Abstract
Estes and Maddox (2002) suggested that the word frequency mirror effect in episodic recognition memory might be due to word likeness rather than to the frequency of experience with a word per se We examined their suggestion using a factorial manipulation of frequency and neighborhood density, a measure used in lexical memory research to measure orthographic word likeness. For study with no pecified task, main effects of density and frequency were in the mirror order, confirming the hypothesized mirror effect of word likeness but not its role in producing the frequency mirror effect. Lexical decision study increased the size of both mirror effects, even though the density manipulation had a negligible effect on lexical decision performance for words. Post hoc analyses showed that neither mirror effect could be explained by differences in lower order measures of word likeness (letter and bigram frequency). The joint orders of frequency and density results were mirrored across new and old conditions in accordance with attention likelihood theory (ALT ), but density effects on z-ROC slope suggest that ALT may require extension to accommodate the effect of word likeness on response confidence.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 802–814.
Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 234–254.
Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 439–461.
Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., &van Rijn, H. (1993).The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 340–357.
Chalmers, K. A., &Humphreys, M. S. (1998). Role of generalized and episode specific memories in the word frequency effect in recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 610–632.
Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 497–505.
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., &Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., &Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.Psychological Review,108, 204–256.
Davis, C. J. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics.Behavior Research Methods,37, 65–70.
Dennis, S., &Humphreys, M. S. (2001). A context noise model of episodic word recognition.Psychological Review,108, 452–478.
Dewhurst, S. A., Hitch, G. J., &Barry, C. (1998). Separate effects of word frequency and age of acquisition in recognition and recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 284–298.
Estes, W. K., &Maddox, W. T. (2002). On the processes underlying stimulus-familiarity effects in recognition of words and nonwords.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 1003–1018.
Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,13, 8–20.
Glanzer, M., &Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 5–16.
Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K., Iverson, G. J., &Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory.Psychological Review,100, 546–567.
Glanzer, M., &Bowles, N. (1976). Analysis of the word-frequency effect in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,2, 21–31.
Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighbourhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 228–244.
Grainger, J., &Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model.Psychological Review,103, 518–565.
Heathcote, A. (1988). Screen control and timing routines for the IBM microcomputer family using a high-level language.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 289–297.
Heathcote, A. (2003). Item recognition memory and the ROC.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 1210–1230.
Hilford, A., Glanzer, M., &Kim, K. (1997). Encoding, repetition, and the mirror effect in recognition memory: Symmetry in motion.Memory & Cognition,25, 593–605.
Hoshino, Y. (1991). A bias in favor of the positive response to highfrequency words in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,19, 607–616.
Joordens, S., &Becker, S. (1997). The long and short of semantic priming effects in lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1083–1105.
Joordens, S., &Hockley, W. E. (2000). Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1534–1555.
Kijewski, M. F., Swensson, R. G., &Judy, P. F. (1989). Analysis of rating data from multiple-alternative tasks.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,33, 428–451.
Kuöcera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Maddox, W. T., &Estes, W. K. (1997). Direct and indirect stimulus frequency effects in recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 539–559.
Malmberg, K. J., &Nelson, T. O. (2003). The word frequency effect for recognition memory and the elevated-attention hypothesis.Memory & Cognition,31, 35–43.
Malmberg, K. J., Steyvers, M., Stephens, J. D., &Shiffrin, R. M. (2002). Feature frequency effects in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,30, 607–613.
McClelland, J. L., &Chappell, M. (1998). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition.Psychological Review,105, 724–760.
Murdock, B. (2003). The mirror effect and the spacing effect.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 570–588.
Nelson, D. L., Zhang, N., &McKinney, V. M. (2001). The ties that bind what is known to the recognition of what is new.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 1147–1159.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph,76(1, Pt. 2).
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., &Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological Review,103, 56–115.
Rastle, K., Harrington, J., &Coltheart, M. (2002). 358,534 nonwords: The ARC Nonword Database.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 1339–1362.
Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C.-F., &Gronlund, S. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves.Psychological Review,99, 518–535.
Reder, L. M., Anderson, J. R., &Bjork, R. A. (1974). A semantic interpretation of encoding specificity.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 648–656.
Reder, L. M., Angstadt, P., Cary, M., Erickson, M. A., &Ayers, M. A. (2002). A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition: Two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 138–152.
Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, M. S., Angstadt, P., &Hiraki, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 294–320.
Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., &Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences.Memory & Cognition,26, 1270–1281.
Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–569.
Sheu, C.-F., &Heathcote, A. (2001). A nonlinear regression approach to estimating signal detection models for rating data.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,33, 108–114.
Shiffrin, R. M., &Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 145–166.
Sikström, S. (2001). The variance theory of the mirror effect in recognition memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 408–438.
Steyvers, M., &Malmberg, K. J. (2003). The effect of normative context variability on recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 760–766.
Stretch, V., &Wixted, J. T. (1998). On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1379–1396.
Wixted, J. T. (1992). Subjective memorability and the mirror effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 681–690.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1341–1354.
Zechmeister, E. B. (1969). Orthographic distinctiveness.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 754–761.
Zechmeister, E. B. (1972). Orthographic distinctiveness as a variable in word recognition.American Journal of Psychology,85, 425–430.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Note—This article was accepted by the previous editorial team, when Colin M. MacLeod was Editor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heathcote, A., Ditton, E. & Mitchell, K. Word frequency and word likeness mirror effects in episodic recognition memory. Memory & Cognition 34, 826–838 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193430
Received:
Accepted:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193430