Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

address #160#163

Merged
jgebal merged 2 commits intoutPLSQL:version3from
Pazus:pritty_reporter_output
Jan 17, 2017
Merged

address #160#163
jgebal merged 2 commits intoutPLSQL:version3from
Pazus:pritty_reporter_output

Conversation

@Pazus
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Pazus Pazus commented Jan 16, 2017

Addressed #160

@Pazus Pazus added this to the version3 milestone Jan 16, 2017
@Pazus Pazus self-assigned this Jan 16, 2017
@Pazus Pazus requested a review from jgebal January 16, 2017 20:42
@Pazus Pazus force-pushed the pritty_reporter_output branch from d49acd6 to fa994a1 Compare January 16, 2017 20:49
@Pazus Pazus force-pushed the pritty_reporter_output branch from fa994a1 to cb190e1 Compare January 16, 2017 20:53
Comment thread source/core/types/ut_assert_result.tpb Outdated
l_expected_msg := ' ' || self.matcher_name || self.additional_info;
if self.expected_value_string is not null or self.expected_type is not null then
l_expected_msg := l_expected_msg || ' (expected value): ';
l_expected_msg := l_expected_msg || ' this: ';
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd remove ' this: ' from l_expected_msg, because we get report in format:

	expected this: '<DEMO_DEPARTMENT>
			 <DEPT_NAME>HR</DEPT_NAME>
		       </DEMO_DEPARTMENT>
		       '(ut3.demo_department)
	to equal this: '<DEMO_DEPARTMENT>
			 <DEPT_NAME>Sales</DEPT_NAME>
		       </DEMO_DEPARTMENT>
		       '(ut3.demo_department)

I think it would be better to have something like:

	expected this: '<DEMO_DEPARTMENT>
			 <DEPT_NAME>HR</DEPT_NAME>
		       </DEMO_DEPARTMENT>
		       '(ut3.demo_department)
	to equal :     '<DEMO_DEPARTMENT>
			 <DEPT_NAME>Sales</DEPT_NAME>
		       </DEMO_DEPARTMENT>
		       '(ut3.demo_department)

@jgebal jgebal merged commit f8008b1 into utPLSQL:version3 Jan 17, 2017
@Pazus Pazus deleted the pritty_reporter_output branch January 18, 2017 05:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants