upon
which the object to be viewed is placed on a slide. Light from the light source below the stage
passes through the object into the objective.
Department of Biotechnology
Brainware University, Kolkata 4
BSCMRIT and 2nd Semester
General Microbiology (GEBT202)
2024-25
10. Mechanical Stage (Slide Mover): Mechanical stage consists of two knobs with rack and pinion
mechanism. The slide containing the object is clipped to it and moved on the stage in two
dimensions by rotating the knobs, so as to focus the required portion of the object.
11. Revolving Nosepiece: It is a rotatable disc at the bottom of the body tube with three or four
objectives screwed to it. The objectives have different magnifying powers. Based on the required
magnification, the nosepiece is rotated, so that only the objective specified for the required
magnification remains in line with the light path.
separate point on the image. Mere increase in size (greater magnification) without the ability to
distinguish structural details (greater resolution) is of little value. Therefore, the basic limitation in light
microscopes is one not of magnification, but of resolving power, the ability to distinguish two adjacent
points as distinct and separate, i.e. to resolve small components in the object into finer details on the
image.
Wavelength of light (λ): The smaller is the wavelength of light (λ), the greater is its ability to resolve
the points on the object into distinctly visible finer details in the image. Thus, the smaller is the
wavelength of light, the greater is its resolving power.
Limit of resolution of objective (d): The limit of resolution of an objective (d) is the distance between
any two closest points on the microscopic object, which can be resolved into two separate and distinct
points on the enlarged image. Points with their in-between distance less than‘d’ or objects smaller
than ‘d’ cannot be resolved into separate points on the image. If the resolving power is high, points
very close to each other can be seen as clear and distinct. Thus, the limit of resolution (the distance
between the two resolvable points) is smaller. Therefore, smaller objects or finer details can be seen,
when’d’ is smaller. Smaller‘d’ is obtained by increasing the resolving power, which in turn is obtained
by using shorter wavelength of light (λ) and greater numerical aperture.
Limit of resolution = d = 0.61λ/NA
Where,
If λ green = 0.55 p and NA = 1.30, then d = 0.61λ/NA = 0.61x0.55/1.30 = 0.26 µ. Therefore, the smallest
details that can be seen by a typical light microscope is having the dimension of approximately 0.2 µ.
Smaller objects or finer details than this cannot be resolved in a compound microscope.
5. Eyepiece: The eyepiece is a drum, which fits loosely into the draw tube. It magnifies the magnified
real image formed by the objective to a still greatly magnified virtual image to be seen by the eye.
Usually, each microscope is provided with two types of eyepieces with different magnifying powers
(X10 and X25). Depending upon the required magnification, one of the two eyepieces is inserted into
the draw tube before viewing. Three varieties of eyepieces are usually available.
They are the Huygenian, the hyper plane and the compensating. Among them, the Huygenian is very
widely used and efficient for low magnification. In this eyepiece, two simple Plano-convex lenses are
fixed, one above and the other below the image plane of the real image formed by the objective.
Bright-field microscopy is the simplest of all the optical microscopy illumination techniques. Sample
illumination is transmitted (i.e., illuminated from below and observed from above) white light, and
contrast in the sample is caused by attenuation of the transmitted light in dense areas of the sample.
Bright-field microscopy is the simplest of a range of techniques used for illumination of samples in light
Department of Biotechnology
Brainware University, Kolkata 6
BSCMRIT and 2nd Semester
General Microbiology (GEBT202)
2024-25
microscopes, and its simplicity makes it a popular technique. The typical appearance of a bright-field
microscopy image is a dark sample on a bright background, hence the name.
The light path of a bright-field microscope is extremely simple; no additional components are required
beyond the normal light-microscope setup. The light path therefore consists of:
a trans illumination light source, commonly a halogen lamp in the microscope stand;
a condenser lens, which focuses light from the light source onto the sample;
an objective lens, which collects light from the sample and magnifies the image;
Oculars and/or a camera to view the sample image.
Bright-field microscopy may use critical or Köhler illumination to illuminate the sample.
Bright-field microscopy typically has low contrast with most biological samples, as few absorb light to
a great extent. Staining is often required to increase contrast, which prevents use on live cells in many
situations. Bright-field illumination is useful for samples that have an intrinsic color, for
example chloroplasts in plant cells. Bright-field microscopy is a standard light-microscopy technique,
and therefore magnification is limited by the resolving power possible with the wavelength of visible
light.
