DOC: Fix psd_demo_complex similarly to psd_demo3
#6843
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Now forcing the (pseudo-)random draws to be repeatable. |
tacaswell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 28, 2016
DOC: Fix `psd_demo_complex` similarly to `psd_demo3`
|
backported to v2.x as d1d7d7a |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reports on
psd_demo_complexsome fixes similar to the ones done in #6841 onpsd_demo3(from which this example is derived):NB: as the axes were not shared between the subplots in
psd_demo3, I removed the sharing in this PR. It might be reintroduced if needed.Besides, the 2nd commit halves the x-tick amount, because otherwise the x-tick labels overlap. Currently, the example looks like:
vs the current one in the devdocs gallery:
BTW, is it normal for the PNG in the devdocs gallery to be only 550x450 pixels?