Chapter 5

 Understanding Requirements

1
Requirements Engineering-I
 Inception—ask a set of questions that establish …
 basic understanding of the problem
 the people who want a solution
 the nature of the solution that is desired, and
 the effectiveness of preliminary communication and collaboration
between the customer and the developer
 Elicitation—elicit requirements from all stakeholders
 Elaboration—create an analysis model that identifies data,
function and behavioral requirements
 Negotiation—agree on a deliverable system that is realistic for
developers and customers

2
Requirements Engineering-II
 Specification—can be any one (or more) of the following:
 A written document
 A set of models
 A formal mathematical
 A collection of user scenarios (use-cases)
 A prototype
 Validation—a review mechanism that looks for
 errors in content or interpretation
 areas where clarification may be required
 missing information
 inconsistencies (a major problem when large products or systems
are engineered)
 conflicting or unrealistic (unachievable) requirements.
 Requirements management

3
Inception
 Identify stakeholders
 “who else do you think I should talk to?”
 Recognize multiple points of view
 Work toward collaboration
 The first questions
 Who is behind the request for this work?
 Who will use the solution?
 What will be the economic benefit of a successful
solution
 Is there another source for the solution that you
need?

4
Eliciting Requirements
 meetings are conducted and attended by both software
engineers and customers
 rules for preparation and participation are established
 an agenda is suggested
 a "facilitator" (can be a customer, a developer, or an outsider)
controls the meeting
 a "definition mechanism" (can be work sheets, flip charts, or wall
stickers or an electronic bulletin board, chat room or virtual
forum) is used
 the goal is
 to identify the problem
 propose elements of the solution
 negotiate different approaches, and
 specify a preliminary set of solution requirements

5
Quality Function Deployment
 Function deployment determines the “value”
(as perceived by the customer) of each
function required of the system
 Information deployment identifies data objects
and events
 Task deployment examines the behavior of the
system
 Value analysis determines the relative priority
of requirements

6
Elicitation Work Products
 a statement of need and feasibility.
 a bounded statement of scope for the system or product.
 a list of customers, users, and other stakeholders who
participated in requirements elicitation
 a description of the system’s technical environment.
 a list of requirements (preferably organized by function)
and the domain constraints that apply to each.
 a set of usage scenarios that provide insight into the use of
the system or product under different operating conditions.
 any prototypes developed to better define requirements.

7
Building the Analysis Model
 Elements of the analysis model
 Scenario-based elements
• Functional—processing narratives for software functions
• Use-case—descriptions of the interaction between an
“actor” and the system
 Class-based elements
• Implied by scenarios
 Behavioral elements
• State diagram
 Flow-oriented elements
• Data flow diagram

8
Use-Cases
 A collection of user scenarios that describe the thread of usage of a
system
 Each scenario is described from the point-of-view of an “actor”—a
person or device that interacts with the software in some way
 Each scenario answers the following questions:
 Who is the primary actor, the secondary actor (s)?
 What are the actor’s goals?
 What preconditions should exist before the story begins?
 What main tasks or functions are performed by the actor?
 What extensions might be considered as the story is described?
 What variations in the actor’s interaction are possible?
 What system information will the actor acquire, produce, or change?
 Will the actor have to inform the system about changes in the external
environment?
 What information does the actor desire from the system?
 Does the actor wish to be informed about unexpected changes?

9
Use-Case Diagram
Ar ms / dis ar ms
s y s t em

Ac c es s es s y s t em s ens or s
via Int er net

homeow ner

Res ponds t o
alar m ev ent

Enc ount er s an
er r or c ondit ion

s y s t em Rec onf igur es s ens or s

adminis t r at or and r elat ed
s y s t em f eat ur es
10
Class Diagram
From the SafeHome system …

Sensor

name/id
type
location
area
characteristics

identify()
enable()
disable()
reconfigure ()

11
State Diagram
Reading
Commands
State name
System status = “ready”
Display msg = “enter cmd”
Display status = steady
State variables

Entry/subsystems ready
Do: poll user input panel
Do: read user input
Do: interpret user input State activities

12
Analysis Patterns
Pattern name: A descriptor that captures the essence of the pattern.
Intent: Describes what the pattern accomplishes or represents
Motivation: A scenario that illustrates how the pattern can be used to address the
problem.
Forces and context: A description of external issues (forces) that can affect how
the pattern is used and also the external issues that will be resolved when the
pattern is applied.
Solution: A description of how the pattern is applied to solve the problem with an
emphasis on structural and behavioral issues.
Consequences: Addresses what happens when the pattern is applied and what
trade-offs exist during its application.
Design: Discusses how the analysis pattern can be achieved through the use of
known design patterns.
Known uses: Examples of uses within actual systems.
Related patterns: On e or more analysis patterns that are related to the named
pattern because (1) it is commonly used with the named pattern; (2) it is structurally
similar to the named pattern; (3) it is a variation of the named pattern.

13
Negotiating Requirements
 Identify the key stakeholders
 These are the people who will be involved in the
negotiation
 Determine each of the stakeholders “win
conditions”
 Win conditions are not always obvious
 Negotiate
 Work toward a set of requirements that lead to “win-
win”

14
Validating Requirements - I
 Is each requirement consistent with the overall objective for the
system/product?
 Have all requirements been specified at the proper level of
abstraction? That is, do some requirements provide a level of
technical detail that is inappropriate at this stage?
 Is the requirement really necessary or does it represent an add-
on feature that may not be essential to the objective of the
system?
 Is each requirement bounded and unambiguous?
 Does each requirement have attribution? That is, is a source
(generally, a specific individual) noted for each requirement?
 Do any requirements conflict with other requirements?

15
Validating Requirements - II
 Is each requirement achievable in the technical environment
that will house the system or product?
 Is each requirement testable, once implemented?
 Does the requirements model properly reflect the information,
function and behavior of the system to be built.
 Has the requirements model been “partitioned” in a way that
exposes progressively more detailed information about the
system.
 Have requirements patterns been used to simplify the
requirements model. Have all patterns been properly
validated? Are all patterns consistent with customer
requirements?

16