2.

3 DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION

PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS TABLE 2.3.1 SHOWING GENDER OF THE RESPONDENTS
PARTICULARS male female Total NO OF RESPONDENT 57 43 100 PERCENTAGE 57 43 100

CHART 2.3.1 SHOWING GENDER THE OF THE RESPONDENTS

gender
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 male female

Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 57% of the respondents are male, 43% of the respondents are female

TABLE 2.3.2 SHOWING AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Below 20 years 20-25 25-35 Above 35 total NO OF RESPONDENT 25 30 30 15 100 PERCENTAGE 25 30 30 15 100

CHART 2.3.2 SHOWING AGE OF THE RESPONDENTS

age
35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Below 20 years 20-25 25-35 Above 35 Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 25% of the respondents are below 20 age, 30% of the respondents are 20-25 age, 15% of the respondents are above 35 age.

TABLE 2.3.3 SHOWING EDUCATION LEVEL OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Illiterate School level Graduation Diploma TOTAL NO OF RESPONDENT 20 35 20 25 100 PERCENTAGE 20 35 20 25 100

CHART 2.3.3 SHOWING OF THE RESPONDENTS

Education level
40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Illiterate School level Graduation Diploma Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 20% of the respondents are illiterate, 35% of the respondents are school level, and 20% of the respondents are graduation and 25% of the respondents are diploma

TABLE 2.3.4 SHOWING OCCUPATION OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Professional Employee Manager Supervisor Total NO OF RESPONDENT 10 70 8 12 100 PERCENTAGE 10 70 8 12 100

CHART 2.3.4 SHOWING OCCUPATION OF THE RESPONDENTS

occupation
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Professional Employee Manager Supervisor Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 10% of the respondents are Professional, 70% of the respondents are Employee, 8% of the respondents are Managers, and 12% of the respondents are Supervisors.

TABLE 2.3.5 SHOWING MAINTENANCE OF ALL MACHINERY OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 73 17 8 100 PERCENTAGE 73 17 8 100

CHART 2.3.5 SHOWING OF THE RESPONDENTS

maintenance of all machinery

80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Strongly agree Agree disagree Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 73% of the respondents are Strongly agree, 17% of the respondents are Agree, 8% of the respondents are disagree.

TABLE 2.3.6 SHOWING FIRST AID FACILITIES PROVIDED OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 65 30 5 100 PERCENTAGE 65 30 5 100

CHART 2.3.6 SHOWING FIRST AID FACILITIES PROVIDED OF THE RESPONDENTS

First Aid Facilities

70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Strongly agree Agree disagree Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 65% of the respondents are Strongly agree, 30% of the respondents are Agree, 5% of the respondents are disagree.

TABLE 2.3.7 SHOWING ENGINEERING ADEVICE OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 75 10 15 100 PERCENTAGE 75 10 15 100

CHART 2.3.7 SHOWING ENGINEERING ADVICE OF THE RESPONDENTS

engineering advice
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Strongly agree Agree disagree Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 75% of the respondents are Strongly agree, 10% of the respondents are Agree,15% of the respondents are disagree.

TABLE 2.3.8 SHOWING AWARENESS OF SAFETY OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 65 25 10 100 PERCENTAGE 65 25 10 100

CHART 2.3.8 SHOWING AWARENESS OF SAFETY OF THE RESPONDENTS

awareness of safety
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Strongly agree Agree disagree Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 65% of the respondents are Strongly agree, 25% of the respondents are Agree,10% of the respondents are disagree.

TABLE 2.3.9 SHOWING FACTORY NOISE UNDER CONTROL OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 80 15 5 100 PERCENTAGE 80 15 5 100

CHART 2.3.9 SHOWING FACTORY NOISE UNDER CONTROL OF THE RESPONDENTS

factory noise under control

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Strongly agree Agree disagree Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 80% of the respondents are Strongly agree, 15% of the respondents are agree, 5% of the respondents are disagree,

TABLE 2.3.10 SHOWING SAFETY COMMITTEE OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 90 8 2 100 PERCENTAGE 90 8 2 100

CHART 2.3.10 SHOWING SAFETY COMMITTEE OF THE RESPONDENTS

Safety committee
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Strongly agree Agree disagree Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 90% of the respondents are Strongly agree, 8% of the respondents are agree, 2% of the respondents are disagree.

