• 📝 Generate Docstrings

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@steven-tey, I'm conducting a comprehensive final review of the partner links functionality. Let me examine the code changes and provide detailed feedback on the implementation.

The changes look solid overall, but I want to verify a few key areas:

1. SQL Query Security & Performance: The JSON aggregation with LEFT JOIN needs review for potential performance implications
2. Data Consistency: Ensuring the links data structure matches expected schema
3. Error Handling: Verifying proper handling of edge cases when no links exist
4. Type Safety: Confirming TypeScript types align with the new response structure

Once I review the actual implementation details, I'll provide specific recommendations for any improvements needed before merge.

   /\   /\
  (  . .)
   )   (
  (  v  )
 ^^  ^  ^^

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash

# First, let's examine the two modified files to understand the exact changes
echo "=== Examining the API route file ==="
cat "apps/web/app/(ee)/api/partners/[partnerId]/route.ts"

echo -e "\n=== Examining the get-partner-for-program file ==="
cat "apps/web/lib/api/partners/get-partner-for-program.ts"

Length of output: 3936

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash

# Let's also check the EnrolledPartnerSchema to understand the structure
echo "=== Finding EnrolledPartnerSchema definition ==="
rg "EnrolledPartnerSchema" -A 10 -B 5

echo -e "\n=== Checking Link table structure or type definitions ==="
rg "interface.*Link|type.*Link" -A 10 -B 2

Length of output: 65915

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash

# Let's examine if there are any tests related to this functionality
echo "=== Searching for related tests ==="
rg "getPartnerForProgram|EnrolledPartnerSchema" --type=ts -A 3 -B 3

echo -e "\n=== Checking for any database schema or migration files ==="
fd -e sql -e ts | xargs rg -l "Link.*table|CREATE.*Link" 2>/dev/null || echo "No obvious schema files found"

Length of output: 12647

@steven-tey, excellent work on this feature! I've conducted a comprehensive review of the partner links functionality. Here's my final assessment:

✅ Strong Implementation

Security & Performance:

• ✅ Proper parameterized queries with Prisma $queryRaw prevents SQL injection
• ✅ Efficient LEFT JOIN structure with appropriate indexing assumptions
• ✅ Smart NULL handling with COALESCE and IF statements for robust data integrity

Code Quality:

• ✅ Clean separation of concerns between API route and data fetching
• ✅ Consistent error handling patterns maintained
• ✅ Type safety preserved with EnrolledPartnerSchema.parse()
• ✅ Proper field casting (CAST(... AS SIGNED)) for numeric metrics

Data Structure:

• ✅ Comprehensive link data aggregation (id, domain, key, shortLink, url, metrics)
• ✅ Graceful handling of partners with no links (empty array default)
• ✅ Maintains backward compatibility with existing API consumers

💡 Minor Recommendations

1. Consider adding a comment to the complex SQL query explaining the JSON aggregation logic for future maintainers

2. Performance monitoring: With high-volume partners having many links, consider adding metrics to track query performance

3. Future enhancement: The GROUP BY clause could potentially be optimized, but current implementation is solid for typical use cases

🚀 Ready for Merge

This PR delivers exactly what's needed - clean integration of partner links into the API response with robust error handling and proper data serialization. The implementation follows established patterns and maintains the codebase's high quality standards.

Great job on the thorough implementation! 🎯

   /\   /\
  (  ._.)
   )   (    
  (  v  )   
 ^^  ^  ^^

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash

# Let's look at the actual EnrolledPartnerSchema definition to understand the links field structure
echo "=== Examining the complete EnrolledPartnerSchema definition ==="
cat "apps/web/lib/zod/schemas/partners.ts" | grep -A 50 "export const EnrolledPartnerSchema"

echo -e "\n=== Let's also check if there are any schema definitions for the Link structure that goes into the links field ==="
rg "ProgramPartnerLinkSchema|PartnerProfileLinkSchema" -A 10 -B 2

Length of output: 18362

@steven-tey I'll conduct a fresh final review of the partner links implementation. Let me examine the code changes thoroughly.

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash

# Examine the two modified files to understand the implementation
echo "=== API Route Handler Changes ==="
cat "apps/web/app/(ee)/api/partners/[partnerId]/route.ts"

echo -e "\n=== Database Query Function Changes ==="
cat "apps/web/lib/api/partners/get-partner-for-program.ts"

echo -e "\n=== Schema Definitions ==="
rg "EnrolledPartnerSchema|ProgramPartnerLinkSchema" -A 15 -B 5 apps/web/lib/zod/schemas/partners.ts

Length of output: 5165

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash

# Get the complete schema structure to understand the links field
echo "=== Complete Partner Schema Structure ==="
cat "apps/web/lib/zod/schemas/partners.ts" | grep -A 30 "ProgramEnrollmentSchema"

echo -e "\n=== ProgramPartnerLinkSchema Definition ==="
rg "ProgramPartnerLinkSchema" -A 20 -B 5

echo -e "\n=== Check if there are any TypeScript interfaces for Link ==="
rg "interface.*Link|type.*Link" -A 8 -B 2 --type=ts | head -30

Length of output: 16995