Payment Banks: Changing Indian Payments Landscape: Sweety Nishant Shah and Neha Mehta
Payment Banks: Changing Indian Payments Landscape: Sweety Nishant Shah and Neha Mehta
SAMVAD: SIBM Pune Research Journal, Vol XIX, 12-19, December 2019 ISSN (Online) : 2348-5329
Abstract
The banking system and financial transactions have taken paradigm shift in recent decade in India. The present era
has entered into smartphone to smart wallet and they have become mainstream mode of online payment. Mobile users
use digital payment gateway and e-commerce applications to facilitate financial transactions to online retailers and
e-businesses. Demonetization has also envisaged progressive shift to cashless economy. The study was conducted to find
out the dimensions and impact of various demographic factors on the usage of payment banks in the Ahmedabad district
of Gujarat. The payment banks show a rapid growth and identified dimensions for the usage of payment banks are; user
friendly, convenience, cost effectiveness, security and easy cash management. People look for the aforesaid factors while
they transact through payment banks. It is observed that most of the people use Paytm, Freecharge and Jio money payment
banks to transact and awareness has impact on the usability of payment banks for bill payment, recharge, ticket booking
and shopping. Considering the demographic factors and its impact on the occupation, annual income and education on the
usage of payment banks whereas age and annual income both impact the frequency of usage and average spending through
payment banks.
1.1 Payment Bank of at least five years in business. The paid-up equity capital
of such payment banks shall at least be 40 percent for the
Payment bank is a non-full-service bank which can
first five years from the commencement of its business.
receive deposits and provide remittances. It cannot
The payment banks would be as per the Foreign Direct
carry out lending activities so they can issue debit card,
Investment (FDI) policy have foreign shareholdings for
but cannot issue credit card (though Paytm has recently
private sector banks. It is also mentioned that payment
launched Paytm First Card which is a credit card. Paytm
banks will be required to invest 75 percent of its demand
is offering this card in partnership with Citibank). The
deposits balances in Government Securities and Treasury
payment bank provides small saving accounts, payment
Bills to meet Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) and Statutory
and remittance services to labour workforce, low income
Liquidity Ratio (SLR), while maximum of 25 percent
households, small businesses and other unorganized
of its deposits will have to be held in current and fixed
sector entities.
deposits with other scheduled commercial banks.
1.2 RBI Guidelines for Payment Bank
RBI registers payment bank as a public limited company 2. Literature Review
under the Companies Act 2013 and licensed under section The structure of banking sector in India is divided into
22 of the banking regulation act, 1949, with specific two categories banks and financial institutions. Banks
licensing conditions restricting its activities to acceptance consists of public sector, private sector, foreign, rural,
of demand deposits and provision of payments and urban and rural cooperatives. While financial institutions
remittance services. It is governed by the provisions of the consist of All-India financial institutions, state-level and
Banking Regulation Act, 1949; Reserve bank of India act, others (Singh, 2019). The growth of Indian banking
1934; Foreign Exchange Management, 1999; Payment and sector is at good pace with rising disposable income.
Settlement Systems Act, 2007; other relevant statutes and Access to banking systems has also improved with lot of
directives issued by RBI and other regulators from time to government initiatives that promotes banking technology
time, including the regulations of SEBI regarding public and increased usage of unbanked and non-metropolitan
issues and other guidelines applicable to listed banking region. Government of India is promoting cashless
companies. transaction post demonetization which has raised the
usage of internet banking, mobile banking and payment
1.3 Eligibility Criteria banks. Cashless payments in 2016 increased by 22 per
According to the norms of RBI as discussed by Reddy cent when compared to 2015 (Waghmare, 2016). This
(2019), the existing non-bank pre-paid payment percentage will grow tremendously with the rise and
instruments issuers, professionals, non-banking finance promotion of digital India. It is expected that the users of
companies, telecom companies, supermarket chains, online banking in the country will increase to 150 million
corporate etc., would be able to apply for being a payment from 45 million by 2020 (Financial Express, 2017).
bank. These entities are required to have Rs. 100 crore Technology advancement and digital India has also led to
capitals and have to mandatory use word ‘Payment’. trending usage of payment banks. It is a new development
The scope of activities that payment banks are in the banking sector which is in some measure similar to
permitted to conduct includes deposits (only current/ banks but with limited services that banks provide.
