Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@cortinico
Copy link
Member

Closes #3812

My original PR #3801 was wrong. The correct way to apply excludes is to list them inside the Exclusion.kt file.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 22, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #3815 (97afa7e) into main (f8f0d99) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #3815   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     83.58%   83.58%           
- Complexity     3055     3059    +4     
=========================================
  Files           456      456           
  Lines          8916     8924    +8     
  Branches       1752     1752           
=========================================
+ Hits           7452     7459    +7     
- Misses          541      542    +1     
  Partials        923      923           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
.../detekt/generator/printer/rulesetpage/Exclusion.kt 96.66% <100.00%> (+0.37%) 0.00 <0.00> (ø)
...kt/rules/documentation/AbsentOrWrongFileLicense.kt 85.00% <0.00%> (-3.24%) 13.00% <0.00%> (ø%)
.../detekt/rules/documentation/EndOfSentenceFormat.kt 95.45% <0.00%> (+0.21%) 14.00% <0.00%> (+2.00%)
...ekt/rules/documentation/UndocumentedPublicClass.kt 87.87% <0.00%> (+0.37%) 35.00% <0.00%> (+2.00%)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f8f0d99...97afa7e. Read the comment docs.

@BraisGabin BraisGabin merged commit 436ab07 into detekt:main May 22, 2021
@cortinico cortinico changed the title Property apply test excludes for comments Properly apply test excludes for comments May 22, 2021
@cortinico cortinico added this to the 1.18.0 milestone May 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants