Issue #1532 Write surface water sprinkling in absence of groundwater abstraction rates #1533
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Note that pandas has some E.g. for the MODFLOW 6 input files which have an irregular number of columns (e.g. DISV), I use the pandas integer NA. https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/user_guide/integer_na.html You might be able to use some comparable functionality. |
|
|
I refrained from adding the extra logic to "" marks instead of 0.0 in scap_svat, as @HendrikKok and I don't see any reason why MetaSWAP would fail when a 0.0 is written in |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #1532
Description
Fixes a bug where surface water rates were not written to file in absence of groundwater abstraction rates.
Checklist
Issue #nr, e.g.Issue #737