TABLE 2.3.11 SHOWING MANAGEMENT TAKE CARE OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 82 10 8 100 PERCENTAGE 82 10 8 100

CHART 2.3.11 SHOWING MANAGEMENT TAKE CARE OF THE RESPONDENTS

MANAGEMENT TAKE CARE

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Strongly agree Agree disagree Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 82% of the respondents are Strongly agree, 10% of the respondents are agree, 8% of the respondents are disagree.

TABLE 2.3.12 SHOWING SAFETY GUARDS OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 55 35 10 100 PERCENTAGE 55 35 10 100

CHART 2.3.12 SHOWING SAFETY GUARDS OF THE RESPONDENTS

safety guards
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Strongly agree Agree disagree

Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 55% of the respondents are Strongly agree, 35% of the respondents are agree, 10% of the respondents are disagree.

TABLE 2.3.13 SHOWING UNDER CONTROL OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 85 10 5 100 PERCENTAGE 85 10 5 100

CHART 2.3.13 SHOWING UNDER CONTROL OF THE RESPONDENTS

UNDER CONTROL
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Strongly agree Agree disagree Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 85% of the respondents are Strongly agree, 10% of the respondents are agree, 5% of the respondents are disagree.

TABLE 2.3.14 SHOWING SAFETY FORMED OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 85 10 5 100 PERCENTAGE 85 10 5 100

CHART 2.3.14 SHOWING SAFETY FORMED OF THE RESPONDENTS

safety formed
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Strongly agree Agree disagree Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 85% of the respondents are Strongly agree, 10% of the respondents are agree, 5% of the respondents are disagree.

TABLE 2.3.15 SHOWING FENCING OF MACHINERY OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 60 30 10 100 PERCENTAGE 60 30 10 100

CHART 2.3.15 SHOWING FENCING OF MACHINERY OF THE RESPONDENTS

fencing machinery
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Strongly agree Agree disagree Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 60% of the respondents are Strongly agree, 30% of the respondents are agree, 10% of the respondents are disagree.

TABLE 2.3.16 SHOWING ROTATING MACHINE OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 70 20 10 100 PERCENTAGE 70 20 10 100

CHART 2.3.16 SHOWING ROTATING MACHINE THE OF THE RESPONDENTS

rotating machine
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Strongly agree Agree disagree Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 70% of the respondents are strongly agree, 20% of the respondents are agree, 10% of the respondents are disagree.

TABLE 2.3.17 SHOWING EQUIPMENTS TEST OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 45 35 20 100 PERCENTAGE 45 35 20 100

CHART 2.3.17 SHOWING EQUIPMENTS TEST OF THE RESPONDENTS

equipment test
50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Strongly agree Agree disagree Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 45% of the respondents are strongly agree, 35% of the respondents are agree, 20% of the respondents are disagree.

TABLE 2.3.18 SHOWING TAKE CARE FLOORS OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total

NO OF RESPONDENT 80 15 5 100

PERCENTAGE 80 15 5 100

CHART 2.3.18 SHOWING TAKE CARE FLOORS OF THE RESPONDENTS

take care floors

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Strongly agree Agree disagree Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 80% of the respondents are strongly agree, 15% of the respondents are agree, 5% of the respondents are disagree.

TABLE 2.3.19 SHOWING SPECIAL TRAINING OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 90 5 5 100 PERCENTAGE 90 5 5 100

CHART 2.3.19 SHOWING SPECIAL TRAINING OF THE RESPONDENTS

SPECIAL TRAINING
100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Strongly agree Agree disagree Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 90% of the respondents are strongly agree, 5% of the respondents are agree, 5% of the respondents are disagree.

TABLE 2.3.20 SHOWING FIRE FIGHTING OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 85 10 5 100 PERCENTAGE 85 10 5 100

CHART 2.3.20 SHOWING FIRE FIGHTING OF THE RESPONDENTS

fire fighting
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Strongly agree Agree disagree Column1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 85% of the respondents are strongly agree, 10% of the respondents are agree, 5% of the respondents are disagree.

TABLE 2.3.21 SHOWING TRAINING ON FIRST AID OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 89 10 1 100 PERCENTAGE 89 10 1 100

CHART 2.3.21 SHOWING TRAINING ON FIRST AID OF THE RESPONDENTS

training on first aid

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 strongly agree agree disagree Series 1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 89% of the respondents are strongly agree, 10% of the respondents are agree, 1% of the respondents are disagree.

TABLE 2.3.22 SHOWING SAFETY INDUCTION OF RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 65 25 10 100 PERCENTAGE 65 25 10 100

CHART 2.3.22 SHOWING SAFETY INDUCTION OF THE RESPONDENTS

safety induction
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 strongly agree agree disagree Series 1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 65% of the respondents are strongly agree, 25% of the respondents are agree, 10% of the respondents are disagree,

TABLE SHOWING 2.3.23 HEALTH AND SAFETY MANUAL OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS NO OF RESPONDENT PERCENTAGE

Strongly agree Agree disagree Total

80 15 5 100

80 15 5 100

CHART 2.3.23 SHOWING HEALTH AND SAFETY MANUAL OF THE RESPONDENTS

health and safety manual

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 strongly agree agree disagree Series 1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 80% of the respondents are strongly agree, 15% of the

respondents are agree, 5% of the respondents are disagree,

TABLE 2.3.24 SHOWING PERFORMING JOB OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 65 25 10 100 PERCENTAGE 65 25 10 100

CHART 2.3.24 SHOWING PERFORMING JOB OF THE RESPONDENTS

performing their job

70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 strongly agree agree disagree Series 1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 65% of the respondents are strongly agree, 25% of the respondents are agree, 10% of the respondents are disagree,

TABLE 2.3.25 SHOWING WORKERS PARTICIPATION OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 75 15 10 100 PERCENTAGE 75 15 10 100

CHART 2.3.25 SHOWING WORKERS PARTICIPATION OF THE RESPONDENTS

workers participation
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 strongly agree agree disagree Series 1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 75% of the respondents are strongly agree, 15% of the respondents are agree, 10% of the respondents are disagree.

TABLE 2.3.26 SHOWING EMPLOYEE EFFICIENTLY OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 80 15 5 100 PERCENTAGE 80 15 5 100

CHART 2.3.26 SHOWING EMPLOYEE EFFICIENTLY OF THE RESPONDENTS

employees efficiently
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 strongly agree disagree Series 1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 80% of the respondents are strongly agree, 15% of the respondents are agree, 5% of the respondents are disagree.

TABLE 2.3.27 SHOWING INJURIES RECORDED OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 85 10 5 100 PERCENTAGE 85 10 5 100

CHART 2.3.27 SHOWING INJURIES RECORDED OF THE RESPONDENTS

injuries recorded
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 strongly agree agree disagree Series 1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 85% of the respondents are strongly agree, 10% of the respondents are agree, 5% of the respondents are disagree,

TABLE SHOWING 2.3.28 ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 75 10 15 100 PERCENTAGE 75 10 15 100

CHART 2.3.28 SHOWING ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS OF THE RESPONDENTS

organizational effectiveness
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 strongly agree agree disagree Series 1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 75% of the respondents are strongly agree, 10% of the respondents are agree, 15% of the respondents are disagree,

TABLE 2.3.29 SHOWING ZERO LEVEL ACCIDENT OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 82 10 8 100 PERCENTAGE 82 10 8 100

CHART 2.3.29 SHOWING ZERO LEVEL ACCIDENT OF THE RESPONDENTS

zero levelof accident

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 strongly agree agree disagree Series 1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 82% of the respondents are strongly agree, 10% of the respondents are agree, 8% of the respondents are disagree,

TABLE 2.3.30 SHOWING GRADE EXITINGUISHER OF THE RESPONDENTS

PARTICULARS Strongly agree Agree disagree Total NO OF RESPONDENT 80 10 10 100 PERCENTAGE 80 10 10 100

CHART 2.3.30 SHOWING GRADE EXITINGUISHER THE OF RESPONDENTS

exitinguisher time to time

90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 strongly agree agree disagree Series 1

Inference:
In the above table indicates 80% of the respondents are strongly agree, 10% of the respondents are agree, 10% of the respondents are disagree,

CORRELATION Awareness of safety X 65 25 10 x = 100 Special training X2 Y Y2 XY

90 5 5 y = 100

4225 625 100 x2 = 4950

8100 25 25 y2 = 8150

5850 125 50 xy = 6025

(xy x N) (x x y) x2 x N (x2) y2 x N (y)2 (6025 x 3) (100 x 100) 4950 x3 (100)2 8150x 3 (100)2 18075 10000 14850 10000 24450 10000

= =

8075 = 8075 4850x 14450 69.64x120.208 = 8075 = 0.9646 8371.285 = 0.9646 (positive correlation) Inference:It is informed that the correlation is positive as the value (X,Y) likes between 0 to 1 Conclusion From the result there is a strong positive correlation between Awareness safety & accident measure and Special training.