Matrix Analysis - FCE
Matrix Analysis - FCE
Course Requirements
Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION
Course Goals
In this course students will expand their understanding of the analysis of framed
structures. Specifically students will learn to find internal forces/stresses and
deflections so that appropriate structural elements can be determined.
determined Structural
Analysis (CVE 311) dealt with “classical” methods of analysis that were performed by
hand, covering relatively simple truss, beam, and frame structures. In CVE 511 we will
revisit elements of CVE 311, then concentrate on modern “matrix” methods of analysis,
which are easily adaptable for computer solution. A very brief introduction to finite
element analysis, which is sequentially the next level of structural analysis and widely
used in industry, will be given.
Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION
Course Objectives
• The student should gain an understanding of the theory and development of methods
to analyze linear elastic framed structures using the knowledge of mathematics
(linear algebra) engineering (mechanics and material behavior), and computer
science (MATLab,
(MATLab Excel,
Excel Visual Analysis,
Analysis RISA)
• The student develops a foundation of experience for the effective use of computer
programs
p g that rely
y on stiffness ((matrix)) methods of solution.
Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION
Course Outcomes
The student will be expected to show proficiency in both the theory and practical
application of matrix based structural analyses. Students will be able to use software to
analyze realistic civil engineering structures. This will require several skills, including:
4. Interpret
p outputp and validate results using
g simplified
p models and hand
calculations.
Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION
Course Assessment
This course will measure progress in meeting the previously mentioned objectives by
requiring students to:
Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION
Brief History of “Matrix Analysis” Methods (see article posted to web page)
1960 Paper by Argyris and Kelsey introduces the concept that the
displacement-based method of structural analysis is a dual
methodology to the force-based of structural analysis.
Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION
Structural analyses of complex structures utilizing matrix methods involve five key
ingredients:
Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION
Discrete
sc e e Element
e e
Methods of
Analysis
Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION
Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION
Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION
Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION
Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION
In this course we will focus on SMALL STRAIN, LINEAR ELASTIC, STATIC analysis.
Fi it Element
Finite El t analysis
l i can be
b extended
t d d to
t include
i l d more complex
l structural
t t l behavior
b h i
including:
2. Material nonlinearity
• Plasticity
• Creep
• Viscous elasticity
The analytical techniques developed in this class and courses beyond this class can be utilized
to analyse components in other fields, e.g,.
Computational Fluid Dynamics - (CFD) is a branch of fluid mechanics that uses numerical
methods to analyze problems that involve fluid flows. Field equations required to simulate the
interaction of liquids and gases with surfaces defined by boundary conditions are solved with
matrix methods. Complex simulation scenarios such as transonic or turbulent flows are
examined.
Lecture 1: INTRODUCTION
References (continued)
12. J.C. McCormac and J.K. Nelson, Structural Analysis, 2nd ed. Addison-
Wesley, 1997.
13. R.K. Livesley R.K., Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis, 2nd ed.
Pergamon Press, 1975.
14. W. McGuire, R.H. Gallagher and R.D. Ziemian, Matrix Structural
Analysis, 2nd ed. John Wiley, 2000.
15 J.L.
15. Meek Matrix Structural Analysis,
J L Meek, Analysis McGraw-Hill,
McGraw Hill 1971.
1971
16. M. Paz and W.E. Leigh, Integrated Matrix Analysis of Structures - Theory
and Computation, Kluwer Pub., 2001.
17 J.S.
17. J S Przeminiecki
Przeminiecki, Theory of Matrix Structural Analysis,
Analysis Dover Press,
Press
1985.
18. R.L. Sack, Matrix Structural Analysis, Waveland Press, 1994.
19. R.E. Sennet,, Matrix Analysis
y off Structures,, Waveland Press,, 2000.
20. C-K Wang, Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis, International Textbook
Co., 1970
Lecture 4: PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS OF
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Introduction
The flexibility and stiffness methods are the principle subjects of this course. The concepts
are applicable to structures of all types. We will concentrate in this course on beams and
framed structures.
All of the structural elements utilized in this course are usually components of framed
structures. They are classified as follows:
• Beams
B
• Plane trusses
• Space trusses
• Plane frames
• Grids
• Space frames
Framed structural elements are long in comparison to their cross sectional areas.
areas Loads on
these elements consist of concentrated forces, distributed loads and/or couples.
Continuous Beam
Beams have one or more points of support referred to as joints – points A,B,C,D.
ABCD
Beams deflect in the plane of of the loads. Internal forces consist of shear forces, bending
moments (no torques – take CVE 513), and axial loads
Plane Truss
Assume hinged joints - no bending moments through joint and absolutely no twisting
moments through joint (consider a gusset plate).
Loads acting on members are replaced by statically equivalent forces at the joints.
Space Truss
Couple on a member must have moment vector perpendicular to the axis of member.
member A truss
member is incapable of supporting a twisting moment.
Lecture 4: PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS OF
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Plane Frame
Internal resultants consist of bending moments, shearing forces and axial forces.
Grid
Elements can intersect (rigid connection) or cross (hinged connection) one another
All couples have their vectors in the plane of the grid. Torques can be supported.
Each member is assumed to have two axes of symmetry so that bending and torsion can
occur independently of one another (see unsymmetrical bending in CVE 513)
Lecture 4: PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS OF
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Space Frame
Most g
general type
yp of framed structure.
The two external forces can be considered as an action. Also the two reactive forces RA and
RB can be considered as an action. The entire system of forces P, P, RA and RB could also be
considered as an action
Actions and the displacements corresponds to one another, i.e., P1 and ¨ correspond to
each other in the previous overhead since they are of an analogous type (force-translation).
It is not implied that the displacement ¨ is caused entirely by P1, or that P1 only
corresponds to ¨. From undergraduate strength of materials we know that
Notation:
The letter A is used to denote actions - this includes concentrated forces and couples
couples.
The letter D is used to denote displacements - this includes translations and rotations.
Consider the beam shown below subjected to several actions producing several
displacements:
Clearly
C ea y three
t ee actions
act o s are
a e present
p ese t as well
we as three
t ee displacements.
d sp ace e ts.
Lecture 4: PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS OF
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
If we can determine the quantities D11 through D33 then by superposition each displacement
can be written as follows:
D1 D11 D12 D13
Equilibrium
The objectives of any structural analysis is the determination of reactions at supports and
internal actions (bending moments, shearing forces, etc.). A correct solution for any of these
quantities must satisfy the equations of equilibrium:
¦F X 0 ¦FY 0 ¦FZ 0
¦M X 0 ¦M Y 0 ¦M Z 0
In the stiffness method of analysis the equilibrium conditions at the joints of the structure are
the basic equations
q that are solved.
Lecture 4: PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS OF
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Compatibility
We usually impose compatibility at a joint. If two structural elements frame into a joint then
there displacements and rotations at the rigid connection must be the same or consistent with
each other.
We apply a much more rigorous mathematical definition in CVE 604 for compatibility. It is
simply noted here that strain is a function of displacement.
displacement There are 6 components of strain
and only 3 components of displacement at a point in a three dimensional analysis. A
“compatible” displacement field will produce an appropriate state of strain at a point.
Flexibility
l ibili methods
h d use equations
i that
h express the h compatibility
ibili off the
h displacements.
di l
Understanding this issue as it applies to structural analyses give the student a better “feel” as
to how a structure behaves and an ability to judge the correctness of a solution.
