Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

bpo-37646: Document that eval() cannot access nested scopes #15117

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2019

Conversation

rhettinger
Copy link
Contributor

@rhettinger rhettinger commented Aug 4, 2019

@rhettinger rhettinger added docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news needs backport to 3.8 labels Aug 4, 2019
@rhettinger rhettinger merged commit 610a482 into python:master Aug 7, 2019
@rhettinger rhettinger deleted the eval_docs branch August 7, 2019 00:56
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @rhettinger for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

I'm having trouble backporting to 3.8. Reason: 'Error 110 while writing to socket. Connection timed out.'. Please retry by removing and re-adding the needs backport to 3.8 label.

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @rhettinger for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2019
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-15155 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch.

rhettinger added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2019
lisroach pushed a commit to lisroach/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2019
DinoV pushed a commit to DinoV/cpython that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2020
websurfer5 pushed a commit to websurfer5/cpython that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants