Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.scribd.com

0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views23 pages

Sampling Procedures

The document outlines various sampling procedures, categorizing them into probability and non-probability methods. Probability sampling methods include simple random, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling, each with its own merits and demerits, focusing on randomization and representativeness. Non-probability sampling methods, such as convenience, purposive, quota, and respondent-assisted sampling, rely on subjective selection and have their own advantages and limitations.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views23 pages

Sampling Procedures

The document outlines various sampling procedures, categorizing them into probability and non-probability methods. Probability sampling methods include simple random, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling, each with its own merits and demerits, focusing on randomization and representativeness. Non-probability sampling methods, such as convenience, purposive, quota, and respondent-assisted sampling, rely on subjective selection and have their own advantages and limitations.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 23

Sampling Procedures

Probability Sampling Methods

• Probability sampling includes simple random sampling, stratified


sampling, systematic sampling, cluster sampling and multistage
sampling which permits randomization
Simple Random Sampling
• Simple random sampling gives an equal and independent chance of
selection for each element of the population as a sample element.
• Drawing a simple random sample includes enumerating all elements
in the population, specifying equal and independent chances of
inclusion of each element as a sample and random drawing of
numbers
• From a finite population of elements, simple random sampling with
replacement results in an equal probability of selection for all
elements in the population.
Merits and Demerits of Simple Random Sampling

Merits
• An equal and independent chance of selection for each element of the
population into the sample which controls for subjectivity and personal
error.
• It serves as a foundation or basis for all types of random samples.
Demerits
• Biased samples restricting the equal and independent chance of
selection of some elements
• Difficult to ascertain that the sample is representative of the
population.
Systematic Sampling
• Systematic sampling means the selection of the sample from the population
according to some rule or formula.
• The formula being the ratio of population size and the sample size.
• Systematic sampling involves drawing every nth element of the population
from a predetermined list of population.
• If the appropriate unit is unavailable the next is selected
• For example: Let sample size (n) = 200 and population size (N) = 2,000,
selecting each (N/n)th element means selecting every 10th element from the
list and continuing this process until 200 elements are selected is called a
systematic sample.
Merits and Demerits of
Systematic
Merits Sampling
• Systematic sampling is cost-effective
• The resultant sample may be comprehensive and representative of the
population
• It deploys inferential statistics and thus observations of the sample may
be used for generalizations.
Demerits
• systematic sampling requires complete knowledge of the population
and each of its elements
• It fails to ensure representativeness and tends to bear the over-risk in
drawing conclusions from the observations of the sample.
Stratified Random Sampling
• To stratify means to classify or to separate people into groups
according to some characteristics, such as position, rank, income,
education, sex, or ethnic background.
• These separate groupings are referred to as subsets or subgroups.
• For a stratified random sample, the population is divided into groups
or strata.
• A random sample is selected from each stratum based upon the
percentage that each subgroup represents in the population.
Merits and Demerits of
Stratified Sampling Method
Merits
• There is unbiased selection of samples with an equal chance of
selection to all the units of the population.
• It is an objective and a good representative of the population.
• The heterogeneity of the population is converted into homogeneity.
• Observations can be used for inferential purposes.
• Its results are more reliable.
• Since strata are homogenous, there is less chance of standard error.
Demerits
• Its not economical with respect to time, money and energy.
• It poses difficulty in deciding a relevant criterion for stratification since
normally, only one criterion can be used for stratification but
generally, more than one criterion seems to be relevant for
stratification.
• It is difficult to form strata.
• The selected sample may be a representative sample with reference
to the used criterion but not to the other.
Cluster Sampling
• Cluster sampling involves the selection of population elements not
individually but in aggregates/groups.
• With the existence of a large population spread over a large geographical
location, all the other three probability sampling methods would fail to
be cost-effective with respect to time, money, energy and other reasons.
• All the geographical divisions are based on territory, community,
neighbourhood etc.
• Cluster sample converts homogeneous population into heterogeneous.
Merits and Demerits of Cluster
Sampling
Merits
• Cluster sampling is easier, more flexible, practical, highly applicable and
economical to apply to large populations.
• It may be a good representative of the population.
• Elements can be readily substituted within the same random section.
• It is possible to estimate the characteristics of clusters of elements
drawn.
• Observations can be used for inferential purposes i.e. to generalize
research findings from a study sample to the population from which the
sample was obtained.
Demerits
• A lack of surety that each sampling unit included in an area sample
will be of equal size and thus offers little control over the size of each
cluster.
• It is also difficult to ensure that the clusters are mutually exclusive.
• Cluster sampling fails to be free of error and fails to be comprehensive
hence there’s no certainty if it represents the population.
Non-Probability Sampling Methods
• Non-probability sampling based on subjective selection of the sample
elements without ascertaining the equal probability for each element
of the population to be included as the sample element.
• The non-probability samples include convenience sampling,
judgement sampling, quota sampling, double sampling and snowball
sampling
Convenience Sampling
• Convenience sampling refers to the samples that are taken by their
frequent availability or because it is impossible to apply other
sampling methods.
• In convenience sampling sample elements are selected from the
population by virtue of their accessibility or convenience.
• The researcher remains least concerned about including people with
specific traits rather than selecting the available elements.
Merits and Demerits of
Convenience Sampling
Merits
• Fast data collection.
• Inexpensive data collection.
• Easy data collection
Demerits
• It fails to be the representative of population.
• Convenience sampling is biased and not free from error.
• It fails to apply parametric statistics and thus renders limited
generalizability.
Purposive Sampling
• Purposive sampling comprises handpicked samples assuring that
specific elements are included.
• The high degree of selectivity assures the representativeness of all
relevant strata under the study.
• Purposive samples are frequently called judgemental samples
because the judgement to include specific elements of a given
population is exercised by the researcher to seek the information.
Merits and Demerits of
Purposive
Merits
Sampling
• It incorporates cost-effectiveness, accessibility and convenience.
• It involves sufficient care and decision in the selecting elements.
• Purposive sampling assures the selection of specific elements in the sample.
• It employs the application of researcher’s knowledge with reference to the specific sample.
• This sampling plan involves the use of the best available knowledge of the sample subjects
and the control of significant variables.
Demerits
• It is not free from error.
• It fails to assure that the sample is truly random or representative.
• It requires extensive information about the population compared to other sampling
methods.
• Like the other non-probability sampling methods, it fails to use inferential statistics.
Quota Sampling
• Quota sampling is a frequently used non-probability sampling that
involves drawing the proportional elements from various target
population strata.
• It involves combining sample size decisions with particular characteristics
such as age, area, sex, class, etc., which enables the researcher to focus
on the most suitable elements based on these criteria.
• It involves both accessibility and judgement.
• Quota sampling is specific with respect to the size and proportion of
subsamples with subgroups chosen to reflect corresponding proportions
in the population.
Merits and Demerits of Quota
Sampling
Merits
• It is a method that involves ease, frequent usability and cost-
effectiveness as compared to other sampling methods.
• It guarantees the inclusion of members of different sub populations.
• Less data collector error
• Quota sampling is an improvement over the judgement sampling.
Demerits
• Requires adequate resources of more time, money, personnel and effort
• Over representation of population elements in a sample that are not
readily accessible, cooperative, articulate and visible
Respondent Assisted Sampling
• This sampling method involves sampling rare, low incidence and hard
to reach populations and studying social networks.
Merits and Demerits of Respondent
Assisted Sampling
Merits
• It does not have ethical challenges linked to other non probability sampling
methods such as snow ball sampling
Demerits
• Selection bias in the selection of sample elements that is determined by the
subjective choice of previously selected respondents
• It may require more resource requirements of time, money and effort.
• Selected sample elements are not independent of each other as the
selection of a member of the population is dependent on ties to those
previously interviewed.
Factors determining sample size and sampling procedures

You might also like