Nellie Gray Mass, March for Life 2020 |
March for Life 2023 -- a very different year
Francis names pro-abortion atheist as member of Pontifical Academy for Life
A nightmare that has no end: that is the sick pontificate through which we are suffering.
The Pontifical Academy for Life was one of the very few positive post-conciliar creations. Unsurprisingly, it was born of the mind of Dr. Jerôme Lejeune, one of the greatest pro-life heroes, who suggested it to John Paul II and was named its first president.
Since the advent of Francis, the new Pontifical Academy for Life has become a hotbed of dissent from Catholic moral teaching: from contraception to homosexuality to abortion, and other doctrinal issues, there is no matter on which it has not caused scandal under the leadership of Abp. Vincenzo Paglia.
Its newest members were named by Francis yesterday, among them a radical leftist economist, an Italian living in the U.S. named Mariana Mazzucato. Mazzucato is an avowed atheist:
On Abp. Paglia's Statement on the Italian Abortion Law (by John Paul II Academy for Human Life and the Family)
[For Paglia's statement, see previous post on Rorate.]
Last Friday 26 August, Monsignor Vincenzo Paglia, President of the Pontifical Academy for Life (PAV), was a guest on the RAI 3 programme Agorà – Summer. At one point (1) , the presenter Giorgia Rombolà asked Msgr. Paglia for an opinion on law 194/1978, which legalised procured abortion in Italy. Msgr. Paglia replied: “I think that law 194 is now a pillar of our social life”. It should be made clear immediately that the President of the PAV, in expressing himself in this way, did not intend to merely report a judgement present in the community on the 194 law, a judgement that he did not share – as Dr Fabrizio Mastrofini, Monsignor Paglia’s spokesman, attempted to claim a few days later in an official note – but rather was it not that he wanted to express his own personal judgement, a judgement of appreciation?
LIFE WINS - Roe is Overturned!
The Dobbs decision is here.
Gratitude to God Almighty, the Blessed Virgin, and scores of faithful Christians, including so many Catholics, who have prayed, fought, canvassed, voted, waited patiently for this moment.
This is not the end, but it is the beginning of the end.
Moloch Loses One Round: Roe
Memorial of Unborn Children, Madison, Wisconsin (Martin Hudáček) |
Or so it seems, if the final decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health resembles the February draft leaked most likely by a liberal clerk to the website Politico late last night, a draft in which the monstrous 1973 Roe v. Wade and 1992 Planned Parenthood v. Casey decisions are explicitly overturned.
If so, and if confirmed, may God be praised in his Angels and in his Saints!
+Schneider: Abortion-tainted vaccines and the culture of death
By Bishop Athanasius Schneider
Via Gloria.tv
The blood of murdered unborn children cries to God from abortion-tainted vaccines and medicines
Anti-Christian world powers that promote the culture of death are seeking to impose on the world’s population an implicit — though remote and passive — collaboration with abortion. Such remote collaboration, in itself, is also an evil because of the extraordinary historical circumstances in which these same world powers are promoting the murder of unborn children and the exploitation of their remains. When we use vaccines or medicines which utilize cell lines originating from aborted babies, we physically benefit from the “fruits” of one of the greatest evils of mankind — the cruel genocide of the unborn. For if one innocent child had not been cruelly murdered, we would not have these concrete vaccines or medicines. We should not be so naive as not to see that these vaccines and medicines not only offer a health benefit but also promise to promote the culture of death.
March for Life and TLM photos
President Donald Trump, speaking in-person at the March for Life |
Congressman Chris Smith, co-chairman of the House Pro-Life Caucus |
Nellie Gray Mass 2020; Saint Mary Mother of God church in Washington, D.C. |
March for Life: First U.S. president in-person, and plenty of TLMs around
TLMs before and after the March for Life in D.C.
Saint Mary Mother of God church at 727 5th Street, NW |
Many traditional Catholics come to the nation's capital for the March for Life. To that end, there are numerous traditional Latin Masses offered in the District that day. Here is a running list based on various sources for TLMs to be offered in churches in Washington, D.C. -- publicly or privately via public announcement, at main or side altars -- on Friday 24 January:
8 a.m. Low Mass, Saint Mary Mother of God church at 5th and H streets, NW. The pastor of the parish, Father Vincent De Rosa, will offer this Mass on the feast of Saint Timothy.
8:30 a.m. Low Mass, Saint Mary Mother of God church church at 5th and H streets, NW. Father John Zuhlsdorf will offer this Mass.
8:45 a.m. Low Mass, Saint Mary Mother of God church at 5th and H streets, NW. Father Ron Floyd of the Diocese of Fall River will offer this Mass.