savings account), issue ATM/debit cards, payments and The main objectives of payment banks in India are
remittances services and act as distributor of third-party cashless transaction and strengthen usage of financial
products (can cross sell insurance and mutual funds etc). services in different sectors. It is a sort of branchless
Furthermore, the criteria also discussed that the entities transaction with certain regulations (Mas, 2009). Payment
and promoters/promoter groups as defined in the SEBI banks are suitable for growing economies where the
regulations, 2009 should be fit and proper in order to be primary goal is financial inclusion (Winn, 2015). There
eligible to promote payments bank. RBI mentions to assess are very few researches that have analyzed the concept
the fit and appropriate status of the applicants on basis of of payment banks. There are various countries that have
their past records, financial stability and success records implemented the services of non-banking institutions
for payment or fund transfer. India is fighting with lot of of difficulty, compatibility, etc. (Celik, 2008; Comninos,
problems related to fake currency and black money. Hence, et al., 2008; Gan, et al., 2006; Kolodinsky, et al., 2004).
cashless/digital transactions are currently very important There are also studies that show vast difference in the
to curb counterfeiting and other problems (Alvares and demographical profiles of users and non-users of these
Cliford, 2009). Managing currency would become easier types of technologies in terms of demography, behavior
with the help of cashless transaction specifically with and attitude (Venkatesh et al., 2003; Akinci, et al., 2004).
payment banks…Transactions can be tracked, tax will not Consumers also appreciate and prefer dimensions like
be avoided, fraud will be reduced (Das and Agarwal, 2010). trust (Rousseau et al., 1998), basic service quality, value
Because of the technology advancement there are various addition, and cross-buying facility as dimensions for
new payment systems that are evolving in country. National this type of financial services (Bauer et al., 2005). Social
Electronic Fund Transfer (NEFT), Immediate Payment factors enhance the adoption process as individual thinks
Service (IMPS), Aadhaar Enabled Payment System (AEPS) how other perceives their usage of new system (Venkatesh
etc already existed, but now is the time of Unified Payments et al., 2003).
Interface (UPI) payment bank which makes the transaction
easier than any other system.
Payment bank makes bulk and frequent transactions 3. Methodology
quick and easy. This system gives consumers facility
of less operating cost rather no operating cost whereby
3.1 Problem Statement
they can access and use certain types of banking services From the literature review it is found that in India there is
like paying bills, fund transfer directly to account or to little research done on newly introduced financial services
account of other party’s payment bank, and recharges like payment banks and few studies discusses about the
(Clark, 2008). There are several factors due to which consumer perception, preferences and attitude towards
consumers are preferring usage of payment banks. These payment banks. The study wants findout the dimensions
kinds of services are easy to use, less time consuming as along with impact of various demographic factors on the
the interface of applications are made such along with the usage of payment banks.
safety feature (Venkatesh et al., 2003, Sharma and Singh,
2009). Payment banks are affordable as the operating 3.2 Research Objectives
cost is minimum or zero and there are lots of discounts
On the basis of review of literature and evidences from
and offers are available (Karjaluoto, et al, 2002, Polatoglu
previous studies, the present study has been planned with
and Ekin, 2001). There are also issues related to these
the following objectives:
services which are perceived negatively by consumers like
financial cheating, malpractice of account and problems • To identify the major dimensions influencing the pref-
with the application user friendliness (Sharma and Singh, erences and usage of payment banks.
2009, Sukkar & Hasan, 2005). • To analyse the effect of demographic variables on use
Studies also show that consumers perceive that of payment banks.
determinants of payment banks are features like less
time consumption, independence of accessing and
using the service at any time from anyplace and privacy 3.3 Research Design and Sampling
(Karjaluoto, et al, 2002). Though, there are perceived risk The study was conducted in the Ahmadabad district
and worry about security issues affects the growth of this of Gujarat, and a sample size of 196 respondents was
service (Bamoriya and Singh, 2012, Hooper & Zhou, selected on judgmental basis (where the respondents
2007, Wang, et al., 2003). The service adoption process by who had knowledge or awareness about payment banks
consumer will increase only if they find it useful and safe were surveyed) to meet the objectives of the study. The
(Ali et al., 2010). Even consumer awareness (knowledge, research design for the study is descriptive in nature.
conviction and action) affects adoptions of technology The questionnaire constructed for the study included
and payment banks (Rogers and Shoemaker, 1971, Sathye, several questions which were continuous and categorical
1999). A study conducted in US found factors that help in nature. The survey consisted of questions that covered
adoption of this facility are comparative advantage, level demographics, awareness of payment banks, financial
attitude and preferences towards payment banks, and Time taken for .749
reasons for not adopting the said services. transaction is
less
Customer .771
4. Data Analysis Services
4.1 Identification of Dimensions of Usage Convenience of .715
Transaction
of Payment Banks
No time to go .521
To determine the important factors affecting the at banks
preferences for usage of payment banks, the Principal Contact number .683
Component Factor Analysis (PCA) with varimax rotation is only required
was performed for the 20 items measuring perception. As and there is no
shown in the (Table 1), the result indicates that Bartlett’s need for the
details required
Test of Sphericity (Bartlett, 1954) was significant (Chi
in banking
square 3789.826, p-value<0.0001). The Kaiser Mayer- transaction
Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy was high at like IFSC
0.710 is exceeding the recommended value of 0.6 (Kaiser, code, account
1974). The two results of (KMO and Bartllet’s) suggest number, etc.
that the data is appropriate to proceed with factor analysis Factor-3 (Cost 0.737
(Malhotra, 2010). effective)
Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was performed Discounts/ .693
and only those factors retained which had the Eigen value offers Available
more than 1 since they are considered significant. The Cashless .417
result was that there was a total of 5 factors consisting transaction
19 items, which explained for 72.264% of the total Easy .720
variance. One item has communality less than 0.5 which Accessibility
is discarded from the analysis. The inter-item correlation One can .698
keep track on
and inter-item consistency of each factor was also
expenditure
measured by calculating each factor’s Cronbach’s alpha incurred
(Cronbach, 1951).
Factor- 4 0.710
(Security)
Table 1. Factors affecting perception and usage of Secured .745
payment banks Transaction
Privacy .843
F-1 F-2 F-3 F-4 F-5 Reliability
(Cronbach Immediate .744
Alpha) proofs of
transactions are
Factor-1 (User 0.865 available
Friendly)
Safety of money .529
Easy to use .849 deposited
User Friendly .796 Factor-5 0.581
APP Interface (Easy Cash
Innovative .577 Management)
Linking of .486 Relief from .709
banking service exchange
with payment of small
bank denomination
Factor-2 0.808 Instant refund .837
(Convenience) available
Factor 1 loaded on four variables and is labeled as User Table 2. Different payment banks and mean values
Friendly and it comprises of dimensions related to easy Sr. no Payment bank Mean Value
usability, application interface, linking of banking accounts 1 Paytm 1.28
with payment bank and innovative features of payment
2 Aditya Birla Money 1.96
bank. The reliability of the variables constitutes the factor
3 Airtel M Commerce Service Ltd. 1.75
is 0.865 (Cronbach’s alpha). The factor extracted is very
important to people for doing their financial transaction 4 IPPB (India Post Payment Bank) 1.92
and at ease it can be done. Consistent with our expectation 5 Mitra (Fino Payments Bank) 1.92
based on literature review, it was found that people prefer 6 JIO Money (Reliance Industries Ltd.) 1.67
financial transaction if technology is simple and user 7 National Security Depository Ltd. 2.025
friendly. 8 Easy Money (Tech Mahendra Ltd.) 1.91
Factor 2 loaded five variables and is labeled as 9 Vodafone m-pesa Ltd. 1.75
Convenience with reliability 0.808 (Cronbach’s Alpha). The 10 Phonepe 1.87
factor comprises statements that relate to convenience of
11 BHIM 1.70
transaction, less transaction time, good customer services,
12 Freecharge 1.61
not required to visit bank for transactions and details for
13 Ultra cash 1.98
fund transfer. Considering time constraints people are
using payment banks where they are not required to visit 14 Oxigen Wallet 1.91
bank branches. 15 Trupay 2.01
Factor 3 loaded on four variables and has reliability 16 MobiKwik Lite 1.85
0.737 (Cronbach’s Alpha). The dimension is labelled as 17 Paynear 2.01
Cost Effectiveness. It includes variables like discounts/ 18 Chillr 2.15
offers available on payment bank usages like points, wallets
and discounts. Payments banks are even beneficial for
expenditure tracking and to perform cash less transaction
without extra charges.