Let
One of these four unknown is referred to as a static redundant. The number of static
redundant represents the degree of static indeterminacy of the structures
A distinction may also be made between external and internal indeterminacy. The
beam in the previous slide is externally statically indeterminate to the first degree.
degree
The truss below is determinate from the standpoint that we could calculate the
reactions given the loads applied. However, we would be unable to find the internal
forces in the cross members. The truss is internally indeterminate to the second
degree.
Lecture 4: PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS OF
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
r = number of reactions
c = number of internal conditions (c = 1 for a hinge; c = 2 for a roller; and c = 0 for a
structure with no geometric instability)
b = number of members
r = number of reactions
j = number of joints Three Dimensional Frames
c = number of internal conditions
Degree of indeterminacy = (b + r) - (3j + c)
b = Number of members
r = Number of reactions
j = Number of joints
c = Number of internal conditions
Lecture 4: PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS OF
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
For the stiffness method the displacement at joints become unknown quantities. Thus
kinematic indeterminacy is important here. When a structure is subjected to loads each joint
may undergo
d translations
l i and/or
d/ rotations.
i At
A supports some displacements
di l will
ill be
b known,
k
others will not. The number of unknown joint displacements corresponds to the kinematic
indeterminacy of structure. Reconsider the beams and the truss from the previous slide.
Consider the beam in (a). At joint A the beam is fixed and cannot undergo any joint
displacement. However at joint B the beam is free to translate in the horizontal direction
and rotate in the p
plane of the beam. Thus the beam is kinematicallyy indeterminate to the
second degree.
The truss in in (c) can undergo two displacements at each joint. Although rotations can take
place
l att eachh joint,
j i t since
i moments
t cannott be
b sustained
t i d att truss
t joints,
j i t rotations
t ti have
h no
physical significance in this problem.
Often structural members are very stiff in the axial direction. Thus very little axial
displacement will take place. Removing the axial load or deformation from the system of
unknowns can reduce the degree of indeterminacy of the structure.
Lecture 4: PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS OF
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Mobile Structures
When the number of reactive forces is g greater than the number of equations
q of static
equilibrium for the entire structure taken as a free body, the structure is statically
indeterminate
However a problem can appear to be statically determinate when it is not. Consider the
beam above. This is a planar problem. Thus in general there are three equations of statics
available namely
¦F X 0 ¦F Y 0 ¦M Z 0
But the summation of forces in the x-direction is not applicable, and the structure is mobile.
Lecture 5: PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS OF
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Principle Of Superposition
Requirements:
The first demands that the material is linear elastic. The second allows all calculations can be
conducted in terms of the original dimensions of the structure. The third implies that the
effect of axial forces on bending is neglected (moment magnification).
The relationship between actions and displacements play an important role in structural
analysis. A convenient way to see this relationship is through a linear, elastic spring
The action A will compress (translate) the spring an amount D. This can be expressed
through the simple expression:
D FA
In this equation F is the flexibility of the spring, and this quantity is defined as the
displacement produced by a unit value of the action A.
A SD
1 1
F S
S
1
S F 1
F
Lecture 5: PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS OF
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
With
D11 deflection at A1 caused by A1
D12 deflection at A1 caused by A2
D13 deflection at A1 caused by A3
th
then
D11 F11 A1
D12 F12 A2
D13 F13 A3
All the flexibility coefficients in the figures have two subscripts (Fij). The first subscript
identifies the displacement (Di) associated with an action (Aj). The second subscript
denotes where the unit action is being applied. Figure (c) is associated with action A1,
figure (d) is associated with action A2, and figure (e) is associated with action A3.
Flexibility coefficients are taken as positive when the deformation represented by the
coefficient is in the same direction as the ith action.
Lecture 5: PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS OF
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
A1 S 11 D1 S 12 D 2 S 13 D 3
A2 S 21 D1 S 22 D 2 S 23 D 3
A3 S 31 D1 S 32 D 2 S 33 D 3
This system
Thi t off equations
ti can be
b obtained
bt i d from
f the
th
displacement system of equations under suitable
conditions.
Each stiffness coefficient is shown acting in its assumed positive direction, which is
the same direction as the corresponding action.
action If the actual direction of one of the
stiffnesses is opposite to that assumption, then the stiffness coefficient will have a
negative value.
The calculations of the stiffness coefficients for the beam shown can be quite
lengthy. However, analyzing a beam like the one shown previously by the stiffness
method can be expedited by utilizing a special structure where all the joints of the
structure are restrained. We will get into the details of this in the next section of
notes.
t
The primary purpose of this discussion is for the student to visualize what flexibility
and stiffness coefficients represent physically.
Lecture 5: PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS OF
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
The calculations of displacements in larger more extensive structures by the means of the
matrix methods derived later requires that the structure be subject to loads applied only at the
joints. Thus in general, loads are categorized into those applied at joints, and those that are
not.
t Loads
L d that
th t are nott applied
li d to
t joints
j i t mustt be
b replaced
l d with
ith statically
t ti ll equivalent
i l t loads.
l d
Consider the statically indeterminate beam with a distributed load between joints A and B, and
a point load between joints B and C:
First one must identify joints, and here we select points A, B, and C for convenience. By
superposition the beam can be separated into two beams, one with loads located at the joints,
and a second with loads between the joints:
Lecture 5: PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS OF
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
To transfer the loads that act on the members to the joints, the joints of the structure are
restrained against all displacements. This produces two fixed end beams:
When these fixed end beams are subjected to the member loads, a set of fixed end actions is
produced.
d d The Th same fixed-end
fi d d actions
ti are shown
h in
i the
th following
f ll i figure
fi where
h they
th are
depicted as restraint actions in the restrained structure.
If the restraint actions are reversed in direction, they constitute a set of forces and couples that
are statically equivalent to the member loads. These equivalent joint loads, when added to the
actual joint loads produce the combined joint loads shown in the next figure.
figure
The combined loads are then used in carrying out the structural analysis. Will the unknown
displacements at nodes be correct using this statically equivalent system? Will the
displacements computed along segment AB in the figure above be equivalent to the
displacements along segment AB given the original load configuration?
Lecture 6: FLEXIBILITY AND STIFFNESS
MATRICES
or
n n n
^D` >F @ ^A` ¦ Di ¦ ¦F ij Aj
i 1 i 1 j 1
or
n n n
^A` >S @ ^D` ¦ Ai ¦ ¦S ij Dj
i 1 i 1 j 1
Lecture 6: FLEXIBILITY AND STIFFNESS
MATRICES
Since the actions Ai and displacements Di correspond to one another in both formats, it
follows the flexibility matrix Fij and the stiffness matrix Sij are related to each other.
Taking the matrix inverse of
Thus the stiffness matrix is the inverse of the flexibility matrix and vice versa provided that
the same set of actions and displacements are being considered in both equations
Note that a flexibility matrix or stiffness matrix is not an array that is determined by the
geometry of the structure only.
only The matrices are directly related to the geometry and the set
of actions and displacements under consideration.
Lecture 6: FLEXIBILITY AND STIFFNESS
MATRICES
Example
The cantilever beam shown in the figure below is subjected to a force (A1) and moment (A2)
at the free end. Develop the flexibility matrix and the stiffness matrix for assuming
displacements D1 and D2 are of interest.
