It does look like the battery is at the back of the unit.
Good for weight distribution. Hanging the full weight on the front of your face is really uncomfortable.
This photo shows that you need at least 9 volts to wake up the battery controller after it being set to shipping mode, it has absolutely no indication of any power usage requirements for the device to operate. Even if the power usage of the device falls into this range, it is a coincidence and had nothing to do with this image.
I highly doubt it’s going to need a supply that can do at least 9V to exit shipping mode, at least I haven’t yet seen a device behave like that. I more so think that’s what power supplies Valve suggests to use if you want to play and charge simultaneously, that being said I believe actual power usage is going to be somewhere around those 27W at max so the battery doesn’t discharge, with 45W being a buffer to charge the battery while in use, though that’s still just a wild guess.
I hope the frame supports bypass charging. Like i’m certain i fried those batteries fairly bad already in my Pico 4 in less than two years because i use it so much plugged in. Two hours for one charge is just too damn short.
Pretty much every modern piece of USB-PD equipment supports bypass charging… What killed your Pico’s battery is most likely the heat not the possibility of there being no “bypass charging”.
Ney,
bypass charging isnt even nearly as widespread as you make it out to be. There are news articles written when a big phone manufacturer finally updates a device to support it. IMHO usb-pd is the same mess like with everything when it comes to usb standardization.
Pico 4 batteries are in the back like with the frame. Sure charging also causes heat. But i doubt my pico batteries degraded because of their charging management beeing so bad that it causes heat death. thats just ridiculous.
“finally update a device to support it” are… are you seriously that dumb to think that a SOFTWARE update somehow “enables” a physical function?
Look into how PMICs and BMSes work internally and how the power flow looks when running from battery vs when running from external power. Quite literally in the latter case, power cannot flow from the battery to the power rails because it’s being charged, and when the battery is fully charged, power is cut off. That IS the definition of “bypass charging”.
“finally update a device to support it” are… are you seriously that dumb to think that a SOFTWARE update somehow “enables” a physical function?
https://www.androidauthority.com/pixel-bypass-charging-3507373/
dickhead
Holy shit are you mentally challenged. This is the very same PMIC feature I was talking about, and it wasn’t “enabled” period, but enabled WHEN USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE 80% CHARGE LIMITER. Very important distinction. Doesn’t mean the Pixel phones weren’t doing bypass charging prior to this.
But of course to realise that you’d need some comprehensive reading abilities which you clearly lack.
Uuuuuh, buddy…
Getting so worked up over semantics of bypass charging isnt a good look fou you.
Especially if you automatically treat people like they’re soo much dumber than yourself.
Nothing wrong with sharing some knowledge and while doing that correcting people if they’re wrong.
But i even looked up power management integrated circuits and battery managment systems. Idk but those arent even usb-pd or bypass charging specific things. Idk whats your point with that? Like that they exist and a 2026 high tech device will have them so the battery doesnt explode? Like, no shit?
Happy to see some sources that bypass charging is basically a requirement with USB-PD.
PS Fuck You
Well, since you’re so nice telling me to fuck myself while asking me to teach you, I’ll do just that, you dumb little shit. So sit down and shut the fuck up.
Batteries can do two things, both exclusively, meaning the two can’t happen at the same time:
- charge
- discharge
Energy either goes into the cell (charging) or goes out of the cell (discharging). The two literally can’t happen at the same time, due to the fundamental laws of physics, how electrons behave within the mediums inside a battery cell.
Now that we cleared up, let’s discuss how a BMS works. A battery management system, as the name suggests, manages a battery. This is important because the lithium ion chemistry isn’t exactly stable, and thus you need to manage it. Like I’m managing all this information for you, you vapid cunt.
So what a BMS does is ensuring that the cell neither goes below a safe voltage (over-discharge), nor does it go above (over-charge), nor does the cell pull or deliver too many amps (overheating issues). As I said, it manages the battery. A BMS is essential in any lithium ion battery application, let it be a phone, an UPS, battery wall, electric scooter/bike/car/airplane/boat, even shitty little RC cars and drones.
Now, the BMS itself handles what you call “bypass charging”, aka not charging the battery beyond its safe voltage, cutting off the power supply to the cell when the right voltage is reached so the cell isn’t under active use. Every single BMS since the mid-2000s does this for safety reasons. Every. Single. BMS.
So how this works is, the device by default is powered by the battery, the BMS pulling voltage from the cell and providing it to a number of power rails (via converters, let them be buck, step-up or step-down or any other configuration, even voltage dividers - feel free to look these terms up, there should be simple enough explanations that even an absolute doughnut like you can understand). Most devices will have a 5V, 3.3V and 1.8V rail for various applications (most “internal peripheries” like storage chips and sensors require 3.3V, external devices usually use 5V, and SoCs, other core chips use 1.8V). In some cases the 5V rail might not be the main one, but 3.3V, they’re freely interchangeable in this though exercise. The point is, there’s a primary rail, which will provide power to the rest - and it’s usually the highest voltage rail as it requires the lowest amps to deliver higher wattage.
So the battery is nicely chugging along, then suddenly external power is connected. What happens will surprise morons like yourself:
- USB-PD negotiates voltage
- 5V rail is then powered by the external source, either directly or by conversion
- other rails are now supplied by the 5V rail
- this triggers the PMIC to signal the BMS that it can begin charging
- BMS detaches battery from the outgoing power rails, ending the discharge cycle
- BMS takes incoming voltage, steps it down to appropriate charging voltage (usually around 4.2-4.3V), and monitors the battery while it charges, limiting current as and when necessary
- system is now powered via external power
This is all neat, so where does “bypass charging” come in? Well quite simple, my dear simpleton, it happens when, quelle surprise, shocked Pikachu face - the battery is fully charged.
See when the BMS detects the battery is charged - by the fact it reports an internal voltage of appropriate volts - it simply cuts off power to it. Charging voltage is dropped to 0, the battery is essentially disconnected (not fully physically, as there’s no internal relay inside, but a similar electric gate does stand in the way, disconnecting the cell from the rest of the circuit), and aside from voltage monitoring at an interval, the battery is idle. It’s not charging, it’s not discharging, it’s just sitting there, fully charged. All the while, the system is powered by the external power supply. The only reason the battery is not fully disconnected is so the battery can kick in the moment external power is removed so your system - whatever it may be - doesn’t get interrupted. But up until then, there’s no charge or discharge happening to the battery.
Oh, and to cover that firmware update change: most modern devices (emphasis on most) use programmable BMSes where the charging voltage (which, again, microbrain, determines the charge status of a battery) can be set. So instead of 4.2V, which is 100% capacity, it can be set to around 4.12V (which is about 80%, well, approx. 78% actually), so the “bypass charging” cutoff happens there.
Now, would you kindly stop swinging that microdick around and put it away before you prove to even more people just how stupid you are?
If a feature is present, but not being used, that is effectively the same as it not being present in the first place.
It’s not about a feature “being present but not being used”. BMSes provide “bypass charging” by cutting off the battery once it’s charged so it’s not being used (neither charged nor discharged). This usually happens at the 100% charging voltage.
Programmable BMSes allow this voltage to be set. When you limit battery charging to 80%, programmable BMSes allow the bypass charging to happen at this lower percentage, which simply wasn’t a default on Pixel devices because Google overlooked the connection between the software feature and the hardware control.
This doesn’t mean that:
- other manufacturers overlooked it too
- the feature didn’t exist in the past
- the feature didn’t work in the past
- the feature is something new
yet again, some reading comprehension of the full article instead of thinking you’re all-knowing because you’ve read the title or maybe even the first paragraph, is a super helpful skill in life. I recommend you start using it.
Sounds to me like 27W is at most its peak power draw, and I bet there’s even still buffer in that.
Yes, looks like it’ll usually be pulling 20 watts or less. Still a lot though
This guy has one already through the developer program and make a few videos about it https://youtube.com/watch?v=MbFGt-KUv9M
Actually you are probably right, my other post of the climbey dev did show a way smaller power draw 🤔
Personally I would be completely ok with 45w, if the headset can handle higher power draw without overheating I think it would be nice to both push the system and charge it.
Hm yeah that would be nice. I’m just not sure if the headset can draw that much, as others have said, it might just be the maximum speed it can charge at.
Tbh both would be fine imo as long as it doesn’t overheat or cause significant hardware issues
The image doesn’t say it “needs” that much power, only that there is an optional mode, likely for high performance or so, but it will probably have heat issues then.
I think you’re reading into it a little too hard. I don’t suspect an optional mode based on what’s written there. Those power specs come from the USB Power Delivery 2.0/3.x standards. There’s 9 Volt USB PD that can supply 27 Watts at the 3 Amp ceiling, and the next step up is 15 Volt USB PD that can supply 45 Watts at 3 Amps. Since a 45 Watt charger is the one that’s recommended, I don’t expect heat issues there.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_hardware#USB_Power_Delivery
I am referring to the headline of this post that claims that “Steam Frame needs 27-45W of power to run”, which is not at all substantiated by the image shared.
You are right about the title, I can’t believe I just read over that first part of that paragraph. Even my other post of the climbey dev talking about his devkit shows a much lower power draw.
If the “special mode” is what I think it is, it’s just a battery saving method that’s also used on the Steam Deck. With that, it requires being plugged in to turn on at all, otherwise it just remains in stasis. After it turns on, it operates normally.
The recommended adapter specs are most likely just for optimal charging, nothing to do with the stasis mode.
That sounds interesting. How does it work on the Steam Deck?
It’s not a mode that would be used often as it’s purpose is to protect the battery if the Steam Deck is going to be inactive for a long time. Most people will only encounter it when they turn on their Deck the first time, as Valve ships them in that mode. You have to go into the BIOS to activate it, and when you want to use the Deck again, it will only turn on by plugging a charging cable into it.
iFixit has a step-by-step guide: https://www.ifixit.com/Guide/How+to+Enable+Steam+Deck+Battery+Storage+Mode/149962
Sounds like what another comment is calling shipping mode !programming.dev/comment/21353763 Obviously I can’t figure out how to link to a comment
Yup. That’s another name for it.
You can’t cross-post image posts huh
Thanks for contributing to this community.







