Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views2 pages

03 Abstract

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views2 pages

03 Abstract

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Abstract

With military conflicts becoming resource-intensive, expensive and largely

ineffective in obtaining long-term benefits, countries around the world are focusing

more on diplomatic engagement and virtuous modes like culture for achieving

strategic dividends. Cultural engagement, along with other ‘soft’ forms of

engagement, popularly known as ‘soft power’ is being increasingly deployed along

with state capacity, strategic strengths and charismatic leadership for converting a

state’s latent capacities into ‘actualized power’.

In the discipline of international relations, the term ‘soft power’ has been

increasingly gaining prominence. The core objective of soft power has been to shape

the preferences of other powers through appeal and attractions. Soft power is largely

non-coercive in nature; it includes culture, political values, economy and many other

elements. It was Joseph Nye who popularized the term in one of his pioneering

research works entitled: “Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American

Power”, published in 1990. Further, Nye reconceptualized the term in 2004 through

publishing another important book “Soft Power: The Means to Success in World

Politics”. Then onwards, countries across the globe started giving prominence to the

soft power concept in foreign policy implementation process. It may however be

noted that it is not just the sovereign states alone that relies more on the application

of soft power in the arena of international relations, there are a host of NGOs or

international institutions that focus on the theme. In other words, the growing

weightage given to the concept of soft power is a natural response towards the

rapidly changing global context.


Being one of the oldest civilisations of the world, India has been “re-emerging” in

recent times as a major player in the arena of international relations, pushing behind

centuries of colonial exploitation, backwardness and slumber. Many scholars believe

that India’s political system, its thriving democracy, military capabilities along with

space and missile programme and the country’s growing human resource will give it

a great power status in the 21st century. In other words, with the combination of hard

and soft power resources, India has been playing a very important role. In this

context, Shashi Tharoor (2012:277) however claims, “India’s potential leadership

role in the world lies in its soft power.”

Keywords: power, soft power, hard power, india’s foreign policy, non-alignment
movement etc.

You might also like