4.3 Association between Awareness about
Factor 4 loaded on four variables with reliability of Payment Bank Services and usage of
0.710 (Cronbach’s alpha). The factor is labelled as Security Payment Bank
which is also one of the most important factors considered Chi-square has been applied to check the association
by the users while they transacting in money. The factor between usage and awareness of payment bank.
consists security and confidentiality of transaction,
immediate proofs of transactions and safety of money Hypothesis-1
deposited with payment bank. H1: There is significant association between usage of pay-
Factor 5 loaded on two variables with reliability of ment bank and awareness of payment bank.
0.581 (Cronbach’s alpha). The factor is labelled as Easy The chi- analysis has χ = 42.668, p = 0.00; (p value
Cash Management consisting statements like hassle free <.05), so null hypothesis is rejected and can be inferred
transaction of not small denomination of currency and that awareness and usage of payment banks are
instant refund facility. significantly associated.
4.2 Awareness of different Payment Banks 4.4 Purpose of using Payment Banks
The data about the awareness of the payment banks col- To understand the different purposes of using payment
lected from the respondents is depicted in (Table 2). banks, multiple choice question was asked to respondents
From the data it can be inferred that most of the respon- and the mean values inferred that most of the respondents
dents are aware about the Paytm (Mean Values; 1.28), use payment banks to make bill payments (mean value-
Freecharge (Mean Values; 1.61), JioMoney (Mean Values; 1.565), recharge (mean value-1.62), ticket booking and
1.67), BHIM (Mean Values; 1.70) and Vodafone m-pesa shopping in order (mean value-1.75). There are some
ltd. ((Mean Values; 1.75) whereas other payment banks as other usages also like to book hotel or travel, payment for
per mean values have less awareness among respondents. insurance premium and school fees payment.
payment banks in India must try linking and extending 2. Ali, Sadia Samar, & Bharadwaj, R.K. (2010). Factor analysis
banking services with payment banks. It is observed that approach of decision making in Indian e-banking: a value
most of the respondents feel the same. KYC can be used to adding consumer’s perspective. Retrieved from: http://
check the credibility of the user to avoid fraud cases. This inderscience.metapress.com/app/home/contributionasp?re
will help people to use smart banking systems rather than ferrer=parent&b ackto=issue, 2,6
3. Al-Sukkar and Hasan, H. (2005). Toward a model for the
traditional branch wise banking. There are large numbers
acceptance of internet banking, MB139QH in developing
of rural areas in the country where bank branches are less.
countries, Information Technology for Development, 11(4),
People residing in rural and the migrants need to often 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.20026
send money home which is usually done in cash with 4. Alvares, Cliford. (2009). The problem regarding fake cur-
help of some traveler. Hence, the usage of bank account rency in India. Business Today, 18(5), 24-24
reduces. Marketer must try spreading awareness and 5. Bamoriya, P. S. & Singh, P. (2012). Mobile banking in india:
impart knowledge to this segment related to usage of barrier in adoption and service preferences. Integral Review-
payment banks and its features which will enhance the A Journal of Management, 5(1), 1–7. ISSN:2278-6120
banking operations. 6. Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors
Marketers must also provide more secured and for various chi square approximation. Journal of Royal
transparent transactions to boost up payment banks Statistical Society, 16(Series B), 296-298.
usage as people trust the traditional banking systems. 7. Bauer, H.H., Hammerschmidt, M., & Falk, T. (2005).
Measuring the quality of e-banking portals. International
The penetration of payment banks can be enhanced by
Journal of Bank Marketing, 23(2), 153–75. https://doi.
reducing the difficulty of digital transaction, changing
org/10.1108/02652320510584395
perception of customers related to it and promoting
8. Celik, H. (2008). What determines Turkish customers’
cashless transactions. Most of the retailers do not have the acceptance of internet banking? Marketing, 26(5), 353–370.
facility of digital transaction. If a customer wants to make https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320810894406
cashless transaction, aforesaid reason becomes hindrance. 9. Clark, A. (2008). Mobile banking & Switching.
Marketers must tie-up with retailers and promote usage Retrieved from: www.mcom.co.nz/assets/sm/163/.../
of payment banks for convenient cashless transactions. CriticalSwitchingEvents-WhitePaper.pdf
Payment banks must link up with some major financial 10. Comninos, A., Esselaar, S., Ndiwalana, A., & Stork, C. (2008).
institutions and provide some sort of offers, discounts, Towards evidence based ICT policy and regulation m-bank-
and schemes to increase its usage. All this will lead to ing the unbanked. Retrieved from: http://externo.casafrica.
rapid growth and more money into banking system. es/aeo/pdf/english/overview_part_2_09_aeo_09.pdf
There are many bottlenecks and challenges which need to 11. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal
structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. https://doi.
be addressed in terms of real benefits, technology, safety,
org/10.1007/BF02310555
perception, etc. The current users of this facility are the
12. Das, A. & Agarwal, R. (2010) Cashless Payment System in
early adopters and majority who are using it because of ease India- A Roadmap Technical Report 2010.
of transaction, time convenience and most importantly 13. Financial Expres., (2017). Online banking users in India
cashless transaction. Security concern of users should to reach 150 million by 2020 according to the Study.
be answered by marketers soon upgrading their systems. Retrieved from: http://www.financialexpress.com/industry/
Government, banks and marketers should communicate banking-finance/online-banking-users-in-india-to-reach-
and create awareness and knowledge regarding payment 150-billion-by-2020-according-to-a-study/731048/
banks, its importance and usability to increase subscribes 14. Gan, C., Clemes, M., Limsounchai, V., & Weng, A. (2006).
or users which will increase adoption of this system. A logic analysis of electronic banking in New Zealand.
International Journal of Bank Marketing, 24(6), 360–383.
https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320610701717
6. References 15. Hooper, V. & Zhou, Y. (2007). Addictive, dependent, compul-
sive? A study of mobile phone usage. 20th Bled eConference
1. Akinci, S., Aksoy, S., and Atilgan, E. (2004). Adoption of eMergence: Merging and Emerging Technologies, Processes,
internet banking among sophisticated consumer seg- and Institutions Bled, Slovenia, June 4–6.
ments in an advanced developing country. International 16. Karjaluoto, H. (2002). Selection criteria for a mode
Journal of Bank Marketing, 22(3), 212–32. https://doi. of bill payment: Empirical investigation among finn-
org/10.1108/02652320410530322 ish bank customers. International Journal of Retail and
Distribution Management, 30(6), 331–339. https://doi. International Journal of Bank Marketing. 17(7), 324–334.
org/10.1108/09590550210429540 https://doi.org/10.1108/02652329910305689
17. Kolodinsky, J.M., Hogarth, J.M., &Hilgert, M.A. (2004). 25. Sharma, P, and Singh, P (2009). Users’ perception about
The adoption of electronic banking technologies by US mobile banking- with special reference to Indore & around.
consumers. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 22(4), Review of Business & Technology Research, 2(1), 1–4.
238–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320410542536 26. Singh, H. (2019). Structure of Banking Sector in
18. Malhotra, N. K. (2010). Marketing Research. An Applied India. Retrieved from: https://www.jagranjosh.com/
Approach, 6th Global Edition, London: Pearson. general-knowledge/structure-of-banking-sector-in-
19. Mas, Ignacio. (2009). The economics of branchless bank- india-1448530019-1 accessed on 2/4/2019.
ing. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 27. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., and Davis, F. (2003).
4.2: 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2009.4.2.57 User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A
20. Polatoglu, V.N. & Ekin, S. (2001). An empirical investigation Unified View. MIS Quaterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.
of the Turkish consumers’ acceptance of Internet banking org/10.2307/30036540
services. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 19(4), 28. Waghmare, A. (2016). 2016: The year of cashless pay-
156–165. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320110392527 ments trending upwards. Retrieved from: http://www.
21. Reddy, S. (2019). What are Payment Banks and Small business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/post-demon-
Banks? Retrieved from: https://www.relakhs.com/pay- etisation-digital-payments-are-down-15-116122700098_
ments-banks-small-banks-meaning-benefits/ 1.html
22. Rogers, E.M., & Shoemaker, F. (1971). Communications in 29. Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Lin, H., & Tang, T. (2003). Determinants
Innovation. New York: Free Press. of user acceptance of internet banking: an empirical study.
23. Rousseau, D.M, Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., Camerer, C. 1998. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 14(5), 501–519.
Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230310500192
Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 393–404. https:// 30. Winn, J.K. (2015). Mobile payments and financial inclu-
doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617 sion: Kenya, Brazil and India as Case Studies. University of
24. Sathye, M. (1999). Adoption of internet banking by Washington School of Law Research Paper, 29.
Australian consumers: an empirical investigation. The