Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

test(codegen): benchmark ASCII-only output - #26538

Open
camc314 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/codegen-ascii-only-benchmark
Open

test(codegen): benchmark ASCII-only output#26538
camc314 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/codegen-ascii-only-benchmark

Conversation

@camc314

@camc314 camc314 commented Sep 10, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds a codegen_ascii_only benchmark group using the same inputs and source map settings as the existing codegen benchmarks, with ascii_only: true.

Copilot AI lite review requested due to automatic review settings September 10, 2026 16:12
Copilot AI reviewed Sep 10, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 10, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-10T16:37:28.627149Z 572cea4 New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@camc314 camc314 changed the title perf(codegen): benchmark ASCII-only output test(codegen): benchmark ASCII-only output Sep 10, 2026
@codspeed-hq

codspeed-hq Bot commented Sep 10, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 72 untouched benchmarks
🆕 5 new benchmarks
⏩ 9 skipped benchmarks1

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
🆕 Simulation codegen_ascii_only[App.tsx] N/A 23.8 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation codegen_ascii_only[binder.ts] N/A 8.8 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation codegen_ascii_only[kitchen-sink.tsx] N/A 49.5 ms N/A
🆕 Simulation codegen_ascii_only[RadixUIAdoptionSection.jsx] N/A 234 µs N/A
🆕 Simulation codegen_ascii_only[react.development.js] N/A 4.2 ms N/A

Comparing codex/codegen-ascii-only-benchmark (572cea4) with main (d21d5cf)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 9 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

@camc314 Graphite App

camc314 commented Sep 10, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent changes, fast-track this PR to the front of the merge queue

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@camc314
camc314 force-pushed the codex/codegen-ascii-only-benchmark branch 2 times, most recently from 67d0cc9 to 5a10da4 Compare September 10, 2026 16:26
@camc314 camc314 mentioned this pull request Sep 10, 2026
Open
@camc314
camc314 force-pushed the codex/codegen-ascii-only-benchmark branch from 5a10da4 to 572cea4 Compare September 10, 2026 16:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

Copilot code review Copilot
Copilot review effort, defaults to Lite
Applies to this pull request for everyone.Learn more about Copilot code review.
Copilot left review comments

Assignees

@overlookmotel overlookmotel

@Dunqing Dunqing

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@camc314 @overlookmotel @Dunqing