Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views15 pages

Coherence Detecting

The document discusses direct and coherent detection methods in photodetection, highlighting the differences in signal processing, noise characteristics, and signal-to-noise ratios (S/N). It explains the mathematical formulations for direct and coherent detection, including homodyne and heterodyne detection, and the conditions required for effective coherent detection. Additionally, it covers the implications of phase fluctuations, receiver sensitivity, and the performance of various detection schemes in terms of bit error rate (BER) and photons per bit.

Uploaded by

FrankFan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views15 pages

Coherence Detecting

The document discusses direct and coherent detection methods in photodetection, highlighting the differences in signal processing, noise characteristics, and signal-to-noise ratios (S/N). It explains the mathematical formulations for direct and coherent detection, including homodyne and heterodyne detection, and the conditions required for effective coherent detection. Additionally, it covers the implications of phase fluctuations, receiver sensitivity, and the performance of various detection schemes in terms of bit error rate (BER) and photons per bit.

Uploaded by

FrankFan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

Direct and Coherent Detection

SIGNAL

E I
ph

DIRECT
beamsplitter
SIGNAL

E I ph
E
0

LOCAL
COHE RENT
OSCILLATOR

direct detection is linear in power Iph = σP


and quadratic in field amplitude: Iph = σA 〈 E 2〉 /2Z0

1
from:”Photodetectors”, by S.Donati, Prentice Hall 2000
Coherent gain

In coherent detection, signal and local oscillator fields are:


E = E exp i(ωt+ϕ), E0 = E0 exp i(ω0t+ϕ0)

thus Iph= (σA/2Z0) [〈 E 2〉 +〈  E0 2〉 + 2 Re 〈 E0 E*〉 ] =


= (σA/2Z0) {E2 + E02+ 2 E E0 〈 cos [(ω -ω0)t+ϕ-ϕ0]〉 }
or, Iph = I + I 0 + 2µ √(I I0)
compared to I of direct detection, we find a
coherent gain Gcoh= Iph/I= 1+2µ √(I0 /I)

µ is the coherence factor. When ω=ω0 detection is called


homodyne, while if ω≠ω0 we have heterodyne detection.

2
from:”Photodetectors”, by S.Donati, Prentice Hall 2000
Coherence factor

µ=〈 cos (ϕ-ϕ0)〉 ranges from µ= 0 (uncorrelated phases of signal and


local oscill ator) , to µ= 1 (complete correlation).

Now consider homodyne detection (ω=ω0) and write ϕ as the sum


of a mean 〈 ϕ〉 and a random part ϕr: ϕ = 〈 ϕ〉 +ϕr
Developing µ, µ = 〈 cos(〈 ϕ〉 +ϕr -ϕ0)〉
= cos(〈 ϕ〉 -ϕ0) 〈 cos ϕr〉 − sin(〈 ϕ〉 -ϕ0) 〈 sin ϕr〉 .
As 〈 ϕr〉 =0, also 〈 sin ϕr〉 =0 and if ϕr has a regular statistics. So:
µ = cos [〈 ϕ〉 -ϕ0] 〈 cos ϕr 〉 = cos ∆ϕ µΦ
Beating signal is multiplied by factor cos∆ϕ, that is, homodyne
detection is sensitive to the in-phase component with 〈 ϕ〉 =ϕ0; the
in-quadrature component with 〈 ϕ〉 = ϕ0+π/2 gives a zero output.

3
from:”Photodetectors”, by S.Donati, Prentice Hall 2000
Phase fluctuations

The random part 〈 cosϕr〉 =µΦ describes relative phase fluctuations.


For ϕr small (<<1 rad), cosine is close to unity and its mean is ≈ 1;
for large ϕr (over 2π), cosine spans from -1 to + 1 and mean will be
≈ 0. For small ϕr <<1, developing cosine in series of ϕr:
µΦ = 〈 cos ϕ r〉 = 〈 1 - ϕr2/2! + ϕr4/4! +...〉 ≈ 1− σΦ 2/2
we see that µ is connected to phase variance σΦ .
+π +π

0 t 0 t

−π −π
small ϕ r large ϕr

1 1

0 t 0 t

-1 -1

<cos ϕr > ≈ 1 <cos ϕr > ≈0

4
from:”Photodetectors”, by S.Donati, Prentice Hall 2000
Coherent S/N ratio
In direct detection, (S/N)2dir = I 2/ [2e(I+ Id)B + 4kTB/R]
and quantum limit is (S/N) 2dir/q = I /2eB for I>>Id+4kT/R.
In homodyne, signal is (σA/2Z0)2µEE0 , noise is sum of local
oscillator and signal shot-noises, plus Johnson noise of load:
[(σA/2Z )2µEE ] 2
______________________________
0 0
(S/N) 2hom =
2e[(σA/2Z0)(E2+E02)+Id] B+4kTB/R
4µ2I I 0
____________________
=
2e(I+I0+Id)B +4kTB/R
dividing by I0 and letting IR=2kT/eR,
4µ2 I
_________________
(S/N) 2hom =
[2e(1+(I+Id+I R)/I 0] B

5
from:”Photodetectors”, by S.Donati, Prentice Hall 2000
Quantum limited S/N
for I0>>I0q=I+ Id+I R, the quantum limit is always reached:
(S/N)2hom /q = 4µ2I /2eB
In coherent detection the Q-L condition is on local oscillator
amplitude, not on signal amplitude as in direct detection. Making
local oscillator I0>>I+Id+IR large enough, Q-L is reached, even at
weak signal levels.
Heterodyne detection follows the same arguments, but beating
signal is now at the frequency ω-ω0, so that
Iph = 2√(I I 0 ) cos [(ω-ω0)t+〈 ϕ〉 -ϕ0] 〈 cosϕr〉
(S/N) 2het = 2µφ2I I 0 / [2e(Ι+Ι0+Id)B + 4kTB/R]
i.e., it has a modest penalty - a factor of 2 (or 3dB) respect to
homodyne but does not require the phase adjustment.
6
from:”Photodetectors”, by S.Donati, Prentice Hall 2000
Condition for coherent detection
Requirements:
H phase matching of signal and local oscillator (for homodyne),
or beating will be reduced by a factor: cos(〈 ϕ〉 -ϕ0)
H phase coherence, or signal will be reduced by: 〈 cosϕr〉 =µφ.
H superposition of E and E0 on the PD with spatial coherence
or beating will be reduced by a factor:
µsp =∫AE(x, y) . E0*(x,y)dxdy /[∫AE(x, y)2dxdy ∫AE0(x,y)2dxdy ]1/2
H superposition of E and E0 with polarization matching or signal
is reduced by:
E.E0/EE0=µpol (E, E0 = Jones matrixes)
All previous expressions are generalized by using µφ →µφ µsp µpol

7
from:”Photodetectors”, by S.Donati, Prentice Hall 2000
S/N, BER and photons /bit

N "1"

N
N/2 threshold S

1 threshold S
0 p(n) 0 "0"
p(01)

ideal direct detection: ideal coherent detection:


BER=e -N threshold at N/2
for BER= 10-9: N=10 p/b and P(01)=P(10)
(S/N)2=10

8
from:”Photodetectors”, by S.Donati, Prentice Hall 2000
Photons per bit and modulation

• homodyne detection of amplitude modulated (ASK) signal:


BER = erfc N/2σN (N=number of photons per bit)
N=2(I .I0)1/2T/e=2(NsN0)1/2 σN=(2eI 0/2T)1/2T/e=N01/2
then, BER = erfc √Ns
and for BER=10-9 we get Ns=36 p/b
•homodyne detection of a phase-modulated PSK signal:
BER = erfc 2√Ns, and Ns=9 p/b
•heterodyne detection of a PSK-modulated signal:
BER= erfc√ 2Ns, and Ns=18
homodyne detection of a 4Φ−PSK modulated signal
BER = erfc 2√2Ns, and Ns=4.5

9
from:”Photodetectors”, by S.Donati, Prentice Hall 2000
State-of-the-art receiver sensitivity

-20 x NEC88
x DIRECT 10 µ
AT&T 88 x NEC 89
O COHERENT x
FUJ 87x
RECEIVER SENSITIVITY (dBm)
x

RECEIVER SENSITIVITY (W)


x
-30 x SEL87 NTT 97 1µ

85
EC
x
er
mpl ifi

N
lpr ea bi t
-40 opt ic
a x NTT 92 36 ph / t 0.1µ
i
m s O ph/b
t e 0
t sy s O O NTT 89 1 / bi t
dir ec AT&T 85 4p
h
-50 SEL 88 O. NTT 85 10n
.O O.
AT&T 85 ts
BT 85 O l imi
n t
-60 er e 1n
c oh

-70 0.1n

0.1 0.4 1.0 2 4 10 20 40


TRANSMISSION RATE 1/T (Gbit/s)
OR TRANSMISSION BANDWIDTH 2B (GHz)

10
from:”Photodetectors”, by S.Donati, Prentice Hall 2000
Balanced detector
I1
+
- S
E1

E I2

SIGNAL E
2

E
0
LOCAL
OSCILLATOR

I1 = (1/2)(I 0+I)+√(I 0I) sin(ϕ-ϕ0), I 2 = (1/2)(I 0+ I)-√(I 0I) sin(ϕ-ϕ0)


S = I 1-I2 = 2√(I 0I) sin (ϕ-ϕ0)

11
from:”Photodetectors”, by S.Donati, Prentice Hall 2000
Beamsplitter phaseshift

At a beamsplitter, the continuity condition of electric fields at the separation boundary requires that
the incident Ei is always the sum of reflected Er and transmitted Et fields:
Ei = Et + Er (I)

where the underlines indicate rotating vectors. Also, in a l ossless beamsplitter power P is
unchanged upon splitting and, as P is proportional to E2, we have:

Ei2 = Et2 + Er2 (II)

To have both equations satisfied, the three vectors must lie on a right-angle triangle, as shown in
the fi gure below. Then, the angle - or phaseshift - be tween reflected Er and tr ansmitted Et vectors
is π/2 irrespective of the actual splitting ratio, while the angle ψ between incident and transmitted
fields increases from 0 to π/2 as Et decreases from Ei to 0 (or, R goes from 0 to 1). We can then
write, for the lossless beamsplitter:

_Er

_Er
_E i
_Et
E i
P E
_t
-
ψ

Et = √(1-R) Ei eiψ, Er = √R Ei ei(ψ−π/2)

For a lossy beamsplitter, Eq.(I) still applies, while (II) holds with the ≥ sign; then point P in
the figure shifts internal to the circle and the Er Et phaseshift becomes larger than π/2 (of an angle
p/2√[R(1-R)] where p is the loss).

12
from:”Photodetectors”, by S.Donati, Prentice Hall 2000
Balanced detectors with input subtraction

+V
bb
E
1

E
- S
2 +

- V bb

13
from:”Photodetectors”, by S.Donati, Prentice Hall 2000
Coherent receiver with polarization diversity

+
GLAN -
cube BS
BS
balanced
SIGNAL detector

BS
GLAN
cube BS
∆f ≈
OSCILLATOR

+ DEMOD OUT
LOCAL

+ - balanced freq
contr f/V
detector CONV

14
from:”Photodetectors”, by S.Donati, Prentice Hall 2000
Two -frequency heterodyne receiver

beamsplitter
or circulator
frequency-
ω stab. laser
two-frequency
source

transmitter ω+∆ω acoustooptical ω


and receiver modulator
telescope

+ -
balanced
detector
OUT

15
from:”Photodetectors”, by S.Donati, Prentice Hall 2000

You might also like