TST mark test as xfail due to bug fix in pandas-dev - #26344
Closed
glemaitre wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Member
|
So this means we won't be really supporting |
Member
Author
This does not change. Here, it is just that the number of column detected as numerical or categorical will changed depending if |
Member
|
I think we can adjust the implementation to infer better dtypes. I opened #26386 as an alternative to this PR. |
Member
|
Closing since #26386 has been merged |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Partially address #26154
Solving the issue pointed out here: #26154 (comment)
In short,
pandaswill better infer type duringDataFrameconcatenation with missing values. Previously, due to the way we read by chunk in theliac-arffparser, we could end up withNoneandnp.nanin the same column. The new version of pandas will identify both values are missing values.Since the new behaviour is what one would expect but we cannot make a backport, a way is to mark the test as
xfail.