Abstract
Ratings of age of acquisition (AoA), imageability, and familiarity were collected for 1,526 words. The methodology made use of a modular approach, in which the full sample of words was divided into five separate blocks. Within each block, each word was rated on each of the three variables by 20 participants (undergraduate students from the University of Bristol). Analyses comparing these ratings to existing norm databases demonstrated that this methodology resulted in high reliability (assessed by Cronbach’s α) and validity. The ratings were also transformed to be compatible with the Gilhooly and Logie (1980) norms. This transformation resulted in a set of norms for 3,394 words, which is by far the largest database of ratings for AoA, imageability, and familiarity to date. The resulting database should be useful for researchers interested in manipulating or controlling these factors in word recognition, neuropsychological, or memory studies. These norms can be downloaded from language.psy.bris .ac.uk/bristol_norms.html.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baayen, R. H. (2005). Data mining at the intersection of psychology and linguistics. In A. Cutler (Ed.),Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: Four cornerstones (pp. 69–83). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., &van Rijn, H. (1995). The CELEX lexical database, release 2 [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium & University of Pennsylvania.
Balota, D. A. (1990). The role of meaning in word recognition. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.),Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 9–32). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2002).The English Lexicon Project: A Web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. Accessed September 30, 2004, at the Washington University Web site, elexicon.wustl.edu.
Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., &Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of singlesyllable words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,133, 283–316.
Balota, D. A., Pilotti, M., &Cortese, M. J. (2001). Subjective frequency estimates for 2,938 monosyllabic words.Memory & Cognition,29, 639–647.
Bird, H., Franklin, S., &Howard, D. (2001). Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,33, 73–79.
Brown, G. D. A., &Watson, F. L. (1987). First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency.Memory & Cognition,15, 208–216.
Burnard, L. (1995).The user’s reference guide for the British National Corpus. Oxford: Oxford University Computing Services.
Carroll, J. B., &White, M. N. (1973). Age-of-acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 563–576.
Coltheart, M. (1981a). The MRC psycholinguistic database.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 497–505.
Coltheart, M. (1981b).MRC psycholinguistic database user manual: Version 1. Accessed September 30, 2004, at the Web site of the Council for the Central Laboratory of the Research Councils, www.psych .rl.ac.uk/User_Manual_v1_0.html.
Cortese, M. J., &Fugett, A. (2004). Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36, 384–387.
Davis, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics.Behavior Research Methods,37, 65–70.
Davis, C. J., &Perea, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish.Behavior Research Methods,37, 665–671.
Duyck, W., Desmet, T., Verbeke, L. P. C., &Brysbaert, M. (2004). WordGen: A tool for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36, 488–499.
Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 256–281.
Ghyselinck, M., Lewis, M. B., &Brysbaert, M. (2004). Age of acquisition and the cumulative-frequency hypothesis: A review of the literature and a new multi-task investigation.Acta Psychologica,115, 43–67.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Gilhooly, M. L. (1980). The validity of age-ofacquisition ratings.British Journal of Psychology,71, 105–110.
Gilhooly, K. J., &Logie, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 395–427.
Gordon, B. (1985). Subjective frequency and the lexical decision latency function: Implications for mechanisms of lexical access.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 631–645.
Hirsh, K. W., &Funnell, E. (1995). Those old, familiar things: Age of acquisition, familiarity and lexical access in progressive aphasia.Journal of Neurolinguistics,9, 23–32.
Hulme, C., Stuart, G., Brown, G. D. A., &Morin, C. (2003). Highand low-frequency words are recalled equally well in alternating lists: Evidence for associative effects in serial recall.Journal of Memory & Language,49, 500–518.
Juhasz, B., &Rayner, K. (2003). Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 1312–1318.
Marcel, A. J., &Patterson, K. (1978). Word recognition and production: Reciprocity in clinical and normal studies. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII (pp. 209–226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Meng, X., Rosenthal, R., &Rubin, D. B. (1992). Comparing correlated correlation coefficients.Psychological Bulletin,111, 172–175.
Morrison, C. M., Chappell, T. D., &Ellis, A. W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50A, 528–559.
Morrison, C. M., &Ellis, A. W. (2000). Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision.British Journal of Psychology,91, 167–180.
Morrison, C. M., Ellis, A. W., &Quinlan, P. T. (1992). Age of acquisition, not word frequency, affects object naming, not object recognition.Memory & Cognition,20, 705–714.
Paivio, A. (1971).Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., &Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,76(1, Pt. 2), 1–25.
Richardson, J. T. E. (1975). The effect of word imageability in acquired dyslexia.Neuropsychologia,13, 281–288.
Roodenrys, S., Hulme, C., Alban, J., Ellis, A. W., &Brown, G. D. A. (1994). Effects of word frequency and age of acquisition on shortterm memory span.Memory & Cognition,22, 695–701.
Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., Bowers, J. S., &Damian, M. F. (2004). Age-of-acquisition effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from expert vocabularies.Cognition,93, B11-B26.
Toglia, M. P., &Battig, W. R. (1978).Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 143–154.
Zeno, S. M., Ivens, S. H., Millard, R. T., &Duvvuri, R. (1995).The educator’s word frequency guide. New York: Touchstone.
Zevin, J. D., &Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks.Journal of Memory & Language,47, 1–29.
Zevin, J. D., &Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Age-of-acquisition effects in reading aloud: Tests of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory.Memory & Cognition,32, 31–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was partially supported by ESRC Postdoctoral Fellowship PTA-026-27-0769 to H.S.-G., an Australian Research Council APD grant to C.J.D., and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Grant 7/S17491 to Jeff Bowers and Markus Damian.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., Davis, C.J. The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability, and familiarity. Behavior Research Methods 38, 598–605 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193891
Received:
Accepted:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193891