-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 436
Graduate TopologyAwareScheduling to Beta. #6830
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Graduate TopologyAwareScheduling to Beta. #6830
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-kueue ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
014693d
to
c97af4c
Compare
55636ca
to
447a53b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
Leaving final tagging to @tenzen-y.
/hold
I'm still working on #4041, but I wouldn't like to block on it, because:
- I'm not convinced eliminating the label is worth it, because it means we need to index, and the indexer can throw errors due to lookups to additional objects on the path.
- We can still deprecate the label and drop while in Beta. Beta is not "written in stone API"
- Dropping the label is easy, because if replaced with index, then the change is fully backwards-compatible.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mbobrovskyi, mimowo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: fe48bfef5e555cda7210dcd82f91e278a9b769b9
|
Are there any objections to merge this PR? |
seems like it already requires rebasing |
447a53b
to
486d7ec
Compare
Rebased. |
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 48908fb999e301d0ef1b0989f06b377e75f7f094
|
/release-note-edit
|
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
/kind api-change
What this PR does / why we need it:
Graduate TopologyAwareScheduling to Beta.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #3450
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?