Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

kquinsland
Copy link
Contributor

Good for basic validation.
More work (and probably some CI automation?) would be needed for precisely validating each of the possible custom checks.

This should resolve: #899

Good for basic validation.
More work (and probably some CI automation?) would be needed for correctively validating each of the possible custom checks.
@kquinsland kquinsland requested a review from rhybrillou as a code owner July 3, 2025 18:31
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 3, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 28.66%. Comparing base (dbd7529) to head (3f2e00f).
Report is 141 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #978       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   62.36%   28.66%   -33.70%     
===========================================
  Files         197      209       +12     
  Lines        4854     5947     +1093     
===========================================
- Hits         3027     1705     -1322     
- Misses       1439     4126     +2687     
+ Partials      388      116      -272     
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 28.66% <ø> (-33.70%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@rhybrillou rhybrillou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @kquinsland
Thanks a lot for your contribution.
Can you please cross-check the properties of the customChecks array object ?

Copy link
Contributor

@rhybrillou rhybrillou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you check again the parameters for the customChecks array items ? I think a description property is missing there.

Add `customChecks.description`
@kquinsland kquinsland requested a review from rhybrillou July 15, 2025 01:53
@rhybrillou rhybrillou merged commit 094a35c into stackrox:main Jul 15, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[FEATURE_REQUEST] Publish the config file schema on schemastore.org
2 participants