Addition of JSON as new input type #98
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
👉 View analysis in DeepCode’s Dashboard |
izar
requested changes
Jun 15, 2020
Collaborator
izar
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am still having difficulties with understanding the use case for this one. Who wakes up in the morning thinking "oh i think i'll write myself a system description in JSON, it is so much clearer than using statements!" ?
How about making this a utility script that transforms well-formed JSON into python code that runs pytm? This way the code stays focused and anyone wanting to move from JSON to code is able to have the middle format to work from.
Collaborator
|
Possibly superseded by #105 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.