(continued)
L3 L2 L2 L
D1 A1 A2 D2 A1 A2
3EI 2 EI 2 EI EI
ª L3 L2 º
« »
>F @ « 3EI 2 EI »
« 2 »
« L L »
«¬ 2 EI EI »¼
Lecture 6: FLEXIBILITY AND STIFFNESS
MATRICES
In order to develop the stiffness matrix consider the following beam reactions
due to applied displacements:
12 EI 6 EI 4 EI
S11 S12 S 21 S 22
L3 L2 L
12 EI 6 EI 6 EI 4 EI
A1 D1 D2 A2 D1 D2
L3 L2 L2 L
When the flexibility matrix and the stiffness matrix are multiplied together, the
result is the identity matrix:
ª 12 EI 6 EI º ª L3 L2 º
« L3 « » ª1 0º
L2 » « 3EI 2 EI » « »
>S @>F @ «
«
»
»« 2 » « »
« 6 EI 4 EI » « L L » «¬0 1 »¼
«¬ L2 L »¼ «¬ 2 EI EI »¼
This infers but does not prove that the two matrices are inverses of one another.
Reciprocal Theorems
If th
the lloads
d on a structure
t t are zero andd gradually
d ll increase
i suchh that
th t all
ll loadings
l di hit peakk
values at the same time, the work done during this period of time will be the average, hence
1
W A1 D1 A2 D2 A3 D3 An Dn
2
In a matrix format but both A and D are column vectors by definition so to perform this
matrix multiplication we must use the transpose of one or the other column vectors.
vectors Thus
§1· §1·
¨ ¸ ^A` ^D` ¨ ¸ ^A`^D`
T T
W
©2¹ ©2¹
Recall that
§1· §1·
¨ ¸ ^A` ^D` ¨ ¸ ^A` >F @^A`
T T
W
©2¹ ©2¹
Substituting this relationship in the equation from the previous slide yields
§1· §1·
¨ ^A`^D` ¨ ^A` >F @ ^A`
T T T
W
©2¹ ©2¹
§1· T §1·
¨ ¸^A` >F @^A` ¨ ¸^A`>F @ ^A`
T T
©2¹ ©2¹
Thus the flexibility matrix must be symmetric. To prove the stiffness matrix is symmetric
recall that
§1· §1·
¨ ¸ ^A`^D` ¨ ¸ >S @^D`^D`
T T
W
©2¹ ©2¹
§1· §1· T
¨ ^A` ^D` ¨ >S @ ^D` ^D`
T T
W
©2¹ ©2¹
©2¹ ©2¹
>S @ >S @T
Hence the stiffness matrix is symmetric. Of course the fact that the stiffness matrix is
symmetric could have been concluded from the fact that the flexibility matrix is symmetric
and the stiffness matrix is the inverse of the flexibility matrix. But this has not been
f
formally
ll proven.
Lecture 7: The Flexibility Method
Flexibility Method
In 1864 James Clerk Maxwell published the first consistent treatment of the flexibility
method for indeterminate structures. His method was based on considering deflections, but
the presentation was rather brief and attraced little attention. Ten years later Otto Mohr
independently extended Maxwell’s theory to the present day treatment. The flexibility
method will sometimes be referred to in the literature as Maxwell-Mohr method.
The fundamental concepts that underpin the flexibility method will be illustrated by the
study of a two span beam
beam. The procedure is as follows
A more general approach consists in finding the displacement at B caused by a unit load in
the direction of RB. Then this displacement can be multiplied by RB to determine the total
displacement
Also in a more general approach a consistent sign convention for actions and displacements
must be adopted. The displacements in the released structure at B are positive when they are
in the direction of the action released,
released i.e.,
i e upwards is positive.
positive
5 w L4
'B
384 EI
Th by
Thus b the
h compatibility
ibili equation
i
'B §5·
'B G B RB 0 RB ¨ ¸w L
GB ©8¹
Lecture 7: The Flexibility Method
Both displacements
p are shown in their
assumed positive direction.
Lecture 7: The Flexibility Method
We can now write the compatibility equations for this structure. The displacements
p g to Q1 and Q2 will be zero. These are labeled DQ1 and DQ2 respectively
corresponding p y
In some cases DQ1 and DQ2 would be nonzero then we would write
The superposition equations from the previous page can be written in matrix format as
^D `
Q ^D `QL >F @ ^Q`
where:
{DQ } - matrix of actual displacements corresponding to the redundant
{DQL } - matrix of displacements in the released structure corresponding to the
redundant action [Q] and due to the loads
[F] - flexibility matrix for the released structure corresponding to the redundant
actions
ti [Q]
{Q} - matrix of redundant
DQ1 ½ DQL1 ½ Q1 ½
^D `
Q ® ¾ ^D `
QL ® ¾ ^Q` ® ¾
¯ DQ 2 ¿ ¯ DQL 2 ¿ ¯Q2 ¿
ª F11 F12 º
F «F F22 »¼
¬ 21
Lecture 7: The Flexibility Method
The vector [Q] of redundants can be found by solving for them from the matrix equation
on the p
previous overhead.
To see how this works consider the previous beam with a constant flexural rigidity EI. If
we identify actions on the beam as
P1 2P M PL P2 P P3 P
ª0º
DQ «0»
¬ ¼
13PL3 97 PL3
DQL1 DQL 2
24 EI 48 EI
The positive signs indicate that both displacements are upward. In a matrix format
PL3 ª 26 º
>D @
QL
48EI «¬ 97 »¼
Lecture 7: The Flexibility Method
The flexibility matrix [F ] is obtained by subjecting the beam to unit load corresponding
to Q1 and computing the following displacements
L3 5 L3
F11 F21
3EI 6 EI
Similarly subjecting the beam to unit load corresponding to Q2 and computing the
following displacements
5 L3 8 L3
F12 F22
6 EI 3EI
ªQ1 º
>Q @ «Q » >F @1 >DQ @ >D @
QL
¬ 2¼
§ 6 EI · ª 16 5 º ª0º § PL3 · ª26 º ½
¨ 3 ¸« ® ¨¨ ¸¸ « » ¾
© 7 L ¹ ¬ 5 2 »¼ ¯ «¬0»¼ © 48 EI ¹ ¬97 ¼ ¿
§ P · ª 69 º
¨ ¸« »
© 56 ¹ ¬ 64¼
Lecture 7: The Flexibility Method
The redundants have been obtained. The other unknown reactions can be found from
the released structure.
structure Displacements can be computed from the known reactions on
the released structure and imposing the compatibility equations.
Example
A three
h span bbeam shown
h at the
h lleft
f is
i
acted upon by a uniform load w and
concentrated loads P as shown. The
g y EI.
beam has a constant flexural rigidity
Treat the supports at B and C as
redundants and compute these
redundants.
In this problem the bending moments at B
and C are chosen as redundants to
indicate how unit rotations are applied to
released structures.
Each redundant consists of two moments,
one acting in each adjoining span.
Lecture 7: The Flexibility Method
The displacements corresponding to the two redundants consist of two rotations – one for
j g span.
each adjoining p The displacement
p DQL1 and DQL2 corresponding
p g to Q1 and Q2.
These displacements will be caused by the loads acting on the released structure.
The displacement DQL1 is composed of two parts, the rotation of end B of member AB
and the rotation of end B of member BC
wL3 PL2
DQL1
24 EI 16 EI
Similarly,
PL2 PL2 PL2
DQL 2
16 EI 16 EI 8 EI
such that
L2 L 3P º
ª 2 wL
DQL « »
48 EI ¬ 6P ¼
The flexibility coefficients are determined next. The flexibility coefficient F11 is the sum
of two rotations at joint B. One in span AB and the other in span BC (not shown below)
L L 2L
F11
3EI 3EI 3EI
Similarly the coefficient F21 is equal to the sum of rotations at joint C. However, the
rotation in span CD is zero from a unit rotation at joint B. Thus
L
F21
6 EI
Lecture 7: The Flexibility Method
Similarly
L L 2L
F22
3EI 3EI 3EI
L
F12
6 EI
1 2 EI ª 4 1º
F « »
5L ¬ 1 4 ¼
ªQ1 º
>Q @ «Q » >F @1 >DQ @ >D @
QL
¬ 2¼
2 EI ª 4 1º ª0º L2 ª 2 wL 3P º ½
« 1 4 » ® «0 » « »¾
5L ¬ ¼ ¯¬ ¼ 48 EI ¬ 6P ¼¿
L ª 8wL 6 P º
120 ¬« 2 wL 21P »¼
and
wL2 PL wL2 7 PL
Q1 Q2
15 20 15 40
Lecture 8: Flexibility Method
Example
The displacements in the released structure caused by P and corresponding to Q1, Q2 and Q3
are in the previous figures.
The displacement DQL1 consists of the sum of two translations which are found by analyzing
the released structure as a set of two cantilever beams AB and CB.
First analyze the cantilever beam AB. The load P will cause a downward translation at B and a
clockwise rotation at B. There is no axial displacement thus
DQL1 AB
0
The displacements DQL2 and DQL3 also consist of two vertical displacements and two rotations.
5 PL3 PL2
DQL 2 DQL 3 AB
AB
48 EI 8 EI
Lecture 8: Flexibility Method
Since there is no load on member CB, there will be no displacement at end B and
DQL1 CB
DQL 2 CB
DQL 3 CB
0
0 ½
° °
° ° 0 ½
° 5 PL °
3
PL2 ° °
DQL ® ¾ ® 5 L ¾
° 48 EI
2 °
48 EI ° 6 °
° PL ° ¯ ¿
° 8 EI °
¯ ¿
We now want to determine the flexibility matrix F. Consider the released structure with
Q1 1
The displacements corresponding to Q1, Q2 and Q3 are shown as flexibility coefficients F11,
F21 and F31. If both axial and flexural deformations are considered, the displacements at
end B of member AB are
L
F11 AB
F21 AB
0 F31 AB
0
AE
H3 H2
F11 CB
F21 CB
0 F31 CB
3EI 2 EI
L H3 H2
F11 F21 0 F31
AE 3EI 2 EI
Lecture 8: Flexibility Method
Q2 1
H
CB : F12 CB
0 F22 CB
F32 CB
0
AE
Which leads to flexibility coefficients
L3 H L2
F21 0 F22 F32
3EI AE 2 EI
H2 L2 L
H
F13 F23 F33
2 EI 2 EI EI EI
Lecture 8: Flexibility Method
ª L H3 º
« H2 »
0
« EA 3EI 2 EI »
« »
« L3 L2 »
>F @ « 0
H
»
« 3EI EA 2 EI »
« »
« H2 L2 L H»
« »
¬« 2 EI 2 EI EI EI ¼»
Now let
P 10 K E 30,000 ksi
L H 12 ft 144 inches I 200 in 4
A 10 in 2
L H 144
0.00048 in / kip
EA EA 30,000 10
3
H3 144
0.165888 in / kip
3EI 3 30,000 200
The axial compliance (flexibility) of each component is quite small relative to the
flexural compliance (flexibility). We will ignore the axial compliance of the beam
and the column when assembling the flexibility matrix. The inverse of compliance is
stiffness. This is equivalent to stating that the axial stiffness of the beam and column
is so large relative to flexural stiffness of the beam and column that axial
displacements are negligible.
Lecture 8: Flexibility Method
ª 0.1659 0 .0 0.001728 º
>F @ « 0 .0 0.1659 0.001728 »»
«
«¬ 0.001728 0.001728 0.000048 »¼
With F-1 and DQL we can compute the unknown redundants utilizing the matrix
equation
i.e.,
Note that the displacements associated with the redundants in the original structural,
represented by the matrix {DQ} are zero. Because joint B is a rigid connection one can
rationalize the rotation DQ3 is zero from this assumption. The other two displacements
are zero because the axial stiffness of the beam and column is so large.
Lecture 8: Flexibility Method
It should be noted that Q2 consists of a pair of forces acting on the released structure.
A displacement corresponding to Q2 consists of the relative translation of the ends of
the bar AD. When the ends of bar AD displace toward one another the displacements
are in the direction of Q2 and thus are positive. When the ends move away the
displacements are negative.
The first step in the analysis is determining the displacements that correspond to Q1
and Q2 in the released structure due to external loads. These displacements are
denoted DQL1 and DQL2 and are depicted in the previous slide.
Assuming that all the members have the same axial stiffness EA, then from application
of Castigliano’s theorem
PL
DQL1
PL
1 2 2 DQL 2 2
EA EA
PL
3.828
EA
Please verify these quantities for homework. Note the minus signs.
Lecture 8: Flexibility Method
The next step will be the determination of the displacements associated with Q1 and Q2
in the released structure due to unit loads at Q1 and Q2, i.e., determine the flexibility
coefficients. The flexibility coefficient F11 is the displacement corresponding to Q1 and
caused by a unit value of Q1. Thus
L
F11 1 2 2
EA
L
3.828
EA
L
F21 4 2
2 EA
L
2.707
EA
2L
F22 1 2
EA
L
4.828
EA
L
F12 4 2
2 EA
L
2.707
EA
Lecture 8: Flexibility Method
ª3.828 2.707 º
>F @ L
«2.707 4.828»
EA ¬ ¼
The inverse of this matrix is
ª0.4328 0.2426 º
>F @ 1 EA
« 0.2426 0.3431 »
L ¬ ¼
There are no support displacements in the truss. Thus the displacement in the structure
corresponding to Q1 is
DQ1 0
In addition, the displacement in the structure corresponding to Q2 consists of a relative
displacement of the cut ends of bar AD. In the original, or primary structure, the cut
ends of bar AD occupy the same location in space before loads are applied. After loads
are applied the cut ends move to a different location in space, but relative to each other,
no translation takes place between the cut ends, i.e, the bar does not separate. Thus
DQ 2 0
leads to
IIn the
th previous
i sections
ti we have
h only
l considered
id d loads
l d acting
ti on the
th structure.
t t We
W
would also like to consider the effects of
p
• Temperature changes
g {D{ QT}
• Prestrain of members {DQP}
These effects are taken in to account by including them in the calculation of
displacements (next page) in the released structure in a manner similar to {DQL} The
effects will produce displacements in the released structure, and the displacements are
associated with the redundant actions {Q}in the released structure.
The temperature displacements {DQT } in the released structure may be due to either
uniform changes in temperature or to differential changes in temperature. A
differential change in temperature assumes that the top and the bottom of the member
changes
h temperature andd thus
h will
ill undergo
d a curvature along
l the
h axis
i off the
h structurall
component. A uniform change in temperature will increase or decrease the length of
the structural component.
When the matrices {DQT } and {DQP}are found they can be added to the matrix {DQL }
of displacements due to loads in order to obtain the sum of all displacements in the
released structure. By superposition
^D `
Q ^D `
QL ^D `
QT ^D `
QP >F @ ^Q`
As before the superposition equation is solved for the matrix of redundants {Q}.
If the displacement does correspond to a redundant, its effect can be taken into account
byy includingg the displacement
p in the vector {D
{ Q }}.
In a more general situation there will be restraint displacements that do not correspond
to any of the selected redundants. In that event, the effects of restraint displacements
must be incorporated in the analysis of the released structure in a manner similar to
temperature displacements and prestrains. When restraint displacements occur in the
released structure a new matrix {DQR } is introduced.
Lecture 9: Flexibility Method
Thus the sum of all matrices representing displacements in the released structure will be
denoted by {DQS} and is expressed as follows
^D `
QS ^D ` QL ^D ` QT ^D `
QP ^D `
QR
^D ` Q ^D `
QS >F @ ^Q`
When this expression is inverted to obtain the redundants we find that
Joint Displacements,
p Member End Actions And Reactions
In the previous sections we have focused on finding redundants using the flexibility
method. After redundants were found other actions in the released structure could be
found using equations of equilibrium.
equilibrium When all actions in a structure have been
determined it is possible to compute displacements by isolating the individual components
of a structure and computing displacements from strength of materials expression.
Usually in a structural analysis the displacements of the joints are of primary interest.
Instead of following the procedure just outlined we will now introduce a systematic
procedure for calculating joint displacements, member end actions and reactions directly
into the flexibility method computations.
computations
Lecture 9: Flexibility Method
The principle of superposition will be used to obtain the joint displacements [DJ] in the actual
structure. In order to do this we need to evaluate the displacements in the released structure.
In the released structure the displacements associated with the actual joint displacements are
designated {DJL}. The rotations at joints B ( = DJ1) and C ( = DJ2) are required. Consider the
expressions
DJ 1 DJL1 DJQ11Q1 DJQ12Q2
Here
A similar
i il expression
i can be
b derived
d i d for
f the t ti att C ( = DJ2),
th rotation ) ii.e.,
The expressions on the previous slide can be expressed in a matrix format as follows
where
DJ 1 ½ DJL1 ½ Q1 ½
^DJ ` ® ¾ ^DJL ` ® ¾ ^Q` ® ¾
¯ DJ 2 ¿ ¯ DJL 2 ¿ ¯Q2 ¿
ª º
>D @
JQ «
DJQ11
DJQ 21
DJQ12
DJQ 22 »
¬ ¼
The expressions on the previous slide can be expressed in a matrix format as follows
where
AM 1 ½ AML 1 ½
°A ° °A °
° M2° ° ML 2 ° Q1 ½
^AM ` ® ¾ ^AML ` ® ¾ ^Q` ® ¾
A A ¯Q2 ¿
° M 3 ° ° ML 3 °
°¯ AM 4 °¿ °¯ AML 4 °¿
AMQ 11 AMQ 12 ½
° °
° AM Q 21 AMQ 22 °
^A `
MQ ® ¾
° AMQ 31 AMQ 32 °
°A AMQ 42 °¿
¯ MQ 41
where
AR1 ½ ARL1 ½ Q1 ½
^AR ` ® ¾ ^ARL ` ® ¾ ^Q` ® ¾
¯ AR 2 ¿ ¯ ARL 2 ¿ ¯Q2 ¿
ª º
>A @
RQ «
ARQ11
ARQ 21
ARQ12
ARQ 22 »
¬ ¼
When the effects of joint displacements, member end actions and reactions are accounted for
the equation of superposition becomes
^DJ ` ^DJS ` >D @^Q`
JQ
here
Hence there is no need to generalize the expression for {AM } and {AR } to account for
temperature effects, prestrain and displacement effects. None of these effects will produce
any actions or reactions in a statically determinate released structure.
structure Instead the released
structure will merely change its configurations to accommodate these effects. The effects of
these influences are merely propagated into matrices {AM } and {AR } through the value of the
redundants {Q}.
Lecture 9: Flexibility Method
Example
Consider
C id the
th two
t span beam
b to
t the
th left
l ft
where it is assumed that the objective is
to calculate the various joint
displacements
p DJ , member end actions
AM , and end reactions AR. The beam has
a constant flexural rigidity EI and is acted
upon by the following loads
P1 2P
M PL
P2 P
P3 P
1 § 2 PL · 1 § 3 PL · 3 L § PL · 1 PL L
D JL 2 ¨ ¸ 2 L ¨ ¸ ¨ ¸L
2 © EI ¹ 2 © 2 EI ¹ 2 © EI ¹ 2 EI 2
13 PL 2
8 EI
PL 2 ª10 º
>D JL @ «13 »
8 EI ¬ ¼
Th ffrom the
Then h equations
i off equilibrium
ilib i
¦ M A 0
L 3L
A RL 2 2P PL P P2L
2 2
PL
A RL 2
2
¦F Y 0
ARL 1 2P P P
ARL 1 2P
Lecture 9: Flexibility Method
Using a free body diagram from segment AB of the entire beam, i.e.,
¦ FY 0
A ML 1 2P 2P
A ML 1 0
¦ M B 0
L PL
A ML 2 2P 2 PL
2 2
3 PL
A ML 2
2
Using a free body diagram from segment BC of the entire beam, i.e.,
¦F Y 0
AML 3 P P
AML 3 0
¦ M B 0
PL
A ML 4 PL
2
PL
A ML 4
2
Lecture 9: Flexibility Method
ª 0 º
« »
« »
« 3 PL » ª 2P º
« 2 » « »
A ML « » ARL « »
« » « PL »
« 0 »
« » ¬« 2 ¼»
« PL »
« »
¬ 2 ¼
1 L 1 L
D JQ 11 L D JQ 21 L
2 EI 2 EI
L2 L2
2 EI 2 EI
Lecture 9: Flexibility Method
1 L 1 2L
D JQ 12 2 1 L D JQ 22 2L
2 EI 2 EI
3 L2 2 L2
2 EI EI
Thus
ª1 3º
^D `
JQ
L2
«1 4 »¼
2 EI ¬
IIn a similar
i il fashion,
f hi applying
l i a unit it load
l d associated ith Q1 and
i t d with d Q2 in
i the
th previous
i
cantilever beam, we obtain the following matrices
1 1 ½
°0 L °°
^A `
MQ
°
®
1°
¾
°0
¯° 0 L °¿
ª 1 1 º
>A @
RQ « L 2 L »¼
¬
Lecture 9: Flexibility Method
Previously (Lecture 5)
60 ½
^Q ` P
® ¾
56 ¯ 64 ¿
with
then
PL 2 17 ½
^D J ` ® ¾
112 EI ¯ 5¿
Similarly, with
5 ½
° °
P ° 20 L °
^A M ` ® ¾
56 ° 64 °
°̄°¯ 36 L °¿
Lecture 9: Flexibility Method
Finally with
107 ½
^A R ` P
® ¾
56 ¯ 31 L ¿
The analysis of a structure by the flexibility method may be described by the following steps:
1. Problem statement
2. Selection of released structure
3
3. Analysis of released structure under loads
4. Analysis of released structure for other causes
5. Analysis of released structure for unit values of redundant
6. Determination of redundants through the superposition equations, i.e.,
^D ` Q ^D `
QS >F @ ^Q`
^D `
QS ^D `QL ^D `
QT ^D `
QP ^D `
QR
7. Determine the other displacements and actions. The following are the four flexibility
matrix equations for calculating redundants member end actions, reactions and joint
displacements
^DJ ` ^DJS ` >D @^Q`
JQ
DJ jx1 JJoint
i t di
displacement
l t iin th
the actual
t l structure
t t (j = number
b off
joint displacement)
D JL jx1 Joint displacements in the released structure due to loads
D JS jx1 D JS D JL D JT D JP D JR
Introduction
Although the mathematical formulation of the flexibility and stiffness methods are
similar, the physical concepts involved are different.
We found that in the flexibility method, the unknowns were the redundant actionss. In
the stiffness method the unknown quantities will be the joint displacements. Hence, the
number of unknowns is equal to the degree of kinematic indeterminacy for the stiffness
method.
Flexibility Method: Stiffness Method:
• Unknown redundant actions (Q) • Unknown joint displacements (D) are
are identified and structure is released identified and structure is restrained
• Released structure is statically • Restrained structure is kinematically
determinate determinate, i.e., all displacements are zero
• Flexibility matrix is formulated and • Stiffness matrix is formulated and unknown
redundant actions (Q) are solved for joint displacements (D) are solved for
• Other
Oth unknown
k quantities
titi in
i the
th • Other
Oth unknown
k quantities
titi in
i the
th structure
t t
structure are functionally dependent are functionally dependent on the
on the redundant actions displacements.
Actual Beam
Neglecting axial deformations,
deformations the beam
to the left is kinematically indeterminate
to the first degree. The only unknown is
a joint translation at B, that is the
Restrained Beam #1 rotation. We alter the beam such that it
becomes kinematically determinate by
making the rotation șB zero. This is
accomplished by making the end B a
Restrained Beam #2 fixed end. This new beam is then called
the restrained structure.
S
Superposition
iti off restrained
t i d beams
b #1
and #2 yields the actual beam.
Restrained Beam with unit rotation
We will discuss the restrained beam with
a unit rotation momentarily.
Lecture 10: THE STIFFNESS METHOD
wL2 4 EI
¦M
12
L
TB 0
yields
i ld
wL3
TB
48 EI
In a manner analogous to that developed for the flexibility method, we seek a way
to consider the previous simple structure under the effect of a unit load. We also
wish to utilize the superposition principle
principle. Both will help develop a systematic
approach to structures that have a higher degree of kinematic indeterminacy.
The effect of a unit rotation on the previous beam is depicted in the fourth part of
the figure on the second slide. Here the moment applied mB will produce a unit
rotation at B. Since mB is an action corresponding to the rotation at TB and is caused
by a unit rotation, then mB is a stiffness coefficient for the restrained structure. The
value of mB is
4 EI
mB
L
Lecture 10: THE STIFFNESS METHOD
Again, equilibrium at the joint is imposed. The couple in the restrained beam from
the load on the beam will be added to the moment mB (corresponding to a unit value
of TB) multiplied by TB. The sum of these two terms must give the moment in the
actual beam, which is zero, i.e.,
MB mBT B 0
or
wL2 § 4 EI ·
¨ ¸ TB 0
12 © L ¹
wL3
TB
48 EI
This seems a little simple minded, but the systematic approach of applying the principle
of superposition will allow us to analyze more complex structures.
Having
H b i d TB then
i obtained h other
h quantities,
i i suchh as memberb end-actions
d i andd reactions
i
can be computed. For example, the reaction force R acting at A can be computed by
summing the force RA in the restrained structure due to loads and the force rA multiplied
y TB, i.e.,,
by
R RA rAT B
thus
wL 6 EI § wL3 ·
R ¨¨ ¸¸
2 L2 © 48 EI ¹
5wL
8
Lecture 10: THE STIFFNESS METHOD
Note that every example cited have fixed-fixed end conditions. All are kinematically
determinate.
Lecture 10: THE STIFFNESS METHOD
All loads except those corresponding to the unknown joint displacements are assumed to
act on the
h restrained
i d structure. Thus
Th onlyl actions
i P1, P2 and
d P3 are shown
h acting
i on the
h
restrained structure.
The moments ADL1 and ADL2 are the actions of the restraints associated with D1 (AD1) and D2
(AD2) respectively. The notation in parenthesis will help with the matrix notation
y
momentarily.
Lecture 10: THE STIFFNESS METHOD
In order to generate the stiffness coefficients at joints B and C, unit values of the unknown
displacements D1 and D2 are induced in separately restrained structures.
Two superposition equations describing the moment conditions on the original structure
may now be expressed at joints B and C. The superposition equations are
AD 2 ADL 2 S 21 D1 S 22 D2
The two superposition equations express the fact that the actions in the original structure
are equal to the corresponding actions in the restrained structure due to the loads plus the
corresponding actions in the restrained structure under the unit displacements multiplied by
the displacements themselves. These equations can be expressed in matrix format as
here
AD1 ½
^AD ` ® ¾
¯ AD 2 ¿
ADL1 ½
^ADL ` ® ¾
¯ ADL 2 ¿
ª S11 S12 º
>S @ «S »
¬ 21 S 22 ¼
D1 ½
^D` ® ¾
¯ D2 ¿
and
with
PL ½
^AD ` ® ¾
¯0¿
PL ½
° 8 °
^ADL ` ® PL ¾
° °
¯ 8 ¿
The next step is the formulation of the stiffness matrix. Consider a unit rotation at B
Lecture 10: THE STIFFNESS METHOD
thus
4 EI 4 EI
S11c S11cc
L L
8 EI
S11 S11c S11cc
L
2 EI
S 21
L
With a unit rotation at C
4 EI 2 EI
S 22 S12
L L
EI ª8 2º
L «¬2 4»¼
S
ª2 1º
> S @1 L
« 1 4»
14 EI ¬ ¼
PL ½½
L ª 2 1º °° Pl ½ ° 8 °°°
^D` ®® ¾ ® PL ¾¾
14 EI «¬ 1 4»¼ ° ¯ 0 ¿ ° °°
°̄°¯ ¯ 8 ¿°¿
PL2 17 ½
® ¾
112 EI ¯ 5¿
Lecture 11: THE STIFFNESS METHOD
We would now like to develop the equations for determining [AM] and [AR]. The procedure
closely follows the procedure developed for the flexibility method. For the stiffness
method, we determine the member end-actions due to the external loads, denoted by [AML]
and add to them the contributions of the member end-actions caused by unit displacements
multiplied by the actual displacements. Thus
{AML} is the vector of member end actions due to the external loads on the restrained
structure.
[AMD] is the matrix of member end-actions due to unit values of the displacements on
the restrained structure
Example
Consider again the two span beam previously discussed and determine
Once again, member end actions in the restrained structure will be denoted by a vector
[AML]. Keep in mind the beams below are really one restrained beam with the
cantilever support in the middle of the beam. The member end-actions are treated as if
they were support reactions for each beam segment.
2P P
AML1 P AML 3
2 2
2 Pa 2b PL PL
AML 2 AML 4
L2 4 8
Lecture 11: THE STIFFNESS METHOD
We can use the same approach when we analyze the restrained structure after unit
displacements are applied. The corresponding member end actions, denoted by the
matrix [AMD] are given below when a unit rotation is applied at B.
6 EI 6 EI
AMD11 AMD 31
L2 L2
4 EI 4 EI
AMD 21 AMD 41
L L
The corresponding member end actions associated with a unit rotation is applied at C
are
6 EI
AMD12 0 AMD 32
L2
2 EI
AMD 22 0 AMD 42
L
thus
ª6 0º
EI « 4 L 0»
>AMD @ « »
L2 « 6 6»
«¬ 4 L 2 L »¼
Lecture 11: THE STIFFNESS METHOD
PL2 17 ½
^D` ® ¾
112 EI ¯ 5¿
which leads to
8 ½ 6 0 ½ 5 ½
° ° ° ° ° °
P ° 2 L ° EI ° 4 L 0 ° PL2 17 ½ P °20 L °
^AM ` ® ¾ ® ¾ ® ¾ ® ¾
8 ° 4 ° L2 ° 6 6 ° 112 EI ¯ 5¿ 56 ° 64 °
°¯ L °¿ °¯ 4 L 2 L °¿ °¯36 L °¿
Turning our attention to beam reactions in the restrained structure, denoted by a vector
[ARL] once again the beams below are really one restrained beam with the cantilever
supports replaced with forces and moments. The two beams are treated as cantilever-
cantilever beams.
P P
ARL1 P c 3
ARL P ARL 4 P
2 2
PL P
ARL 2 cc 3
ARL
4 2
3
ARL 3 c 3
ARL cc 3
ARL P
2
Lecture 11: THE STIFFNESS METHOD
We also analyze the restrained structure after unit displacements are applied. The
corresponding reactions, denoted by the matrix [ARD] are given below when a unit
rotation is applied at B.
6 EI 6 EI 6 EI
ARD11 c 31
ARD ARD 41
L2 L2 L2
2 EI 6 EI
ARD 21 cc 31
ARD
L L2
ARD31 0
ARD12 ARD 22 c 32
ARD 0
6 EI 6 EI
cc 32
ARD ARD 32 ARD 42
L2 L2
thus
6 0½
°2L 0 °
EI ° °
^ARD ` 2 ® ¾
L °0 6°
°¯ 6 6°¿
Lecture 11: THE STIFFNESS METHOD
PL2 17 ½
^D` ® ¾
112 EI ¯ 5¿
which leads to
4½ 6 0½ 107 ½
° ° °2L 0 ° ° °
P °L° EI ° ° PL2 17 ½ P ° 31L °
^AR ` ® ¾ ® ¾ ® ¾ ® ¾
4 °6° L2 ° 0 6 ° 112 EI ¯ 5¿ 56 ° 69 °
°¯ 2°¿ °¯ 6 6°¿ °¯ 64°¿
Example 2
For the two span beam previously discussed determine the unknown displacement at joints
B and C. In addition find the member end-actions as well as the reactions.
The actions in the restrained structure due to applied loads corresponding to the
previously identified displacements are
P1 L P2 L PL P2 P
ADL1 ADL 2
8 8 8 2 2
thus
P L ½
^ADL ` ® ¾
8 ¯ 4 ¿
4 EI 4 EI 8 EI
S11 S11c S11cc
L L L
6 EI
S 21
L2
Lecture 11: THE STIFFNESS METHOD
12 EI
S 22
L2
6 EI
S12
L2
Thus
2 EI ª 4 L2 3L º
>S @ « »
L3 ¬ 3L 6 ¼
which leads to
L ª 6 3L º
>S @ 1
30 EI «¬3L 4 L2 »¼
With
>AD @ 0
and
Once again, member end actions in the restrained structure will be denoted by a vector
[AML]. Keep in mind the restrained beam is treated as two cantilever beams side by
side.
P1 L PL
AML1
P1
P AML 2
2 8 4
thus
P 4 ½
^AML ` ® ¾
4 ¯ L ¿
We analyze the restrained structure after unit displacements are applied. The
corresponding member end actions, denoted by the matrix [AMD] are given below
when a unit rotation is applied at B.
6 EI 4 EI
AMD11 AMD 21
L2 L
AMD 22 0 AMD12 0
Lecture 11: THE STIFFNESS METHOD
Thus
2 EI ª 3 0º
>AMD @
L2 «¬ 2 L 0»¼
P 23 ½
^AM ` ^AML ` >AMD @ ^D` ® ¾
20 ¯ 7 L ¿
Next we turn our attention to beam reactions in the restrained structure subject to the
applied loads, denoted by a vector [ARL]. Keep in mind the restrained beam is treated
as two cantilever beams side by side.
P1
ARL1 P
2
P1 L PL
ARL 2
8 4
P1 P2 3P
ARL 3
2 2 2
P2 L PL
ARL 4
8 8
Lecture 11: THE STIFFNESS METHOD
Thus 8 ½
° °
P ° 2L °
^ARL ` ® ¾
8 ° 12 °
°¯ L °¿
We analyze the restrained structure after unit displacements are applied. The
corresponding member end actions, denoted by the matrix [AMD] are given below
when a unit rotation is applied at B.
6 EI
ARD11
L2
2 EI
ARD 21 2 EI
L ARD 41
L
6 EI 6 EI
ARD 31 c 31
ARD cc 31
ARD 0
L2 L2
6 EI
ARD 42
L2
ARD12 ARD 22 0
12 EI 12 EI
ARD 32 c 32
ARD cc 32
ARD 0
L3 L3
thus
3L 0 ½
° L2 0 °°
2 EI °
^ARD ` ® ¾
L3 ° 0 6 °
°¯ L2 3L °¿
Lecture 11: THE STIFFNESS METHOD
17 ½
° °
P °4 L °
^AR ` ^ARL ` >ARD @ ^D` ® ¾
20 ° 43 °
°¯3L °¿
Lecture 12: TRUSSES & GRIDS – STIFFNESS METHOD
Example
Consider the plane truss with four bars meeting at a common joint E. This truss
only has two degrees of freedom from a kinematic standpoint. It is a convenience
to identify the bars of the truss numerically. The bars have lengths L1, L2, L3 and
L4 and axial rigidities EA1, EA2, EA3 and EA4
Because the weight of each truss member is included the axial forces at either end of
a truss member will be different at joints A, B, C and D then the axial force at joint
E. The
h axial
i l forces
f at joint
j i E could
ld be
b computedd as wellll as the
h shear
h stresses at the h
end of each truss member, however they are omitted in this example for simplicity.
The loads P1 and P2 correspond to unknown displacements D1 and D2, thus
P1 ½
^AD ` ® ¾
¯ P2 ¿
Each truss member can be considered loaded as shown below. The points of
support are indicated as A and E for the purpose of discussion and do not
correspondd to actuall joints
j i in i labeled
l b l d in
i the
h original
i i l truss. One
O couldld use the
h Greek
G k
alphabet, but the nomenclature should be transparent given the context where it
used.
Since the weights of the truss members produce no horizontal reactions, the actions
ADL1 must be zero and ADL2 must be equal to half the weight of all the truss elements,
ie
i.e.,
0 ½ 0½
°° °° °° °°
^ADL ` ® ¾ ® ¾
° w1 L1 w2 L2 w3 L3 w4 L4 ° °W °
°¯ 2 °¯ 2 °¿
2 2 2 °¿
The quantity W is the total weight of the truss. For the purpose of calculating end
actions for the vector AML, consider that from the previous figure
w1 L1 sin J 1 ½
° °
wi Li 1 °w2 L2 sin J 2 °
AMLi sin J i or ^AML ` ® ¾
2 2 ° w3 L3 sin J 3 °
°¯w4 L4 sin J 4 °¿
Lecture 12: TRUSSES & GRIDS – STIFFNESS METHOD
The next step is formulating the stiffness matrix by imposing unit displacement
associated with D1 and D2 on the restrained structure as indicated below
To obtain the stiffness values it is necessary to compute the forces in the truss
elements when the unit displacements are applied to joint E.
