You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I got a message from @tvw11 that he ran into a hard crash with Modflow 6 when writing a combination of DRN and SSM package with inconsistent datasets: The concentrations had np.nan in cells where data was specified in the DRN package, which caused a nan written to the auxiliary column. At minimum, we should validate the concentrations upon writing the DRN package as well.
List of packages where validation of concentrations is missing:
DRN
EVT
WEL
The WEL might be something to pick up in a separate issue, as the validation in this package is lacking anyway.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fixes#805
# Description
Validation of concentrations was missing for the DRN, WEL, and EVT
package. This PR:
* Adds validation schemata to the DRN and EVT
* Adds ``AnyNodataSchema``
* Validate if ``Well`` has no nodata for certain variables.
I was struggling a bit with the linting/formatting it appears that we
are running both ``black `` as well as ``ruff`` which causes changes.
# Checklist
<!---
Before requesting review, please go through this checklist:
-->
- [x] Links to correct issue
- [x] Update changelog, if changes affect users
- [x] PR title starts with ``Issue #nr``, e.g. ``Issue #737``
- [x] Unit tests were added
- [ ] **If feature added**: Added/extended example
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I got a message from @tvw11 that he ran into a hard crash with Modflow 6 when writing a combination of DRN and SSM package with inconsistent datasets: The concentrations had
np.nan
in cells where data was specified in the DRN package, which caused anan
written to the auxiliary column. At minimum, we should validate the concentrations upon writing the DRN package as well.List of packages where validation of concentrations is missing:
The WEL might be something to pick up in a separate issue, as the validation in this package is lacking anyway.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: