Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

[DI] highlight suspicious tests #31942

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

nicolas-grekas
Copy link
Member

Q A
Branch? 4.2
Bug fix? no
New feature? no
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Tests pass? yes
Fixed tickets -
License MIT
Doc PR -

Why doesn't this break something?
Related to #27710 I think
/cc @xabbuh @ro0NL if you have any idea why :)

@@ -340,6 +341,7 @@ class ConfigurationWithArrayNodeRequiringOneElement implements ConfigurationInte
{
public function getConfigTreeBuilder()
{
throw new \Exception();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the test ensures we dont require a node to be present, if the user didnt configure anything. However the side effect is the config tree isnt even initialized ... so it doesnt matter much what happens here.

I'd keep this tree for the purpose of clarity, in the sense we don't expect an InvalidConfigException due nodes being required.

@@ -332,6 +332,7 @@ class EnvConfigurationWithoutRootNode implements ConfigurationInterface
{
public function getConfigTreeBuilder()
{
throw new \Exception();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this test from #27472 is actually invalidated due #27710, we should pass some config to ensure the treebuilder is called

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

up for a PR?

@ro0NL ro0NL mentioned this pull request Jun 7, 2019
@nicolas-grekas
Copy link
Member Author

Closing in favor of #31944, thanks @ro0NL

@nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas deleted the di-bad-test branch June 7, 2019 21:07
nicolas-grekas added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2019
This PR was merged into the 4.2 branch.

Discussion
----------

[DI] Fix suspicious test

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch?       | 4.2
| Bug fix?      | yes
| New feature?  | no
| BC breaks?    | no     <!-- see https://symfony.com/bc -->
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass?   | yes    <!-- please add some, will be required by reviewers -->
| Fixed tickets | #31942
| License       | MIT
| Doc PR        | symfony/symfony-docs#... <!-- required for new features -->

cc @nicolas-grekas

Commits
-------

25b961a [DI] Fix suspicious test
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants