-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
resource store: prevent segfault on cleanup step #4834
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
resource store: prevent segfault on cleanup step #4834
Conversation
if a resource has a watcher, but has not yet been put to the store, we should not be marking it as stale. Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <[email protected]>
|
/cherry-pick release-1.21 |
|
@haircommander: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.21 in a new PR and assign it to you. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/cherry-pick release-1.20 |
|
@haircommander: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.20 in a new PR and assign it to you. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/cherry-pick release-1.19 |
|
@haircommander: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.19 in a new PR and assign it to you. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4834 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 42.98% 43.00% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 107 107
Lines 9792 9795 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 4209 4212 +3
Misses 5132 5132
Partials 451 451 |
saschagrunert
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
mrunalp
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: haircommander, mrunalp, saschagrunert The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
8 similar comments
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
@haircommander: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/override ci/prow/e2e-agnostic |
|
@saschagrunert: Overrode contexts on behalf of saschagrunert: ci/prow/e2e-agnostic, ci/prow/e2e-gcp DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@haircommander: new pull request created: #4846 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@haircommander: new pull request created: #4847 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@haircommander: new pull request created: #4848 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
if a resource has a watcher, but has not yet been put to the store, we should not be marking it as stale.
Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt [email protected]
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for your reviewer:
related to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955596
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?