Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

cjcullen
Copy link
Member

This is one step towards fixing #2462. GKE no longer uses the validate endpoint, and its been deprecated for a couple weeks now, so I want to chop it off.

@roberthbailey
Copy link
Contributor

@bgrant0607 FYI.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you rip out the InstallValidator function as well?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

@bgrant0607
Copy link
Member

Thanks. Ref #7092. See also #7775 (comment)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is this completely removed? shouldn't just the nodes be removed from the list?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, that is what the code below does (out of frame of the diff). This first chunk validates that the getServersToValidate()flow works with nodes included, which we will no longer support.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

gotcha, thanks.

@lavalamp lavalamp assigned davidopp and unassigned lavalamp May 15, 2015
@cjcullen cjcullen force-pushed the nodenames branch 3 times, most recently from a10ef64 to 2789aff Compare May 18, 2015 18:27
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please remove NewValidator

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aaaand its gone. Took down a bunch of other dead code with it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes pushed?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes.

@bgrant0607
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@bgrant0607 bgrant0607 added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 26, 2015
thockin added a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2015
@thockin thockin merged commit 7b9dbbf into kubernetes:master May 27, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants