Isn't "https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/labels/Up%20for%20Grabs" more correct? Just sent a PR to up-for-grabs.net as well 😄

I think that one would also show closed issues. Wouldn't it?

IIRC, last time I checked, 'up-for-grabs' was more common.
On 28 Jan 2015 11:34, "Kristian Hellang" [email protected] wrote:

Isn't "https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/labels/Up%20for%20Grabs" more
correct? Just sent a PR
up-for-grabs/up-for-grabs.net#150 to up-for-grabs.net
as well [image: 😄]

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#103 (comment).

I think that one would also show closed issues. Wouldn't it?

Nope, if you check the link, it'll search for is:open label:"Up for Grabs" 😄

EDIT: It will include PRs, though. Not sure that's an issue.

IIRC, last time I checked, 'up-for-grabs' was more common.

Not sure that'll work, since the label itself is "Up for Grabs".

Yep, my comment was out of context. I should probably have a look at the PR
rather than blindly replying by email 😃. It was a comment about the
name of the label itself.
On 28 Jan 2015 11:41, "Kristian Hellang" [email protected] wrote:

IIRC, last time I checked, 'up-for-grabs' was more common.

Not sure that'll work, since the label itself is "Up for Grabs".

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#103 (comment).

@khellang I have updated the commit with your link 😉