Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

fix double expanding arguments on Windows (2nd try) #1942

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

fix double expanding arguments on Windows (2nd try) #1942

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

@mattn
Copy link
Member

@mattn mattn commented Aug 5, 2017

See #1938

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #1942 into master will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1942      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage    75.1%   75.06%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          76       76              
  Lines      125315   125275      -40     
==========================================
- Hits        94117    94043      -74     
- Misses      31198    31232      +34
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/if_xcmdsrv.c 83.33% <0%> (-0.93%) ⬇️
src/if_py_both.h 75.36% <0%> (-0.71%) ⬇️
src/os_unix.c 56.67% <0%> (-0.34%) ⬇️
src/gui_gtk_x11.c 47.5% <0%> (-0.16%) ⬇️
src/window.c 81.33% <0%> (-0.14%) ⬇️
src/channel.c 83.93% <0%> (-0.1%) ⬇️
src/term.c 52.93% <0%> (-0.06%) ⬇️
src/gui.c 45.53% <0%> (-0.06%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 086d535...fba59a3. Read the comment docs.

@brammool brammool closed this in 39d21e3 Aug 5, 2017
@mattn mattn deleted the fix-backtick branch August 11, 2017 08:09
janlazo added a commit to janlazo/neovim that referenced this pull request May 7, 2019
@janlazo
vim-patch:8.0.0876: backslashes and wildcards in backticks don't work
ecb3746 
Problem:    MS-Windows: Backslashes and wildcards in backticks don't work.
Solution:   Do not handle backslashes inside backticks in the wrong place.
            (Yasuhiro Matsumoto, closes vim/vim#1942)
vim/vim@39d21e3
janlazo added a commit to janlazo/neovim that referenced this pull request May 7, 2019
@janlazo
vim-patch:8.0.0876: backslashes and wildcards in backticks don't work
f76792a 
Problem:    MS-Windows: Backslashes and wildcards in backticks don't work.
Solution:   Do not handle backslashes inside backticks in the wrong place.
            (Yasuhiro Matsumoto, closes vim/vim#1942)
vim/vim@39d21e3
@janlazo janlazo mentioned this pull request May 7, 2019
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@mattn @codecov-io