-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 157
Language.Nix: improve and test Identifier handling #669
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
sternenseemann
wants to merge
11
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
language-nix-identifier-wrangling
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+124
−21
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The representation with Strings is tricky of course since identifiers in Nix are technically byte strings (if you allow quoting). For our purposes, it is practical to assume that all identifiers are ASCII or UTF-8 encoded. With quoting, we can represent any Unicode character except '\0'.
Instead of properties, give some examples that are hopefully clearer. We can keep the properties and actually execute them as part of a test suite.
It doesn't make sense to prescribe some kind of “correct” behavior with NUL bytes, so it's best not to test it.
Currently this is practically > 95% which isn't great. Presumably, the examples for simple identifiers are very short as well.
With this, we can get below 70% generated identifiers that don't need quoting.
This relates to #164, as there are packages like `assert` which clash with Nix keywords. However, this does not actually provide us with a solution since quoting isn't possible in some contexts (e.g. function arguments).
This increases correctness as toNixName is already used to generate the package expression arguments. If toNixName and attr were to diverge, packages would fail to resolve their dependencies correctly. A side effect of this change is that `pPrint attr` only quotes attribute names as needed, resulting in a huge diff for hackage-packages.nix.
c99580b
to
80b555b
Compare
Some comments:
|
sternenseemann
commented
Sep 12, 2025
-- 'parseSimpleIdentifier') in isolation, but won't be accepted by Nix because | ||
-- [keywords](https://nix.dev/manual/nix/2.30/language/identifiers.html#keywords) | ||
-- take precedence. | ||
illegalSimpleIdentifiers :: [String] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe this should be called nixKeywords
, though this is less accurate w.r.t. what it means to us…
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.