9 a.m. pontifical Low Mass, Holy Comforter church at 1357 East Capitol Street, SE. Raymond Cardinal Burke will offer this Mass assisted by the Institute of Christ the King. [ N.B. this is quite a welcome development in the Archdiocese of Washington compared to the Mr. McCarrick and Cardinal Wuerl years.]
Anno Domini MMXX - Notes for the Year - January 3rd: Roe should be overruled
"For while I was yet little I pleased the Most High, and from my womb have I brought forth God and man."
'Roe’s jurisprudence has been haphazard from the beginning. Roe did not actually hold that abortion was a “fundamental” constitutional right, but only implied it. ... Roe’s jurisprudence has been characterized by Delphic confusion and protean change.'*'[We] respectfully suggest that the court’s struggle—similar to dozens of other courts’ herculean struggles in this area—illustrates the unworkability of the “right to abortion” found in Roe and the need for the Court to take up the issue of whether Roe and Casey should be reconsidered and, if appropriate, overruled.'
of the United States Congress
to the Supreme Court of the United States
in the pending case June Medical Services LLC v. Gee
On the 80th Anniversary of Victory Day in Spain
«CON INMENSO GOZO»
OF HIS HOLINESS
(April 14, 1939)
IRELAND: a post-mortem examination - by Roberto de Mattei (Revisited)
The State acknowledges the right to life of the unborn and, with due regard to the equal right to life of the mother, guarantees in its laws to respect, and, as far as practicable, by its laws to defend and vindicate that right.
A homily from Silverstream Priory for Low Sunday — Ireland's Eleventh Hour
De Mattei: The historical background of the abortion law in Italy
Abortion in Italy forty years later (1978-2018)
Roberto de Mattei
Corrispondenza Romana
March 21, 2018
Recently the attention of the media in Italy has been focused on the
fortieth anniversary of Aldo Moro’s kidnapping. On March 16th 1978, in an
ambush on Via Fani in Rome, the Christian Democrat politician was kidnapped and
his bodyguards murdered by the Red Brigade. On May 9th, after a
captivity of 55 days, his body was found riddled with bullets in the boot of a
car in Via Caetani. No-one has yet to recall though, that, during that same
springtime of 1978, the law n.194 on abortion was debated and approved by the
Italian Parliament and that since then, it has been the cause of six million
victims in our country.
Op-Ed: "Better a Millstone" - Catholic school principal left alone: Planned Parenthood wins another battle
It is always local situations that show how deep the problems in the Church are at the present time. The problematic issuances from Rome, Germany and Chicago are indeed disturbing, but to see how far things have gone, one must go to the local level of the Church: the diocese and the parish. Go to a typical parish Mass to see the fruit of the liturgical experiment of the post-Conciliar Church. The unmooring from the Tradition of the Church is plain to see in the carrying out of the deliberate misunderstanding of the Mass and the disappearance of reverence. Not to mention the precipitous decline in the percentage of Catholics who go to Mass regularly.
This poverty is talked about by those who are entrusted with running the government and by those running the Church. But those who run the Church understand that nothing can be done, at least at the basic level of dollars and cents, without the wealthy of Fairfield County. Nothing to be done. What they mean by “to be done” has little to do with Jesus’ directive to go out and preach the Gospel. What the hierarchy means by “to be done” is to pay attention to the assurance that the bureaucracy continues to function, much like the government in Washington D.C. in the continuous pseudo-crises of government funding.
Call for Masses for Ireland's abortion referendum
A previous Pilgrimage to Our Lady of Caversham, outside Reading, England. This year's Pilgriamge, whose Mass will be offered for this intention, takes place this Saturday at 11:30am. |
March for Life TLMs in Washington, D.C.
UPDATE; 17 Jan.: President Trump will address the March for Life via satellite. Speaker Paul Ryan will address the March for Life in person.
De Mattei - Forty years against life: from abortion to euthanasia (1978-2017)
Episcopal Bastards: Bishops' Conference of France celebrates country's greatest Abortion Figure
Catholic University of Louvain: abortion a 'fundamental right'
Tania van Hemelryck, the special adviser to the university president on gender politics, spoke to Belgian television on behalf of the university, saying: “The authorities want to find out the exact status of the text and how it was used during this course, bearing in mind that in any case UCL defends the fundamental right to abortion, and particularly women’s right to choose.”...
The official statement published by UCL on its website says much the same thing:
“Whatever the outcome of the inquiry, the right to abortion is enshrined in Belgian law and the note that was brought to the attention of UCL is at odds with the values upheld by the university. Conveying standpoints that contradict these values in the framework of a teaching course is unacceptable.”