-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.9k
DOC Ensures that check_pairwise_arrays passes numpydoc validation #23519
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR @wchathura. Here are some suggestions
Co-authored-by: Jérémie du Boisberranger <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jérémie du Boisberranger <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jérémie du Boisberranger <[email protected]>
I committed the suggestions using "commit suggestions" button. How can I further proceed? Thank you very much!! |
I just noticed that you also modified |
Hi I removed the "pairwise_kernels" from the list and ran the test. Test passed. Here is the code I used to run the test Thank you very much |
thanks but I meant removing it in the PR :) don't worry I just did it |
Thank you so much for the help :) :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thanks @wchathura
Thank you @jeremiedbb :) Hopefully I can contribute more in the future 🤞 |
Reference Issues/PRs
Addresses #21350
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Fixes the function check_pairwise_arrays function to pass numpydoc validation
Any other comments?
This is my first contribution. Any advice is appreciated