Sparse Channel Estimation in mmWave
MIMO systems
(insert paper, authors)
Harish Umasankar
Objectives
Need for mmWave
mmWave and its Advantages and
Challenges
(FILL)
Need for mmWave
Growing number of devices
Growing Traffic
Need for High Data Transmission Rates
Introduction to mmWave
Frequency ranging from 30 GHz to 300
GHz
Large bandwidth High data rates
Small Wavelength MIMO with large
number of antennas
Challenges In Using mmWave
High Propagation Loss
Sensitive to blockage by obstacles
Existing Solution: Beam Forming
Beamforming is a technique that is used to focus transmitted
signals to specific locations
Limitation of Beam Forming
Solution: Hybrid Architecture
Additional challenges in mmWave MIMO:
Large number of antennas traditionally requires
large number of RF chains =>High power
consumption
Solution: Hybrid RF baseband
transceiver with limited number of RF
chains
System Model: Sparse Channel Estimation
The pilot output
is given as
• RF Combiner,
Baseband Combiner
• RF Precoder,
Baseband Precoder
• Pilot matrix
• Noise matrix
(channel derivation -> leads to saying sparse channel)
Problem Statement: Sparse Channel Estimation
High signal blockage at mmWave
frequency
Leads to few multipath components
Sparse nature of mmWave channel.
Only few non-zero entries in high
dimensional channel vector.
mmWave MIMO Beamspace Channel
The virtual channel representation
is given as
: Receive array response dictionary matrix
: Transmit array response dictionary matrix
: Sparse beamspace channel matrix
(1)
Performing the vec operation
Where , and
Sparse Channel Estimation
Let pilot matrix I
After performing vec operation
• Sensing matrix
• : Sparse channel vector to be estimated
Sparse Channel Estimation
Conventional Techniques:
Least squares (LS) method
Linear Minimum Mean Squared
Error (LMMSE) technique
For Large data size
LS/LMMSE Computationally
complex
Does not exploit sparsity
Sparse recovery technique-
Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP)
OMP Algorithm
𝐲 𝐐 𝐡𝒂
OMP Algorithm