Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Reintroduce 'related resource URL' #654

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Reintroduce 'related resource URL' #654

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bintoro
Copy link
Contributor

@bintoro bintoro commented May 21, 2015

Has anyone noticed that the entire definition of related resource URL has been inadvertently eliminated? This PR adds it back.

@ethanresnick
Copy link
Member

Lololol. Not sure how/when this happened...probably my fault though. Thanks @bintoro!

@tkellen
Copy link
Member

tkellen commented May 21, 2015

Thanks @bintoro. We're perhaps pushing a bit too hard for 1.0, but it has to happen at some point. When the dust settles this afternoon @dgeb and I plan to attempt reading the spec through as though it were our first time (probably impossible) to suss out any final weirdness like this.

@dgeb dgeb added this to the 1.0 milestone May 21, 2015
@bintoro bintoro force-pushed the related-resource-url-2 branch from 4d944fb to eea0b62 Compare May 21, 2015 20:56
@bintoro
Copy link
Contributor Author

bintoro commented May 21, 2015

Rebased due to PR #586.

@dgeb
Copy link
Member

dgeb commented May 21, 2015

thanks for catching this @bintoro 👍

@tkellen
Copy link
Member

tkellen commented May 22, 2015

👍

@dgeb
Copy link
Member

dgeb commented May 22, 2015

Rebased and merged via d76ebd0

@dgeb dgeb closed this May 22, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@bintoro @ethanresnick @tkellen @dgeb