ChatGPT Share
New chat
Search chats
Library
Sora
GPTs Examine the reactance diagram for the power system shown in fig.
Neglect resistance and use a base of 100MVA, 220kV in 50Ω line. The
Projects NEW ratings of the generator motor and transformer are given
belowGenerator: 40MVA, 25KV, X’’ =20%.
Synchronous Motor: 50MVA, 11KV, X ’’ =30%
Chats
T1: Y-Y transformer : 40MVA 33/220KV, X=15%
Per-unit reactance diagram T2:Y- Y transformer : 30 MVA 11/220KV, X=15%
Network admittance matrix
Bus admittance impedance matrices
Thought for 18s
Current scalar or vector
Nice — let’s put everything on the common 100 MVA system base and label the reactance diagram with per-
Reciprocal of complex number
unit values (resistances neglected as you asked).
Per-unit representation explanation
Bases and base impedance
Inductance-based rotor estimation
System MVA base Sbase = 100 MVA.
Conference paper intro rewrite
Use Vbase = 220 kV for the 220 kV network (line) nodes.
Hybrid energy system titles Base impedance on 220 kV bus:
Research paper draft 2
Vbase (220 × 103 )2
= = = 484 Ω.
Zbase
100 × 106
Bifilar winding in stepper motor Sbase
Hall principle explanation Given machine/transformer data (original MVA bases and %X)
Hysteresis current regulation Generator: SG = 40 MVA, X ′′ = 20% = 0.20 (machine base 40 MVA).
Synchronous motor: SM = 50 MVA, X ′′ = 30% = 0.30.
New chat
Transformer T1 (Y–Y 33/220 kV): ST 1 = 40 MVA, XT 1 = 15% = 0.15.
Active drivers vs passive radiators Transformer T2 (Y–Y 11/220 kV): ST 2 = 30 MVA, XT 2 = 15% = 0.15.
Zebronics vs Sony soundbar Line series reactance: j50 Ω.
Convert cm to inch Convert %X to per-unit on 100 MVA base
Clean energy technology quiz Use:
IJONS Scopus indexing status
Sold
Xpu, new = Xpu, old × .
Per unit impedance calculation Snew
Impedance diagram analysis Generator on 100 MVA base:
40
Per-phase impedance calculation
XG = 0.20 ×
100 = 0.08 pu.
Motor on 100 MVA base:
Base quantities and approximations 50
XM = 0.30 ×
100 = 0.15 pu.
System planning need Transformer T1 on 100 MVA base:
40
Obediently vs sincerely usage XT 1 = 0.15 ×
100 = 0.06 pu.
Transformer T2 on 100 MVA base:
Explanation for low results
30
XT 2 = 0.15 ×
100 = 0.045 pu.
SRM drive control
Line reactance in per-unit (on 220 kV / 100 MVA base)
Resistance types comparison
Xline,Ω 50
Xline,pu = = = 0.1033058 ≈ 0.1033 pu.
484
Zbase
Summary (per-unit values on 100 MVA system base)
Generator internal reactance XG = 0.08 pu.
Transformer T1 (33/220 kV) leakage XT 1 = 0.06 pu.
Line reactance (the j50 Ω section) Xline = 0.1033 pu.
Transformer T2 (11/220 kV) leakage XT 2 = 0.045 pu.
Motor internal reactance XM = 0.15 pu.
(If you prefer, these can be placed on the reactance diagram in order from left to right:
G — XG = 0.08 — T1 XT 1 = 0.06 — line Xline = 0.1033 — T2 XT 2 = 0.045 — M XM = 0.15.)
Optional: equivalent ohms on the 220 kV / 100 MVA base (for reference)
Multiply each pu by Zbase = 484 Ω:
XG = 0.08 pu ⇒ 38.72 Ω
XT 1 = 0.06 pu ⇒ 29.04 Ω
Xline = 0.1033 pu ⇒ 50 Ω (given)
XT 2 = 0.045 pu ⇒ 21.78 Ω
XM = 0.15 pu ⇒ 72.6 Ω
Note: expressing machines’ impedances in ohms on the 220 kV base is just for numeric comparison —
physically their windings are at 25 kV / 11 kV; normally you keep per-unit values on the common MVA
base and per-bus voltage base (as I did) so you can connect everything correctly in the reactance
diagram without extra winding-side conversions.
If you want, I can now:
draw the annotated reactance diagram with the pu values on each element, or
compute the bus-admittance (Ybus) matrix of the simplified network (you’ll need to tell me the node
structure you want — e.g., are you treating each transformer winding as a node, or collapsing the 33/25
kV generator node onto a single bus, etc.). Which would you like next?
Ask anything
sureshak
S
Free ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info. See Cookie Preferences.
