L4 integration: Modifications to DAC. #1937
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a PR in a series (#1888, #1890, #1903, #1904, #1916, #1917, #1918, #1919, #1920, #1921, #1922, #1924, #1925, #1929 ) of PR to support the STM32L4 series in micropython. (see http://forum.micropython.org/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=1332&sid=64e2f63af49643c3edee159171f4a365)
Line 384-401 there were some changes due to new structure which is used to store the DMA stat in self. 384-386 I retrived the last dma which was setup on self. This dma is later deinitialized (line 407).
I am not sure what was the meaning of 400/401 which I removed from the source. I assume, that the DMA should be set up between the DAC instance number which was used in the constructor of it. In the old source there was always a DMA between DAC1 and the memory - which I assume is not the behaviour which the user assumes. Or where am I wrong?