Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

We upgraded the pause image to 3.5, which is now reflected in CRI-O as
well as our config migration.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

None

Special notes for your reviewer:

None

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Update default pause image to version 3.5

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. labels Mar 16, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: saschagrunert

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 16, 2021
@saschagrunert saschagrunert changed the title Update pause image to 3.5 WIP: Update pause image to 3.5 Mar 16, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 16, 2021
@saschagrunert saschagrunert changed the title WIP: Update pause image to 3.5 Update pause image to 3.5 Mar 16, 2021
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 16, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 16, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #4663 (cdd8936) into master (1e86661) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 20.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4663      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   40.95%   40.94%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         110      110              
  Lines        9545     9547       +2     
==========================================
  Hits         3909     3909              
- Misses       5189     5191       +2     
  Partials      447      447              

We upgraded the pause image to 3.5, which is now reflected in CRI-O as
well as our config migration.

Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@saschagrunert: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/kata-jenkins 2416762 link /test kata-containers
Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 16, 2021

@saschagrunert: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/kata-jenkins 2416762 link /test kata-containers
ci/openshift-jenkins/integration_rhel 2416762 link /test integration_rhel
ci/openshift-jenkins/integration_crun_cgroupv2 2416762 link /test integration_cgroupv2
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic 2416762 link /test e2e-agnostic

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

func migrateFrom1_20(cfg *config.Config) error {
// Upgrade pause image
logrus.Infof("Checking for pause_image, which now should be k8s.gcr.io/pause:3.5 instead of k8s.gcr.io/pause:3.2")
if cfg.PauseImage == "k8s.gcr.io/pause:3.2" {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would this be better?

Suggested change
if cfg.PauseImage == "k8s.gcr.io/pause:3.2" {
if cfg.PauseImage != config.DefaultPauseImage {

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This would change the value to k8s.gcr.io/pause:3.2, which would change the logic there :)

@saschagrunert
Copy link
Member Author

Closing in favor of #4550

@saschagrunert saschagrunert deleted the pause branch March 23, 2021 08:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants