Fixes test to check epoch in package name #1765
Conversation
539f263 to
067b45a
Compare
|
/packit test rpm-software-management/dnf5#2447 |
1 similar comment
|
/packit test rpm-software-management/dnf5#2447 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I haven't look at all the changes but the tests don't pass, not even with your PR.
It seems most of the changes are not needed.
I would maybe try to first run the main branch CI against a dnf5 build with your changes and then focus only on the failing tests.
| Problem: package filesystem-3.9-2.fc29.x86_64 from dnf-ci-fedora requires setup, but none of the providers can be installed | ||
| Problem: package filesystem-0:3.9-2.fc29.x86_64 from dnf-ci-fedora requires setup, but none of the providers can be installed | ||
| - conflicting requests | ||
| - package setup-2.12.1-1.fc29.noarch from dnf-ci-fedora is filtered out by exclude filtering | ||
| - package setup-0:2.12.1-1.fc29.noarch from dnf-ci-fedora is filtered out by exclude filtering |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this message is from libsolv so its not affected by our change, it still doesn't add epoch 0.
| | filesystem-0:3.9-2.fc29.x86_64 | Dependency | dnf-ci-fedora | | ||
| | glibc-2.28-9.fc29.x86_64 | User | dnf-ci-fedora | | ||
| | glibc-all-langpacks-2.28-9.fc29.x86_64 | Dependency | dnf-ci-fedora | | ||
| | glibc-common-2.28-9.fc29.x86_64 | Dependency | dnf-ci-fedora | | ||
| | setup-2.12.1-1.fc29.noarch | Dependency | dnf-ci-fedora | | ||
| | setup-0:2.12.1-1.fc29.noarch | Dependency | dnf-ci-fedora | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This doesn't pass.
Its odd that the change would affect only a couple of all of the packages.
4e40fd7 to
6cee4fa
Compare
|
/packit test rpm-software-management/dnf5#2447 |
|
/packit test rpm-software-management/dnf5#2447 |
8f601e5 to
d07fd56
Compare
|
/packit test rpm-software-management/dnf5#2447 |
|
Thank you, I have tested it locally and the tests pass. |
Fixes test to check epoch in package name