Advantages:
Simplicity of setup with only basic equipment required.
Living cells can be seen with bright-field microscopes.
Limitations:
Very low contrast of most biological samples.
The practical limit to magnification with a light microscope is around 1300X. Although higher
magnifications are possible, it becomes increasingly difficult to maintain image clarity as the
magnification increases.
Low apparent optical resolution due to the blur of out-of-focus material.
Samples that are naturally colorless and transparent cannot be seen well, e.g. many types of
mammalian cells. These samples often have to be stained before viewing. Samples that do
have their own color can be seen without preparation, e.g. the observation of cytoplasmic
streaming in Chara cells.
Enhancements:
Reducing or increasing the amount of the light source by the iris diaphragm.
Use of an oil-immersion objective lens and a special immersion oil placed on a glass cover over
the specimen. Immersion oil has the same refraction as glass and improves the resolution of
the observed specimen.
Use of sample-staining methods for use in microbiology, such as simple stains (methylene
blue, safranin, crystal violet) and differential stains (negative stains, flagellar stains, endospore
stains).
Use of a colored (usually blue) or polarizing filter on the light source to highlight features not
Department of Biotechnology
Brainware University, Kolkata 7
BSCMRIT and 2nd Semester
General Microbiology (GEBT202)
2024-25
visible under white light. The use of filters is especially useful with mineral samples.
Fig: An example bright-field micrograph. This image shows a cross-section of the vascular tissue in a plant stem.
A. Binocular upright Bright Field Microscope B. Trinocular Upright Bright Field Microscope
Department of Biotechnology
Brainware University, Kolkata 8
BSCMRIT and 2nd Semester
General Microbiology (GEBT202)
2024-25
Advantages: Dark-field microscopy is a very simple yet effective technique and well suited for uses
involving live and unstained biological samples, such as a smear from a tissue culture or individual, water-
borne, single-celled organisms.
Dark-field microscopy techniques are almost entirely free of halo or relief-style artifacts typical of DIC and
phase-contrast imaging. This comes at the expense of sensitivity to phase information.
Considering the simplicity of the setup, the quality of images obtained from this technique is impressive.
Disadvantages: One limitation of dark-field microscopy is the low light levels seen in the final image. This
means that the sample must be very strongly illuminated, which can cause damage to the sample.
The interpretation of dark-field images must be done with great care, as common dark features of bright-
field microscopy images may be invisible, and vice versa. In general, the dark-field image lacks the low
spatial frequencies associated with the bright-field image, making the image a high-passed version of the
underlying structure.
but become visible when shown as brightness variations. It was first described in 1934 by Dutch physicist
Frits Zernike.
When light waves travel through a medium other than vacuum, interaction with the medium causes the
wave amplitude and phase to change in a manner dependent on properties of the medium. Changes in
amplitude (brightness) arise from the scattering and absorption of light, which is often wavelength-
dependent and may give rise to colors. Photographic equipment and the human eye are only sensitive to
amplitude variations. Without special arrangements, phase changes are therefore invisible. Yet, phase
changes often carry important information. Phase-contrast microscopy is particularly important in biology.
It reveals many cellular structures that are not visible with a simpler bright-field microscope, as
exemplified in the figure. These structures were made visible to earlier microscopists by staining, but this
required additional preparation and thus killing the cells. The phase-contrast microscope made it possible
for biologists to study living cells and how they proliferate through cell division. It is one of the few
methods available to quantify cellular structure and components that does not use fluorescence. After its
invention in the early 1930s, phase-contrast microscopy proved to be such an advancement in microscopy
that its inventor Frits Zernike was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1953. Phase-contrast microscopy
is basically a specially designed light microscope with all the basic parts in addition to which an annular
phase plate and annular diaphragm are fitted.
The basic principle to making phase changes visible in phase-contrast microscopy is to separate the
illuminating (background) light from the specimen-scattered light (which makes up the foreground details)
and to manipulate these differently.
In figure B, the ring-shaped illuminating light (green) that passes the condenser annulus is focused on the
specimen by the condenser. Some of the illuminating light is scattered by the specimen (yellow). The
remaining light is unaffected by the specimen and forms the background light (red). When observing an
unstained biological specimen, the scattered light is weak and typically phase-shifted by −90° (due to both
the typical thickness of specimens and the refractive index difference between biological tissue and the
surrounding medium) relative to the background light. This leads to the foreground and background
having nearly the same intensity, resulting in low image contrast.
Department of Biotechnology
Brainware University, Kolkata 10
BSCMRIT and 2nd Semester
General Microbiology (GEBT202)
2024-25
Working Principle
1. Partially coherent illumination produced by the tungsten-halogen lamp is directed through a collector
lens and focused on a specialized annulus (labeled condenser annulus) positioned in the sub stage
condenser front focal plane.
2. Wave fronts passing through the annulus illuminate the specimen and either pass through undeviated
or are diffracted and retarded in phase by structures and phase gradients present in the specimen.
3. Undeviated and diffracted light collected by the objective is segregated at the rear focal plane by a phase
plate and focused at the intermediate image plane to form the final phase-contrast image observed in the
eyepieces.
Department of Biotechnology
Brainware University, Kolkata 11
BSCMRIT and 2nd Semester
General Microbiology (GEBT202)
2024-25
● The specimen holder is an extremely thin film of carbon or collodion held by a metal grid.
4. Image viewing and Recording System
● The final image is projected on a fluorescent screen.
● Below the fluorescent screen is a camera for recording the image.
Department of Biotechnology
Brainware University, Kolkata 13
BSCMRIT and 2nd Semester
General Microbiology (GEBT202)
2024-25
8. The ocular lenses then produce the final further magnified image.
For TEM, samples must be cut into very thin cross-sections. This is to allow electrons to pass right through
the sample. After being fixed and dehydrated, samples are embedded in hard resin to make them easier
to cut. Then, an instrument called an ultramicrotome cuts the samples into ultra-thin slices (100 nm or
thinner).
Department of Biotechnology
Brainware University, Kolkata 14
BSCMRIT and 2nd Semester
General Microbiology (GEBT202)
2024-25
● It provides detailed images of the surfaces of cells and whole organisms that are not possible by
TEM. It can also be used for particle counting and size determination, and for process control.
● It is termed a scanning electron microscope because the image is formed by scanning a focused
electron beam onto the surface of the specimen in a raster pattern(the beam sweeps horizontally
left-to-right at a steady rate).
Samples destined for the SEM aren’t cut into thin sections, because the SEM visualises the surface of
three-dimensional objects. Instead, SEM samples are coated with a thin layer of metal (usually gold or
gold-palladium). The metal coating makes samples conductive.
2.6 STAINING
Types of Stain
Simple stains
A simple stain is a stain using only a single dye that does not differentiate between different types of
organisms. There is a single staining step and everything that stains is stained the same color.
Simple staining:
Differential stain
A differential stain uses more than one dye and stains different kinds of organisms with different colors.
The differential stains are Gram stain and Ziehl - Neelsen acid fast stains. Differential staining requires the
use of chemical reagents that are applied sequentially to a heat-fixed smear. The first reagent is called
the primary stain. Its function is to impart color to all cells. In order to establish a color contrast, the
second reagent used is the decolorizing agent. Based on the chemical composition of the cellular
components, the decolorizing agent may or may not remove the primary stain from the entire cell or only
from certain cell structures. The final reagent, counter stain, has a contrasting color to that of the primary
stain.
Introduction:
Danish physician Hans Christian Gram developed the Gram staining method in 1884. Gram staining
procedure uses four chemicals; crystal violet, iodine, alcohol, and safranin, to stain bacteria. Gram staining
involves primary staining, decolorizing and counterstaining. Gram devised his technique not for the
Department of Biotechnology
Brainware University, Kolkata 15
BSCMRIT and 2nd Semester
General Microbiology (GEBT202)
2024-25
purpose of distinguishing one type of bacterium from another but to make bacteria more visible in stained
sections of lung tissue. He published his method in 1884, and included in his short report the observation
that the typhus bacillus did not retain the stain. Gram staining is still the cornerstone of bacterial
identification and taxonomic division. This differential staining technique separates most bacteria into two
groups based on cell wall composition.
Gram staining differentiates bacteria by the chemical and physical properties of their cell walls. Gram-
positive cells have a thick layer of peptidoglycan in the cell wall that retains the primary stain, crystal violet.
Gram-negative cells have a thinner peptidoglycan layer that allows the crystal violet to wash out on
addition of ethanol. They are stained pink or red by the counterstain, commonly safranin or fuchsine.
Lugol's iodine solution is always added after addition of crystal violet to strengthen the bonds of the stain
with the cell membrane. Gram staining is almost always the first step in the preliminary identification of a
bacterial organism.
1. Fixation of clinical materials to the surface of the microscope slide either by heating or by using
methanol. (Methanol fixation is recommended rather than heat fixation. Methanol fixation
preserves the morphology of host cells and bacteria. Heating the slide causes cell distortion, could
increase cell debris, and may cause erroneous Gram stain results.).
2. Application of the primary stain (crystal violet). Crystal violet is a dark blue to purple dye. It stains
all cells blue/purple.
3. Application of mordant: The iodine solution (mordant) is added to form a crystal violet-iodine (CV-
I) complex; all cells continue to appear blue.
4. Decolorization step: The decolorization step distinguishes gram-positive from gram-negative cells.
The organic solvent such as acetone or ethanol extracts the blue dye complex from the lipid-rich,
thin-walled gram-negative bacteria to a greater degree than from the lipid-poor, thick-walled,
gram-positive bacteria. The gram-negative bacteria appear colorless, and gram-positive bacteria
remain blue.
5. Application of counterstain (safranin): The red dye safranin stains the decolorized gram-negative
● The highly cross-linked and multi-layered peptidoglycan of the gram-positive cell is dehydrated by
the addition of ethanol. Thus ethanol treatment traps the large CV-I complexes within the cell.
After decolorization, the gram-positive cell remains purple. In contrast, the gram-negative cell loses the
purple color and is only revealed when the counterstain, the positively charged dye safranin, is added.
Illustrative figure showing major differences between Gram Positive and Gram Negative
Limitations The sensitivity of the Gram stain procedure is low. Sometimes, you may fail to see the organism
in Gram Stain smear, but the same clinical specimen may yield organisms when cultured. To be visible on
a slide, organisms that stain by the Gram method must be present in about 104 to 105 organisms per
milliliter of centrifuged fluid. Gram staining technique is not recommended for spirochetes and
mycobacteria. Mycobacteria stain weakly with gram stain, and bacteria such
as Mycoplasma, Rickettsiae, Chlamydiae do not take up the dyes used in Gram stain or are too small to be
seen with light microscopy.
a. Absorb light
c. Reflect light
d. Scatter light
a. Opaque
b. Transparent
d. Fluorescent
c. Metal-coated specimens
d. Fluorescent specimens
6.In phase contrast microscopy, differences in refractive index are converted into differences in:
a. Absorption
b. Color
c. Intensity
d. Polarization
d. Electron microscopy
a. Shorter
b. Longer
c. Equal to
Department of Biotechnology
Brainware University, Kolkata 19
BSCMRIT and 2nd Semester
General Microbiology (GEBT202)
2024-25
d. Unrelated to
9. Which microscopy technique provides the highest resolution among the options mentioned?
d. Electron microscopy
10. Electron microscopy is capable of achieving much higher magnifications than light microscopy
because:
Answers:
8. Why can electron microscopy achieve much higher magnifications than light microscopy?
9. Which microscopy technique provides detailed images of internal cellular structures with the
highest resolution?
10. What are the primary advantages of electron microscopy over light microscopy?
11. Given that the limit of resolution (d) is determined by Abbe’s equation, d=λ/2NA, where λ is the
wavelength of the illuminating source and NA is the numerical aperture of the objective lens.
Calculate the resolution limits of a microscope A (λ ≈ 500 nm, NA = 1.4) and microscope B (λ ≈
0.005 nm, NA = 0.9). How do these values quantitatively explain the superior resolving power
among these 2 microscopes, interpret your answer?
2.7 REFERENCES
Prescott’s and Dunn’s Microbiology. Prescott. Willey et al, 10th Ed. Tata McGraw-Hill.
Brock: Biology of Microorganisms. Madigan et al, 15th Ed. Pearson.
Department of Biotechnology
Brainware University, Kolkata 21