Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@bintoro
Copy link
Contributor

@bintoro bintoro commented May 21, 2015

Has anyone noticed that the entire definition of related resource URL has been inadvertently eliminated? This PR adds it back.

@ethanresnick
Copy link
Member

Lololol. Not sure how/when this happened...probably my fault though. Thanks @bintoro!

@tkellen
Copy link
Member

tkellen commented May 21, 2015

Thanks @bintoro. We're perhaps pushing a bit too hard for 1.0, but it has to happen at some point. When the dust settles this afternoon @dgeb and I plan to attempt reading the spec through as though it were our first time (probably impossible) to suss out any final weirdness like this.

@dgeb dgeb added this to the 1.0 milestone May 21, 2015
@bintoro bintoro force-pushed the related-resource-url-2 branch from 4d944fb to eea0b62 Compare May 21, 2015 20:56
@bintoro
Copy link
Contributor Author

bintoro commented May 21, 2015

Rebased due to PR #586.

@dgeb
Copy link
Member

dgeb commented May 21, 2015

thanks for catching this @bintoro 👍

@tkellen
Copy link
Member

tkellen commented May 22, 2015

👍

@dgeb
Copy link
Member

dgeb commented May 22, 2015

Rebased and merged via d76ebd0

@dgeb dgeb closed this May 22, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants