Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views13 pages

Case Study

Uploaded by

Debangshu Ari
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views13 pages

Case Study

Uploaded by

Debangshu Ari
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

IRB Credit Risk Modelling

Understanding the Internal Ratings-Based Approach under Basel


Framework

Presenter - Debangshu
Date - 20/09/2025
Key topics to be covered

● Introduction to Basel Guidelines ● Pre-Implementation Model Testing

● Key Components of Credit Risk Modelling ● Post-Implementation Model Monitoring

● IRB Framework ● Key challenges

● Data preparation ● Future Trends

● Model Methodology
Introduction to Basel Guidelines

Basel II - 2004 Basel III - 2010 Basel IV - 2017

● Improve risk sensitivity by ● Enhancement in capital ● More risk-sensitive


redefining risk and liquidity standard. standardized approach.
management standards.
● Pillar 1 - Minimum capital ● CET1 capital requirement ● Restrictions on using
requirement for credit, raised to 4.5% of RWA A-IRB models for large
market and operational from 2%, capital buffer to corporate, sovereign and
risk. be kept. banks.
● Pillar 2 - Supervisory ● 3% leverage ratio to be ● 72.5% cap introduced for
review process on risk
assessment and capital maintained to prevent A-IRB model for RWA.
adequacy framework. excessive borrowing.
● Stricter boundary between
● Pillar 3 - Banks need to ● Liquid assets to be kept for banking and trading book,
disclose risk exposures, 30 days stress, 1 year introduction of FRTB.
capital structure, and risk
assessment methods. stable funding needed.
Key Components of IRB credit risk modelling

● PD : Likelihood borrower defaults within 1 year.


● LGD : % of exposure lost if borrower defaults.
● EAD : Outstanding exposure at time of default.
● M : Effective maturity of loan/exposure(Per guideline, always between 1-5 years)
● Regulatory capital requirement : This is defined as the formula below -

where G is inverse normal cdf, R is asset correlation, b is maturity adjustment function. Using
this formula, conservative capital is calculated at 99.9% confidence level.
● Two levels: Foundation IRB (regulators provide LGD, EAD) vs Advanced IRB (bank estimates
all inputs).
IRB Framework

Standardized Approach Internal-Rating Based Approach


● Fixed risk weights ● Bank estimates PD, LGD, EAD, M

● Based on external ratings ● Risk-sensitive

● Simple & transparent ● Complex, model-driven

● Suitable for small/medium banks ● Suitable for large banks

● Less risk-sensitive, rating agency ● Costly, huge inconsistency across


reliance banks, risk of tweaking the model
assumption, data or methodology to
report lower RWA.
Data Preparation

Loan-Level
Data Calculate
Financial
Ratios

Default data
Data Sources

EDA, Data
Perform Data
Cleaning &
Checks
Standardize
Macroeconom
ic data

Derive default
definition
Develop the
External data
model
Model Methodology : Segmentation of Assets

IRB Approach

A-IRB and
Retail IRB
F-IRB

Residential Mortgage Institution Exposure

Revolving credit retail exposure Corporate Exposure

Other exposures Large financial Exposure


Model Methodology : PD/LGD

Input Data

Processed Data

Calculate PIT CDR via Calculate PIT Loss Severity via


logistic/linear regression model linear/fractional logit model

Convert PIT Loss Severity to


Convert PIT CDR to TTC PD
downturn LGD

PD Segmentation LGD Segmentation


Pre-Implementation Model Testing

● Diagnostic testing for estimation method to ensure the models are suitable for usage.

● Perform backtesting on in-sample and out-of-sample data separately.

● Sensitivity analysis on key categorical and numerical risk parameters.

● Compare with the capital required per standardized approach and calculate regulatory amount
of capital saved per IRB approach.
Post-Implementation Model Monitoring

● Check PD and LGD buckets PSI(Population Stability Index)

● Check data relevancy by comparing the distribution of key variables in the data.

● Check if PD or LGD is underestimated in consecutive quarters in recent times.

● If either of these tests fail, the model needs to be re-calibrated with latest data.
Key Challenges

● Data Quality & Availability

● Mixing internal and external data without any bias

● Risk Estimates sensitive to economic cycle

● Huge cost associated with recalibration of the model


Future Trends

● Machine Learning methods(Xgboost etc) for PD estimation.

● Scenario-based LGD modelling just like other time-sensitive scenarios.

● Climate risk integration


Thank you all!

You might also like