Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@jerop
Copy link
Contributor

@jerop jerop commented Sep 10, 2025

  • Add comprehensive section on extending PR review workflow to support forks
  • Document simple fork support approach using contributor's own Google auth
  • Explain GitHub Actions security model for fork-based PRs
  • Provide implementation approaches from simple to advanced
  • Include security best practices and resources for pull_request_target
  • Reference centralized authentication documentation
  • Reorganize content with clear implementation approaches

Fixes #191

@gemini-cli
Copy link

gemini-cli bot commented Sep 10, 2025

🤖 Hi @jerop, I've received your request, and I'm working on it now! You can track my progress in the logs for more details.

@jerop jerop enabled auto-merge (squash) September 10, 2025 19:22
Copy link

@gemini-cli gemini-cli bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📋 Review Summary

This pull request adds excellent documentation on how to extend the PR review workflow to support forks. The new section is well-written, comprehensive, and provides clear implementation approaches.

🔍 General Feedback

  • The documentation is clear and easy to understand.
  • The inclusion of security best practices and resources is a great addition.
  • The different implementation approaches are well-explained, allowing users to choose the best option for their needs.

@jerop jerop force-pushed the docs/fork-support branch 2 times, most recently from 0e04978 to 399d3d5 Compare September 10, 2025 20:33
Copy link
Contributor

@leehagoodjames leehagoodjames left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Jerop,

I think this currently reads as an authoritative stance on workflow triggers and GitHub credential access policies. I think it may be more concise, and more inutitive, to instead explain our opinionated approach (explaining our "why" for not running on branches from forks), and then point the user to the docs if they want to deviate from that.

This summary would contain less breadth - while still covering the exact reasoning behind our decision - which some users may share

- Add comprehensive section on extending PR review workflow to support forks
- Document simple fork support approach using contributor's own Google auth
- Explain GitHub Actions security model for fork-based PRs
- Provide implementation approaches from simple to advanced
- Include security best practices and resources for pull_request_target
- Reference centralized authentication documentation
- Reorganize content with clear implementation approaches
@jerop jerop merged commit 11742af into main Sep 14, 2025
9 checks passed
@jerop jerop deleted the docs/fork-support branch September 14, 2025 16:32
google-github-actions-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2025
## What's Changed
* chore: script to generate examples by @leehagoodjames in
#244
* chore: update readme to state user must copy gemini-dispatch.yml by
@leehagoodjames in
#249
* Relax node requirement and bump actions-utils by @sethvargo in
#253
* feat: support /fix slash command and workflow by @leehagoodjames in
#190
* feat(docs): improve manual setup instructions for workflows by @jerop
in #263
* feat: improve action input descriptions by @jerop in
#264
* fix: enforce COMMENT event type for submit_pending_pull_request_review
by @jerop in
#271
* docs: add fork support documentation for PR review workflow by @jerop
in #268
* feat(action): add support for preview and nightly versions by @jerop
in #281
* feat(workflows): add gemini_cli_version to all workflows by @jerop in
#279
* feat: migrate to new Gemini CLI configuration format by @jerop in
#284
* feat: clean up temp fix for empty API key by @jerop in
#285
* Sort inputs alphabetically in action.yml by @jerop in
#286
* chore: organize workflow inputs alphabetically and add missing
parameters by @jerop in
#288
* feat: add auth input validation by @jerop in
#289
* fix(action): correct quoting in workflow expressions by @jerop in
#293
* fix(validation): improve validation error messages by @jerop in
#297
* fix(validate-inputs): surface errors in logs, annotation, and step
summary by @jerop in
#299
* feat(validate-inputs): downgrade validation failures to warnings by
@jerop in
#300
* fix(validate-inputs): use env-based bash shebang for portability by
@jerop in
#303
* feat: simplify input validation logic by @jerop in
#304
* fix(action): correct input validation script behavior by @jerop in
#309
* feat: add command substitution security warning by @jerop in
#306
* fix(triage): correct duplicate step numbering in workflow by @aladh in
#331
* feat: Optionally install extensions by @CallumHYoung in
#329
* docs(extensions): add documentation for extensions by @jerop in
#340
* chore(workflows): Apply formatting and fix example prompt by @jerop in
#339
* refactor(workflows): improve prompts to use env vars directly by
@jerop in
#342
* fix(review): Remove --source argument to match CLI 8.0 release by
@CallumHYoung in
#347

## New Contributors
* @aladh made their first contribution in
#331
* @CallumHYoung made their first contribution in
#329

**Full Changelog**:
v0.1.12...v0.1.13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support review of pull requests created from forks

3 participants