When joint E is subjected to a unit translation to the right the truss element elongates
an amount
EA
cos J
L
When joint E is subjected to a unit translation vertically the truss element elongates
an amount
EA
sin J
L
The formulas given above are suitable for use in analyzing this plane truss. In a later
lecture a more systematic approach to the development of member stiffnesses is
developed that works for trusses and all types of structures.
The stiffness S11 is composed of contributions from various elements of the truss.
Consider the contribution to S11 from member 3, i.e.,
EAA3
S 311 cos 2 J 3
L3
Thus
The final expression results from the fact that truss element 1 is horizontal and truss
element 4 is vertical.
Lecture 12: TRUSSES & GRIDS – STIFFNESS METHOD
Similarly the stiffness S21 is composed of contributions from various elements of the
truss. Consider the contribution to S21 from member 3, i.e.,
EA3
S 3 21 cos J 3 sin J 3
L3
Thus
S 21 S 121 S 2 21 S 3 21 S 4 21
EA2 EA3
S12 cos J 2 sin J 2 cos J 3 sin J 3
L2 L3
The two expressions on this page as well as the two from the previous page
constitute the stiffness matrix [S]. The next step would be inverting this matrix and
performing the following matrix computation to find the displacement D1 and D2.
Since the vector {AML} was determined earlier as well, we need only identify the elements
of the matrix {AMD}. This matrix contains the member end-actions due to unit
displacements associated with the displacements D1 and D2, but the end actions are
computed using the restrained structure. Thus for ith member using a previous figure
EAi EAi
AMDi1 cos J i AMDi 2 sin J i
Li Li
thus
EA1 EA1 ½
° L cos J 1 L1
sin J 1 °
° 1 °
° EA2 cos J EA2
sin J 2 °
° L2 2
°
^AMD ` ® EA
L2
EA3 ¾
° 3 cos J 3 sin J 3 °
° L3 L3 °
° EA4 EA4 °
° cos J 4 sin J 4 °
¯ 4L L4 ¿
And we can now solve
Example
The grid shown below consists of two members (AB and BC) that are rigidly joined at
B. Each member is assumed to have flexural rigidity EI and torsional rigidity GJ.
Kinematically, the only unknowns are the displacements at B. Since axial rigidities of
the members is assumed to be quite large relative to EI and GJ, the displacements at B
consist of one translation (D1) and two rotations (D2 and D3).
) Determine these
unknown displacements.
Lecture 12: TRUSSES & GRIDS – STIFFNESS METHOD
It is easier to see what the reactions are if we break the structure above into two
substructures such that
cc 1
ADL 0 cc 2
ADL 0 cc 3
ADL 0
or
P PL
ADL1 ADL 2 0 ADL 3
2 8
and
d iin a matrix
t i format
f t
4 ½
P ° °
^ADL ` ® 0 ¾
8 ° °
¯ L ¿
Lecture 12: TRUSSES & GRIDS – STIFFNESS METHOD
We have {ADL} and {AD} the next step is the solution of the superposition
expression
The stiffness matrix is found by analyzing the restrained structure for the effects of unit
translations and rotations associated with the unknown displacements. In the following
figure the grid structure is once again split into two substructures.
substructures
12 EI 6 EI
S11cc cc
S 21 cc
S 31 0
L3 L2
24 EI 6 EI 6 EI
S11 S 21 S 31
L3 L2 L2
Lecture 12: TRUSSES & GRIDS – STIFFNESS METHOD
To obtain the second column of the stiffness matrix utilize the following figure
GJ
S12c 0 c
S 22 c
S 32 0
L
6 EI 4 EI
S12cc cc
S 22 cc
S 32 0
L2 L
6 EI 4 EI GJ
S12 S 22 S 32 0
L2 L L
To obtain the third column of the stiffness matrix utilize the following figure
6 EI 4 EI
S13c c
S 23 0 c
S 33
L2 L
GJ
S13cc 0 cc
S 23 0 cc
S 33
J
6 EI 4 EI GJ
S13 S 23 0 S 33
L2 L L
Lecture 12: TRUSSES & GRIDS – STIFFNESS METHOD
Define
GJ
K
EI
then
ª 24 6L 6L º
EI « »
>S @ 6L 4 K L2 0
L3 « »
¬« 6 L 0 4 K L »¼
2
ª L2 C1 2 6L 6L º
« »
>S @
1 1
« 6L 4 K L2 0 »
24 EIC1C2 « 6L 2»
¬ 0 4 K L ¼
where
C1 4 K
C2 1 K
C3 5 2K
Solving
L 4 K 5 2K ½
PL2 ° °
^D` ® 6 5 2K ¾
96 EI 1 K 4 K ° °
¯ 18 ¿
Lecture 13: TEMPERATURE, PRESTRAIN & SUPPORT
SETTLEMT - THE STIFFNESS METHOD
In the previous sections we have only considered loads acting on the structure. We
would also like to consider the effects of
As in the flexibility method the temperature actions {ADT} in the restrained structure
may be due to either uniform changes in temperature or to differential changes in
temperature.
When the matrices [ADT ] and [ADP] are found they can be added to the matrix {ADL }
of actions due to loads in the restrained structure. By superposition
Consider the possibility of known actions occurring at the restraints (or supports) of
the structure. There are two possibilities to consider depending on whether the
restraint actions corresponds to one of the displacements {D}.
If the action does correspond to a displacement, its effect can be taken into account by
including the displacement in the vector {AD }.
In a more general situation there will be actions at restraints that do not correspond to
any of the selected displacements. In that event, the effects these actions must be
incorporated in the analysis of the restrained structure in a manner similar to
temperature displacements and prestrains. When actions occur at a restraint in the
restrained structure a new matrix {ADS} is introduced.
Lecture 13: TEMPERATURE, PRESTRAIN & SUPPORT
SETTLEMT - THE STIFFNESS METHOD
Thus the sum of all matrices representing displacements in the restrained structure will be
denoted by {ADS } and is expressed as follows
The analysis of a structure by the stiffness method may be described by the following steps:
1. Problem statement
2. Selection of restrained structure
3. Analysis of restrained structure under loads
4. Analysis of restrained structure for other causes
5. Analysis of restrained structure for unit values of displacements
6. Determination of displacements through the superposition equations, i.e.,
7. Determine the other displacements and actions. The following are the two matrix
equations for calculating redundants member end actions and reactions
All matrices used in the stiffness method are summarized in the following tables
D dx1 Unknownjointdisplacements(d=numberofdisplacements)
dx1 Actionsintheactualstructurecorrespondingtotheunknown
AD displacements.
AM mx1 Memberendactionsintheactualstructure(m=numberof
memberendactions)
AML mx1 Memberendactionsintherestrainedstructuredueto
externalloadsexceptthosethatcorrespondtotheunknown
displacements
AMD mxd Memberendactionsintherestrainedstructureduetounit
valuesoftheunknowndisplacements
mx1 Memberendactionsintherestrainedstructuredueto
AMT , AMP , AMR
temperature,prestrain,andrestraintdisplacement
mx1
AMS AMS AML AMT AMP AMR
AR rx1 Reactionsintheactualstructure(r=numberofreactions)
rx1 Reactionsintherestrainedstructureduetoallexternalloads
ARL exceptthosethatcorrespondtotheunknowndisplacements