Some UARTxEN don't exist for some devices, since this applies only to STM32L47xxx, STM32L48xxx, STM32L49xxx and STM32L4Axxx devices. Not sure if there is a way to organize the YAMLs to account for this. Or is it somehow possible to optionally apply a patch, only if the corresponding field exists?

The best way of doing this in the current system is to have a separate yaml file for those uarts that exist only on some families, and then include that from the device yaml in the devices/ folder. For example you would have rcc_l4.yaml included by all parts (as currently) and rcc_l4_uartx_y.yaml included by only some parts

Are the parts you're interested in covered by the part definitions in the devices/ folder? It's possible we don't have all of them yet.

Are the parts you're interested in covered by the part definitions in the devices/ folder?

In devices/ there is e.g. stm32l4x6.yaml, this would need e.g. stm32l49x.yaml. Does that work?

Or do I need to specifically create e.g. stm32l496.yaml?

I had a UART/USART typo before, I think it should be working now after also splitting it up into individual files.

Memory map comparison

Memory map comparison

Memory map comparison

@richardeoin, CI is passing now.

Memory map comparison

Memory map comparison

Memory map comparison

Thanks @richardeoin, I have made the requested changes.

Memory map comparison

Memory map comparison

Build succeeded:

• CI