-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26k
ENH Add verbose option to VotingClassifier and VotingRegre… #16069
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…ssor addresses issue scikit-learn#10360
…ers to `_parallel_fit_estimator`.
Fix test errors for PR scikit-learn#15991
…into verbose_voting
Co-Authored-By: Guillaume Lemaitre <[email protected]>
Co-Authored-By: Guillaume Lemaitre <[email protected]>
Co-Authored-By: Guillaume Lemaitre <[email protected]>
@glemaitre this PR is meant to address your comments in #15991.... if CI agrees ... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. It follows the same API as Pipeline, ColumnTransformer, and FeatureUnion.
@thomasjpfan If you can have a quick look. I think that we will be able to close a lot of redundant PRs.
Co-Authored-By: Thomas J Fan <[email protected]>
Co-Authored-By: Thomas J Fan <[email protected]>
Co-Authored-By: Thomas J Fan <[email protected]>
I'm on the lint fix. |
Thanks @cmarmo. To make a merge close multiple issues you need to repeat "closes" before each issue number |
Reference Issues/PRs
Fixes #10360
If merged closes #14772, #15991, #10365, #10974
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Add a boolean verbose option to
VotingClassifier
andVotingRegressor
.Follows the example of #11364.